Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Automatic Question-Answer Generation for Long-Tail Knowledge (2403.01382v1)

Published 3 Mar 2024 in cs.CL

Abstract: Pretrained LLMs have gained significant attention for addressing open-domain Question Answering (QA). While they exhibit high accuracy in answering questions related to common knowledge, LLMs encounter difficulties in learning about uncommon long-tail knowledge (tail entities). Since manually constructing QA datasets demands substantial human resources, the types of existing QA datasets are limited, leaving us with a scarcity of datasets to study the performance of LLMs on tail entities. In this paper, we propose an automatic approach to generate specialized QA datasets for tail entities and present the associated research challenges. We conduct extensive experiments by employing pretrained LLMs on our newly generated long-tail QA datasets, comparing their performance with and without external resources including Wikipedia and Wikidata knowledge graphs.

PDF HTML Abstract

Automatic Question-Answer Generation for Long-Tail Knowledge: Challenges and Implications

Introduction to Long-Tail Knowledge in QA Systems

The advent of LLMs such as GPT-3 has significantly advanced the field of natural language processing, particularly in open-domain Question Answering (QA). Despite their broad knowledge base, LLMs still face challenges when dealing with rare or 'long-tail' knowledge — concepts and entities not frequently covered in their training data. This limitation hinders the broader application of LLMs in diverse domains where specialized knowledge is crucial. This paper, authored by researchers from Carnegie Mellon University, introduces an automatic approach to generate Question and Answer (QA) datasets targeting these long-tail entities and discusses the inherent challenges and future implications of this endeavor.

Generating QA Datasets for Tail Entities

The paper proposes a novel framework to automatically construct specialized QA datasets using degree information from Wikidata knowledge graphs, distinguishing itself from previous methods that relied heavily on Wikipedia. The significance of degree information (i.e., the number of connections an entity has within Wikidata) is highlighted as a more refined metric to identify tail entities, which are underrepresented in existing datasets.

The process of automatic QA dataset generation encounters several challenges:

  • Selection of Degree Bounds for Tail Entities: Defining what constitutes a tail entity is not straightforward. This paper categorizes entities with specific degree bounds into 'coarse-tail' and 'fine-tail' entities for experimental purposes.
  • Filtering Noisy Triplets: Ensuring the clarity and relevance of the questions generated from Wikidata triplets necessitates filtering out ambiguous entities and properties, which is not an easily automatable task.
  • Difficulty Control and Prompt Engineering: Balancing question difficulty and crafting effective LLM prompts are critical for generating meaningful QA pairs.
  • Granularity of Questions and Answers: Accounting for the varying levels of detail within correct answers poses additional complications.

Through extensive experimentation, the researchers generated new datasets showcasing distinct distributions and posing different challenges from existing QA datasets.

Evaluating LLMs with External Resources

The performance evaluation of GPT-3 on the newly generated datasets revealed a consistent struggle with tail entity questions, underscoring the model's limitations in accessing rare knowledge. Further investigation into augmenting GPT-3 with external resources — specifically, retrieving relevant documents using Dense Passage Retrieval (DPR) from Wikipedia and leveraging additional Wikidata knowledge graphs — was conducted to understand if these could mitigate the model's shortcomings.

Surprisingly, augmenting with DPR alone led to decreased performance due to the irrelevance of the retrieved documents, highlighting the gap in retrieving long-tail knowledge even with state-of-the-art retrieval systems. However, a combined approach of using DPR with ranking adjustments based on Wikidata knowledge graphs showed promise, enhancing both DPR retrieval accuracy and GPT-3's QA performance.

Implications and Future Directions

This paper's findings have substantial implications for the development and evaluation of QA models, particularly emphasizing the urgent need for better handling of long-tail knowledge. The challenges identified in automatically generating QA datasets pinpoint areas requiring further investigation and innovation. Moreover, the exploration of external resources to improve LLM performance opens avenues for research into more sophisticated integration methods that can leverage disparate knowledge sources effectively.

In conclusion, addressing the long-tail knowledge problem in QA systems is crucial for the advancement of LLMs and their application across diverse domains. This paper marks a significant step towards understanding and overcoming these challenges, with the potential to inspire a wide range of future research in AI and natural language processing.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. Semantic parsing on freebase from question-answer pairs. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing. 1533–1544.
  2. Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 1877–1901.
  3. Searchqa: A new q&a dataset augmented with context from a search engine. arXiv preprint arXiv:1704.05179 (2017).
  4. Aaron Gokaslan and Vanya Cohen. 2019. Openwebtext corpus.
  5. Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. Comput. Surveys 55, 12 (2023), 1–38.
  6. Triviaqa: A large scale distantly supervised challenge dataset for reading comprehension. arXiv preprint arXiv:1705.03551 (2017).
  7. Large language models struggle to learn long-tail knowledge. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.08411 (2022).
  8. Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2004.04906 (2020).
  9. Are pretrained language models symbolic reasoners over knowledge? arXiv preprint arXiv:2006.10413 (2020).
  10. Natural questions: a benchmark for question answering research. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics 7 (2019), 453–466.
  11. The bigscience roots corpus: A 1.6 tb composite multilingual dataset. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35 (2022), 31809–31826.
  12. Latent retrieval for weakly supervised open domain question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.00300 (2019).
  13. The structure and performance of an open-domain question answering system. In Proceedings of the 38th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics. 563–570.
  14. Language models as knowledge bases? arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.01066 (2019).
  15. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 21, 1 (2020), 5485–5551.
  16. Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych. 2019. Sentence-bert: Sentence embeddings using siamese bert-networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:1908.10084 (2019).
  17. SLING: A framework for frame semantic parsing. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.07032 (2017).
  18. How much knowledge can you pack into the parameters of a language model? arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.08910 (2020).
  19. Jointlk: Joint reasoning with language models and knowledge graphs for commonsense question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.02732 (2021).
  20. Memorisation versus generalisation in pre-trained language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.00828 (2021).
  21. Llama: Open and efficient foundation language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.13971 (2023).
  22. Ellen M Voorhees et al. 1999. The trec-8 question answering track report.. In Trec, Vol. 99. 77–82.
  23. Denny Vrandečić and Markus Krötzsch. 2014. Wikidata: a free collaborative knowledgebase. Commun. ACM 57, 10 (2014), 78–85.
  24. Opt: Open pre-trained transformer language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.01068 (2022).
  25. Greaselm: Graph reasoning enhanced language models for question answering. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08860 (2022).
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (7)
  1. Rohan Kumar (8 papers)
  2. Youngmin Kim (24 papers)
  3. Sunitha Ravi (1 paper)
  4. Haitian Sun (16 papers)
  5. Christos Faloutsos (88 papers)
  6. Ruslan Salakhutdinov (248 papers)
  7. Minji Yoon (12 papers)
Citations (4)
View on Semantic Scholar