Experimental demonstration of scalable cross-entropy benchmarking to detect measurement-induced phase transitions on a superconducting quantum processor (2403.00938v2)
Abstract: Quantum systems subject to random unitary evolution and measurements at random points in spacetime exhibit entanglement phase transitions which depend on the frequency of these measurements. Past work has experimentally observed entanglement phase transitions on near-term quantum computers, but the characterization approach using entanglement entropy is not scalable due to exponential overhead of quantum state tomography and postselection. Recently, an alternative protocol to detect entanglement phase transitions using linear cross entropy was proposed, attempting to eliminate both bottlenecks. Here, we report demonstrations of this protocol in systems with one-dimensional and all-to-all connectivities on IBM's quantum hardware on up to 22 qubits, a regime which is presently inaccessible if postselection is required. We demonstrate data collapses onto scaling functions with critical exponents in semiquantitative agreement with theory. Our demonstration of the cross entropy benchmark (XEB) protocol paves the way for studies of measurement-induced entanglement phase transitions and associated critical phenomena on larger near-term quantum systems.
- M. Yoganathan, R. Jozsa, and S. Strelchuk, Quantum advantage of unitary clifford circuits with magic state inputs, Proceedings of the Royal Society A 475, 20180427 (2019).
- Y. Bao, S. Choi, and E. Altman, Theory of the phase transition in random unitary circuits with measurements, Phys. Rev. B 101, 104301 (2020).
- A. Nahum, S. Vijay, and J. Haah, Operator Spreading in Random Unitary Circuits, Phys. Rev. X 8, 021014 (2018).
- T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Emergent statistical mechanics of entanglement in random unitary circuits, Phys. Rev. B 99, 174205 (2019).
- T. Zhou and A. Nahum, Entanglement membrane in chaotic many-body systems, Phys. Rev. X 10, 031066 (2020).
- F. Arute et al., Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor, Nature 574, 505 (2019).
- A. Morvan et. al., Phase transition in random circuit sampling (2023), arXiv:2304.11119 [quant-ph] .
- B. Skinner, J. Ruhman, and A. Nahum, Measurement-Induced Phase Transitions in the Dynamics of Entanglement, Phys. Rev. X 9, 031009 (2019).
- S. M. Bhattacharjee and F. Seno, A measure of data collapse for scaling, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 34, 6375 (2001).
- L. Viola and S. Lloyd, Dynamical suppression of decoherence in two-state quantum systems, Phys. Rev. A 58, 2733 (1998).
- A. Kofman and G. Kurizki, Universal dynamical control of quantum mechanical decay: modulation of the coupling to the continuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 270405 (2001).
- S. Niu and A. Todri-Sanial, Effects of dynamical decoupling and pulse-level optimizations on ibm quantum computers, IEEE Trans. Quantum Eng. 3, 1 (2022a).
- S. Niu and A. Todri-Sanial, Analyzing strategies for dynamical decoupling insertion on ibm quantum computer, arXiv:2204.14251 (2022b).
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.