Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 47 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 11 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 101 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 195 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 465 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

A Survey of Large Language Models in Cybersecurity (2402.16968v1)

Published 26 Feb 2024 in cs.CR and cs.AI

Abstract: LLMs have quickly risen to prominence due to their ability to perform at or close to the state-of-the-art in a variety of fields while handling natural language. An important field of research is the application of such models at the cybersecurity context. This survey aims to identify where in the field of cybersecurity LLMs have already been applied, the ways in which they are being used and their limitations in the field. Finally, suggestions are made on how to improve such limitations and what can be expected from these systems once these limitations are overcome.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (103)
  1. Irena Bojanova and Carlos Eduardo C Galhardo. Bug, fault, error, or weakness: Demystifying software security vulnerabilities. IT Prof., 25(1):7–12, January 2023.
  2. An overview of the benefits, challenges, and legal aspects of penetration testing and red teaming. International Cybersecurity Law Review, 4(4):387–397, September 2023.
  3. Jian hua Li. Cyber security meets artificial intelligence: a survey. Frontiers of Information Technology & Electronic Engineering, 19(12):1462–1474, December 2018.
  4. Artificial intelligence in cyber security: research advances, challenges, and opportunities. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(2):1029–1053, March 2021.
  5. Automated software vulnerability detection with machine learning. February 2018.
  6. Software vulnerability detection using deep neural networks: A survey. Proc. IEEE Inst. Electr. Electron. Eng., 108(10):1825–1848, October 2020.
  7. Software vulnerability discovery techniques: A survey. In 2012 Fourth International Conference on Multimedia Information Networking and Security. IEEE, November 2012.
  8. Just-in-time software vulnerability detection: Are we there yet? Journal of Systems and Software, 188:111283, 2022.
  9. Intelligent network intrusion prevention feature collection and classification algorithms. Algorithms, 14(8), 2021.
  10. A network intrusion detection system based on convolutional neural network. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst., 38(6):7623–7637, June 2020.
  11. AI-driven cybersecurity: An overview, security intelligence modeling and research directions. SN Comput. Sci., 2(3), May 2021.
  12. Role of artificial intelligence in the internet of things (IoT) cybersecurity. Discov. Internet Things, 1(1), December 2021.
  13. Trusting artificial intelligence in cybersecurity is a double-edged sword. Nat. Mach. Intell., 1(12):557–560, November 2019.
  14. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. 2018.
  15. LLaMA: Open and efficient foundation language models. February 2023.
  16. OpenAI. GPT-4 technical report. March 2023.
  17. Automated penetration testing using deep reinforcement learning. In 2020 IEEE European Symposium on Security and Privacy Workshops (EuroS&PW), pages 2–10, 2020.
  18. A systematic literature review and meta-analysis on artificial intelligence in penetration testing and vulnerability assessment. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 75:175–188, 2019.
  19. Autonomous penetration testing using reinforcement learning. CoRR, abs/1905.05965, 2019.
  20. R A Kemmerer. Cybersecurity. In 25th International Conference on Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings. IEEE, 2003.
  21. Cyber security threats and vulnerabilities: A systematic mapping study. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 45(4):3171–3189, January 2020.
  22. An investigation on cyber security threats and security models. In 2015 IEEE 2nd International Conference on Cyber Security and Cloud Computing, pages 307–311, 2015.
  23. An overview of penetration testing. International Journal of Network Security & Its Applications, 3(6):19, 2011.
  24. An overview of vulnerability assessment and penetration testing techniques. Journal of Computer Virology and Hacking Techniques, 11:27–49, 2015.
  25. Cyber security analysis using vulnerability assessment and penetration testing. In 2016 World Conference on Futuristic Trends in Research and Innovation for Social Welfare (Startup Conclave), pages 1–5. IEEE, 2016.
  26. F. Rosenblatt. The perceptron - a perceiving and recognizing automaton. Technical Report 85-460-1, Cornell Aeronautical Laboratory, Ithaca, New York, January 1957.
  27. The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychological review, 65 6:386–408, 1958.
  28. Learning representations by back-propagating errors.
  29. Learning sets of filters using back-propagation. 2(1):35–61.
  30. Geoffrey E. Hinton. Learning multiple layers of representation. 11(10):428–434.
  31. Deep learning. 521(7553):436–444.
  32. Yoav Goldberg. A primer on neural network models for natural language processing, 2015.
  33. Attention Is All You Need.
  34. QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMs.
  35. LORA: LOW-RANK ADAPTATION OF LARGE LAN- GUAGE MODELS.
  36. LLaMA-Adapter: Efficient Fine-tuning of Language Models with Zero-init Attention.
  37. Language Models are Unsupervised Multitask Learners.
  38. Emergent abilities of large language models, 2022.
  39. Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language Models.
  40. Language Models are Few-Shot Learners.
  41. PassGAN: A deep learning approach for password guessing. September 2017.
  42. Attention is all you need. June 2017.
  43. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback. March 2022.
  44. Evaluating large language models trained on code. July 2021.
  45. CodeBERT: A pre-trained model for programming and natural languages. February 2020.
  46. Controlling large language models to generate secure and vulnerable code. February 2023.
  47. Anastasiia Grishina. Enabling automatic repair of source code vulnerabilities using data-driven methods. February 2022.
  48. VulRepair: a t5-based automated software vulnerability repair. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, New York, NY, USA, November 2022. ACM.
  49. Transformer-based language models for software vulnerability detection. April 2022.
  50. WebGPT: Browser-assisted question-answering with human feedback. December 2021.
  51. Toolformer: Language models can teach themselves to use tools. February 2023.
  52. Tool learning with foundation models, 2023.
  53. Emergent autonomous scientific research capabilities of large language models. April 2023.
  54. Using Large Language Models for Cybersecurity Capture-The-Flag Challenges and Certification Questions.
  55. An Empirical Study on Using Large Language Models to Analyze Software Supply Chain Security Failures.
  56. Out of the Cage: How Stochastic Parrots Win in Cyber Security Environments.
  57. Examining Zero-Shot Vulnerability Repair with Large Language Models. In 2023 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP), pages 2339–2356.
  58. Marwan Omar. VulDefend: A Novel Technique based on Pattern-exploiting Training for Detecting Software Vulnerabilities Using Language Models. In 2023 IEEE Jordan International Joint Conference on Electrical Engineering and Information Technology (JEEIT), pages 287–293.
  59. Harnessing GPT-4 for Generation of Cybersecurity GRC Policies: A Focus on Ransomware Attack Mitigation. page 103424.
  60. Detecting Phishing Sites Using ChatGPT.
  61. ChatIDS: Explainable Cybersecurity Using Generative AI.
  62. Devising and Detecting Phishing: Large language models vs. Smaller Human Models.
  63. Julian Hazell. Large Language Models Can Be Used To Effectively Scale Spear Phishing Campaigns.
  64. Getting pwn’d by AI: Penetration Testing with Large Language Models.
  65. Revolutionizing Cyber Threat Detection with Large Language Models.
  66. SecureFalcon: The Next Cyber Reasoning System for Cyber Security.
  67. Prompting Is All You Need: Automated Android Bug Replay with Large Language Models.
  68. On the Uses of Large Language Models to Interpret Ambiguous Cyberattack Descriptions.
  69. PentestGPT: An LLM-empowered Automatic Penetration Testing Tool.
  70. From Text to MITRE Techniques: Exploring the Malicious Use of Large Language Models for Generating Cyber Attack Payloads.
  71. RatGPT: Turning online LLMs into Proxies for Malware Attacks.
  72. Transformer-Based Language Models for Software Vulnerability Detection. In Proceedings of the 38th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, pages 481–496. ACM.
  73. VulRepair: A T5-based automated software vulnerability repair. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, pages 935–947. ACM.
  74. Large language models can be easily distracted by irrelevant context, 2023.
  75. Lost in the middle: How language models use long contexts, 2023.
  76. Self-contradictory hallucinations of large language models: Evaluation, detection and mitigation, 2023.
  77. On the origin of hallucinations in conversational models: Is it the datasets or the models?, 2022.
  78. Survey of hallucination in natural language generation. ACM Computing Surveys, 55(12):1–38, mar 2023.
  79. Siren’s song in the ai ocean: A survey on hallucination in large language models, 2023.
  80. On faithfulness and factuality in abstractive summarization, 2020.
  81. Instruction tuning for large language models: A survey, 2023.
  82. EW-tune: A framework for privately fine-tuning large language models with differential privacy. In 2022 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW). IEEE, nov 2022.
  83. Fine-Tuning Language Models with Just Forward Passes.
  84. Longlora: Efficient fine-tuning of long-context large language models, 2023.
  85. Parameter-efficient fine-tuning of large-scale pre-trained language models. Nature Machine Intelligence, 5(3):220–235, March 2023.
  86. Full parameter fine-tuning for large language models with limited resources, 2023.
  87. Speciality vs generality: An empirical study on catastrophic forgetting in fine-tuning foundation models, 2023.
  88. An empirical study of catastrophic forgetting in large language models during continual fine-tuning, 2023.
  89. Investigating the catastrophic forgetting in multimodal large language models, 2023.
  90. Larger language models do in-context learning differently, 2023.
  91. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. In H. Larochelle, M. Ranzato, R. Hadsell, M.F. Balcan, and H. Lin, editors, Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 33, pages 9459–9474. Curran Associates, Inc., 2020.
  92. Recent advances in retrieval-augmented text generation. In Proceedings of the 45th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR ’22, page 3417–3419, New York, NY, USA, 2022. Association for Computing Machinery.
  93. Generation-augmented retrieval for open-domain question answering, 2021.
  94. A survey on retrieval-augmented text generation, 2022.
  95. Retrieval-augmented generation for code summarization via hybrid gnn, 2021.
  96. Chain-of-verification reduces hallucination in large language models, 2023.
  97. Twenty years of mixture of experts. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 23(8):1177–1193, 2012.
  98. Mixture-of-experts with expert choice routing, 2022.
  99. From sparse to soft mixtures of experts, 2023.
  100. Training language models to follow instructions with human feedback, 2022.
  101. Code llama: Open foundation models for code, 2023.
  102. Llama 2: Open Foundation and Fine-Tuned Chat Models.
  103. OpenAI. GPT-4 Technical Report.
Citations (3)
View on Semantic Scholar
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Summary

  • The paper introduces a novel Mixture-of-Experts framework that leverages specialized LLMs for targeted cybersecurity tasks.
  • It surveys existing LLM applications in intrusion detection, vulnerability assessment, and penetration testing while addressing challenges like context loss and high false positives.
  • The framework employs an intelligent gating model to route tasks efficiently, promising improved precision, scalability, and adaptability in combating cyber threats.

Exploring the Integration of LLMs in Cybersecurity: A Mixture-of-Experts Approach

Introduction to the Study's Aims and Methodology

The increasing reliance on digital infrastructure across various sectors underscores the critical need for robust cybersecurity measures. Traditional defense mechanisms, while effective to an extent, often struggle to keep pace with the sophistication of contemporary cyber threats. In response to this challenge, the advent of LLMs has opened new frontiers in AI, offering promising prospects for enhancing cybersecurity efforts. This paper presents a comprehensive survey aimed at exploring the application of LLMs within the field of cybersecurity, particularly focusing on vulnerability assessment and penetration testing tasks. By surveying existing implementations and proposing a novel Mixture-of-Experts framework, the paper seeks to harness the capabilities of specialized LLMs to address the complex landscape of cyber threats.

The Current State of LLMs in Cybersecurity

Previous research has demonstrated the efficacy of deep neural networks in various cybersecurity applications, including malware detection, network intrusion prevention, and password guessing. However, issues such as the lack of model explainability and high false positive rates have marred their widespread acceptance. LLMs, with their advanced neural network architectures, have shown immense potential in generalizing across different tasks, presenting a new avenue for cybersecurity applications. The survey within this paper reveals an increasing interest in incorporating LLMs for cybersecurity, yet it also highlights a noticeable gap between the rapid advancements in LLM technology and their application within the cybersecurity domain.

Identifying Issues and Challenges

While LLMs exhibit remarkable text generation capabilities, their performance tends to diminish in complex, evolving tasks due to issues like loss of context and hallucinations. These challenges are particularly pronounced in cybersecurity applications, where accuracy and reliability are paramount. Traditional methods to mitigate these limitations, such as fine-tuning, in-context learning, and retrieval-augmented generation, although helpful, do not fully address the complexities involved in cybersecurity tasks.

Proposing a Novel Solution: The Mixture-of-Experts Framework

To overcome the aforementioned challenges, the paper proposes a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework that leverages the specialization of different foundation LLMs for various cybersecurity subtasks. This approach aims to harness the collective intelligence of these models, essentially creating a system where multiple "experts" in specific domains collaboratively contribute to a comprehensive cybersecurity solution. The proposed framework envisions a gating model that intelligently routes tasks to the most suitable expert model, ensuring a targeted, efficient response to various cybersecurity challenges.

Implications and Future Research Directions

The integration of LLMs in cybersecurity, as proposed in the Mixture-of-Experts framework, holds significant potential to revolutionize cybersecurity practices. By enhancing the precision, scalability, and adaptability of cybersecurity mechanisms, this approach offers a promising solution to the ever-evolving threat landscape. However, realizing this potential necessitates further research to refine the expertise of specialized LLMs, expand the framework's coverage to encompass a broader range of cybersecurity domains, and empirically validate its effectiveness in real-world scenarios. Future exploration should also address ethical considerations surrounding AI in cybersecurity, ensuring that these advanced systems are developed and deployed responsibly.

Conclusion

The paper underscores the burgeoning potential of LLMs to enhance cybersecurity measures through a novel Mixture-of-Experts framework. By addressing current challenges and outlining a path for future research, this paper contributes to the evolving dialogue on the integration of AI in cybersecurity. As digital threats grow in complexity, the collaborative intelligence model offered by the proposed framework represents a forward-thinking solution, promising a new era of intelligent cybersecurity defenses.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown
Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

YouTube