Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
AI Research Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 75 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 104 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 170 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 468 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

RepoAgent: An LLM-Powered Open-Source Framework for Repository-level Code Documentation Generation (2402.16667v1)

Published 26 Feb 2024 in cs.CL and cs.AI

Abstract: Generative models have demonstrated considerable potential in software engineering, particularly in tasks such as code generation and debugging. However, their utilization in the domain of code documentation generation remains underexplored. To this end, we introduce RepoAgent, a LLM powered open-source framework aimed at proactively generating, maintaining, and updating code documentation. Through both qualitative and quantitative evaluations, we have validated the effectiveness of our approach, showing that RepoAgent excels in generating high-quality repository-level documentation. The code and results are publicly accessible at https://github.com/OpenBMB/RepoAgent.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (40)
  1. A convolutional attention network for extreme summarization of source code. In Proceedings of the 33nd International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 48, pages 2091–2100, New York City, NY, USA.
  2. Evaluating large language models trained on code. Computing Research Repository, arXiv:2107.03374.
  3. AgentVerse: Facilitating multi-agent collaboration and exploring emergent behaviors. In Proceedings of the the 12th International Conference on Learning Representations, Vienna, Austria.
  4. A study of the documentation essential to software maintenance. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication: documenting & Designing for Pervasive Information, pages 68–75, Coventry, UK.
  5. BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies, Volume 1 (Long and Short Papers), pages 4171–4186, Minneapolis, Minnesota. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  6. On the use of automated text summarization techniques for summarizing source code. In Proceedings of the 17th Working Conference on Reverse Engineering, pages 35–44, Beverly, MA, USA.
  7. MetaGPT: Meta programming for multi-agent collaborative framework. In Proceedings of the the 12th International Conference on Learning Representations, Vienna, Austria.
  8. Summarizing source code using a neural attention model. In Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers), pages 2073–2083, Berlin, Germany. Association for Computational Linguistics.
  9. Junaed Younus Khan and Gias Uddin. 2022. Automatic code documentation generation using GPT-3. In Proceedings of the 37th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering, pages 174:1–174:6, Rochester, MI, USA.
  10. M.M. Lehman. 1980. Programs, life cycles, and laws of software evolution. Proceedings of the IEEE, 68(9):1060–1076.
  11. StarCoder: may the source be with you! Computing Research Repository, arXiv:2305.06161.
  12. Gitagent: Facilitating autonomous agent with github by tool extension. Computing Research Repository, arXiv:2312.17294.
  13. Robert C Martin. 1996. The dependency inversion principle. C++ Report, 8(6):61–66.
  14. Automatic generation of natural language summaries for Java classes. In Proceedings of the IEEE 21st International Conference on Program Comprehension, pages 23–32, San Francisco, CA, USA.
  15. CodeGen: An open large language model for code with multi-turn program synthesis. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Learning Representations, Kigali, Rwanda.
  16. OpenAI. 2022. OpenAI: Introducing ChatGPT.
  17. OpenAI. 2023. GPT-4 technical report. Computing Research Repository, arXiv:2303.08774.
  18. Communicative agents for software development. Computing Research Repository,, arXiv:2307.07924.
  19. Tool learning with foundation models. Computing Research Repository, arXiv:2304.08354.
  20. ToolLLM: Facilitating large language models to master 16000+ real-world APIs. In The Twelfth International Conference on Learning Representations, Vienna, Austria.
  21. Improving language understanding by generative pre-training. Preprint.
  22. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 21(140):1–67.
  23. A review on source code documentation. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 13(5):1 – 44.
  24. Improving automated source code summarization via an eye-tracking study of programmers. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 390–401, Hyderabad, India.
  25. Code Llama: Open foundation models for code. Computing Research Repository,, arXiv:2308.12950.
  26. Towards automatically generating summary comments for java methods. In Proceedings of the 25th IEEE/ACM international conference on Automated software engineering, pages 43–52, Antwerp, Belgium.
  27. A prompt learning framework for source code summarization. Computing Research Repository, arXiv:2312.16066.
  28. DebugBench: Evaluating debugging capability of large language models. Computing Research Repository, arXiv:2401.04621.
  29. Llama 2: Open foundation and fine-tuned chat models. Computing Research Repository, arXiv:2307.09288.
  30. Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2017, pages 5998–6008, Long Beach, CA, USA.
  31. gDoc: Automatic generation of structured API documentation. In Companion Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023, pages 53–56, Austin, TX, USA.
  32. Chain-of-thought prompting elicits reasoning in large language models. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 35: Annual Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems 2022, pages 24824–24837, New Orleans, LA, USA.
  33. AutoGen: Enabling next-gen llm applications via multi-agent conversation framework. Computing Research Repository,, arXiv:2308.08155.
  34. XAgent. 2023. Xagent: An autonomous agent for complex task solving.
  35. Measuring program comprehension: A large-scale field study with professionals. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 44(10):951–976.
  36. Lemur: Harmonizing natural language and code for language agents. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Learning Representations, Vienna, Austria.
  37. Proagent: From robotic process automation to agentic process automation. Computing Research Repository, arXiv:2311.10751.
  38. A survey of automatic source code summarization. Symmetry, 14(3):471.
  39. A novel neural source code representation based on abstract syntax tree. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE/ACM 41st International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 783–794, Montréal, Québec, Canada.
  40. Cost, benefits and quality of software development documentation: A systematic mapping. Journal of Systems and Software, 99:175–198.
Citations (20)

Summary

  • The paper introduces RepoAgent, an open-source framework that leverages LLMs to generate comprehensive, repository-level code documentation.
  • It employs a three-stage process including global structure analysis via AST parsing and DAGs to accurately inform documentation generation.
  • Evaluation shows RepoAgent outperforms manual methods, with human-preference rates reaching up to 91.33% in key repository cases.

An Examination of RepoAgent: A Framework for Repository-Level Documentation Generation

The paper introduces RepoAgent, a state-of-the-art open-source framework designed to generate, maintain, and update documentation for code repositories, leveraging the capabilities of LLMs. The researchers have identified the gap in automated documentation processes and addressed it with RepoAgent, which is capable of producing high-quality, comprehensive code documentation at a repository level. The framework utilizes the advancements in LLMs to analyze the global structure of code and its contextual relationships within a repository, thus offering a robust solution to a problem that traditionally requires significant manual effort.

Core Components and Methodology

RepoAgent comprises three main stages: global structure analysis, documentation generation, and updates. The global structure analysis involves constructing a semantic representation of the entire repository, utilizing Abstract Syntax Tree (AST) parsing techniques to understand the relationships between code components. This analysis is complemented by mapping out reference relationships, which results in a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG) that informs the documentation generation process.

The documentation generation stage involves creating detailed and structured documentation using a backend LLM, which is induced through intricate prompt engineering based on the parsed data. The framework ensures accuracy and consistency by structuring documentation into functionality, parameters, code description, notes, and examples sections. This is achieved with minimal manual intervention, boosting productivity and consistency across documentation efforts.

The final stage of RepoAgent involves integrating with Git to automate documentation updates triggered by code changes, ensuring synchronicity between the evolving codebase and its accompanying documentation. This integration reflects the researchers' emphasis on reducing the maintenance burden traditionally associated with code documentation.

Evaluation and Performance

The effectiveness of RepoAgent is underscored by both qualitative showcase and rigorous human evaluation. The framework's application to nine Python repositories illustrates its practical utility, detailing its capability to generate documentation that rivals or exceeds human-authored versions in quality. In human preference tests, RepoAgent's documentation was preferred significantly over human alternatives, achieving preference rates of 70% and 91.33% for the Transformers and LlamaIndex repositories, respectively.

Quantitative analysis further highlights RepoAgent's capabilities. Its ability to accurately identify reference relationships exceeds that of conventional methods, while its performance in format alignment shows robust adherence to documentation structure when driven by models such as GPT-4. The research demonstrates that RepoAgent not only excels in documenting isolated code components but effectively provides repository-wide context and coherence.

Implications and Future Work

The implications of RepoAgent extend both practically and theoretically. The automated documentation process alleviates the significant burden of maintaining high-quality code documentation, potentially transforming how developers approach documentation tasks within the software engineering lifecycle. Its deployment could lead to more efficient development cycles and better resource allocation within software projects.

Theoretically, the approach's reliance on the capabilities of LLMs offers insights into possible enhancements in AI-enabled software engineering tools. As models continue to evolve, future iterations of RepoAgent could broaden their programming language applicability and improve integration within existing development workflows.

In summary, RepoAgent represents a significant advancement in leveraging AI for software engineering documentation tasks. It underlines the potential for AI-driven tools to automate complex and tedious tasks, offering increased accuracy and efficiency. Future work will no doubt explore extensive multi-language support and further integration with AI-assisted development environments, paving the way for a potential shift in coding practices and collaboration methodologies.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 3 posts and received 12 likes.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com