Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 77 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 45 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 75 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 206 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 431 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Automation of Quantum Dot Measurement Analysis via Explainable Machine Learning (2402.13699v5)

Published 21 Feb 2024 in cs.CV, cond-mat.mes-hall, and cs.LG

Abstract: The rapid development of quantum dot (QD) devices for quantum computing has necessitated more efficient and automated methods for device characterization and tuning. This work demonstrates the feasibility and advantages of applying explainable machine learning techniques to the analysis of quantum dot measurements, paving the way for further advances in automated and transparent QD device tuning. Many of the measurements acquired during the tuning process come in the form of images that need to be properly analyzed to guide the subsequent tuning steps. By design, features present in such images capture certain behaviors or states of the measured QD devices. When considered carefully, such features can aid the control and calibration of QD devices. An important example of such images are so-called $\textit{triangle plots}$, which visually represent current flow and reveal characteristics important for QD device calibration. While image-based classification tools, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), can be used to verify whether a given measurement is $\textit{good}$ and thus warrants the initiation of the next phase of tuning, they do not provide any insights into how the device should be adjusted in the case of $\textit{bad}$ images. This is because CNNs sacrifice prediction and model intelligibility for high accuracy. To ameliorate this trade-off, a recent study introduced an image vectorization approach that relies on the Gabor wavelet transform (Schug $\textit{et al.}$ 2024 $\textit{Proc. XAI4Sci: Explainable Machine Learning for Sciences Workshop (AAAI 2024) (Vancouver, Canada)}$ pp 1-6). Here we propose an alternative vectorization method that involves mathematical modeling of synthetic triangles to mimic the experimental data. Using explainable boosting machines, we show that this new method offers superior explainability of model prediction without sacrificing accuracy.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. Sanity Checks for Saliency Maps. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 31.
  2. Intelligible Models for HealthCare: Predicting Pneumonia Risk and Hospital 30-Day Readmission. In Proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1721–1730.
  3. Daugman, J. 1988. Complete discrete 2-d gabor transforms by Neural Networks for image analysis and compression. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, 36(7): 1169–1179.
  4. Fabrication process and failure analysis for robust quantum dots in silicon. Nanotechnology, 31: 505001.
  5. Can Machines ‘Learn’ Finance? J. Invest. Manag., 18(2): 23–36.
  6. SciPy: Open source scientific tools for Python. [Online; accessed Febryary 15, 2024].
  7. Machine learning techniques for state recognition and auto-tuning in quantum dots. npj Quantum Inf., 5(6): 1–10.
  8. Accurate intelligible models with pairwise interactions. In Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 623–631.
  9. A Unified Approach to Interpreting Model Predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, volume 30.
  10. A Simplex Method for Function Minimization. Comput. J., 7(4): 308–313.
  11. Accuracy, Interpretability, and Differential Privacy via Explainable Boosting. arXiv:2106.09680.
  12. InterpretML: A Unified Framework for Machine Learning Interpretability. arXiv:1909.09223.
  13. ”Why Should I Trust You?”: Explaining the Predictions of Any Classifier. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, 1135–1144.
  14. Extending Explainable Boosting Machines to Scientific Image Data. arXiv:2305.16526.
  15. Explainable Machine Learning for Ultracold Atoms Image Data. (in preparation).
  16. Characterization of individual charge fluctuators in Si/SiGe quantum dots. arXiv:2401.14541.
  17. Scalable Gate Architecture for a One-Dimensional Array of Semiconductor Spin Qubits. Phys. Rev. Appl., 6(5): 054013.
  18. Autotuning of Double-Dot Devices In Situ with Machine Learning. Phys. Rev. Appl., 13(3): 034075.
  19. Colloquium: Advances in automation of quantum dot devices control. Rev. Mod. Phys., 95(1): 011006.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 1 like.