Electric Field Evaluation of Reconfigurable Intelligent Surface in Wireless Networks (2402.13132v1)
Abstract: Reconfigurable intelligent surface (RIS) used as infrastructure in wireless networks has been a trend, thanks to its low cost and high flexibility. Working in many ways including reflective mirrors and phase-shifted surfaces, RIS is able to enhance the coverage in communications and provide more degrees of freedom for sensing. However, the key issue lies in how to place RIS in accordance with the regulations for electromagnetic field (EMF) exposure, which requires refined evaluations. In this paper, we first investigate the regulations in terms of E-field. Then, relevant deployment characteristics are evaluated jointly: the minimum distance from the base station (BS) to the RIS, and the minimum height of the RIS are given for a given BS power limit and as function of the number of RIS elements. The ray-tracing simulations verify the correctness of our analysis. Besides, different frequency ranges (FRs) and radiation patterns of RIS elements are investigated. The results show that the EMF exposure risk is negligible when RIS works in the reflective-only (RO) mode. However, when it works in the beamforming (BO) mode, its placement should be well specified based on our analytical framework to comply with the regulations of E-field limit in general public scenarios. Finally, we provide an E-field measurement methodology and low-cost solutions in terms of general wireless networks and 5G standalone networks, which pave the way for real-world evaluation in future work.
- M. A. ElMossallamy, H. Zhang, L. Song, K. G. Seddik, Z. Han, and G. Y. Li, “Reconfigurable intelligent surfaces for wireless communications: Principles, challenges, and opportunities,” IEEE Transactions on Cognitive Communications and Networking, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 990–1002, 2020.
- A. Balmori, “Electrosmog and species conservation,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 496, pp. 314–316, 2014.
- M. Salovarda and K. Malaric, “Measurements of Electromagnetic Smog,” Proc. IEEE Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference, May, 2006.
- B. M. Hochwald, D. J. Love, S. Yan, P. Fay, and J.-M. Jin, “Incorporating specific absorption rate constraints into wireless signal design,” IEEE Communications Magazine, vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 126–133, 2014.
- P. Mei, Y. Cai, K. Zhao, Z. Ying, G. F. Pedersen, X. Q. Lin, and S. Zhang, “On the study of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces in the near-field region,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 8718–8728, 2022.
- M. Di Renzo, F. Habibi Danufane, X. Xi, J. de Rosny, and S. Tretyakov, “Analytical modeling of the path-loss for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces – anomalous mirror or scatterer?” in Proc. IEEE 21st International Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC), 2020, pp. 1–5.
- E. Björnson, T. Demir, and L. Sanguinetti, “A primer on near-field beamforming for arrays and reconfigurable intelligent surfaces,” in Proc. 55th Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems, and Computers, 2021, pp. 105–112.
- Y. Jiang, F. Gao, M. Jian, S. Zhang, and W. Zhang, “Reconfigurable intelligent surface for near field communications: Beamforming and sensing,” IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications, vol. 22, no. 5, pp. 3447–3459, 2023.
- G. C. Trichopoulos, P. Theofanopoulos, B. Kashyap, A. Shekhawat, A. Modi, T. Osman, S. Kumar, A. Sengar, A. Chang, and A. Alkhateeb, “Design and evaluation of reconfigurable intelligent surfaces in real-world environment,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 3, pp. 462–474, 2022.
- W. Tang, X. Chen, M. Z. Chen, J. Y. Dai, Y. Han, M. D. Renzo, S. Jin, Q. Cheng, and T. J. Cui, “Path loss modeling and measurements for reconfigurable intelligent surfaces in the millimeter-wave frequency band,” IEEE Transactions on Communications, vol. 70, no. 9, pp. 6259–6276, 2022.
- K. Ntontin, D. Selimis, A.-A. A. Boulogeorgos, A. Alexandridis, A. Tsolis, V. Vlachodimitropoulos, and F. Lazarakis, “Optimal reconfigurable intelligent surface placement in millimeter-wave communications,” in Proc. 15th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 2021, pp. 1–5.
- Z. Cui and S. Pollin, “Impact of reconfigurable intelligent surface geometry on communication performance,” IEEE Wireless Communications Letters, vol. 12, no. 5, pp. 898–902, 2023.
- International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection, “ICNIRP Website,” November, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.icnirp.org
- A. Ebadi-Shahrivar, P. Fay, B. M. Hochwald, and D. J. Love, “Multi-antenna SAR estimation in linear time,” in Proc. IEEE International Symposium on Antennas and Propagation & USNC/URSI National Radio Science Meeting, 2018, pp. 583–584.
- ITU-T, “Guidance on complying with limits for human exposure to electromagnetic fields,” International Telecommunication Union, Recommendation K.52, 06 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/itu-t/recommendations/rec.aspx?rec=14724&lang=en
- ITU-T, “Measurement of radio frequency electromagnetic fields to determine compliance with human exposure limits when a base station is put into service,” International Telecommunication Union, Recommendation K.100, 06 2021. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-K.100-202106-I/en
- International Commission on Non-Ionising Radiation Protection, “Guidelines for limiting exposure to electromagnetic fields (100 kHz to 300 GHz).” March, 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.icnirp.org/cms/upload/publications/ICNIRPrfgdl2020.pdf
- World Health Organization (WHO), “Electromagnetic fields: Exposure limits for radio-frequency fields,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://www.who.int/data/gho/data/indicators/indicator-details/GHO/electric-field-(v-m)
- Federal Communications Commission (FCC), “Human exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields and reassessment of fcc radiofrequency exposure limits and policies,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2020/04/01/2020-02745/human-exposure-to-radiofrequency-electromagnetic-fields-and-reassessment-of-fcc-radiofrequency
- Vlanderen, “Environmental quality standards for electromagnetic waves with a frequency between 100 khz and 300 ghz.” [Online]. Available: https://navigator.emis.vito.be/detail?woId=40609&woLang=nl
- Ministry of Ecology and Environment the People’s Republic of China, “Controlling limits for electromagnetic environment,” 2015. [Online]. Available: https://english.mee.gov.cn/Resources/standards/Radioactivity/Electromagnetic˙Radiation/201605/t20160512˙337592.shtml
- ITU-T, “Mitigation techniques to limit human exposure to EMFs in the vicinity of radiocommunication stations,” International Telecommunication Union, Recommendation K.70, 06 2020. [Online]. Available: https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-K.70-202112-I!Amd1
- FCC Lab Office of Engineering and Technology, “Compliance verification/measurement method for part 30 devices,” 2019.
- 3GPP, “TR 38.101-1, User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception; frequency range 1 standalone,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=3283
- 3GPP, “TR 38.101-2, User Equipment (UE) radio transmission and reception; frequency range 2 standalone,” 2020. [Online]. Available: https://portal.3gpp.org/desktopmodules/Specifications/SpecificationDetails.aspx?specificationId=3284
- V. Degli-Esposti, E. M. Vitucci, M. D. Renzo, and S. A. Tretyakov, “Reradiation and scattering from a reconfigurable intelligent surface: A general macroscopic model,” IEEE Transactions on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 70, no. 10, pp. 8691–8706, 2022.
- Z. Cui, P. Zhang, and S. Pollin, “6G wireless communications in 7-24 GHz band: Opportunities, techniques, and challenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.06425, 2023.
- “5G/NR - Frame Structure ,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.sharetechnote.com/html/5G/5G˙FrameStructure.html
- F. Minucci, D. Verbruggen, H. Sallouha, V. Volski, G. Vandenbosch, G. Bovet, and S. Pollin, “Measuring 5G Electric Fields Strength With Software Defined Radios,” IEEE Open Journal of the Communications Society, vol. 3, pp. 2258–2271, 2022.
- “Narda 5G tools,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.narda-sts.com/en/applicationstechnology/5g-measurements/
- B. Reynders, R. Iyare, S. Rajendran, V. Volskiy, G. A. Vandenbosch, and S. Pollin, “Using cheap rtl-sdrs for measuring electrosmog,” 2018.
- Y. Ben-Aboud, M. Ghogho, S. Pollin, and A. Kobbane, “Electro-smog monitoring using low-cost software-defined radio dongles,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 107 149–107 158, 2021.
- M. D. Migliore, D. Franci, S. Pavoncello, E. Grillo, T. Aureli, S. Adda, R. Suman, S. D’Elia, and F. Schettino, “A New Paradigm in 5G Maximum Power Extrapolation for Human Exposure Assessment: Forcing gNB Traffic Toward the Measurement Equipment,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 101 946–101 958, 2021.
- S. Aerts, K. Deprez, D. Colombi, M. Van den Bossche, L. Verloock, L. Martens, C. Törnevik, and W. Joseph, “In Situ Assessment of 5G NR Massive MIMO Base Station Exposure in a Commercial Network in Bern, Switzerland,” Applied Sciences, vol. 11, no. 8, 2021.
- J. Luo, E. Mendivil, M. Christopher, and T.-S. Chou, “On the Measurement of Radiated Power for 5G Mobile Device with Spectrum Analyzer,” in Proc. 14th European Conference on Antennas and Propagation (EuCAP), 2020, pp. 1–5.
- C. Carciofi, A. Garzia, S. Valbonesi, A. Gandolfo, and R. Franchelli, “RF electromagnetic field levels extensive geographical monitoring in 5g scenarios: dynamic and standard measurements comparison,” in Proc. International Conference on Technology and Entrepreneurship (ICTE), 2020, pp. 1–6.