Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
144 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
8 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Surrogate models for vibrational entropy based on a spatial decomposition (2402.12744v3)

Published 20 Feb 2024 in physics.comp-ph, cs.NA, and math.NA

Abstract: The temperature-dependent behavior of defect densities within a crystalline structure is intricately linked to the phenomenon of vibrational entropy. Traditional methods for evaluating vibrational entropy are computationally intensive, limiting their practical utility. We show that total entropy can be decomposed into atomic site contributions and rigorously estimate the locality of site entropy. This analysis suggests that vibrational entropy can be effectively predicted using a surrogate model for site entropy. We employ machine learning to develop such a surrogate models employing the Atomic Cluster Expansion model. We supplement our rigorous analysis with an empirical convergence study. In addition we demonstrate the performance of our method for predicting vibrational formation entropy and attempt frequency of the transition rates, on point defects such as vacancies and interstitials.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (51)
  1. Atomic cluster expansion: Completeness, efficiency and stability. J. Comput. Phys., 454, 2022.
  2. Polynomial approximation of symmetric functions. Math. Comp., 93:811–839, 2024.
  3. Gaussian approximation potentials: The accuracy of quantum mechanics, without the electrons. Phys. Rev. Lett., 104:136403, 2010.
  4. Automatic differentiation in machine learning: A survey. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 18(1):5595–5637, 2017.
  5. J. Behler and M. Parrinello. Generalized neural-network representation of high-dimensional potential-energy surfaces. Phys. Rev. Lett., 98:146401, Apr 2007.
  6. Efficient parametrization of the atomic cluster expansion. Phys. Rev. Mater., 6:013804, Jan 2022.
  7. Thermodynamic limit of the transition rate of a crystalline defect. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 238(3):1413–1474, 2020.
  8. Asymptotic expansion of the elastic far-field of a crystalline defect. arXiv preprints, 2108.04765, 2021.
  9. J. Braun and C. Ortner. Sharp uniform convergence rate of the supercell approximation of a crystalline defect. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 58, 2020.
  10. Higher order far-field boundary conditions for crystalline defects. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05573, 2022.
  11. Reactivity of single-atom alloy nanoparticles: Modeling the dehydrogenation of propane. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 145(27):14894–14902, 2023.
  12. Thermodynamic limit of crystal defects with finite temperature tight binding. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 230:701–733, Nov 2018.
  13. Geometry equilibration of crystalline defects in quantum and atomistic descriptions. Math. Models Methods Appl. Sci., 29:419–492, 2019.
  14. H. Chen and C. Ortner. QM/MM methods for crystalline defects. Part 1: Locality of the tight binding model. Multiscale Model. Simul., 14:232–264, 2016.
  15. QM/MM methods for crystalline defects. part 3: machine-learned mm models. Multiscale Model. Simul., 20(4):1490–1518, 2022.
  16. Point Defects in Metals II, Dynamical Properties and Diffusion Controlled Reactions. Springer, 1980.
  17. R. Drautz. Atomic cluster expansion for accurate and transferable interatomic potentials. Phys. Rev. B, 99:014104, 2019.
  18. Analysis of boundary conditions for crystal defect atomistic simulations. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 222(3):1217–1268, 2016.
  19. ACEpotentials.jl.git. https://github.com/ACEsuit/ACEpotentials.jl.
  20. JuLIP.jl.git. https://github.com/JuliaMolSim/JuLIP.jl.
  21. Insight into understanding the jump frequency of diffusion in solids. AIP Adv., 10(6):065132, 2020.
  22. M. Finnis. Interatomic Forces in Condensed Matter. Oxford University Press, 2003.
  23. Adaptive multigrid strategy for geometry optimization of large-scale three-dimensional molecular mechanics. J. Comput. Phys., 485:112113, 2023.
  24. B. Fultz. Vibrational thermodynamics of materials. Prog. Mater. Sci., 55(4):247–352, 2010.
  25. H. Gades and H. M. Urbassek. Pair versus many-body potentials in atomic emission processes from a cu surface. Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res., Sect. B, 69(2):232–241, 1992.
  26. What color is your jacobian? graph coloring for computing derivatives. SIAM Rev., 47:629–705, 2005.
  27. High-performance symbolic-numerics via multiple dispatch. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.03949, 2021.
  28. Sparsity programming: Automated sparsity-aware optimizations in differentiable programming. 2019.
  29. Computing A,αlog({}^{\alpha},\log(start_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT italic_α end_FLOATSUPERSCRIPT , roman_log (A), and related matrix functions by contour integrals. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 46(5):2505–2523, 2008.
  30. Reaction-rate theory: fifty years after kramers. Rev. Mod. Phys., 62:251–341, Apr 1990.
  31. A climbing image nudged elastic band method for finding saddle points and minimum energy paths. J. Chem. Phys., 113(22):9901–9904, 2000.
  32. T. Hudson and C. Ortner. On the stability of Bravais lattices and their Cauchy–Born approximations. ESAIM: Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 46:81–110, 2012.
  33. M. Kubale. Graph Colorings. Contemporary Mathematics; v. 352. American Mathematical Society, 2004.
  34. Machine learning surrogate models for strain-dependent vibrational properties and migration rates of point defects. Phys. Rev. Mater., 6:113803, Nov 2022.
  35. Machine learning surrogate models for prediction of point defect vibrational entropy. Phys. Rev. Mater., 4:063802, 2020.
  36. The atomic simulation environment—a python library for working with atoms. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 29(27):273002, 2017.
  37. Structural stability and lattice defects in copper: Ab initio, tight-binding, and embedded-atom calculations. Phys. Rev. B, 63:224106, May 2001.
  38. Elastic far-field decay from dislocations in multilattices. Multiscale Model. Simul., 21(4):1379–1409, 2023.
  39. C. Ortner and Y. Wang. A framework for a generalization analysis of machine-learned interatomic potentials. Multiscale Model. Simul., 21(3):1053–1080, 2023.
  40. Forward-mode automatic differentiation in Julia. arXiv:1607.07892 [cs.MS], 2016.
  41. A. V. Shapeev. Moment tensor potentials: A class of systematically improvable interatomic potentials. Multiscale Model. Simul., 14(3):1153–1173, 2016.
  42. Computer simulation of local order in condensed phases of silicon. Phys. Rev. B, 31:5262–5271, 1985.
  43. T. Torabi. ACEntropy.git. https://github.com/tinatorabi/ACEntropy.
  44. T. Torabi. ComplexElliptic.jl.git. https://github.com/tinatorabi/ComplexElliptic.jl.
  45. The theory of defect concentration in crystals. Phys. Rev., 93:265–268, Jan 1954.
  46. A. F. Voter. Introduction to the kinetic monte carlo method. In Radiation effects in solids, pages 1–23. Springer, 2007.
  47. A posteriori error estimation and adaptive algorithm for atomistic/continuum coupling in two dimensions. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 40(4):A2087–A2119, 2018.
  48. A posteriori error estimates for adaptive qm/mm coupling methods. SIAM J. Sci. Comput., 43(4):A2785–A2808, 2021.
  49. A theoretical case study of the generalization of machine-learned potentials. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Eng., 422:116831, 2024.
  50. Acepotentials.jl: A julia implementation of the atomic cluster expansion. J. Chem. Phys., 159:164101, 2023.
  51. Pair vs many-body potentials: Influence on elastic and plastic behavior in nanoindentation of fcc metals. J. Mech. Phys. Solids, 57(9):1514–1526, 2009.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now