Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
121 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
9 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
47 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

LLM Comparator: Visual Analytics for Side-by-Side Evaluation of Large Language Models (2402.10524v1)

Published 16 Feb 2024 in cs.HC, cs.AI, cs.CL, and cs.LG

Abstract: Automatic side-by-side evaluation has emerged as a promising approach to evaluating the quality of responses from LLMs. However, analyzing the results from this evaluation approach raises scalability and interpretability challenges. In this paper, we present LLM Comparator, a novel visual analytics tool for interactively analyzing results from automatic side-by-side evaluation. The tool supports interactive workflows for users to understand when and why a model performs better or worse than a baseline model, and how the responses from two models are qualitatively different. We iteratively designed and developed the tool by closely working with researchers and engineers at a large technology company. This paper details the user challenges we identified, the design and development of the tool, and an observational study with participants who regularly evaluate their models.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (21)
  1. ModelTracker: Redesigning performance analysis tools for machine learning. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI). 337–346. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702509
  2. Concrete problems in AI safety. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.06565 (2016). https://arxiv.org/abs/1606.06565
  3. PaLM 2 technical report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.10403 (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.10403
  4. ChainForge: A Visual Toolkit for Prompt Engineering and LLM Hypothesis Testing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.09128 (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.09128
  5. Embedding Comparator: Visualizing differences in global structure and local neighborhoods via small multiples. In 27th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (IUI). 746–766. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490099.3511122
  6. The Role of Interactive Visualization in Explaining (Large) NLP Models: from Data to Inference. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.04528 (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2301.04528
  7. Google Cloud. 2024. Perform automatic side-by-side evaluation. https://cloud.google.com/vertex-ai/docs/generative-ai/models/side-by-side-eval
  8. Adam Coscia and Alex Endert. 2023. KnowledgeVIS: Interpreting Language Models by Comparing Fill-in-the-Blank Prompts. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2023).
  9. Boxer: Interactive comparison of classifier results. In Computer Graphics Forum, Vol. 39. Wiley Online Library, 181–193. https://arxiv.org/abs/2004.07964
  10. ActiVis: Visual exploration of industry-scale deep neural network models. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 24, 1 (2017), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2017.2744718
  11. EvalLM: Interactive Evaluation of Large Language Model Prompts on User-Defined Criteria. arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.13633 (2023). https://arxiv.org/abs/2309.13633
  12. LiPO: Listwise Preference Optimization through Learning-to-Rank. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.01878 (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01878
  13. RuleMatrix: Visualizing and understanding classifiers with rules. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 25, 1 (2018), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2018.2864812
  14. LMdiff: A visual diff tool to compare language models. In Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP): System Demonstrations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.01582
  15. Interactive and visual prompt engineering for ad-hoc task adaptation with large language models. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 29, 1 (2022), 1146–1156. https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.07852
  16. The language interpretability tool: Extensible, interactive visualizations and analysis for NLP models. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP): System Demonstrations. https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.05122
  17. Learning-from-disagreement: A model comparison and visual analytics framework. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics (2022). https://arxiv.org/abs/2201.07849
  18. Goal-Driven Explainable Clustering via Language Descriptions. In Proceedings of the 2023 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 10626–10649. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2023.emnlp-main.657
  19. Machine learning testing: Survey, landscapes and horizons. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 48, 1 (2020), 1–36. https://arxiv.org/abs/1906.10742
  20. Judging LLM-as-a-judge with MT-Bench and Chatbot Arena. In Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS): Datasets and Benchmarks Track. https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.05685
  21. Describing differences between text distributions with natural language. In International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML). PMLR, 27099–27116. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v162/zhong22a.html
Citations (11)

Summary

  • The paper introduces LLM Comparator, a novel tool that visually compares LLM outputs using interactive tables and rationale clustering to reveal performance nuances.
  • The tool overcomes traditional spreadsheet limitations by enabling detailed analysis of text responses and highlighting overlapping word differences.
  • The design supports a rationale-centric approach that facilitates hypothesis formation and targeted improvements in LLM performance.

Visual Analytics for Evaluating LLMs Through LLM Comparator

Introduction to LLM Comparator

The evaluation of LLMs presents unique challenges, particularly when it comes to assessing models without clear ground-truth responses. The LLM Comparator, a novel visual analytics tool, has been developed to facilitate the analysis of automatic side-by-side evaluation results, enabling users to interactively explore the qualitative differences and performance metrics between LLMs. This solution was iteratively designed with inputs from researchers and engineers, focusing on improving scalability and interpretability in model evaluation processes.

Challenges in Current Evaluation Workflows

The practice of evaluating LLMs often involves automatic side-by-side evaluations, where another LLM acts as a judge to compare outputs. This method, while efficient, has left users desiring deeper insights into model performance beyond aggregated scores. Key challenges identified include:

  • The absence of specialized tools for detailed analysis of evaluation results, leading users to resort to spreadsheets and computational notebooks.
  • Difficulty in interpreting and comparing long text responses within traditional tools designed for numerical data.
  • A need for analysis on a slice-level basis to identify specific areas where one model outperforms another.

In response to these challenges, specific design goals were set for the LLM Comparator, aiming at facilitating the interaction between aggregated data and individual examples, and enabling users to address analytical questions concerning model performance differentials.

Design and Development of LLM Comparator

The LLM Comparator is structured around an interactive table and a visualization summary panel. The interactive table allows users to inspect individual examples, highlighting differences and providing rationale summaries. The visualization summary, on the other hand, aids in analyzing score distributions, win rates by prompt category, rationale clusters, and n-grams or custom functions, offering a comprehensive view of comparative model performance.

Unique features include:

  • Overlapping word highlights for easy comparison of responses.
  • LLM-generated summaries of rationales, offering succinct explanations for evaluative decisions.
  • Rationale clusters and n-grams analysis for deep dives into specific aspects influencing model performance.

Observational Study Insights

An observational paper with tool users revealed several usage patterns, such as:

  • An "example-first deep dive" approach, where users start by closely examining individual responses to form hypotheses about model behavior.
  • Leveraging prior experience to test for known undesirable model behaviors.
  • A "rationale-centric top-down exploration," using rationale clusters as a starting point for analysis.

These patterns underscore the tool's capability to facilitate hypothesis formation and verification, enriching the user's ability to discern model performance nuances.

Theoretical and Practical Implications

The introduction of LLM Comparator into LLM evaluation workflows represents a significant step forward in addressing the interpretability and scalability challenges inherent in current practices. Theoretically, this tool advances our understanding of how visual analytics can enhance the interpretability of complex AI models. Practically, it has already demonstrated value to a wide user base, enabling more nuanced insights into model performance and fostering improvements in LLM development.

Future Directions

While the LLM Comparator has shown considerable promise, future developments may focus on integrating LLM-based custom metrics for assessing high-level attributes, pre-configuring the tool with common testing patterns, and improving the rationale clustering mechanism. These enhancements have the potential to further streamline the evaluation process, making it more robust and efficient.

Conclusion

The LLM Comparator is a timely and much-needed tool that bridges a critical gap in the evaluation of LLMs by offering sophisticated visual analytics capabilities. It allows researchers and engineers to delve into the nuanced performance of LLMs, providing a clearer understanding of when, why, and how models differ in their responses. This tool not only aids in the immediate evaluation of models but also paves the way for future advancements in LLM research and development.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com