Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 62 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 47 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 10 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 91 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 139 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 433 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 31 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Central-surface-densities correlation in general MOND theories (2402.07159v2)

Published 11 Feb 2024 in astro-ph.GA, gr-qc, and hep-ph

Abstract: It is shown that the foundational axioms of MOND alone predict a strong correlation between a bulk measure of the baryonic surface density, $\Sigma_B$, and the corresponding dynamical one, $\Sigma_D$, of an isolated object, such as a galaxy. The correlation is encapsulated by its high- and low-$\Sigma_B$ behaviors. For $\Sigma_B\gg\Sigma_M\equiv a_0/2\pi G$ ($\Sigma_M$ is the critical MOND surface density) one has $\Sigma_D\approx\Sigma_B$. Their difference -- which would be interpreted as the contribution of dark matter -- is $\Sigma_P=\Sigma_D-\Sigma_B\sim\Sigma_M\ll\Sigma_B$. In the deep-MOND limit, $\Sigma_B\ll\Sigma_M$, one has $\Sigma_D\sim (\Sigma_M\Sigma_B){1/2}$. This is a primary prediction of MOND, shared by all theories that embody its basic tenets. Sharper correlations, even strict algebraic relations, $\Sigma_D(\Sigma_B)$, are predicted in specific MOND theories, for specific classes of mass distribution -- e.g., pure discs, or spherical systems -- and for specific definitions of the surface densities. I proceed to discuss such tighter correlations for the central surface densities of axisymmetric galactic systems, $\Sigma0_B$ and $\Sigma0_D$. Past work has demonstrated such relations for pure discs in the AQUAL and QUMOND theories. Here I consider them in broader classes of MOND theories. For most observed systems, $\Sigma0_D$ can not be determined directly at present, but, in many cases, a good proxy for it is the acceleration integral $\mathcal{G}\equiv\int_0\infty g_r d\ln~r$, where $g_r$ is the radial acceleration along a reflection-symmetry plane of a system, such as a disc galaxy. $\mathcal{G}$ can be determined directly from the rotation curve. I discuss the extent to which $\mathcal{G}$ is a good proxy for $\Sigma0_D$, and how the relation between them depends on system geometry, from pure discs, through disc-plus-bulge ones, to quasi-spherical systems.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 1 post and received 0 likes.