Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Behind the Screen: Investigating ChatGPT's Dark Personality Traits and Conspiracy Beliefs (2402.04110v1)

Published 6 Feb 2024 in cs.CL

Abstract: ChatGPT is notorious for its intransparent behavior. This paper tries to shed light on this, providing an in-depth analysis of the dark personality traits and conspiracy beliefs of GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. Different psychological tests and questionnaires were employed, including the Dark Factor Test, the Mach-IV Scale, the Generic Conspiracy Belief Scale, and the Conspiracy Mentality Scale. The responses were analyzed computing average scores, standard deviations, and significance tests to investigate differences between GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. For traits that have shown to be interdependent in human studies, correlations were considered. Additionally, system roles corresponding to groups that have shown distinct answering behavior in the corresponding questionnaires were applied to examine the models' ability to reflect characteristics associated with these roles in their responses. Dark personality traits and conspiracy beliefs were not particularly pronounced in either model with little differences between GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. However, GPT-4 showed a pronounced tendency to believe in information withholding. This is particularly intriguing given that GPT-4 is trained on a significantly larger dataset than GPT-3.5. Apparently, in this case an increased data exposure correlates with a greater belief in the control of information. An assignment of extreme political affiliations increased the belief in conspiracy theories. Test sequencing affected the models' responses and the observed correlations, indicating a form of contextual memory.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (66)
  1. “A Complete Survey on Generative AI (AIGC): Is ChatGPT from GPT-4 to GPT-5 All You Need?”, 2023 arXiv:2303.11717 [cs.AI]
  2. “Summary of ChatGPT/GPT-4 Research and Perspective Towards the Future of Large Language Models”, 2023 arXiv:2304.01852 [cs.CL]
  3. Krystal Hu “ChatGPT sets record for fastest-growing user base - analyst note”, 2023 URL: https://www.reuters.com/technology/chatgpt-sets-record-fastest-growing-user-base-analyst-note-2023-02-01/
  4. “Let’s chat about ChatGPT”, 2023 UBS URL: https://www.ubs.com/global/en/wealth-management/our-approach/marketnews/article.1585717.html
  5. “A Comprehensive Capability Analysis of GPT-3 and GPT-3.5 Series Models”, 2023 arXiv:2303.10420 [cs.CL]
  6. “Language Models are Few-Shot Learners”, 2020 arXiv:2005.14165 [cs.CL]
  7. Philipp Hacker, Andreas Engel and Marco Mauer “Regulating ChatGPT and other Large Generative AI Models”, 2023 arXiv:2302.02337 [cs.CY]
  8. OpenAI “GPT-4 Technical Report”, https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774, 2023 arXiv:2303.08774 [cs.CL]
  9. “Introducing ChatGPT and Whisper APIs”, 2023 URL: https://openai.com/blog/introducing-chatgpt-and-whisper-apis
  10. “ChatGPT: Applications, Opportunities, and Threats” In 2023 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS) Charlottesville, VA, USA: IEEE, 2023, pp. 274–279 DOI: 10.1109/SIEDS58326.2023.10137850
  11. Partha Pratim Ray “ChatGPT: A comprehensive review on background, applications, key challenges, bias, ethics, limitations and future scope” In Internet of Things and Cyber-Physical Systems 3, 2023, pp. 121–154 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iotcps.2023.04.003
  12. “The relationship between trust in AI and trustworthy machine learning technologies”, 2019 arXiv:1912.00782 [cs.CY]
  13. “Trustworthy AI: From principles to practices” In ACM Computing Surveys 55.9 ACM New York, NY, 2023, pp. 1–46
  14. Magdalena Wischnewski, Nicole Krämer and Emmanuel Müller “Measuring and Understanding Trust Calibrations for Automated Systems: A Survey of the State-Of-The-Art and Future Directions” In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’23 <conf-loc>, <city>Hamburg</city>, <country>Germany</country>, </conf-loc>: Association for Computing Machinery, 2023 DOI: 10.1145/3544548.3581197
  15. OpenAI “How should AI systems behave, and who should decide?”, 2023 URL: https://openai.com/blog/how-should-ai-systems-behave
  16. Emilio Ferrara “Should ChatGPT be Biased? Challenges and Risks of Bias in Large Language Models”, 2023 arXiv:2304.03738 [cs.CY]
  17. Brady D Lund and Ting Wang “Chatting about ChatGPT: how may AI and GPT impact academia and libraries?” In Library Hi Tech News 40.3 Emerald Publishing Limited, 2023, pp. 26–29
  18. “DecodingTrust: A Comprehensive Assessment of Trustworthiness in GPT Models”, 2024 arXiv:2306.11698 [cs.CL]
  19. “In ChatGPT We Trust? Measuring and Characterizing the Reliability of ChatGPT”, 2023 arXiv:2304.08979 [cs.CR]
  20. “Is ChatGPT a General-Purpose Natural Language Processing Task Solver?”, 2023 arXiv:2302.06476 [cs.CL]
  21. “The Self-Perception and Political Biases of ChatGPT” In Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies 2024, 2024 DOI: 10.1155/2024/7115633
  22. “Understanding conspiracy theories” In Political psychology 40 Wiley Online Library, 2019, pp. 3–35
  23. Robbie M Sutton and Karen M Douglas “Conspiracy theories and the conspiracy mindset: Implications for political ideology” In Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 34 Elsevier, 2020, pp. 118–122
  24. “Conspiracy theories and social media platforms” In Current Opinion in Psychology 47 Elsevier, 2022, pp. 101407
  25. “A Survey on Evaluation of Large Language Models”, 2023 arXiv:2307.03109 [cs.CL]
  26. “A Survey of Large Language Models”, 2023 arXiv:2303.18223 [cs.CL]
  27. Oliver John, Laura Naumann and C Soto “Paradigm shift to the integrative big five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues” In Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, 3 Edn. The Guilford Press, 2008, pp. 114–158
  28. “More than the Big Five: Egoism and the HEXACO model of personality” In European Journal of Personality 23.8 SAGE Publications Sage UK: London, England, 2009, pp. 635–654
  29. Malissa A Clark, Ariel M Lelchook and Marcie L Taylor “Beyond the Big Five: How narcissism, perfectionism, and dispositional affect relate to workaholism” In Personality and Individual differences 48.7 Elsevier, 2010, pp. 786–791
  30. Morten Moshagen, Benjamin E Hilbig and Ingo Zettler “The dark core of personality.” In Psychological review 125.5 American Psychological Association, 2018, pp. 656
  31. Richard Christie and Florence L Geis “Studies in machiavellianism” New York, NY, USA: Academic Press, 1970
  32. Isabel Briggs Myers “The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator: Manual (1962).” In Consulting Psychologists Press Consulting Psychologists Press, 1962
  33. Jochen Hartmann, Jasper Schwenzow and Maximilian Witte “The political ideology of conversational AI: Converging evidence on ChatGPT’s pro-environmental, left-libertarian orientation”, 2023 arXiv:2301.01768 [cs.CL]
  34. “ChatGPT an ENFJ, Bard an ISTJ: Empirical Study on Personalities of Large Language Models”, 2023 arXiv:2305.19926 [cs.CL]
  35. Robert Brotherton, Christopher C French and Alan D Pickering “Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale” In Frontiers in psychology 4 Frontiers, 2013, pp. 279
  36. “The Conspiracy Mentality Scale Distinguishing Between Irrational and Rational Suspicion” In Social Psychology 50, 2019 DOI: 10.1027/1864-9335/a000381
  37. “ChatGPT Output Regarding Compulsory Vaccination and COVID-19 Vaccine Conspiracy: A Descriptive Study at the Outset of a Paradigm Shift in Online Search for Information” In Cureus 15.2, 2023, pp. e35029 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35029
  38. Stephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton and Owain Evans “TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human Falsehoods”, 2022 arXiv:2109.07958 [cs.CL]
  39. “Toxicity in ChatGPT: Analyzing Persona-assigned Language Models”, 2023 arXiv:2304.05335 [cs.CL]
  40. Chinedu Pascal Ezenkwu “Towards Expert Systems for Improved Customer Services Using ChatGPT as an Inference Engine” In 2023 International Conference on Digital Applications, Transformation & Economy (ICDATE) Miri, Sarawak, Malaysia: IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5 DOI: 10.1109/ICDATE58146.2023.10248647
  41. OpenAI “Create Role in Chat completion”, 2023 URL: https://platform.openai.com/docs/api-reference/chat/create#chat/create-role
  42. OpenAI “Continuous Model Upgrades”, 2023 OpenAI URL: https://platform.openai.com/docs/models/continuous-model-upgrades
  43. “Trusting and trustworthiness: What are they, how to measure them, and what affects them” In Journal of Economic Psychology 31.1 Elsevier, 2010, pp. 64–79
  44. Anna Gunnthorsdottir, Kevin McCabe and Vernon Smith “Using the Machiavellianism instrument to predict trustworthiness in a bargaining game” In Journal of economic psychology 23.1 Elsevier, 2002, pp. 49–66
  45. Brian K Miller, Kay Nicols and Robert Konopaske “Measurement invariance tests of revisions to archaically worded items in the Mach IV scale” In PLOS ONE 14.10, 2019, pp. 1–16 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0223
  46. Alexander Wei, Nika Haghtalab and Jacob Steinhardt “Jailbroken: How Does LLM Safety Training Fail?”, 2023 arXiv:2307.02483 [cs.LG]
  47. “The nonparametric Behrens-Fisher problem: asymptotic theory and a small-sample approximation” In Biometrical Journal: Journal of Mathematical Methods in Biosciences 42.1 Wiley Online Library, 2000, pp. 17–25
  48. Markus Pauly, Thomas Asendorf and Frank Konietschke “Permutation-based inference for the AUC: A unified approach for continuous and discontinuous data” In Biometrical Journal 58.6 Wiley Online Library, 2016, pp. 1319–1337
  49. Andrea Valenzuela “Custom Memory for ChatGPT API”, 2023 URL: https://towardsdatascience.com/custom-memory-for-chatgpt-api-artificial-intelligence-python-722d627d4d6d
  50. R Core Team “R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing”, 2022 R Foundation for Statistical Computing URL: https://www.R-project.org/
  51. Guido Van Rossum and Fred L. Drake “Python 3 Reference Manual” Scotts Valley, CA: CreateSpace, 2009
  52. Hadley Wickham “ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis” Springer-Verlag New York, 2016 URL: https://ggplot2.tidyverse.org
  53. Kevin Ushey, JJ Allaire and Yuan Tang “reticulate: Interface to ’Python”’ R package version 1.27, 2023 URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=reticulate
  54. Toshiaki Ara “brunnermunzel: (Permuted) Brunner-Munzel Test” R package version 2.0, 2022 URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=brunnermunzel
  55. “dplyr: A Grammar of Data Manipulation” R package version 1.0.10, 2022 URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=dplyr
  56. Frank E Harrell Jr “Hmisc: Harrell Miscellaneous” R package version 5.1-0, 2023 URL: https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=Hmisc
  57. John D Hunter “Matplotlib: A 2D graphics environment” In Computing in science & engineering 9.3 IEEE, 2007, pp. 90–95
  58. “Array programming with NumPy” In Nature 585, 2020, pp. 357–362 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2
  59. Donald R Lynam and Joshua D Miller “The basic trait of antagonism: An unfortunately underappreciated construct” In Journal of Research in Personality 81 Elsevier, 2019, pp. 118–126
  60. “Validating a German Version of the Conspiracy Mentality Scale (CMS)” In Journal of Personality Assessment 105.5 Taylor & Francis, 2022, pp. 1–11
  61. “Welcome to the Jangle: Comparing the Empirical Profiles of the “Dark” Factor and Antagonism” In Assessment 30.8, 2022, pp. 2626–2643 DOI: 10.1177/10731911221124847
  62. Colin E Vize, Joshua D Miller and Donald R Lynam “Examining the conceptual and empirical distinctiveness of agreeableness and “dark” personality items” In Journal of Personality 89.3 Wiley Online Library, 2021, pp. 594–612
  63. “Agreeableness and the common core of dark traits are functionally different constructs” In Journal of Research in Personality 87 Elsevier, 2020, pp. 103986
  64. “Beyond (low) Agreeableness: Toward a more comprehensive understanding of antagonistic psychopathology” In Journal of Personality 90.6 Wiley Online Library, 2022, pp. 956–970
  65. Jan-Willem Van Prooijen, André PM Krouwel and Thomas V Pollet “Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories” In Social psychological and personality science 6.5 Sage Publications Sage CA: Los Angeles, CA, 2015, pp. 570–578
  66. “Conspiracy mentality and political orientation across 26 countries” In Nature human behaviour 6.3 Nature Publishing Group UK London, 2022, pp. 392–403
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Erik Weber (4 papers)
  2. Jérôme Rutinowski (10 papers)
  3. Markus Pauly (79 papers)
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com