2000 character limit reached
How to Use Data Science in Economics -- a Classroom Game Based on Cartel Detection (2401.14757v1)
Published 26 Jan 2024 in econ.GN and q-fin.EC
Abstract: We present a classroom game that integrates economics and data-science competencies. In the first two parts of the game, participants assume the roles of firms in a procurement market, where they must either adopt competitive behaviors or have the option to engage in collusion. Success in these parts hinges on their comprehension of market dynamics. In the third part of the game, participants transition to the role of competition-authority members. Drawing from recent literature on machine-learning-based cartel detection, they analyze the bids for patterns indicative of collusive (cartel) behavior. In this part of the game, success depends on data-science skills. We offer a detailed discussion on implementing the game, emphasizing considerations for accommodating diverging levels of preexisting knowledge in data science.
- Alsawaier, R. S. (2018): “The effect of gamification on motivation and engagement,” The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 35(1), 56–79.
- Athey, S., and G. W. Imbens (2019): “Machine learning methods that economists should know about,” Annual Review of Economics, 11, 685–725.
- Bergman, M. A., J. Lundberg, S. Lundberg, and J. Y. Stake (2020): “Interactions across firms and bid rigging,” Review of Industrial Organization, 56, 107–130.
- Correa, M., F. García-Quero, and M. Ortega-Ortega (2016): “A role-play to explain cartel behavior: Discussing the oligopolistic market,” International Review of Economics Education, 22, 8–15.
- Dobrescu, L. I., B. Greiner, and A. Motta (2015): “Learning economics concepts through game-play: An experiment,” International Journal of Educational Research, 69, 23–37.
- Duzhak, E., J. Hoff, and J. S. Lopus (2021): “The effects of the chair the fed simulation on high school Students’ knowledge,” The American Economist, 66(1), 74–89.
- Harrington, J. E. (2006): “Behavioral screening and the detection of cartels,” European competition law annual, pp. 51–68.
- Harrington, J. E. (2008): Detecting cartels.
- Harrington, J. E., and D. Imhof (2022): “Cartel Screening and Machine Learning,” Stanford Computational Antitrust, 2, 133–154.
- Holt, C. A. (1999): “Teaching economics with classroom experiments: A symposium,” Southern Economic Journal, 65(3), 603–610.
- Huber, M., and D. Imhof (2019): “Machine learning with screens for detecting bid-rigging cartels,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 65, 277–301.
- Imhof, D. (2019): “Detecting bid-rigging cartels with descriptive statistics,” Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 15(4), 427–467.
- Imhof, D., Y. Karagök, and S. Rutz (2018): “Screening for bid rigging—does it work?,” Journal of Competition Law & Economics, 14(2), 235–261.
- Imhof, D., and H. Wallimann (2021): “Detecting bid-rigging coalitions in different countries and auction formats,” International Review of Law and Economics, 68.
- Ishii, R. (2014): “Bid roundness under collusion in Japanese procurement auctions,” Review of Industrial Organization, 44, 241–254.
- Ken Danger, A. C. (2009): “Guidelines for Fighting Bid Rigging in Public Procurement,” OECD Competition Committee.
- OECD (2022): “Data Screening Tools in Competition Investigations,” OECD Competition Policy Roundtable Background Note.
- Picault, J. (2015): “Introduction to strategic interactions, duopolies and collusion: A classroom experiment,” Australasian Journal of Economics Education, 12(2), 12–29.
- (2019): “The economics instructor’s toolbox,” International Review of Economics Education, 30, 100154.
- Plass, J. L., B. D. Homer, and C. K. Kinzer (2015): “Foundations of game-based learning,” Educational psychologist, 50(4), 258–283.
- Platz, L. (2022): “Learning with serious games in economics education a systematic review of the effectiveness of game-based learning in upper secondary and higher education,” International Journal of Educational Research, 115, 102031.
- Porter, R. H., and J. D. Zona (1993): “Detection of Bid Rigging in Procurement Auctions,” Journal of Political Economy, 101(3), 518–538.
- Prensky, M. (2003): “Digital game-based learning,” Computers in Entertainment (CIE), 1(1), 21–21.
- Rodríguez, M. J. G., V. Rodríguez-Montequín, P. Ballesteros-Pérez, P. E. Love, and R. Signor (2022): “Collusion detection in public procurement auctions with machine learning algorithms,” Automation in Construction, 133, 104047.
- Silveira, D., L. B. de Moraes, E. P. Fiuza, and D. O. Cajueiro (2023): “Who are you? Cartel detection using unlabeled data,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 88, 102931.
- Silveira, D., S. Vasconcelos, M. Resende, and D. O. Cajueiro (2022): “Won’t Get Fooled Again: A supervised machine learning approach for screening gasoline cartels,” Energy Economics, 105, 105711.
- Stigler, G. J. (1964): “A theory of oligopoly,” Journal of political Economy, 72(1), 44–61.
- Varian, H. R. (2014): “Big data: New tricks for econometrics,” Journal of economic perspectives, 28(2), 3–28.
- Wallimann, H., D. Imhof, and M. Huber (2022): “A machine learning approach for flagging incomplete bid-rigging cartels,” Computational Economics, pp. 1–52.
- Wallimann, H., and S. Sticher (2023): “On suspicious tracks: machine-learning based approaches to detect cartels in railway-infrastructure procurement,” Transport Policy.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.
