Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
110 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
44 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Navigating Multidimensional Ideologies with Reddit's Political Compass: Economic Conflict and Social Affinity (2401.13656v1)

Published 24 Jan 2024 in cs.SI, cs.CY, physics.soc-ph, and stat.AP

Abstract: The prevalent perspective in quantitative research on opinion dynamics flattens the landscape of the online political discourse into a traditional left--right dichotomy. While this approach helps simplify the analysis and modeling effort, it also neglects the intrinsic multidimensional richness of ideologies. In this study, we analyze social interactions on Reddit, under the lens of a multi-dimensional ideological framework: the political compass. We examine over 8 million comments posted on the subreddits /r/PoliticalCompass and /r/PoliticalCompassMemes during 2020--2022. By leveraging their self-declarations, we disentangle the ideological dimensions of users into economic (left--right) and social (libertarian--authoritarian) axes. In addition, we characterize users by their demographic attributes (age, gender, and affluence). We find significant homophily for interactions along the social axis of the political compass and demographic attributes. Compared to a null model, interactions among individuals of similar ideology surpass expectations by 6%. In contrast, we uncover a significant heterophily along the economic axis: left/right interactions exceed expectations by 10%. Furthermore, heterophilic interactions are characterized by a higher language toxicity than homophilic interactions, which hints at a conflictual discourse between every opposite ideology. Our results help reconcile apparent contradictions in recent literature, which found a superposition of homophilic and heterophilic interactions in online political discussions. By disentangling such interactions into the economic and social axes we pave the way for a deeper understanding of opinion dynamics on social media.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (64)
  1. Amy Adamczyk. 2022. Religion as a Micro and Macro Property: Investigating the Multilevel Relationship between Religion and Abortion Attitudes across the Globe. European Sociological Review (March 2022), jcac017. https://doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcac017
  2. Partisan Sharing: Facebook Evidence and Societal Consequences. In COSN’14: ACM Conference on Online Social Networks. 13–24.
  3. Chris Bail. 2021. Breaking the Social Media Prism: How to Make Our Platforms Less Polarizing. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780691216508
  4. Delia Baldassarri and Andrew Gelman. 2008. Partisans without Constraint: Political Polarization and Trends in American Public Opinion. AJS 114, 2 (Jan. 2008), 408–446. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1010098
  5. Pablo Barberá. 2015. Birds of the same feather tweet together: Bayesian ideal point estimation using Twitter data. Political analysis 23, 1 (2015), 76–91.
  6. Reddit news users more likely to be male, young and digital in their news preferences. Pew Research Center (2016).
  7. Modeling Echo Chambers and Polarization Dynamics in Social Networks. Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (Jan 2020), 048301. Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.048301
  8. Emergence of Polarized Ideological Opinions in Multidimensional Topic Spaces. Phys. Rev. X 11, 1 (Jan. 2021), 011012. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.011012
  9. Kenneth Benoit and Michael Laver. 2012. The dimensionality of political space: Epistemological and methodological considerations. European Union Politics 13, 2 (June 2012), 194–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116511434618
  10. Users polarization on Facebook and Youtube. PLOS ONE 11, 8 (2016), e0159641.
  11. Max Bradley and Simon Chauchard. 2022. The Ethnic Origins of Affective Polarization: Statistical Evidence from Cross-National Data. Frontiers in Political Science (2022), 64.
  12. Modeling Multidimensional Public Opinion Polarization Process under the Context of Derived Topics. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 2 (Jan. 2021), 472. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph18020472
  13. The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 9 (2021), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
  14. Political polarization on twitter. In Fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media.
  15. Quantifying echo chamber effects in information spreading over political communication networks. EPJ Data Science 8, 1 (2019), 35. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0213-9
  16. Opposites repel: the effect of incorporating repulsion on opinion dynamics in the bounded confidence model. In Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on Autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS ’13). International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Richland, SC, 1225–1226.
  17. Munmun De Choudhury. 2011. Tie formation on twitter: Homophily and structure of egocentric networks. In 2011 IEEE third international conference on privacy, security, risk and trust and 2011 IEEE third international conference on social computing. IEEE, 465–470.
  18. No Echo in the Chambers of Political Interactions on Reddit. Scientific Reports 11 (2021), 2818. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81531-x
  19. Mixing beliefs among interacting agents. Advs. Complex Syst. 03, 01n04 (Jan. 2000), 87–98. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219525900000078
  20. Echo chambers in the age of misinformation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1509.00189 (2015).
  21. Echo chambers: Emotional contagion and group polarization on facebook. Scientific reports 6 (2016), 37825. Publisher: Nature Publishing Group.
  22. Why Do Liberals Drink Lattes? Amer. J. Sociology 120, 5 (March 2015), 1473–1511. https://doi.org/10.1086/681254
  23. Elizabeth Dubois and Grant Blank. 2018. The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, communication & society 21, 5 (2018), 729–745.
  24. John V Duca and Jason L Saving. 2016. Income inequality and political polarization: time series evidence over nine decades. Review of Income and Wealth 62, 3 (2016), 445–466.
  25. Gunther Eysenbach and James E Till. 2001. Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. Bmj 323, 7321 (2001), 1103–1105.
  26. Measuring Proximity Between Newspapers and Political Parties: The Sentiment Political Compass. Policy & Internet 12, 3 (2020), 367–399. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.222
  27. Configuring Random Graph Models with Fixed Degree Sequences. Technical Report arXiv:1608.00607. arXiv. http://arxiv.org/abs/1608.00607 arXiv:1608.00607 [physics, q-bio, stat] type: article.
  28. André Freire. 2008. Party Polarization and Citizens’ Left—Right Orientations. Party Politics 14, 2 (March 2008), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068807085889
  29. Quantifying Controversy in Social Media. In WSDM ’16: 9th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 33–42.
  30. Factors in Recommending Contrarian Content on Social Media. In 9th International ACM Web Science Conference (WebSci). 263–266.
  31. Reducing Controversy by Connecting Opposing Views. In ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM). [best student paper award], 81–90.
  32. Political Discourse on Social Media: Echo Chambers, Gatekeepers, and the Price of Bipartisanship. In The Web Conference (WWW). 913–922.
  33. R Kelly Garrett. 2009. Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14, 2 (2009), 265–285.
  34. Blogs are echo chambers: Blogs are echo chambers. In 42nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. 1–10.
  35. Avoiding the echo chamber about echo chambers. Knight Foundation (2018).
  36. Rainer Hegselmann and Ulrich Krause. 2002. Opinion Dynamics and Bounded Confidence Models, Analysis and Simulation. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 5, 3 (2002), 1–2.
  37. Samara Klar. 2014. A multidimensional study of ideological preferences and priorities among the American public. Public Opinion Quarterly 78, S1 (2014), 344–359.
  38. Party polarization in American politics: Characteristics, causes, and consequences. Annual Review of Political Science, Vol 13 9 (2006), 83–110.
  39. J.C. Lester. 1994. The evolution of the political compass (and why libertarianism is not right-wing). Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 17, 3 (Jan. 1994), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/1061-7361(94)90011-6
  40. Jan Clifford Lester. 1995. Liberty and the political compass (or how left-wingism is anti-liberty). Journal of Social and Evolutionary Systems 18, 3 (1995), 213–216.
  41. Jan Clifford Lester. 1996. The political compass and why libertarianism is not right-wing. Journal of social philosophy 27, 2 (1996), 176–86.
  42. Lilliana Mason and Julie Wronski. 2018. One tribe to bind them all: How our social group attachments strengthen partisanship. Political Psychology 39 (2018), 257–277.
  43. Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities. American Behavioral Scientist 62, 1 (Jan. 2018), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576
  44. Modeling Political Activism around Gun Debate via Social Media. ACM Transactions on Social Computing (April 2022), 3532102. https://doi.org/10.1145/3532102
  45. Echo Tunnels: Polarized News Sharing Online Runs Narrow but Deep. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media 17 (June 2023), 662–673. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22177
  46. Evidence of Demographic rather than Ideological Segregation in News Discussion on Reddit. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2023. ACM, Austin TX USA, 2777–2786. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543507.3583468
  47. Ethics of social media research: common concerns and practical considerations. Cyberpsychology, behavior, and social networking 16, 9 (2013), 708–713.
  48. Modeling Explosive Opinion Depolarization in Interdependent Topics. Phys. Rev. Lett. 130 (May 2023), 207401. Issue 20. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.130.207401
  49. Vanishing threshold in depolarization of correlated opinions on social networks. arXiv:2306.01329 [physics.soc-ph]
  50. Andreas Petrik. 2010. Core concept “Political Compass”. How Kitschelt’s model of liberal, socialist, libertarian and conservative orientations can fill the ideology gap in civic education. JSSE-Journal of Social Science Education (2010).
  51. Joseph Phillips. 2022. Affective Polarization: Over Time, Through the Generations, and During the Lifespan. Political Behavior (2022), 1–26.
  52. Detection of suicidal ideation on social media: multimodal, relational, and behavioral analysis. J. of medical internet research 22, 7 (2020), e17758.
  53. Samuel C Rhodes. 2022. Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and fake news: how social media conditions individuals to be less critical of political misinformation. Political Communication 39, 1 (2022), 1–22.
  54. Communities, Gateways, and Bridges: Measuring Attention Flow in the Reddit Political Sphere. In Social Informatics: 13th International Conference, SocInfo 2022, Glasgow, UK, October 19–21, 2022, Proceedings. Springer, 3–19.
  55. Polarization of the vaccination debate on Facebook. Vaccine 36, 25 (2018), 3606–3612.
  56. An agent-based model of multi-dimensional opinion dynamics and opinion alignment. Chaos 30, 9 (Sept. 2020), 093139. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0007523
  57. Polarization under rising inequality and economic decline. Science Advances 6, 50 (Dec. 2020), eabd4201. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.abd4201
  58. Michael Storper. 2018. Separate Worlds? Explaining the Current Wave of Regional Economic Polarization. Journal of Economic Geography 18, 2 (March 2018), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lby011
  59. Petter Törnberg. 2018. Echo chambers and viral misinformation: Modeling fake news as complex contagion. PLoS one 13, 9 (2018), e0203958.
  60. Petter Törnberg. 2022. How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119, 42 (Oct. 2022), e2207159119. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2207159119
  61. Atypical combinations and scientific impact. Science 342, 6157 (2013), 468–472.
  62. James A Vela-McConnell. 1999. Who is my neighbor? Social affinity in a modern world. SUNY Press.
  63. Isaac Waller and Ashton Anderson. 2021. Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms. Nature 600, 7888 (2021), 264–268.
  64. Secular vs. Islamist polarization in egypt on twitter. In 2013 IEEE/ACM international conference on advances in social networks analysis and mining (ASONAM). 290–297. https://doi.org/10.1145/2492517.2492557
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (4)
  1. Ernesto Colacrai (1 paper)
  2. Federico Cinus (10 papers)
  3. Michele Starnini (48 papers)
  4. Gianmarco de Francisci Morales (63 papers)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Reddit Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Reddit

  1. [2401.13656] Navigating Multidimensional Ideologies with Reddit's Political Compass: Economic Conflict and Social Affinity (6 points, 4 comments)