Evidence of Demographic rather than Ideological Segregation in News Discussion on Reddit (2302.07598v2)
Abstract: We evaluate homophily and heterophily among ideological and demographic groups in a typical opinion formation context: online discussions of current news. We analyze user interactions across five years in the r/news community on Reddit, one of the most visited websites in the United States. Then, we estimate demographic and ideological attributes of these users. Thanks to a comparison with a carefully-crafted network null model, we establish which pairs of attributes foster interactions and which ones inhibit them. Individuals prefer to engage with the opposite ideological side, which contradicts the echo chamber narrative. Instead, demographic groups are homophilic, as individuals tend to interact within their own group - even in an online setting where such attributes are not directly observable. In particular, we observe age and income segregation consistently across years: users tend to avoid interactions when belonging to different groups. These results persist after controlling for the degree of interest by each demographic group in different news topics. Our findings align with the theory that affective polarization - the difficulty in socializing across political boundaries-is more connected with an increasingly divided society, rather than ideological echo chambers on social media. We publicly release our anonymized data set and all the code to reproduce our results: https://github.com/corradomonti/demographic-homophily
- Samuel J Abrams and Morris P Fiorina. 2012. “The big sort” that wasn’t: A skeptical reexamination. PS: Political Science & Politics 45, 2 (2012), 203–210.
- An early look at the parler online social network. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.03820 (2021).
- Partisan Sharing: Facebook Evidence and Societal Consequences. In COSN’14: ACM Conference on Online Social Networks. 13–24.
- Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook. Science 348, 6239 (2015), 1130–1132.
- Reddit news users more likely to be male, young and digital in their news preferences. Pew Research Center (2016).
- The pushshift reddit dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.08435 (2020).
- Users polarization on Facebook and Youtube. PLOS ONE 11, 8 (2016), e0159641.
- Bill Bishop. 2009. The big sort: Why the clustering of like-minded America is tearing us apart. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
- A network model characterized by a latent attribute structure with competition. Information Sciences 354 (2016), 236–256.
- Paolo Boldi and Corrado Monti. 2016. Llamafur: learning latent category matrix to find unexpected relations in wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 8th acm conference on web science. 218–222.
- Greater Internet use is not associated with faster growth in political polarization among US demographic groups. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 114, 40 (2017), 10612–10617.
- Max Bradley and Simon Chauchard. 2022. The Ethnic Origins of Affective Polarization: Statistical Evidence from Cross-National Data. Frontiers in Political Science (2022), 64.
- Clandestino or Rifugiato? Anti-immigration Facebook Ad Targeting in Italy. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.
- Pew Research Center. [n. d.]. Demographics and Political Views of News Audiences — pewresearch.org. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2012/09/27/section-4-demographics-and-political-views-of-news-audiences/. [Accessed 12-Feb-2023].
- The Echo Chamber Effect on Social Media. PNAS: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 9 (2021), e2023301118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2023301118
- Political polarization on twitter. In Proceedings of the international aaai conference on web and social media, Vol. 5. 89–96.
- Falling into the Echo Chamber: The Italian Vaccination Debate on Twitter. In ICWSM ’20: Fourteenth International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media. 130–140.
- Quantifying echo chamber effects in information spreading over political communication networks. EPJ Data Science 8, 1 (2019), 35. https://doi.org/10.1140/epjds/s13688-019-0213-9
- Kareem Darwish. 2019. Quantifying polarization on twitter: the kavanaugh nomination. In International conference on social informatics. Springer, 188–201.
- No Echo in the Chambers of Political Interactions on Reddit. Scientific Reports 11 (2021), 2818. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-81531-x
- Elizabeth Dubois and Grant Blank. 2018. The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, communication & society 21, 5 (2018), 729–745.
- Understanding news outlets’ audience-targeting patterns. EPJ Data Science 8, 1 (2019), 1–20.
- Filter bubbles, echo chambers, and online news consumption. Public opinion quarterly 80, S1 (2016), 298–320. Publisher: Oxford University Press tex.date-added: 2019-11-13 17:02:52 +0000 tex.date-modified: 2019-11-13 17:02:52 +0000.
- Richard Fletcher and Rasmus Kleis Nielsen. 2018. Are people incidentally exposed to news on social media? A comparative analysis. New media & society 20, 7 (2018), 2450–2468.
- Linton C Freeman. 1978. Segregation in social networks. Sociological Methods & Research 6, 4 (1978), 411–429.
- Quantifying Controversy in Social Media. In WSDM ’16: 9th ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 33–42.
- Political Discourse on Social Media: Echo Chambers, Gatekeepers, and the Price of Bipartisanship. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference. 913–922.
- Venkata Rama Kiran Garimella and Ingmar Weber. 2017. A long-term analysis of polarization on Twitter. In Eleventh international AAAI conference on web and social media.
- R Kelly Garrett. 2009. Echo chambers online?: Politically motivated selective exposure among Internet news users. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 14, 2 (2009), 265–285.
- Avoiding the echo chamber about echo chambers. Knight Foundation (2018).
- James T Hamilton. 2011. All the news that’s fit to sell. In All the News That’s Fit to Sell. Princeton University Press.
- The normalization of hatred: Identity, affective polarization, and dehumanization on Facebook in the context of intractable political conflict. Social Media+ Society 6, 2 (2020), 2056305120913983.
- Eelco Harteveld. 2021. Ticking all the boxes? A comparative study of social sorting and affective polarization. Electoral Studies 72 (2021), 102337.
- Sources of segregation in social networks: A novel approach using Facebook. American Sociological Review 82, 3 (2017), 625–656.
- The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science 22, 1 (2019), 129–146.
- Affect, not ideology: a social identity perspective on polarization. Public opinion quarterly 76, 3 (2012), 405–431.
- Shanto Iyengar and Sean J Westwood. 2015. Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American journal of political science 59, 3 (2015), 690–707.
- Chris Jackson. 2018. Fake News, Filter Bubbles, and Post-Truth Are Other People’s Problems. Global Market Research and Public Opinion Specialist (IPSOS), Washington DC (2018).
- Gary C Jacobson. 2016. Polarization, gridlock, and presidential campaign politics in 2016. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 667, 1 (2016), 226–246.
- News, talk, opinion, participation: The part played by conversation in deliberative democracy. Political communication 16, 4 (1999), 361–385.
- Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. Freedom and control in modern society 18, 1 (1954), 18–66.
- Angela M Lee and Hsiang Iris Chyi. 2014. When Newsworthy is Not Noteworthy: Examining the value of news from the audience’s perspective. Journalism studies 15, 6 (2014), 807–820.
- Matthew Levendusky. 2009. The partisan sort: How liberals became Democrats and conservatives became Republicans. University of Chicago Press.
- Trevon D Logan and John M Parman. 2017. The national rise in residential segregation. The Journal of Economic History 77, 1 (2017), 127–170.
- In the United States, right-wing violence is on the rise. Washington Post 25 (2018). https://www.washingtonpost.com/national/in-the-united-states-right-wing-violence-is-on-the-rise/2018/11/25/61f7f24a-deb4-11e8-85df-7a6b4d25cfbb_story.html
- Lilliana Mason and Julie Wronski. 2018. One tribe to bind them all: How our social group attachments strengthen partisanship. Political Psychology 39 (2018), 257–277.
- Marshall McLuhan. 1994. Understanding media: The extensions of man. MIT press.
- Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual review of sociology (2001), 415–444.
- Of sports and politics: Predicting category-specific retention of news events from demographic variables. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 22, 1 (2010), 117–129.
- George Michael. 2017. The rise of the alt-right and the politics of polarization in America. Skeptic (Altadena, CA) 22, 2 (2017), 9–18.
- Nonparametric latent feature models for link prediction. Advances in neural information processing systems 22 (2009).
- Rishabh Misra. 2022. News category dataset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.11429 (2022).
- Rishabh Misra and Jigyasa Grover. 2021. Sculpting Data for ML: The first act of Machine Learning.
- Michael Molloy and Bruce Reed. 1995. A critical point for random graphs with a given degree sequence. Random structures & algorithms 6, 2-3 (1995), 161–180.
- Corrado Monti and Paolo Boldi. 2017. Estimating latent feature-feature interactions in large feature-rich graphs. Internet Mathematics 1, 1 (2017), 2640.
- Measuring political polarization: Twitter shows the two sides of Venezuela. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science 25, 3 (2015), 033114.
- Krzysztof Nowicki and Tom A B Snijders. 2001. Estimation and prediction for stochastic blockstructures. Journal of the American statistical association 96, 455 (2001), 1077–1087.
- Eli Pariser. 2011. The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. penguin UK.
- Judea Pearl. 2009. Causality. Cambridge University Press.
- Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 conference on empirical methods in natural language processing (EMNLP). 1532–1543.
- Pew Research Center. 2017. The partisan divide on political values grows even wider. Technical Report. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2017/10/05/the-partisan-divide-on-political-values-grows-even-wider
- Joseph Phillips. 2022. Affective Polarization: Over Time, Through the Generations, and During the Lifespan. Political Behavior (2022), 1–26.
- Echo chambers on Facebook. Available at SSRN 2795110 (2016).
- Communities, Gateways, and Bridges: Measuring Attention Flow in the Reddit Political Sphere. In Social Informatics: 13th International Conference, SocInfo 2022, Glasgow, UK, October 19–21, 2022, Proceedings. Springer, 3–19.
- Stacy Rosenberg. Pew Research Center. Who is Listening, Watching, Reading - and Why — pewresearch.org. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2010/09/12/section-4-who-is-listening-watching-reading-and-why. [Accessed 12-Feb-2023].
- Thomas C Schelling. 1969. Models of segregation. The American economic review 59, 2 (1969), 488–493.
- Polarization of the vaccination debate on Facebook. Vaccine 36, 25 (2018), 3606–3612.
- Cass R Sunstein. 2005. Why societies need dissent. Vol. 9. Harvard University Press.
- Cass R Sunstein. 2009. Republic.com 2.0.
- Discussion of Climate Change on Reddit: Polarized Discourse or Deliberative Debate? Environmental Communication (2022), 1–19.
- Isaac Waller and Ashton Anderson. 2021. Quantifying social organization and political polarization in online platforms. Nature 600, 7888 (2021), 264–268.
- Gab: The alt-right social media platform. John Hopkins University (2018).
- Corrado Monti (27 papers)
- Jacopo D'Ignazi (4 papers)
- Michele Starnini (48 papers)
- Gianmarco de Francisci Morales (63 papers)