Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Benders decomposition for congested partial set covering location with uncertain demand (2401.12625v1)

Published 23 Jan 2024 in math.OC and cs.DM

Abstract: In this paper, we introduce a mixed integer quadratic formulation for the congested variant of the partial set covering location problem, which involves determining a subset of facility locations to open and efficiently allocating customers to these facilities to minimize the combined costs of facility opening and congestion while ensuring target coverage. To enhance the resilience of the solution against demand fluctuations, we address the case under uncertain customer demand using $\Gamma$-robustness. We formulate the deterministic problem and its robust counterpart as mixed-integer quadratic problems. We investigate the effect of the protection level in adapted instances from the literature to provide critical insights into how sensitive the planning is to the protection level. Moreover, since the size of the robust counterpart grows with the number of customers, which could be significant in real-world contexts, we propose the use of Benders decomposition to effectively reduce the number of variables by projecting out of the master problem all the variables dependent on the number of customers. We illustrate how to incorporate our Benders approach within a mixed-integer second-order cone programming (MISOCP) solver, addressing explicitly all the ingredients that are instrumental for its success. We discuss single-tree and multi-tree approaches and introduce a perturbation technique to deal with the degeneracy of the Benders subproblem efficiently. Our tailored Benders approaches outperform the perspective reformulation solved using the state-of-the-art MISOCP solver Gurobi on adapted instances from the literature.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (52)
  1. Profit maximizing distributed service system design with congestion and elastic demand. Transportation Science, 46(2):247–261, 2012.
  2. A strong conic quadratic reformulation for machine-job assignment with controllable processing times. Operations Research Letters, 37(3):187–191, 2009.
  3. S. Atta. An improved harmony search algorithm using opposition-based learning and local search for solving the maximal covering location problem. Engineering Optimization, pages 1–20, 2023.
  4. Solving maximal covering location problem using genetic algorithm with local refinement. Soft Computing, 22:3891–3906, 2018.
  5. A computational study of off-the-shelf minlp solvers on a benchmark set of congested capacitated facility location problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04216, 2023.
  6. J. F. Benders. Partitioning procedures for solving mixed-variables programming problems. Numerische Mathematik, 4(1):238–252, 1962.
  7. The gradual covering decay location problem on a network. European Journal of Operational Research, 151(3):474–480, 2003.
  8. D. Bertsimas and M. Sim. Robust discrete optimization and network flows. Mathematical programming, 98(1):49–71, 2003.
  9. An iterated-tabu-search heuristic for a variant of the partial set covering problem. Journal of Heuristics, 20(2):143–164, 2014.
  10. A review of congestion models in the location of facilities with immobile servers. European Journal of Operational Research, 178(3):643–662, 2007.
  11. Efficient presolving methods for solving maximal covering and partial set covering location problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 2023.
  12. T. R. L. Christensen and A. Klose. A fast exact method for the capacitated facility location problem with differentiable convex production costs. European Journal of Operational Research, 292(3):855–868, 2021.
  13. R. Church and C. ReVelle. The maximal covering location problem. In Papers of the regional science association, volume 32, pages 101–118. Springer-Verlag Berlin/Heidelberg, 1974.
  14. Benders decomposition for very large scale partial set covering and maximal covering location problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 275(3):882–896, 2019.
  15. Two new location covering problems: The partial p-center problem and the partial set covering problem. Geographical Analysis, 31(3):217–235, 1999.
  16. The congested facility location problem. Location Science, 3(1):9–23, 1995.
  17. An exact algorithm for the maximal covering problem. Naval Research Logistics (NRL), 43(3):435–461, 1996.
  18. Benders decomposition without separability: A computational study for capacitated facility location problems. European Journal of Operational Research, 253(3):557–569, 2016.
  19. Redesigning Benders decomposition for large-scale facility location. Management Science, 63(7):2146–2162, 2017.
  20. A note on the selection of Benders’ cuts. Mathematical Programming, 124:175–182, 2010.
  21. A. Frangioni and C. Gentile. Perspective cuts for a class of convex 0–1 mixed integer programs. Mathematical Programming, 106:225–236, 2006.
  22. A. Frangioni and C. Gentile. Sdp diagonalizations and perspective cuts for a class of nonseparable miqp. Operations Research Letters, 35(2):181–185, 2007.
  23. A. Frangioni and C. Gentile. A computational comparison of reformulations of the perspective relaxation: SOCP vs. cutting planes. Operations Research Letters, 37(3):206–210, 2009.
  24. Tighter approximated milp formulations for unit commitment problems. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 24(1):105–113, 2008.
  25. A comparison of lagrangean and surrogate relaxations for the maximal covering location problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 124(2):377–389, 2000.
  26. R. D. Galvão and C. ReVelle. A lagrangean heuristic for the maximal covering location problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 88(1):114–123, 1996.
  27. O. Günlük and J. Linderoth. Perspective relaxation of mixed integer nonlinear programs with indicator variables. In International Conference on Integer Programming and Combinatorial Optimization, pages 1–16. Springer, 2008.
  28. O. Günlük and J. Linderoth. Perspective reformulation and applications. In Mixed Integer Nonlinear Programming, pages 61–89. Springer, 2012.
  29. Gurobi Optimization. MIQCPMethod, January 2023. https://www.gurobi.com/documentation/10.0/refman/miqcpmethod.html.
  30. Gurobi Optimization, LLC. Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual, 2023. https://www.gurobi.com.
  31. S. L. Hakimi. Optimum distribution of switching centers in a communication network and some related graph theoretic problems. Operations Research, 13(3):462–475, 1965.
  32. J. Harkness and C. ReVelle. Facility location with increasing production costs. European Journal of Operational Research, 145(1):1–13, 2003.
  33. Optimal location: minimum versus equilibrium allocation. In Operational research’87, pages 718–729. North-Holland, 1987.
  34. Exact approaches to the single-source network loading problem. Networks, 59(1):89–106, 2012.
  35. A lagrangean/surrogate heuristic for the maximal covering location problem using hillman’s edition. International Journal of Industrial Engineering, 9:57–67, 2002.
  36. D. Lu. Facility location with economies of scale and congestion. Master’s thesis, University of Waterloo, 2010.
  37. Accelerating Benders decomposition: Algorithmic enhancement and model selection criteria. Operations Research, 29(3):464–484, 1981.
  38. A hybrid adaptive iterated local search heuristic for the maximal covering location problem. International Transactions in Operational Research, 2023.
  39. Intensification, learning and diversification in a hybrid metaheuristic: an efficient unification. Journal of Heuristics, 25:539–564, 2019.
  40. Intelligent-guided adaptive search for the maximum covering location problem. Computers & Operations Research, 78:129–137, 2017.
  41. The maximum coverage location problem. SIAM Journal on Algebraic Discrete Methods, 4(2):253–261, 1983.
  42. N. Papadakos. Practical enhancements to the Magnanti–Wong method. Operations Research Letters, 36(4):444–449, 2008.
  43. The benders decomposition algorithm: A literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 259(3):801–817, 2017.
  44. M. G. Resende. Computing approximate solutions of the maximum covering problem with grasp. Journal of Heuristics, 4(2):161–177, 1998.
  45. Solving the maximal covering location problem with heuristic concentration. Computers & Operations Research, 35(2):427–435, 2008.
  46. S. Şelfun. Outer approximation algorithms for the congested p-median problem. Master’s thesis, Bilkent Universitesi (Turkey), 2011.
  47. A decomposition heuristic for the maximal covering location problem. Advances in Operations Research, 2010, 2010.
  48. L. V. Snyder. Facility location under uncertainty: a review. IIE transactions, 38(7):547–564, 2006.
  49. L. V. Snyder. Covering problems. Foundations of location analysis, pages 109–135, 2011.
  50. The location of emergency service facilities. Operations Research, 19(6):1363–1373, 1971.
  51. W. Walker. Using the set-covering problem to assign fire companies to fire houses. Operations Research, 22(2):275–277, 1974.
  52. Incorporating congestion in preventive healthcare facility network design. European Journal of Operational Research, 198(3):922–935, 2009.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.