Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
153 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Seeing the roads through the trees: A benchmark for modeling spatial dependencies with aerial imagery (2401.06762v1)

Published 12 Jan 2024 in cs.CV and cs.LG

Abstract: Fully understanding a complex high-resolution satellite or aerial imagery scene often requires spatial reasoning over a broad relevant context. The human object recognition system is able to understand object in a scene over a long-range relevant context. For example, if a human observes an aerial scene that shows sections of road broken up by tree canopy, then they will be unlikely to conclude that the road has actually been broken up into disjoint pieces by trees and instead think that the canopy of nearby trees is occluding the road. However, there is limited research being conducted to understand long-range context understanding of modern machine learning models. In this work we propose a road segmentation benchmark dataset, Chesapeake Roads Spatial Context (RSC), for evaluating the spatial long-range context understanding of geospatial machine learning models and show how commonly used semantic segmentation models can fail at this task. For example, we show that a U-Net trained to segment roads from background in aerial imagery achieves an 84% recall on unoccluded roads, but just 63.5% recall on roads covered by tree canopy despite being trained to model both the same way. We further analyze how the performance of models changes as the relevant context for a decision (unoccluded roads in our case) varies in distance. We release the code to reproduce our experiments and dataset of imagery and masks to encourage future research in this direction -- https://github.com/isaaccorley/ChesapeakeRSC.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. “Hybrid multiple attention network for semantic segmentation in aerial images,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1–18, 2021.
  2. “Fast building segmentation from satellite imagery and few local labels,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 1463–1471.
  3. “Segment anything,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.02643, 2023.
  4. “Mining self-similarity: Label super-resolution with epitomic representations,” in Computer Vision–ECCV 2020: 16th European Conference, Glasgow, UK, August 23–28, 2020, Proceedings, Part XXVI 16. Springer, 2020, pp. 531–547.
  5. “Imagenet-trained cnns are biased towards texture; increasing shape bias improves accuracy and robustness,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.12231, 2018.
  6. “Local features and global shape information in object classification by deep convolutional neural networks,” Vision research, vol. 172, pp. 46–61, 2020.
  7. “Approximating CNNs with bag-of-local-features models works surprisingly well on imagenet,” in International Conference on Learning Representations, 2019.
  8. “Show why the answer is correct! towards explainable ai using compositional temporal attention,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics (SMC). IEEE, 2021, pp. 3006–3012.
  9. “Mega: moving average equipped gated attention,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.10655, 2022.
  10. “Megabyte: Predicting million-byte sequences with multiscale transformers,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.07185, 2023.
  11. “Resurrecting recurrent neural networks for long sequences,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.06349, 2023.
  12. “Pretraining without attention,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.10544, 2022.
  13. “Efficiently modeling long sequences with structured state spaces,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.00396, 2021.
  14. “On the parameterization and initialization of diagonal state space models,” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, vol. 35, pp. 35971–35983, 2022.
  15. “What makes convolutional models great on long sequence modeling?,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.09298, 2022.
  16. “Simplified state space layers for sequence modeling,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.04933, 2022.
  17. “Long range language modeling via gated state spaces,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.13947, 2022.
  18. “Hungry hungry hippos: Towards language modeling with state space models,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.14052, 2022.
  19. “S4nd: Modeling images and videos as multidimensional signals with state spaces,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 35, pp. 2846–2861, 2022.
  20. “Scalable diffusion models with transformers,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2023, pp. 4195–4205.
  21. “Diffusion models without attention,” 2023.
  22. “A technique for detecting burn scars using modis data,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 1300–1308, 2004.
  23. “Roadtracer: Automatic extraction of road networks from aerial images,” in Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, 2018, pp. 4720–4728.
  24. “Beyond road extraction: A dataset for map update using aerial images,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, 2021, pp. 11905–11914.
  25. “Single-shot end-to-end road graph extraction,” in Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2022, pp. 1403–1412.
  26. “Torchgeo: deep learning with geospatial data,” in Proceedings of the 30th international conference on advances in geographic information systems, 2022, pp. 1–12.
  27. Chesapeake Bay Program, “Chesapeake Bay Land Use and Land Cover Database 2022 Edition: Land Use/Land Cover,” U.S. Geological Survey data release, 2023, Developed by the Chesapeake Conservancy, U.S. Geological Survey and University of Vermont Spatial Analysis Lab.
  28. “Understanding the effective receptive field in deep convolutional neural networks,” Advances in neural information processing systems, vol. 29, 2016.
  29. “U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation,” in Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18. Springer, 2015, pp. 234–241.
  30. Pavel Iakubovskii, “Segmentation models pytorch,” https://github.com/qubvel/segmentation_models.pytorch, 2019.
  31. “Encoder-decoder with atrous separable convolution for semantic image segmentation,” in Proceedings of the European conference on computer vision (ECCV), 2018, pp. 801–818.
  32. “Decoupled weight decay regularization,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1711.05101, 2017.

Summary

  • The paper introduces the Chesapeake RSC dataset with 30,000 labeled patches designed to test long-range dependencies in semantic segmentation tasks.
  • The paper benchmarks established models like FCN, U-Net, and DeepLabV3+, revealing a drop in recall from ~70% near road pixels to under 40% with increased spatial distance.
  • The paper proposes an innovative evaluation workflow that underscores the need for models to integrate distant contextual cues, paving the way for future geospatial model improvements.

Analysis of Long-Range Spatial Contextual Understanding in Geospatial Machine Learning

The paper, "Seeing the roads through the trees: A benchmark for modeling spatial dependencies with aerial imagery," offers a comprehensive assessment of geospatial machine learning models' ability to interpret long-range spatial dependencies within high-resolution satellite and aerial imagery. Recognizing the limitations in current model architectures that primarily focus on local features, this paper introduces the Chesapeake Roads Spatial Context (RSC) dataset—a new benchmark designed to evaluate semantic segmentation models on tasks that demand an understanding of extended spatial contexts, such as determining the continuity of road networks obscured by tree canopies.

Core Contributions and Methodologies

The authors have structured the paper around several key contributions that provide insight into the challenges faced by existing machine learning models:

  1. Introduction of the Chesapeake RSC Dataset: The dataset comprises 30,000 labeled patches from the National Agricultural Imagery Program (NAIP), specifically constructed to test the incorporation of long-range dependencies. It includes classes such as "background," "impervious roads," and "tree canopy over roads," with an emphasis on instances where tree canopies occlude roads—presenting a challenge that requires integrated spatial reasoning capabilities.
  2. Benchmarking Established Semantic Segmentation Models: The paper evaluates mainstream segmentation models including Fully Convolutional Networks (FCN), U-Net with ResNet backbones, and DeepLabV3+, using metrics such as recall, precision, and a novel distance-weighted recall for the "tree canopy over roads" class. Their results indicate marked deficiencies, particularly under occlusions that increase spatial distance from clear cues, affirming the difficulty these models face in navigating spatial occlusion challenges.
  3. Proposed Evaluation Workflow: An innovative evaluation process highlights how segmentation models' performance deteriorates as the distance from contextual cues increases—demonstrating a significant bias towards local information usage over global contextual reasoning. The analysis outlines a decrease in recall from approximately 70% adjacent to road pixels to less than 40% for pixels further away, highlighting the weakness in long-range contextual assimilation.

Results and Implications

The empirical results from the model evaluations underscore a persisting obstacle: commonly used models inadequately account for long-range spatial contexts—a shortcoming particularly evident in scenarios where roads are obscured by tree canopies. Notably, models with larger receptive fields like DeepLabV3+ perform better but still fall short of demonstrating robust spatial reasoning capabilities. The performance drop as a function of spatial distance illustrates the necessity for models that effectively integrate distant contextual information.

The introduction of the Chesapeake RSC dataset and the analytical framework surrounding it adds a vital tool for the machine learning community, offering a platform to rigorously test and refine model architectures aimed at enhancing spatial reasoning capabilities in geospatial tasks.

Future Directions

The paper opens several pathways for further exploration within the domain of geospatial machine learning. Innovating beyond CNN architectures, there is an opportunity to delve into the utilization of vision transformers and recurrent network models, potentially exploring the use of state space models and sequence-based approaches to enhance spatial contextual awareness. Advancements in this direction could realize models that more closely mimic human-like spatial reasoning, ultimately contributing to more nuanced and effective geospatial analysis systems.

Overall, this work emphasizes the potential for enhanced understanding of complex imaging datasets and underscores the significance of incorporating extensive spatial context, inviting continued research to address these intricate challenges within remote sensing applications.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown