Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
158 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Optimization-based Framework for Selecting Under-frequency Load Shedding Parameters (2401.04799v1)

Published 9 Jan 2024 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: High penetration of renewable resources results in a power system with lower inertia and higher frequency sensitivity to power imbalances. Such systems are becoming increasingly susceptible to frequency collapse during extreme disturbances. Under-Frequency Load Shedding (UFLS) is a last-resort protection scheme and acts as an emergency brake by shedding load to arrest frequency decline. Current and emerging efforts to optimize UFLS settings and frequency thresholds are mostly network agnostic, ignoring network spatial information. With the prevalence of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs) in the high-renewable paradigm, the power grid is becoming more bidirectional, making some locations in the network less effective for UFLS action than others. This work proposes a Mixed Integer Linear Program that optimizes the UFLS setpoints (prioritizing one location over another) to minimize frequency deviation and load-shed for a given disturbance. The formulation considers system information and DER generation mix at different network locations, increasing model fidelity. The formulation also captures the discrete nature and practical time delays and deadbands associated with UFLS using a minimal set of binary variables, reducing problem complexity. We empirically validate the optimization approach on the dynamic IEEE 39-bus system for performance metrics, including frequency nadir, steady-state frequency and total load shed.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (19)
  1. Z. Liu, F. Wen, and G. Ledwich, “An optimal under-frequency load shedding strategy considering distributed generators and load static characteristics,” International Transactions on Electrical Energy Systems, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 75–90, 2014.
  2. M. Ghaderi Darebaghi and T. Amraee, “Dynamic multi-stage under frequency load shedding considering uncertainty of generation loss,” IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, vol. 11, no. 13, pp. 3202–3209, 2017.
  3. M. Sun, G. Liu, M. Popov, V. Terzija, and S. Azizi, “Underfrequency load shedding using locally estimated rocof of the center of inertia,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 36, no. 5, pp. 4212–4222, 2021.
  4. U. Rudez and R. Mihalic, “Wams-based underfrequency load shedding with short-term frequency prediction,” IEEE Transactions on Power Delivery, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 1912–1920, 2016.
  5. C. Adiyabazar, F. Gonzalez-Longatt, M. N. Acosta, J. L. Rueda, and P. Palensky, “Optimal UFLS settings: An assessment of frequency system response indicators,” in 2020 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies Europe (ISGT-Europe).   IEEE, 2020, pp. 1141–1145.
  6. P. He, B. Wen, and H. Wang, “Decentralized adaptive under frequency load shedding scheme based on load information,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 52 007–52 014, 2019.
  7. L. Sigrist, I. Egido, and L. Rouco, “Performance analysis of ufls schemes of small isolated power systems,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1673–1680, 2012.
  8. A. Rafinia, J. Moshtagh, and N. Rezaei, “Stochastic optimal robust design of a new multi-stage under-frequency load shedding system considering renewable energy sources,” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, vol. 118, p. 105735, 2020.
  9. F. Ceja-Gomez, S. S. Qadri, and F. D. Galiana, “Under-frequency load shedding via integer programming,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 1387–1394, 2012.
  10. T. Amraee, M. G. Darebaghi, A. Soroudi, and A. Keane, “Probabilistic under frequency load shedding considering rocof relays of distributed generators,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 3587–3598, 2017.
  11. F. Milano, “Rotor speed-free estimation of the frequency of the center of inertia,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 1153–1155, 2017.
  12. H. H. Alhelou, M. E. H. Golshan, T. C. Njenda, and N. D. Hatziargyriou, “An overview of ufls in conventional, modern, and future smart power systems: challenges and opportunities,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 179, p. 106054, 2020.
  13. Y. Zuo, G. Frigo, A. Derviškadić, and M. Paolone, “Impact of synchrophasor estimation algorithms in rocof-based under-frequency load-shedding,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 35, no. 2, pp. 1305–1316, 2019.
  14. V. V. Terzija, “Adaptive underfrequency load shedding based on the magnitude of the disturbance estimation,” IEEE Transactions on power Systems, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 1260–1266, 2006.
  15. B. K. Poolla, S. Bolognani, and F. Dörfler, “Optimal placement of virtual inertia in power grids,” IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 62, no. 12, pp. 6209–6220, 2017.
  16. B. K. Poolla, D. Groß, T. Borsche, S. Bolognani, and F. Dörfler, “Virtual inertia placement in electric power grids,” Energy Markets and Responsive Grids: Modeling, Control, and Optimization, pp. 281–305, 2018.
  17. F. Figliolo and A. Giusto, “Linear model for dynamic studies of power system frequency,” in 2020 IEEE PES Transmission & Distribution Conference and Exhibition - Latin America (T&D LA), 2020, pp. 1–6.
  18. L. Vanfretti and F. Milano, “Experience with psat (power system analysis toolbox) as free and open-source software for power system education and research,” International Journal of Electrical Engineering & Education, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 47–62, 2010.
  19. A. Agarwal, A. Pandey, M. Jereminov, and L. Pillegi, “Continuous switch model and heuristics for mixed-integer problems in power systems,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.14510, 2022.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.