Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Probing the Limits and Capabilities of Diffusion Models for the Anatomic Editing of Digital Twins (2401.00247v1)

Published 30 Dec 2023 in cs.CV and eess.IV

Abstract: Numerical simulations can model the physical processes that govern cardiovascular device deployment. When such simulations incorporate digital twins; computational models of patient-specific anatomy, they can expedite and de-risk the device design process. Nonetheless, the exclusive use of patient-specific data constrains the anatomic variability which can be precisely or fully explored. In this study, we investigate the capacity of Latent Diffusion Models (LDMs) to edit digital twins to create anatomic variants, which we term digital siblings. Digital twins and their corresponding siblings can serve as the basis for comparative simulations, enabling the study of how subtle anatomic variations impact the simulated deployment of cardiovascular devices, as well as the augmentation of virtual cohorts for device assessment. However, while diffusion models have been characterized in their ability to edit natural images, their capacity to anatomically edit digital twins has yet to be studied. Using a case example centered on 3D digital twins of cardiac anatomy, we implement various methods for generating digital siblings and characterize them through morphological and topological analyses. We specifically edit digital twins to introduce anatomic variation at different spatial scales and within localized regions, demonstrating the existence of bias towards common anatomic features. We further show that such anatomic bias can be leveraged for virtual cohort augmentation through selective editing, partially alleviating issues related to dataset imbalance and lack of diversity. Our experimental framework thus delineates the limits and capabilities of using latent diffusion models in synthesizing anatomic variation for in silico trials.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (46)
  1. Learning representations and generative models for 3d point clouds. In International conference on machine learning, pages 40–49. PMLR, 2018.
  2. Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Medical image analysis, 12(1):26–41, 2008.
  3. Generating subpopulation-specific biventricular anatomy models using conditional point cloud variational autoencoders. In International Workshop on Statistical Atlases and Computational Models of the Heart, pages 75–83. Springer, 2021.
  4. Interpretable cardiac anatomy modeling using variational mesh autoencoders. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 9:983868, 2022.
  5. Mask, stitch, and re-sample: Enhancing robustness and generalizability in anomaly detection through automatic diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.19643, 2023.
  6. Patient-specific simulation of transcatheter aortic valve replacement: impact of deployment options on paravalvular leakage. Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology, 18:435–451, 2019.
  7. Acute stent-induced endothelial denudation: Biomechanical predictors of vascular injury. Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, 8:733605, 2021.
  8. Thin-cap fibroatheroma rather than any lipid plaques increases the risk of cardiovascular events in diabetic patients: Insights from the combine oct–ffr trial. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions, 15(5):e011728, 2022.
  9. Can segmentation models be trained with fully synthetically generated data? In Simulation and Synthesis in Medical Imaging: 7th International Workshop, SASHIMI 2022, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2022, Singapore, September 18, 2022, Proceedings, pages 79–90. Springer, 2022.
  10. D. B. Fogel. Factors associated with clinical trials that fail and opportunities for improving the likelihood of success: a review. Contemporary clinical trials communications, 11:156–164, 2018.
  11. Diffusion models for counterfactual generation and anomaly detection in brain images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.02062, 2023.
  12. Impact of tavr on coronary artery hemodynamics using clinical measurements and image-based patient-specific in silico modeling. Scientific Reports, 13(1):8948, 2023.
  13. Generation of structurally realistic retinal fundus images with diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.06813, 2023.
  14. Learning topological interactions for multi-class medical image segmentation. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pages 701–718. Springer, 2022.
  15. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020.
  16. J. Ho and T. Salimans. Classifier-free diffusion guidance. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.12598, 2022.
  17. A platform for high-fidelity patient-specific structural modelling of atherosclerotic arteries: from intravascular imaging to three-dimensional stress distributions. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 18(182):20210436, 2021.
  18. Design and implementation of in silico clinical trial for bioresorbable vascular scaffolds. In 2020 42nd Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society (EMBC), pages 2675–2678. IEEE, 2020.
  19. Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.00364, 2022.
  20. Mixed valvular disease following transcatheter aortic valve replacement: quantification and systematic differentiation using clinical measurements and image-based patient-specific in silico modeling. Journal of the American Heart Association, 9(5):e015063, 2020.
  21. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models for 3d medical image generation. Scientific Reports, 13(1):7303, 2023.
  22. D. P. Kingma and J. Ba. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980, 2014.
  23. Understanding tavr device expansion as it relates to morphology of the bicuspid aortic valve: A simulation study. Plos one, 16(5):e0251579, 2021.
  24. Improved precision and recall metric for assessing generative models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 32, 2019.
  25. Sdedit: Guided image synthesis and editing with stochastic differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.01073, 2021.
  26. Coronary flow impacts aortic leaflet mechanics and aortic sinus hemodynamics. Annals of biomedical engineering, 43:2231–2241, 2015.
  27. Diffusion probabilistic models beat gans on medical images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2212.07501, 2022.
  28. Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741, 2021.
  29. Creation and application of virtual patient cohorts of heart models. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 378(2173):20190558, 2020.
  30. Brain imaging generation with latent diffusion models. In Deep Generative Models: Second MICCAI Workshop, DGM4MICCAI 2022, Held in Conjunction with MICCAI 2022, Singapore, September 22, 2022, Proceedings, pages 117–126. Springer, 2022.
  31. Cheart: A conditional spatio-temporal generative model for cardiac anatomy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.13098, 2023.
  32. Feops heartguide patient-specific computational simulations for watchman flx left atrial appendage closure: a retrospective study. JACC: Advances, 1(5):100139, 2022.
  33. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 10684–10695, 2022.
  34. Clinically-driven virtual patient cohorts generation: An application to aorta. Frontiers in Physiology, page 1375, 2021.
  35. In silico comparison of left atrial ablation techniques that target the anatomical, structural, and electrical substrates of atrial fibrillation. Frontiers in physiology, 11:1145, 2020.
  36. Cardiovision: A fully automated deep learning package for medical image segmentation and reconstruction generating digital twins for patients with aortic stenosis. Computerized Medical Imaging and Graphics, page 102289, 2023.
  37. Multitask brain tumor inpainting with diffusion models: A methodological report. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.12113, 2022.
  38. Left ventricular trabeculations decrease the wall shear stress and increase the intra-ventricular pressure drop in cfd simulations. Frontiers in Physiology, 9:458, 2018.
  39. In-silico trial of intracranial flow diverters replicates and expands insights from conventional clinical trials. Nature communications, 12(1):3861, 2021.
  40. Estimated cost of developing a therapeutic complex medical device in the us. JAMA Network Open, 5(9):e2231609–e2231609, 2022.
  41. The impact of an atrial septal defect on hemodynamics in patients with heart failure. US Cardiol. Rev, 11:72, 2017.
  42. Fully automated construction of three-dimensional finite element simulations from optical coherence tomography. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 165:107341, 2023.
  43. Possible contexts of use for in silico trials methodologies: a consensus-based review. IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics, 25(10):3977–3982, 2021.
  44. Totalsegmentator: robust segmentation of 104 anatomical structures in ct images. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.05868, 2022.
  45. Aortic dissection is determined by specific shape and hemodynamic interactions. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 50(12):1771–1786, 2022.
  46. Arrhythmias and conduction disorders associated with atrial septal defects. Journal of Thoracic Disease, 10(Suppl 24):S2940, 2018.
Citations (2)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

  • The paper demonstrates how latent diffusion models achieve controllable anatomical variations on digital twins via perturbational and localized editing.
  • It reveals inherent biases towards common anatomies and potential topological violations when editing digital twins.
  • The study shows that these methods effectively enrich virtual cohorts, enhancing simulation accuracy for cardiovascular device trials.

Analyzing Diffusion Models for Anatomic Editing of Digital Twins

The paper titled "Probing the Limits and Capabilities of Diffusion Models for the Anatomic Editing of Digital Twins" embarks on a comprehensive exploration of the use of Latent Diffusion Models (LDMs) to craft anatomic variations from patient-specific computational models, termed digital twins. These digital twins, representing cardiovascular anatomies, are crucial in simulating device interventions, yet their fixed nature limits variety, a gap this research aims to bridge by developing an algorithmic approach to generate 'digital siblings' — anatomic variants.

Research Objectives and Methodologies

The central objective of this paper is twofold: firstly, to demonstrate how generative editing techniques, specifically LDMs, can introduce controlled morphological variations to digital twins, and secondly, to harness these techniques to enrich virtual cohorts for enhanced simulation accuracy. The diffusion models are applied to 3D cardiac label maps to generate digital siblings that display both scale-specific and region-specific variations. This editing is critical for in silico trials, which assess cardiovascular devices under various hypothetical anatomical conditions.

To achieve these objectives, the researchers employ an experimental framework that characterizes LDM's ability to perform perturbational and localized edits on digital twins. The perturbational editing introduces variation by perturbing the latent representations of anatomies, while localized editing allows for targeted region-specific changes by manipulating particular tissue labels. Both these methodologies are rigorously tested for their impact on morphological diversity and topological correctness, asserting their viability in digital twin augmentation.

Key Findings

The paper reports several critical insights:

  1. Morphological Fidelity and Topological Integrity: Through perturbational and localized editing, LDMs can effectively introduce anatomical variations at different spatial scales. However, these techniques can introduce biases towards common anatomical forms and may cause topological violations, which the authors quantify using specific metrics.
  2. Bias in Anatomical Space: The paper reveals a bias in generated anatomies towards more prevalent anatomical structures within the training dataset, highlighting a challenge in creating a diverse set of digital siblings.
  3. Cohort Augmentation: By employing selective editing strategies, such as perturbational and localized editing, the paper demonstrates potential in filling under-represented areas within anatomical distributions. This has practical implications for improving the balance and diversity of virtual anatomical cohorts used in simulations.
  4. Topological Limitations: The research cautions that generative edits can potentially produce topological defects in virtual anatomies, which pose challenges for numerical simulations of cardiovascular physics.

Implications and Future Prospects

The paper contributes significantly to the field of medical device simulation and virtual interventions. By potentially expanding the anatomical diversity that virtual cohorts can capture, this research lays the groundwork for more robust and comprehensive simulation studies that could de-risk medical device design processes and expedite clinical trials.

Looking towards the future, the research opens several avenues. Addressing the bias and improving the topological accuracy of generated anatomies remains crucial. Enhancements in LDM architecture, along with more refined training datasets, may help mitigate the current biases. Moreover, developing deterministic models to control the level of introduced noise could optimize anatomical fidelity.

In conclusion, while this research establishes foundational techniques for anatomical editing through diffusion models, it also emphasizes the continued need for innovation to overcome existing limitations. Such advancements are vital for enhancing the capabilities of digital twins in medical simulations, eventually translating into improved medical device efficacy and safety.

File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com PDF File Document Download Save Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Markdown
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets