Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Brain Imaging Generation with Latent Diffusion Models (2209.07162v1)

Published 15 Sep 2022 in eess.IV, cs.CV, and q-bio.QM

Abstract: Deep neural networks have brought remarkable breakthroughs in medical image analysis. However, due to their data-hungry nature, the modest dataset sizes in medical imaging projects might be hindering their full potential. Generating synthetic data provides a promising alternative, allowing to complement training datasets and conducting medical image research at a larger scale. Diffusion models recently have caught the attention of the computer vision community by producing photorealistic synthetic images. In this study, we explore using Latent Diffusion Models to generate synthetic images from high-resolution 3D brain images. We used T1w MRI images from the UK Biobank dataset (N=31,740) to train our models to learn about the probabilistic distribution of brain images, conditioned on covariables, such as age, sex, and brain structure volumes. We found that our models created realistic data, and we could use the conditioning variables to control the data generation effectively. Besides that, we created a synthetic dataset with 100,000 brain images and made it openly available to the scientific community.

Brain Imaging Generation with Latent Diffusion Models

The paper authored by Pinaya et al. presents a compelling exploration of synthetic brain imaging using Latent Diffusion Models (LDMs). Given the challenges of accessing sizable datasets in medical imaging due to privacy restrictions and acquisition costs, the authors propose the use of generative models to augment training datasets with synthetic data. Their work underscores the potential of LDMs to produce high-fidelity three-dimensional brain images conditioned on specific covariables, which is a significant consideration in medical image analysis.

Overview of Goals and Methods

The primary objective of the paper is to generate realistic high-resolution 3D brain images from T1w MRI studies, utilizing a large dataset from the UK Biobank comprising 31,740 instances. The authors employed Latent Diffusion Models, which leverage the concept of medial autoencoders for dimensionality reduction, combined with diffusion processes to gradually denoise samples back to realistic representations. Importantly, the model is conditioned on demographic and anatomical covariates such as age, sex, ventricular volume, and brain volume relative to intracranial volume. The synthetic dataset of 100,000 brain images generated as part of the paper has been made publicly available, providing a substantial resource for future research.

Experimentation and Results

The diffusion models utilized in this paper are reported to exhibit superior performance over GAN-based approaches in both unconditioned and conditioned scenarios. In particular, the paper emphasizes the enhanced stability and convergence capabilities of LDMs relative to GANs, which often suffer from mode collapse and instability during training.

In quantitative assessments, the fidelity of synthetic images was evaluated using the Fréchet Inception Distance (FID), and diversity was assessed using MS-SSIM and 4-G-R-SSIM metrics. Notably, the LDMs demonstrated the best FID score, indicative of their capability to mirror the distribution of genuine images closely. Furthermore, high correlation values between conditioned properties and actual measurements affirm the models' capacity to generate typically conditioned images, exemplifying practical effectiveness.

Conditioning and Extrapolation

One salient aspect of this paper is the demonstration of conditioned image synthesis. The authors successfully showed that LDMs could control brain image generation based on specified covariate inputs. This attribute was verified through conditions such as age and brain structure volumes, where the correlation between these input parameters and image content was quantifiably validated. Additionally, the models exhibited an intriguing robustness by extrapolating beyond the training data's input range, leading to synthetically anomalous structures such as enlarged ventricles, which further illustrates their conceptual understanding of conditioning variables.

Implications and Future Directions

The availability of a synthetic dataset offers an expansive potential for exploration in fields constrained by image data scarcity. The realism and diversity of images generated through LDMs can enhance machine learning model training, particularly in medical applications where privacy restrictions limit data sharing. Practically, this advancement may support ongoing developments in automated diagnosis and clinical decision-making systems, potentially accelerating their deployment into clinical environments.

The theoretical implications of this work also suggest fruitful avenues for further research. Future developments may explore conditioning on a broader set of clinical variables, such as multimodal imaging data or annotations from radiological reports, to further contextualize synthetic generation tasks. Additionally, examining alternative architectures or improving computational efficiency could extend the range of applications and enhance sampling speeds significantly.

In summary, the work of Pinaya et al. contributes meaningfully to the understanding and application of diffusion models in generating synthetic brain images. It presents a valuable intersection of neural imaging, machine learning, and data generation, supporting a broader impetus towards more accessible and scalable medical imaging research.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (8)
  1. Walter H. L. Pinaya (11 papers)
  2. Petru-Daniel Tudosiu (18 papers)
  3. Jessica Dafflon (9 papers)
  4. Virginia Fernandez (7 papers)
  5. Parashkev Nachev (50 papers)
  6. M. Jorge Cardoso (78 papers)
  7. Pedro F da Costa (5 papers)
  8. Sebastien Ourselin (178 papers)
Citations (226)