Semantic Computing for Organizational Effectiveness: From Organization Theory to Practice through Semantics-Based Modelling (2401.00062v1)
Abstract: A critical function of an organization is to foster the level of integration (coordination and cooperation) necessary to achieve its objectives. The need to coordinate and motivation to cooperate emerges from the myriad dependencies between an organization's members and their work. Therefore, to reason about solutions to coordination and cooperation problems requires a robust representation that includes the underlying dependencies. We find that such a representation remains missing from formal organizational models, and we leverage semantics to bridge this gap. Drawing on well-established organizational research and our extensive fieldwork with one of North America's largest municipalities, (1) we introduce an ontology, formalized in first-order logic, that operationalizes concepts like outcome, reward, and epistemic dependence, and their links to potential integration risks; and (2) present real-world applications of this ontology to analyze and support integration in complex government infrastructure projects. Our ontology is implemented and validated in both Z3 and OWL. Key features of our model include inferable dependencies, explainable coordination and cooperation risks, and actionable insights on how dependency structures within an organization can be altered to mitigate the risks. Conceptualizing real-world challenges like incentive misalignment, free-riding, and subgoal optimization in terms of dependency structures, our semantics-based approach represents a novel method for modelling and enhancing coordination and cooperation. Integrated within a decision-support system, our model may serve as an impactful aid for organizational design and effectiveness. More broadly, our approach underscores the transformative potential of semantics in deriving tangible, real-world value from existing organization theory.
- M. Raveendran, L. Silvestri, and R. Gulati, “The Role of Interdependence in the Micro-Foundations of Organization Design: Task, Goal, and Knowledge Interdependence,” Academy of Management Annals, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 828–868, Jul. 2020.
- P. R. Lawrence and J. W. Lorsch, “Differentiation and Integration in Complex Organizations,” Administrative Science Quarterly, vol. 12, no. 1, p. 1, Jun. 1967.
- R. Gulati, P. R. Lawrence, and P. Puranam, “Adaptation in vertical relationships: Beyond incentive conflict,” Strategic Management Journal, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 415–440, May 2005.
- T. Kretschmer and B. S. Vanneste, “Collaboration in strategic alliances: Cooperation and coordination,” in Collaborative Strategy, L. F. Mesquita, R. Ragozzino, and J. J. Reuer, Eds. Edward Elgar Publishing, Apr. 2017.
- B. Holmstrom and P. Milgrom, “The firm as an incentive system,” The American economic review, pp. 972–991, 1994.
- M. C. Jensen and W. H. Meckling, “Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 305–360, 1976.
- G. R. Jones, “Task Visibility, Free Riding, and Shirking: Explaining the Effect of Structure and Technology on Employee Behavior,” The Academy of Management Review, vol. 9, no. 4, p. 684, Oct. 1984.
- A. A. Alchian and H. Demsetz, “Production, information costs, and economic organization,” The American economic review, vol. 62, no. 5, pp. 777–795, 1972.
- P. Puranam, M. Raveendran, and T. Knudsen, “Organization Design: The Epistemic Interdependence Perspective,” Academy of Management Review, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 419–440, Jul. 2012.
- R. Wageman and G. Baker, “Incentives and cooperation: The joint effects of task and reward interdependence on group performance,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 18, no. 2, pp. 139–158, Mar. 1997.
- M. S. Fox and M. Gruninger, “Enterprise Modeling,” AI Magazine, vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 109–121, 1998.
- C. Menzel and R. J. Mayer, “The IDEF Family of Languages,” in Handbook on Architectures of Information Systems, P. Bernus, K. Mertins, and G. Schmidt, Eds. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 1998, pp. 215–249.
- M. Zelm, F. B. Vernadat, and K. Kosanke, “The cimosa business modelling process,” Computers in Industry, vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 123–142, 1995, validation of CIMOSA.
- M. S. Fox, J. F. Chionglo, and F. G. Fadel, “A Common-Sense Model of the Enterprise,” in Proceedings of Industrial Engineering Research Conference, 1993, pp. 179–194.
- M. Rizk, D. Rosu, and M. Fox, “Towards an ontology of task dependence in organizations,” in Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management - Volume 2: KEOD, 2023, pp. 96–107.
- F. Vernadat, “Enterprise modelling: Research review and outlook,” Computers in Industry, vol. 122, p. 103265, Nov. 2020.
- K. Crowston, “A taxonomy of organizational dependencies and coordination mechanisms,” Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Technical Report 174, 1994.
- B. Chandrasekaran, J. R. Josephson, and V. R. Benjamins, “The ontology of tasks and methods,” 1998.
- W. G. Ouchi, “A Conceptual Framework for the Design of Organizational Control Mechanisms,” Management Science, vol. 25, no. 9, pp. 833–848, Sep. 1979.
- K. M. Eisenhardt, “Control: Organizational and Economic Approaches,” Management Science, vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 134–149, Feb. 1985.
- G. A. Okhuysen and B. A. Bechky, “Coordination in Organizations: An Integrative Perspective,” Academy of Management Annals, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 463–502, Jan. 2009.
- J. H. Gittell, R. Seidner, and J. Wimbush, “A Relational Model of How High-Performance Work Systems Work,” Organization Science, vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 490–506, Apr. 2010.