Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 102 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 51 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s
GPT-5 High 27 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 110 tok/s
GPT OSS 120B 475 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 203 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

An integrated EOS, pore-crush, strength and damage model framework for near-field ground-shock (2312.12577v2)

Published 19 Dec 2023 in cs.CE

Abstract: An integrated Equation of State (EOS) and strength/pore-crush/damage model framework is provided for modeling near to source (near-field) ground-shock response, where large deformations and pressures necessitate coupling EOS with pressure-dependent plastic yield and damage. Nonlinear pressure-dependence of strength up to high-pressures is combined with a Modified Cam-Clay-like cap-plasticity model in a way to allow degradation of strength from pore-crush damage, what we call the "Yp-Cap" model. Nonlinear hardening under compaction allows modeling the crush-out of pores in combination with a fully saturated EOS, i.e., for modeling partially saturated ground-shock response, where air-filled voids crush. Attention is given to algorithmic clarity and efficiency of the provided model, and the model is employed in example numerical simulations, including finite element simulations of underground explosions to exemplify its robustness and utility.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (56)
  1. Abaqus, 2011. Abaqus Theory Manual. Dassault Systémes Simulia Corp. Providence.
  2. Theory, verification, and validation of the ARENA constitutive model. Technical Report PAR-10021867-1516.v1. Parresia Research Limited. doi:10.13140/RG.2.2.10671.53922.
  3. Hyper-elastoplastic/damage modeling of rock with application to porous limestone. International Journal of Solids and Structures .
  4. Finite strain elastoplasticity considering the Eshelby stress for materials undergoing plastic volume change. Int. J. Plasticity 77, 214 – 245.
  5. Anisotropic finite hyper-elastoplasticity of geomaterials with Drucker–Prager/Cap type constitutive model formulation. International Journal of Plasticity 123, 224–250.
  6. An energy approach to Modified Cam-Clay plasticity and damage modeling of cohesive soils. Acta Geotechnica , 1–13.
  7. On the mechanical energy and effective stress in saturated and unsaturated porous continua. International Journal of Solids and Structures 43, 1764–1786.
  8. Cam-clay plasticity, part 1: implicit integration of elasto-plastic constitutive relations. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 78, 49–72.
  9. Survey of four damage models for concrete. Sandia National Laboratories 32, 1–80.
  10. Multiscale plasticity of geomaterials predicted via constrained optimization-based granular micromechanics. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 46, 739–778.
  11. Technique for generating pressure-volume relationships and failure envelopes for rocks. Technical Report. Lawrence Livermore National Lab.(LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States).
  12. Static and dynamic pore-collapse relations for ductile porous materials. Journal of Applied Physics 43, 1626–1636.
  13. Equation of state: Manhattan project developments and beyond. Nuclear Technology 207, S286–S294.
  14. Discussion on the suitability of concrete constitutive models for high-rate response predictions of RC structures. International Journal of Impact Engineering 106, 202–216.
  15. Proceedings of the Symposium on the Non-Proliferation Experiment: Results and Implications for Test Ban Treaties, Rockville, Maryland, April 19-21, 1994. Technical Report. Lawrence Livermore National Lab.(LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States).
  16. Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design. Quarterly of applied mathematics 10, 157–165.
  17. Nonlinear analysis of stress and strain in soils. Journal of Soil Mechanics & Foundations Div .
  18. Shock wave profile study of tuff from the nevada test site. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 99, 15529–15537.
  19. Lagrangian-based simulations of hypervelocity impact experiments on mars regolith proxy. Geophysical Research Letters 47, e2020GL087393. E2020GL087393 10.1029/2020GL087393.
  20. Planar impact experiments for EOS measurements1, in: Numerical Modeling for Underground Nuclear Test Monitoring Symposium, p. 93.
  21. Recent advances in methods for measuring the dynamic response of geological materials to 100 GPa. International Journal of Impact Engineering 14, 267–277.
  22. New equations of state for saturated tuff based on the CHEST model, LA-UR-22-29891. Technical Report. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM.
  23. Shock-wave compression of brittle solids. Mechanics of Materials 29, 181–203.
  24. Computational modeling and wave propagation in media with inelastic deforming microstructure. Le Journal de Physique IV 10, Pr9–15.
  25. Strength effects of microfracture on granular microstructures evaluated by FDEM direct numerical simulation, in: ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, ARMA. pp. ARMA–2022.
  26. Modeling heterogeneity and permeability evolution in a compaction band using a phase-field approach. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids , 105441.
  27. A large deformation multiphase continuum mechanics model for shock loading of soft porous materials. International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering 125, e7411.
  28. Sesame table 7122 for saturated tuff (z=6.5302, a=12.7604).
  29. Effects of rock damage on seismic waves generated by explosions. Pure and applied geophysics 158, 1869–1908.
  30. Comparison of chemical and nuclear explosions: numerical simulations of the Non-Proliferation Experiment. Technical Report. Los Alamos National Lab.(LANL), Los Alamos, NM (United States).
  31. Dynamic response of dry and water-saturated sand systems. Journal of Applied Physics 122.
  32. Multilevel well modeling in aggregation-based nonlinear multigrid for multiphase flow in porous media. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.00125 .
  33. SESAME, the Los Alamos National Laboratory Equation of State Database, LA-UR-92-3407. Technical Report. Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL), Los Alamos, NM.
  34. A Micromechanical Model of Porous-Brittle Solids. Springer US, Boston, MA. pp. 329–333.
  35. The source physics experiments large N array. Seismological Research Letters 89, 1618–1628.
  36. Equation of state and Hugoniot locus for porous materials: P-α𝛼\alphaitalic_α model revisited, in: AIP conference proceedings, American Institute of Physics. pp. 129–132.
  37. Incrementally objective implicit integration of hypoelastic–viscoplastic constitutive equations based on the mechanical threshold strength model. Computational Mechanics 53, 941–955.
  38. An analytical expression for temperature in a thermodynamically consistent model with a mie-gruneisen equation for pressure. International Journal of Impact Engineering 143, 103612.
  39. Evidence of shock-compressed stishovite above 300 GPa. Scientific reports 10, 10197.
  40. A three-invariant smooth cap model with mixed hardening. International journal for numerical and analytical methods in geomechanics 18, 657–688.
  41. Thermoplasticity and strain localization in transversely isotropic materials based on anisotropic critical state plasticity. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 40, 2423–2449.
  42. Algorithms for static and dynamic multiplicative plasticity that preserve the classical return mapping schemes of the infinitesimal theory. Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering 99, 61–112.
  43. Probing the effect of material model and geometry assumptions on ground response in the simulation of underground explosions, in: ARMA US Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, ARMA. pp. ARMA–2022.
  44. Phenomenology and modeling of explosion-generated shear energy for the source physics experiments. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 106, 42–53.
  45. Determination of P–V equation of state of a natural clinoptilolite using high-pressure powder synchrotron X-ray diffraction. Physics and Chemistry of Minerals 49, 45.
  46. Analysis of burial depth criteria for containment. Technical Report. California Univ.
  47. Containment analysis for the simultaneous detonation of two nuclear explosives. Technical Report. California Univ.
  48. A model for impact-induced lineament formation and porosity growth on Eros. Icarus 266, 76–87.
  49. The non-linear field theories of mechanics. Springer.
  50. The classical field theories. Springer.
  51. Shock compressibility of condensed materials in strong shock waves generated by underground nuclear explosions. Physics-Uspekhi 37, 1123.
  52. Shock Phenomena in Granular and Porous Materials. Springer.
  53. Generic strength model for dry jointed rock masses. International Journal of Plasticity 24, 2221–2247.
  54. Geodyn Material Library: Pseudocap models for dry porous rocks. Technical Report. Lawrence Livermore National Lab.(LLNL), Livermore, CA (United States).
  55. Simulation of penetration into porous geologic media. International journal of impact engineering 34, 721–731.
  56. Analysis of damage mechanisms and optimization of cut blasting design under high in-situ stresses. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology 66, 19–33.
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

List Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Explore 10 Community Prompts
Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now