Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
143 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Low-rank constrained multichannel signal denoising considering channel-dependent sensitivity inspired by self-supervised learning for optical fiber sensing (2312.08660v2)

Published 14 Dec 2023 in cs.SD and eess.AS

Abstract: Optical fiber sensing is a technology wherein audio, vibrations, and temperature are detected using an optical fiber; especially the audio/vibrations-aware sensing is called distributed acoustic sensing (DAS). In DAS, observed data, which is comprised of multichannel data, has suffered from severe noise levels because of the optical noise or the installation methods. In conventional methods for denoising DAS data, signal-processing- or deep-neural-network (DNN)-based models have been studied. The signal-processing-based methods have the interpretability, i.e., non-black box. The DNN-based methods are good at flexibility designing network architectures and objective functions, that is, priors. However, there is no balance between the interpretability and the flexibility of priors in the DAS studies. The DNN-based methods also require a large amount of training data in general. To address the problems, we propose a DNN-structure signal-processing-based denoising method in this paper. As the priors of DAS, we employ spatial knowledge; low rank and channel-dependent sensitivity using the DNN-based structure. The result of fiber-acoustic sensing shows that the proposed method outperforms the conventional methods and the robustness to the number of the spatial ranks. Moreover, the optimized parameters of the proposed method indicate the relationship with the channel sensitivity; the interpretability.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (23)
  1. “Distributed fiber sensor network using telecom cables as sensing media: Applications,” Proc. Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC), pp. 1–3, 2021.
  2. “Distributed fiber sensor network using telecom cables as sensing media: technology advancements and applications,” Journal of Optical Communications and Networking (JOCN), vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 61–68, 2022.
  3. “Eavesdropping at the speed of light: Distributed acoustic sensing of baleen whales in the arctic,” Frontiers in Marine Science, vol. 9, pp. 1–13, 2022.
  4. “Dynamic structural health monitoring of a model wind turbine tower using distributed acoustic sensing (DAS),” Journal of Civil Structural Health Monitoring, vol. 11, pp. 833–849, 2021.
  5. “Distributed acoustic sensing a new tool for seismic applications,” First Break, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 61–69, 2014.
  6. “Optasense: Fibre optic distributed acoustic sensing for border monitoring,” Proc. european Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference, pp. 362–364, 2012.
  7. “Real-time low noise distributed acoustic sensing in 171km low loss fiber,” OSA Continuum, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 688–701, 2021.
  8. “Automatic fine-grained localization of utility pole landmarks on distributed acoustic sensing traces based on bilinear resnets,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 4675–4679, 2021.
  9. M. Bekara and M. Baan, “Local singular value decomposition for signal enhancement of seismic data,” GEOPHYSICS, vol. 72, no. 2, pp. 59–65, 2007.
  10. Y. Chen and J. Ma, “Random noise attenuation by f-x empiricalmode decomposition predictive filtering,” GEOPHYSICS, vol. 79, no. 3, pp. 81–91, 2014.
  11. “Data augmentation and its application in distributed acoustic sensing data denoising,” Geophysical Journal International, vol. 228, no. 1, pp. 119–133, 2021.
  12. Q. Feng and Y. Li, “Denoising deep learning network based on singular spectrum analysis―DAS seismic data denoising with multichannel svddcnn,” IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, vol. 60, pp. 1–11, 2022.
  13. “Denoising of distributed acoustic sensing data using supervised deep learning,” GEOPHYSICS, vol. 88, no. 1, pp. 91–104, 2023.
  14. “Characteristics and explanations of interference fading of a ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ -OTDR with a multi-frequency source,” Journal of Lightwave Technology, vol. 31, no. 17, pp. 2947–2954, 2013.
  15. “Deep image prior,” Proc. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 9446–9454, 2018.
  16. “Dynamic measurement based on the linear characteristic of phase change in ϕitalic-ϕ\phiitalic_ϕ-OTDR,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 31, no. 14, pp. 1191–1194, 2019.
  17. L. Tucker, “Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis,” Psychometrika, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 279–311, 1966.
  18. “Enhancement of speech corrupted by acoustic noise,” Proc. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pp. 208–211, 1979.
  19. X. Chen and K. He, “Exploring simple siamese representation learning,” Proc. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 15750–15758, 2021.
  20. “Compressive spectral image reconstruction using deep prior and low-rank tensor representation,” Applied Optics, vol. 60, no. 14, pp. 4197–4207, 2021.
  21. “On the importance of asymmetry for siamese representation learning,” Proc. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2022.
  22. J. Piczak, “ESC: Dataset for environmental sound classification,” Proc. the 23rd Annual ACM Conference on Multimedia (ACMM), pp. 1015–1018, 2015.
  23. D. Kingma and J. Ba, “Adam: A method for stochastic optimization,” Proc. International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2015.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.