Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

DAS-N2N: Machine learning Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) signal denoising without clean data (2304.08120v2)

Published 17 Apr 2023 in physics.geo-ph, cs.LG, cs.SD, and eess.AS

Abstract: This article presents a weakly supervised machine learning method, which we call DAS-N2N, for suppressing strong random noise in distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) recordings. DAS-N2N requires no manually produced labels (i.e., pre-determined examples of clean event signals or sections of noise) for training and aims to map random noise processes to a chosen summary statistic, such as the distribution mean, median or mode, whilst retaining the true underlying signal. This is achieved by splicing (joining together) two fibres hosted within a single optical cable, recording two noisy copies of the same underlying signal corrupted by different independent realizations of random observational noise. A deep learning model can then be trained using only these two noisy copies of the data to produce a near fully-denoised copy. Once the model is trained, only noisy data from a single fibre is required. Using a dataset from a DAS array deployed on the surface of the Rutford Ice Stream in Antarctica, we demonstrate that DAS-N2N greatly suppresses incoherent noise and enhances the signal-to-noise ratios (SNR) of natural microseismic icequake events. We further show that this approach is inherently more efficient and effective than standard stop/pass band and white noise (e.g., Wiener) filtering routines, as well as a comparable self-supervised learning method based on masking individual DAS channels. Our preferred model for this task is lightweight, processing 30 seconds of data recorded at a sampling frequency of 1000 Hz over 985 channels (approx. 1 km of fiber) in $<$1 s. Due to the high noise levels in DAS recordings, efficient data-driven denoising methods, such as DAS-N2N, will prove essential to time-critical DAS earthquake detection, particularly in the case of microseismic monitoring.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (66)
  1. TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Systems, Software available from tensorflow.org.
  2. Distributed Acoustic Sensing Using Dark Fiber for Near-Surface Characterization and Broadband Seismic Event Detection, Scientific Reports, 9(1), 1–14, 10.1038/s41598-018-36675-8.
  3. 3-D seismic data acquisition and processing, p. 17–56, Cambridge University Press, 10.1017/CBO9780511802416.003.
  4. Research Note: Signal-to-noise ratio computation for challenging land single-sensor seismic data, Geophysical Prospecting, 70(3), 629–638, 10.1111/1365-2478.13178.
  5. Noise2Self: Blind Denoising by Self-Supervision, Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, PMLR 97, 524–533.
  6. ObsPy: A python toolbox for seismology, Seismological Research Letters, 81(3), 530–533, 10.1785/gssrl.81.3.530.
  7. Transfer learning for self-supervised, blind-spot seismic denoising, Frontiers in Earth Science, 10, 10.3389/feart.2022.1053279.
  8. The potential of self-supervised networks for random noise suppression in seismic data, Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences, 2, 47–59, 10.1016/j.aiig.2021.11.001.
  9. Are deep-ocean-generated surface-wave microseisms observed on land?, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 118(7), 3610–3629, 10.1002/jgrb.50268.
  10. Radon transform-based detection of microseismicity on DAS networks: A case study from Antarctica, EAGE GeoTech 2021 Second EAGE Workshop on Distributed Fibre Optic Sensing, p. 1–4, 10.3997/2214-4609.202131039.
  11. Improved Noise2Noise denoising with limited data, IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Workshops, p. 796–805, 10.1109/CVPRW53098.2021.00089.
  12. Denoising of Distributed Acoustic Sensing Seismic Data Using an Integrated Framework, Seismological Research Letters, 94(1), 457–472, 10.1785/0220220117.
  13. The effect of gauge length on axially incident P-waves measured using fibre optic distributed vibration sensing, Geophysical Prospecting, 65(1), 184–193, 10.1111/1365-2478.12419.
  14. Distributed Acoustic Sensing for Seismic Monitoring of the Near Surface: A Traffic-Noise Interferometry Case Study, Scientific Reports, 7(1), 10.1038/s41598-017-11986-4.
  15. Can DAS be used to monitor mining induced seismicity?, International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 155(May), 105127, 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105127.
  16. Slowness adaptive f-k filtering of prestack seismic data, Geophysics, 59(1), 140–147, 10.1190/1.1443525.
  17. Neural Architecture Search: A Survey, Journal of Machine Learning Research, 20(55), 1–21.
  18. Self-Supervised Representation Learning: Introduction, advances, and challenges, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 39(3), 42–62, 10.1109/MSP.2021.3134634.
  19. Understanding the difficulty of training deep feedforward neural networks, in Proceedings of the Thirteenth International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, vol. 9 of Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, pp. 249–256, PMLR, Chia Laguna Resort, Sardinia, Italy.
  20. An Introduction to Distributed Optical Fibre Sensors, CRC Press, 10.1201/9781315119014.
  21. Vertical seismic optical profiling on wireline logging cable, Geophysical Prospecting, 62(4), 693–701, 10.1111/1365-2478.12141.
  22. Routine Data Processing in Earthquake Seismology, Springer, 10.1073/pnas.0703993104.
  23. Rutford Ice Stream Distributed Acoustic Sensing Dataset associated with the publication: Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) for natural microseismicity studies: A case study from Antarctica, 10.5281/zenodo.4778368.
  24. Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) for Natural Microseismicity Studies: A Case Study From Antarctica, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 126(7), 1–19, 10.1029/2020JB021493.
  25. Automated Machine Learning, The Springer Series on Challenges in Machine Learning, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 10.1007/978-3-030-05318-5.
  26. De-noising distributed acoustic sensing data using an adaptive frequency-wavenumber filter, Geophysical Journal International, 231(2), 944–949, 10.1093/gji/ggac229.
  27. Adaptive filtering of random noise in near-surface seismic and ground-penetrating radar data, Journal of Applied Geophysics, 68(1), 36–46, 10.1016/j.jappgeo.2008.08.013.
  28. Fibre optic distributed acoustic sensing of volcanic events, Nature Communications, 13(1), 10.1038/s41467-022-29184-w.
  29. The seismic wavefield as seen by distributed acoustic sensing arrays: Local, regional and teleseismic sources, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 478(2258), 10.1098/rspa.2021.0812.
  30. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization, in 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), p. 1–15.
  31. Leveraging deep learning for seismic image denoising, First Break, 38(7), 41–48, 10.3997/1365-2397.fb2020048.
  32. The fine structure of souble-frecuency microseisms recorded by seismometers in North America, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 120, 1677–1691, 10.1002/2014JB011820.Received.
  33. ObsPy: A bridge for seismology into the scientific Python ecosystem, Computational Science and Discovery, 8, 014003, 10.1088/1749-4699/8/1/014003.
  34. Noise2Void - Learning Denoising from Single Noisy Images, 10.48550/arXiv.1811.10980.
  35. An examination of the continuous wavelet transform for volcano-seismic spectral analysis, Journal of Volcanology and Geothermal Research, 389, 106728, 10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2019.106728.
  36. Data, model and code to accompany paper ”DAS-N2N: Machine learning Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) signal denoising without clean data”, 10.5281/zenodo.7825684.
  37. Noise2Noise: Learning image restoration without clean data, 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, ICML 2018, 7(3), 4620–4631, 10.48550/arXiv.1803.04189.
  38. Deep learning-based noise reduction for seismic data, Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1861(1), 012011, 10.1088/1742-6596/1861/1/012011.
  39. Illuminating seafloor faults and ocean dynamics with dark fiber distributed acoustic sensing, Science, 366(6469), 1103–1107, 10.1126/science.aay5881.
  40. On the Broadband Instrument Response of Fiber-Optic DAS Arrays, Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 125(2), 1–16, 10.1029/2019JB018145.
  41. Unsupervised Deep Learning for Random Noise Attenuation of Seismic Data, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 19, 1–5, 10.1109/LGRS.2021.3057631.
  42. ObsPy - what can it do for data centers and observatories?, Annals of Geophysics, 54(1), 47–58, 10.4401/ag-4838.
  43. Advanced Digital Signal Processing of Seismic Data, Cambridge University Press, 10.1017/9781139626286.
  44. Distributed acoustic sensing using dark fiber for array detection of regional earthquakes, Seismological Research Letters, 92(4), 2441–2452, 10.1785/0220200416.
  45. Semblance and other coherency measures for multichannel data, Geophysics, 36(3), 482–497, 10.1190/1.1440186.
  46. Recorrupted-to-Recorrupted: Unsupervised Deep Learning for Image Denoising, Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), p. 2043–2052.
  47. Distributed Acoustic Sensing - A new tool for seismic applications, First Break, 32(2), 61–69, 10.3997/1365-2397.2013034.
  48. Digital Signal Processing: Principles, Algoritms and Applications (Third Edition), Prentice-Hall, Inc., USA.
  49. U-Net: Convolutional Networks for Biomedical Image Segmentation, vol. 9351 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, p. 234–241, Springer International Publishing, Cham, 10.48550/arXiv.1505.04597.
  50. Of Poles and Zeros, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2nd edn., 10.1007/978-1-4020-6861-4.
  51. Performance of Seismic Observation by Distributed Acoustic Sensing Technology Using a Seafloor Cable Off Sanriku, Japan, Frontiers in Marine Science, 9(April), 1–13, 10.3389/fmars.2022.844506.
  52. Deep Learning Denoising Applied to Regional Distance Seismic Data in Utah, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America, 111(2), 775–790, 10.1785/0120200292.
  53. A Self-Supervised Deep Learning Approach for Blind Denoising and Waveform Coherence Enhancement in Distributed Acoustic Sensing Data, IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, p. 1–14, 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3132832.
  54. Deep Deconvolution for Traffic Analysis With Distributed Acoustic Sensing Data, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 24(3), 2947–2962, 10.1109/TITS.2022.3223084.
  55. A survey on semi-supervised learning, Machine Learning, 109(2), 373–440, 10.1007/s10994-019-05855-6.
  56. SciPy 1.0: fundamental algorithms for scientific computing in Python, Nature Methods, 17(3), 261–272, 10.1038/s41592-019-0686-2.
  57. Distributed acoustic sensing of microseismic sources and wave propagation in glaciated terrain, Nature Communications, 11(1), 10.1038/s41467-020-15824-6.
  58. Neural Architecture Search: Insights from 1000 Papers, 10.48550/arXiv.2301.08727.
  59. Wilcock & OOI, 2023. Rapid: A Community Test of Distributed Acoustic Sensing on the Ocean Observatories Initiative Regional Cabled Array [Data set]. Ocean Observatories Initiative., 10.58046/5J60-FJ89.
  60. Distributed acoustic sensing recordings of low-frequency whale calls and ship noise offshore Central Oregon, JASA Express Letters, 3(2), 026002, 10.1121/10.0017104.
  61. Applying Conventional Filtering and Picking Approaches to DAS Microseismic Data, First EAGE Workshop on Fibre Optic Sensing, 2020, 1–5, 10.3997/2214-4609.202030011.
  62. Toward improved urban earthquake monitoring through deep-learning-based noise suppression, Science Advances, 8(15), 3564, 10.1126/sciadv.abl3564.
  63. Seismic Noise Interferometry and Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS): Inverting for the Firn Layer S-Velocity Structure on Rutford Ice Stream, Antarctica, Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 127(12), 10.1029/2022JF006917.
  64. A brief introduction to weakly supervised learning, National Science Review, 5(1), 44–53, 10.1093/nsr/nwx106.
  65. To prune, or not to prune: exploring the efficacy of pruning for model compression, 10.48550/arXiv.1710.01878.
  66. Seismic Signal Denoising and Decomposition Using Deep Neural Networks, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 57(11), 9476–9488, 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2926772.
Citations (10)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.