Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 84 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 37 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 86 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 468 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 229 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Lagrangian Liouville models of multiphase flows with randomly forced inertial particles (2312.07713v2)

Published 12 Dec 2023 in physics.flu-dyn, math-ph, and math.MP

Abstract: Eulerian-Lagrangian models of particle-laden (multiphase) flows describe fluid flow and particle dynamics in the Eulerian and Lagrangian frameworks respectively. Regardless of whether the flow is turbulent or laminar, the particle dynamics is stochastic because the suspended particles are subjected to random forces. We use a polynomial chaos expansion (PCE), rather than a postulated constitutive law, to capture structural and parametric uncertainties in the particles' forcing. The stochastic particle dynamics is described by a joint probability density function (PDF) of a particle's position and velocity and random coefficients in the PCE. We deploy the method of distributions (MoD) to derive a deterministic (Liouville-type) partial-differential equation for this PDF. We reformulate this PDF equation in a Lagrangian form, obtaining PDF flow maps and tracing events and their probability in the phase space. That is accomplished via a new high-order spectral scheme, which traces, marginalizes and computes moments of the high-dimensional joint PDF and comports with high-order carrier-phase solvers. Our approach has lower computational cost than either high-order Eulerian solvers or Monte Carlo methods, is not subjected to a CFL condition, does not suffer from Gibbs oscillations and does not require (order-reducing) filtering and regularization techniques. These features are demonstrated on several test cases.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (89)
  1. Drag law for monodisperse gas–solid systems using particle-resolved direct numerical simulation of flow past fixed assemblies of spheres. International journal of multiphase flow, 37(9):1072–1092, 2011.
  2. Particle-resolved simulation of freely evolving particle suspensions: Flow physics and modeling. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 135:103533, 2021.
  3. A hybrid immersed boundary method for dense particle-laden flows. Computers & Fluids, 259:105892, 2023a.
  4. On the clustering of low-aspect-ratio oblate spheroids settling in ambient fluid. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 963:A1, 2023.
  5. P. G. Saffman. On the settling speed of free and fixed suspensions. Studies in Applied Mathematics, 52(2):115–127, 1973.
  6. The particle-source-in cell (PSI-CELL) model for gas-droplet flows. Journal of Fluids Engineering-transactions of The Asme, 99:325–332, 1977.
  7. F. Mashayek. Droplet–turbulence interactions in low-mach-number homogeneous shear two-phase flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 367:163–203, 1998.
  8. S. Elghobashi. Direct numerical simulation of turbulent flows laden with droplets or bubbles. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 51:217–244, 2019.
  9. F. Mashayek and R. V. R. Pandya. Analytical description of particle/droplet-laden turbulent flows. Progress in energy and combustion science, 29(4):329–378, 2003.
  10. Equation of motion for a small rigid sphere in a nonuniform flow. The Physics of Fluids, 26(4):883–889, 1983.
  11. R. Gatignol. The Faxén formulae for a rigid particle in an unsteady non-uniform Stokes flow. J. Méc Théor. Appl., 2(2):143–160, 1983.
  12. L. Brandt and F. Coletti. Particle-laden turbulence: Progress and perspectives. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 54:159–189, 2022.
  13. Stochastic Lagrangian model for hydrodynamic acceleration of inertial particles in gas–solid suspensions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 788:695–729, 2016.
  14. M. Mehrabadi and S. Subramaniam. Mechanism of kinetic energy transfer in homogeneous bidisperse gas-solid flow and its implications for segregation. Physics of Fluids, 29(2):020714, 2017.
  15. Micro/meso simulation of a fluidized bed in a homogeneous bubbling regime. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 92:93–111, 2017.
  16. Pairwise interaction extended point-particle model for a random array of monodisperse spheres. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 813:882–928, 2017a.
  17. Pairwise-interaction extended point-particle model for particle-laden flows. Journal of Computational Physics, 351:329–357, 2017b.
  18. A hybrid point–particle force model that combines physical and data–driven approaches. Journal of Computational Physics, 385:187–208, 2019.
  19. Toward particle-resolved accuracy in Euler–Lagrange simulations of multiphase flow using machine learning and pairwise interaction extended point-particle (PIEP) approximation. Theoretical and Computational Fluid Dynamics, 34(4):401–428, 2020.
  20. A. Seyed-Ahmadi and A. Wachs. Microstructure-informed probability-driven point-particle model for hydrodynamic forces and torques in particle-laden flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 900, 2020.
  21. A. Seyed-Ahmadi and A. Wachs. Physics–inspired architecture for neural network modeling of forces and torques in particle–laden flows. Computers & Fluids, 238:105379, 2022.
  22. L. T. Zhu and A. Wachs. Interpolation of probability–driven model to predict hydrodynamic forces and torques in particle–laden flows. AIChE Journal, page e18209, 2023.
  23. Two-way coupled cloud-in-cell modeling of non-isothermal particle-laden flows: A subgrid particle-averaged Reynolds stress-equivalent (SPARSE) formulation. Journal of Computational Physics, 390:595–618, 2019.
  24. Shock wave interaction with a cloud of particles. Shock Waves, 7(5):275–285, 1997.
  25. G Akiki and S Balachandar. Shear-induced lift force on spheres in a viscous linear shear flow at finite volume fractions. Physics of Fluids, 32(11):113306, 2020.
  26. Drag and lift forces acting on linear and irregular agglomerates formed by spherical particles. Physics of Fluids, 34(2):023307, 2022.
  27. Comprehensive quasi-steady force correlations for compressible flow through random particle suspensions. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, page 104485, 2023.
  28. E. Loth. Drag of non-spherical solid particles of regular and irregular shape. Powder Technology, 182(3):342–353, 2008.
  29. Drag, lift and torque correlations for axi-symmetric non-spherical particles in locally non-uniform flows. arXiv preprint arXiv:2304.10357, 2023b.
  30. Steady three–dimensional unbounded flow past an obstacle continuously deviating from a sphere to a cube. Physics of Fluids, 35(1):013343, 2023.
  31. Adjoint-based particle forcing reconstruction and uncertainty quantification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.10849, 2022.
  32. B Siddani and S Balachandar. Point-particle drag, lift, and torque closure models using machine learning: Hierarchical approach and interpretability. Physical Review Fluids, 8(1):014303, 2023.
  33. Uncertainty quantification in Eulerian–Lagrangian simulations of (point-) particle-laden flows with data-driven and empirical forcing models. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 121:103114, 2019.
  34. Lagrangian models of particle-laden flows with stochastic forcing: Monte Carlo, moment equations, and method of distributions analyses. Physics of Fluids, 33(3):033326, 2021.
  35. S. Tenneti and S. Subramaniam. Particle–resolved direct numerical simulation for gas-solid flow model development. Annual review of fluid mechanics, 46:199–230, 2014.
  36. A direct comparison of particle–resolved and point–particle methods in decaying turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 850:336–369, 2018.
  37. A volume-filtered description of compressible particle-laden flows. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 122:103138, 2020.
  38. J. Capecelatro and O. Desjardins. Volume-filtered Euler-Lagrange method for strongly coupled fluid-particle flows. In Modeling Approaches and Computational Methods for Particle-Laden Turbulent Flows, pages 383–417. Elsevier, 2023.
  39. An eulerian model for particles nonisothermally carried by a compressible fluid. International Journal of Heat and Mass Transfer, 65:845–854, 2013.
  40. Z. Gao and F. Mashayek. Stochastic modeling of evaporating droplets polydispered in turbulent flows. International journal of heat and mass transfer, 47(19-20):4339–4348, 2004a.
  41. Z. Gao and F. Mashayek. Stochastic model for nonisothermal droplet-laden turbulent flows. AIAA journal, 42(2):255–260, 2004b.
  42. Z. Gao and F. Mashayek. A stochastic model for gravity effects in particle-laden turbulent flows. J. Fluids Eng., 126(4):620–625, 2004c.
  43. B. Shotorban and F. Mashayek. Modeling subgrid–scale effects on particles by approximate deconvolution. Physics of Fluids, 17(8):081701, 2005.
  44. B. Shotorban and F. Mashayek. A stochastic model for particle motion in large-eddy simulation. Journal of Turbulence, 7:N18, 2006a.
  45. B. Shotorban and F. Mashayek. On stochastic modeling of heavy particle dispersion in large-eddy simulation of two-phase turbulent flow. In IUTAM Symposium on Computational Approaches to Multiphase Flow: Proceedings of an IUTAM Symposium held at Argonne National Laboratory, October 4–7, 2004, pages 373–380. Springer, 2006b.
  46. Spectral–based simulations of particle–laden turbulent flows. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 35(9):811–826, 2009.
  47. Pseudo-turbulent gas-phase velocity fluctuations in homogeneous gas–solid flow: fixed particle assemblies and freely evolving suspensions. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 770:210–246, 2015.
  48. SPARSE – A subgrid particle averaged Reynolds stress equivalent model: testing with a priori closure. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 473(2199):20160769, 2017.
  49. Closed SPARSE—A predictive particle cloud tracer. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 161:104375, 2023.
  50. D. Domínguez-Vázquez and G. B. Jacobs. SPARSE–R: A point-cloud tracer with random forcing. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 170:104653, 2024. ISSN 0301-9322. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2023.104653.
  51. A stochastic model for solid particle dispersion in a nonhomogeneous turbulent field. International journal of multiphase flow, 29(3):375–394, 2003.
  52. J. Pozorski and S. V. Apte. Filtered particle tracking in isotropic turbulence and stochastic modeling of subgrid-scale dispersion. International Journal of Multiphase Flow, 35(2):118–128, 2009.
  53. M. G. Pai and S. Subramaniam. Two-way coupled stochastic model for dispersion of inertial particles in turbulence. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 700:29–62, 2012.
  54. Stochastic models for capturing dispersion in particle-laden flows. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 903, 2020.
  55. Stochastic model for the hydrodynamic force in Euler–Lagrange simulations of particle–laden flows. Physical Review Fluids, 7(1):014301, 2022a.
  56. Fluid-mediated sources of granular temperature at finite Reynolds numbers. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 942:A7, 2022b.
  57. M. W. Reeks. The Development and Application of a Kinetic Theory for Modeling Dispersed Particle Flows. Journal of Fluids Engineering, 143(8), 2021.
  58. Probability density function method for Langevin equations with colored noise. Phys. Rev. Lett., 110(14):140602, 2013. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.140602.
  59. M. Delgado. Classroom note: The Lagrange-Charpit method. SIAM Review, 39(2):298–304, 1997.
  60. H. Miyagi and T. Taniguchi. Application of the lagrange-charpit method to analyse the power system’s stability. International Journal of Control, 32(2):371–379, 1980.
  61. H. Miyagi and T. Taniguchi. Lagrange-Charpit method and stability problem of power systems. IEEE Proceedings D (Control Theory and Applications), 128(3):117–122, 1981.
  62. A. Halder and R. Bhattacharya. Dispersion analysis in hypersonic flight during planetary entry using stochastic Liouville equation. Journal of Guidance, Control, and Dynamics, 34(2):459–474, 2011.
  63. B. Kruglikov and V. Lychagin. A compatibility criterion for systems of PDEs and generalized Lagrange-Charpit method. AIP Conference Proceedings, 729(1):39–53, 2004.
  64. K. Kanazawa and D. Sornette. Field master equation theory of the self–excited hawkes process. Physical Review Research, 2(3):033442, 2020.
  65. V. G. Rau and N. Krishnamoorthy. Construction of improved Lyapunov functions and extension of transient stability regions for power systems. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 11(1):65–69, 1989.
  66. Classical trajectories: A powerful tool for solving tunneling problems. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 391(1-2):78–81, 2012.
  67. Method of distributions for systems with stochastic forcing. International Journal for Uncertainty Quantification, 11(2), 2021.
  68. Method of distributions for uncertainty quantification. In R. Ghanem, D. Higdon, and H. Owhadi, editors, Handbook of Uncertainty Quantification. Springer, Cham., 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-11259-6_27-1.
  69. Computation of Forward–Time Finite–Time Lyapunov Exponents Using Discontinuous–Galerkin Spectral Element Methods. In ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, volume 56444, page V015T16A015. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2013.
  70. DG–FTLE: Lagrangian coherent structures with high–order discontinuous–Galerkin methods. Journal of Computational Physics, 295:65–86, 2015.
  71. Autonomous learning of nonlocal stochastic neuron dynamics. J. Cogn. Neurodyn., 16:683–705, 2022. doi: 10.1007/s11571-021-09731-9.
  72. Preferential concentration of particles by turbulence. Physics of Fluids A: Fluid Dynamics, 3(5):1169–1178, 1991.
  73. Lagrangian coherent structures and inertial particle dynamics. Physical Review E, 93(3):033108, 2016.
  74. S. Gottlieb and C. W. Shu. Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes. Mathematics of Computation, 67(221):73–85, 1998.
  75. High–order visualization of three–dimensional lagrangian coherent structures with DG–FTLE. Computers & Fluids, 139:197–215, 2016.
  76. K. Hiemenz. Die Grenzschicht an einem in den gleichformigen Flussigkeitsstrom eingetauchten geraden Kreiszylinder. Dinglers Polytech. J., 326:321–324, 1911.
  77. P. D. Hill. Kernel estimation of a distribution function. Communications in Statistics-Theory and Methods, 14(3):605–620, 1985.
  78. A. W. Bowman and A. Azzalini. Applied smoothing techniques for data analysis: the kernel approach with S-Plus illustrations, volume 18. OUP Oxford, 1997.
  79. The exponentially convergent trapezoidal rule. SIAM Review, 56(3):385–458, 2014.
  80. Regularization of singularities in the weighted summation of Dirac–delta functions for the spectral solution of hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Scientific Computing, 72(3):1080–1092, 2017.
  81. A high–order Dirac–delta regularization with optimal scaling in the spectral solution of one–dimensional singular hyperbolic conservation laws. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 36(4):A1831–A1849, 2014.
  82. S. B. Pope. PDF methods for turbulent reactive flows. Progress in energy and combustion science, 11(2):119–192, 1985.
  83. Application of scattering chaos to particle transport in a hydrodynamical flow. Chaos: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Nonlinear Science, 3(4):555–568, 1993.
  84. G. Haller and T. Sapsis. Where do inertial particles go in fluid flows? Physica D: Nonlinear Phenomena, 237(5):573–583, 2008.
  85. T. Sapsis and G. Haller. Instabilities in the dynamics of neutrally buoyant particles. Physics of fluids, 20(1), 2008.
  86. G. Haller and T. Sapsis. Localized instability and attraction along invariant manifolds. SIAM Journal on Applied Dynamical Systems, 9(2):611–633, 2010.
  87. Exact theory of material spike formation in flow separation. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 845:51–92, 2018.
  88. H. O’hara and F. J. Smith. Error estimation in the Clenshaw–Curtis quadrature formula. The Computer Journal, 11(2):213–219, 1968.
  89. L. N. Trefethen. Is Gauss quadrature better than Clenshaw–Curtis? SIAM review, 50(1):67–87, 2008.
Citations (1)
View on Semantic Scholar
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

List Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Explore 10 Community Prompts
Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now
X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

Explore Trending Papers

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube