Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Wiener Chaos in Kernel Regression: Towards Untangling Aleatoric and Epistemic Uncertainty (2312.07387v2)

Published 12 Dec 2023 in stat.ML, cs.SY, eess.SY, and math.OC

Abstract: Gaussian Processes (GPs) are a versatile method that enables different approaches towards learning for dynamics and control. Gaussianity assumptions appear in two dimensions in GPs: The positive semi-definite kernel of the underlying reproducing kernel Hilbert space is used to construct the co-variance of a Gaussian distribution over functions, while measurement noise (i.e. data corruption) is usually modeled as i.i.d. additive Gaussians. In this note, we generalize the setting and consider kernel ridge regression with additive i.i.d. non-Gaussian measurement noise. To apply the usual kernel trick, we rely on the representation of the uncertainty via polynomial chaos expansions, which are series expansions for random variables of finite variance introduced by Norbert Wiener. We derive and discuss the analytic $\mathcal{L}2$ solution to the arising Wiener kernel regression. Considering a polynomial dynamic system as a numerical example, we show that our approach allows us to distinguish the uncertainty that stems from the noise in the data samples from the total uncertainty encoded in the GP posterior distribution.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (32)
  1. On transient dynamics, off-equilibrium behaviour and identification in blended multiple model structures. In 1999 European Control Conference (ECC), pages 3569–3574. IEEE, 1999.
  2. Predictive control with gaussian process models. In The IEEE Region 8 EUROCON 2003. Computer as a Tool., volume 1, pages 352–356. IEEE, 2003.
  3. M.P. Deisenroth. Efficient reinforcement learning using Gaussian processes, volume 9. KIT Scientific Publishing, 2010.
  4. Gaussian Processes for Machine Learning. Adaptive computation and machine learning. The MIT Press, 2006.
  5. Gaussian processes for data-efficient learning in robotics and control. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 37(2):408–423, 2013.
  6. F. Berkenkamp and A. Schoellig. Safe and robust learning control with Gaussian processes. In 2015 European Control Conference (ECC), pages 2496–2501. IEEE, 2015.
  7. Cautious model predictive control using gaussian process regression. IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology, 28(6):2736–2743, 2019.
  8. Y. Heo and V. Zavala. Gaussian process modeling for measurement and verification of building energy savings. Energy and Buildings, 53:7–18, 2012.
  9. Probabilistic forecasting of electricity consumption, photovoltaic power generation and net demand of an individual building using Gaussian processes. Applied Energy, 213:195–207, 2018.
  10. All you need to know about model predictive control for buildings. Annual Reviews in Control, 50:190–232, 2020.
  11. Wind power forecasts using Gaussian processes and numerical weather prediction. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 29(2):656–665, 2013.
  12. Gaussian processes and kernel methods: A review on connections and equivalences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.02582, 2018.
  13. T. Kailath. RKHS approach to detection and estimation problems–I: Deterministic signals in Gaussian noise. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 17(5):530–549, 1971.
  14. N. Wiener. The homogeneous chaos. American Journal of Mathematics, pages 897–936, 1938.
  15. On a stochastic fundamental lemma and its use for data-driven optimal control. IEEE Trans. Automat. Contr., 68:5922 – 5937, 2023.
  16. Behavioral theory for stochastic systems? A data-driven journey from Willems to Wiener and back again. Annual Reviews in Control, 55:92–117, 2023.
  17. Gaussian processes and polynomial chaos expansion for regression problem: linkage via the RKHS and comparison via the KL divergence. Entropy, 20(3):191, 2018.
  18. Metamodel-based sensitivity analysis: polynomial chaos expansions and Gaussian processes. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.04273, 2016.
  19. Data-driven polynomial chaos expansion for machine learning regression. Journal of Computational Physics, 388:601–623, 2019.
  20. G.S. Kimeldorf and G. Wahba. A correspondence between Bayesian estimation on stochastic processes and smoothing by splines. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 41(2):495–502, 1970.
  21. A generalized representer theorem. In International conference on computational learning theory, pages 416–426. Springer, 2001.
  22. T.J. Sullivan. Introduction to Uncertainty Quantification, volume 63. Springer, 2015.
  23. Wiener’s polynomial chaos for the analysis and control of nonlinear dynamical systems with probabilistic uncertainties. IEEE Control Systems, 33(5):58–67, 2013.
  24. Stochastic nonlinear model predictive control with probabilistic constraints. In 2014 American Control Conference, pages 2413–2419. IEEE, 2014.
  25. Fast stochastic model predictive control of high-dimensional systems. In 53rd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pages 2802–2809. IEEE, 2014.
  26. D. Xiu and G.E. M. Karniadakis. The Wiener-Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 24(2):619–644, 2002.
  27. Comments on quantifying truncation errors for polynomial chaos expansions. IEEE Control Systems Letters, 2(1):169–174, January 2018.
  28. Chance-constrained optimal power flow: Risk-aware network control under uncertainty. SIAM Review, 56(3):461–495, 2014.
  29. E. Hüllermeier and W. Waegeman. Aleatoric and epistemic uncertainty in machine learning: An introduction to concepts and methods. Machine Learning, 110(3):457–506, 2021.
  30. Real-time uncertainty decomposition for online learning control, 2020. preprint arXiv:2010.02613.
  31. Posterior variance analysis of gaussian processes with application to average learning curves. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.01404, 2019.
  32. T. Beckers and S. Hirche. Equilibrium distributions and stability analysis of Gaussian Process State Space Models. In 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC). IEEE, 2016.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets