Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 45 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 11 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 88 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 214 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 460 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Quantum Picturalism: Learning Quantum Theory in High School (2312.03653v1)

Published 6 Dec 2023 in physics.ed-ph and quant-ph

Abstract: Quantum theory is often regarded as challenging to learn and teach, with advanced mathematical prerequisites ranging from complex numbers and probability theory to matrix multiplication, vector space algebra and symbolic manipulation within the Hilbert space formalism. It is traditionally considered an advanced undergraduate or graduate-level subject. In this work, we challenge the conventional view by proposing "Quantum Picturalism" as a new approach to teaching the fundamental concepts of quantum theory and computation. We establish the foundations and methodology for an ongoing educational experiment to investigate the question "From what age can students learn quantum theory if taught using a diagrammatic approach?". We anticipate that the primary benefit of leveraging such a diagrammatic approach, which is conceptually intuitive yet mathematically rigorous, will be eliminating some of the most daunting barriers to teaching and learning this subject while enabling young learners to reason proficiently about high-level problems. We posit that transitioning from symbolic presentations to pictorial ones will increase the appeal of STEM education, attracting more diverse audience.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (85)
  1. E. Marshman and C. Singh, “Student difficulties with representations of quantum operators corresponding to observables,” in 2016 Physics Education Research Conference Proceedings.   American Association of Physics Teachers, dec 2016.
  2. H. Stadermann, E. van den Berg, and M. Goedhart, “Analysis of secondary school quantum physics curricula of 15 different countries: Different perspectives on a challenging topic,” Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 010130, 2019.
  3. M. Michelini, R. Ragazzon, L. Santi, and A. Stefanel, “Proposal for quantum physics in secondary school,” Physics Education, vol. 35, no. 6, p. 406, 2000.
  4. P. Bitzenbauer and J.-P. Meyn, “A new teaching concept on quantum physics in secondary schools,” Physics Education, vol. 55, no. 5, p. 055031, 2020.
  5. L. T. Escalada, N. S. Rebello, and D. A. Zollman, “Student explorations of quantum effects in LEDs and luminescent devices,” The Physics Teacher, vol. 42, no. 3, pp. 173–179, 2004.
  6. S. E. Economou and E. Barnes, “Hello quantum world! a rigorous but accessible first-year university course in quantum information science,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.02868, 2022.
  7. J. A. Walsh, M. Fenech, D. L. Tucker, C. Riegle-Crumb, and B. R. La Cour, “Piloting a full-year, optics-based high school course on quantum computing,” Physics Education, vol. 57, no. 2, p. 025010, 2021.
  8. A. Perry, R. Sun, C. Hughes, J. Isaacson, and J. Turner, “Quantum computing as a high school module,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.00282, 2019.
  9. C. Hughes, J. Isaacson, J. Turner, A. Perry, and R. Sun, “Teaching quantum computing to high school students,” The Physics Teacher, vol. 60, no. 3, pp. 187–189, 2022.
  10. N. A. Davis and B. R. La Cour, “Quantum computing for the faint of heart,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE).   IEEE, 2022, pp. 669–672.
  11. J. C. Meyer, G. Passante, S. J. Pollock, and B. R. Wilcox, “The interdisciplinary quantum information classroom: Themes from a survey of quantum information science instructors,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.05944, 2022.
  12. C. Baily and N. D. Finkelstein, “Teaching and understanding of quantum interpretations in modern physics courses,” Physical Review Special Topics-Physics Education Research, vol. 6, no. 1, p. 010101, 2010.
  13. A. Johansson, S. Andersson, M. Salminen-Karlsson, and M. Elmgren, ““shut up and calculate”: The available discursive positions in quantum physics courses,” Cultural Studies of Science Education, vol. 13, pp. 205–226, 2018.
  14. D. Kaiser, “History: Shut up and calculate!” Nature, vol. 505, pp. 153–155, 2014.
  15. K. Krijtenburg-Lewerissa, H. J. Pol, A. Brinkman, and W. Van Joolingen, “Insights into teaching quantum mechanics in secondary and lower undergraduate education,” Physical review physics education research, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 010109, 2017.
  16. T. Bouchée, L. de Putter-Smits, M. Thurlings, and B. Pepin, “Towards a better understanding of conceptual difficulties in introductory quantum physics courses,” Studies in Science Education, vol. 58, no. 2, pp. 183–202, 2022.
  17. S. Abramsky and B. Coecke, “Categorical quantum mechanics,” Handbook of quantum logic and quantum structures, vol. 2, pp. 261–325, 2009.
  18. B. Coecke, “Kindergarten quantum mechanics: Lecture notes,” in AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 810, no. 1.   American Institute of Physics, 2006, pp. 81–98.
  19. S. Abramsky and B. Coecke, “A categorical semantics of quantum protocols,” in Proceedings of the 19th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 2004.   IEEE, 2004, pp. 415–425.
  20. B. Coecke, “Quantum picturalism,” Contemporary Physics, vol. 51, pp. 59–83, 2009, arXiv:0908.1787.
  21. B. Coecke, S. Dündar-Coecke, and S. Gogioso, “IMPACT kindergarten quantum theory,” 2017, https://www.cs.ox.ac.uk/people/bob.coecke/Diag-QT-Exp.-Design.pdf.
  22. B. Tversky, “Semantics, syntax, and pragmatics of graphics,” 2004.
  23. E. Bobek and B. Tversky, “Creating visual explanations improves learning,” Cognitive research: principles and implications, vol. 1, pp. 1–14, 2016.
  24. M. K. Mielicki, “Affordances of graphical and symbolic representations in algebraic problem solving,” Ph.D. dissertation, University of Illinois at Chicago, 2015.
  25. S. Herrlinger, T. N. Höffler, M. Opfermann, and D. Leutner, “When do pictures help learning from expository text? multimedia and modality effects in primary schools,” Research in Science Education, vol. 47, pp. 685–704, 2017.
  26. M. P. Verdi, J. T. Johnson, W. A. Stock, R. W. Kulhavy, and P. Whitman-Ahern, “Organized spatial displays and texts: Effects of presentation order and display type on learning outcomes,” The Journal of Experimental Education, vol. 65, no. 4, pp. 303–317, 1997.
  27. R. N. Carney and J. R. Levin, “Pictorial illustrations still improve students’ learning from text,” Educational psychology review, vol. 14, pp. 5–26, 2002.
  28. J. E. Fan, “Drawing to learn: How producing graphical representations enhances scientific thinking.” Translational Issues in Psychological Science, vol. 1, no. 2, p. 170, 2015.
  29. B. Coecke, D. Horsman, A. Kissinger, and Q. Wang, “Kindergarden quantum mechanics graduates (… or how I learned to stop gluing LEGO together and love the ZX-calculus),” Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 897, pp. 1–22, 2022.
  30. T. C. School, “Qubit by qubit: View past programs,” https://www.qubitbyqubit.org/programs, accessed: 2023-07-30.
  31. U. of Oxford Department of Physics, “Quantum club,” https://www.physics.ox.ac.uk/engage/schools/secondary-schools/projects-and-mentoring/quantum-club, accessed: 2023-07-30.
  32. U. o. W. Institute for Quantum Computing, “Quantum school for young students,” https://uwaterloo.ca/institute-for-quantum-computing/qsys, accessed: 2023-07-30.
  33. S. E. Economou, T. Rudolph, and E. Barnes, “Teaching quantum information science to high-school and early undergraduate students,” 2020.
  34. Z. C. Seskir, P. Migdał, C. Weidner, A. Anupam, N. Case, N. Davis, C. Decaroli, İlke Ercan, C. Foti, P. Gora, K. Jankiewicz, B. R. L. Cour, J. Y. Malo, S. Maniscalco, A. Naeemi, L. Nita, N. Parvin, F. Scafirimuto, J. F. Sherson, E. Surer, J. R. Wootton, L. Yeh, O. Zabello, and M. Chiofalo, “Quantum games and interactive tools for quantum technologies outreach and education,” Optical Engineering, vol. 61, no. 8, p. 081809, 2022.
  35. B. R. La Cour, M. Maynard, P. Shroff, G. Ko, and E. Ellis, “The virtual quantum optics laboratory,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 2022, pp. 677–687.
  36. P. Migdał, K. Jankiewicz, P. Grabarz, C. Decaroli, and P. Cochin, “Visualizing quantum mechanics in an interactive simulation – virtual lab by quantum flytrap,” Optical Engineering, vol. 61, no. 08, jun 2022.
  37. Y.-P. Liao, Y.-L. Cheng, Y.-T. Zhang, H.-X. Wu, and R.-C. Lu, “The interactive system of bloch sphere for quantum computing education,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 2022, pp. 718–723.
  38. J. Marckwordt, A. Muller, D. Harlow, D. Franklin, and R. H. Landsberg, “Entanglement Ball: Using Dodgeball to Introduce Quantum Entanglement,” The Physics Teacher, vol. 59, no. 8, pp. 613–616, 11 2021.
  39. M. Mykhailova, “Developing programming assignments for teaching quantum computing and quantum programming,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 2022, pp. 688–692.
  40. O. Salehi, Z. Seskir, and I. Tepe, “A computer science-oriented approach to introduce quantum computing to a new audience,” IEEE Transactions on Education, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 1–8, 2022.
  41. J. R. Wootton, F. Harkins, N. T. Bronn, A. C. Vazquez, A. Phan, and A. T. Asfaw, “Teaching quantum computing with an interactive textbook,” in 2021 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 2021, pp. 385–391.
  42. S. Khodaeifaal, “Updated and adapted curriculum and pedagogy of physics with the fourth industrial revolution and quantum revolution: From waves principles to quantum mechanics fundamentals,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 2022, pp. 653–668.
  43. A. Maldonado-Romo and L. Yeh, “Quantum computing online workshops and hackathon for spanish speakers: A case study,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 2022, pp. 709–717.
  44. T. Q. Atlas, “The quantum atlas,” https://quantumatlas.umd.edu/, accessed: 2023-07-30.
  45. S. Chitransh, D. Fischer, N. Kawalek, N. LaRacuente, J. Markman, S. P. Gaunkar, and U. Zvi, “A multidisciplinary, artistic approach to broadening the accessibility of quantum science,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE), 2022, pp. 701–708.
  46. D. Hoekzema, E. van den Berg, G. Schooten, and L. van Dijk, “The particle/wave-in-a-box model in Dutch secondary schools,” Physics education, vol. 42, no. 4, p. 391, 2007.
  47. M. V. Bøe and S. Viefers, “Secondary and university students’ descriptions of quantum uncertainty and the wave nature of quantum particles,” Science & Education, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 297–326, 2023.
  48. A. Huseby and B. Bungum, “Observation in quantum physics: Challenges for upper secondary physics students in discussing electrons as waves,” Physics Education, vol. 54, no. 6, p. 065002, 2019.
  49. U. S. di Uccio, A. Colantonio, S. Galano, I. Marzoli, F. Trani, and I. Testa, “Development of a construct map to describe students’ reasoning about introductory quantum mechanics,” Physical Review Physics Education Research, vol. 16, no. 1, p. 010144, 2020.
  50. D. Franklin, J. Palmer, W. Jang, E. M. Lehman, J. Marckwordt, R. H. Landsberg, A. Muller, and D. Harlow, “Exploring quantum reversibility with young learners,” in Proceedings of the 2020 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research, ser. ICER ’20.   New York, NY, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2020, p. 147–157.
  51. I. M. Greca and O. Freire, “Does an emphasis on the concept of quantum states enhance students’ understanding of quantum mechanics?” Science & Education, vol. 12, pp. 541–557, 2003.
  52. R. Penrose, “Applications of negative dimensional tensors,” in Combinatorial Mathematics and its Applications.   Academic Press, 1971, pp. 221–244.
  53. A. Joyal and R. Street, “The geometry of tensor calculus I,” Advances in Mathematics, vol. 88, pp. 55–112, 1991.
  54. B. Coecke and R. Duncan, “Interacting quantum observables: categorical algebra and diagrammatics,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 13, no. 4, p. 043016, 2011.
  55. R. Duncan, A. Kissinger, S. Perdrix, and J. Van De Wetering, “Graph-theoretic simplification of quantum circuits with the ZX-calculus,” Quantum, vol. 4, p. 279, 2020.
  56. N. de Beaudrap, X. Bian, and Q. Wang, “Fast and effective techniques for T-count reduction via spider nest identities,” in 15th Conference on the Theory of Quantum Computation, Communication and Cryptography (TQC 2020).   Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik, 2020, arXiv:2004.05164.
  57. ——, “Techniques to reduce π𝜋\piitalic_π/4-parity-phase circuits, motivated by the ZX calculus,” Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 318, pp. 131–149, may 2020.
  58. A. Kissinger and J. van de Wetering, “Reducing T-count with the ZX-calculus,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1903.10477, 2019.
  59. J. Huang, S. M. Li, L. Yeh, A. Kissinger, M. Mosca, and M. Vasmer, “Graphical css code transformation using zx calculus,” in press 2023.
  60. N. de Beaudrap and D. Horsman, “The ZX calculus is a language for surface code lattice surgery,” Quantum, vol. 4, p. 218, 2020.
  61. A. Kissinger, “Phase-free ZX diagrams are CSS codes (… or how to graphically grok the surface code),” arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.14038, 2022.
  62. A. B. Khesin, J. Z. Lu, and P. W. Shor, “Graphical quantum Clifford-encoder compilers from the ZX calculus,” arXiv:2301.02356.
  63. A. Kissinger, J. van de Wetering, and R. Vilmart, “Classical simulation of quantum circuits with partial and graphical stabiliser decompositions,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.09202, 2022.
  64. B. Coecke, B. Edwards, and R. W. Spekkens, “Phase groups and the origin of non-locality for qubits,” Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 270, no. 2, pp. 15–36, 2011.
  65. M. Backens and A. N. Duman, “A complete graphical calculus for Spekkens’ toy bit theory,” Foundations of Physics, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 70–103, 2016.
  66. S. Gogioso, “A Diagrammatic Approach to Quantum Dynamics,” in 8th Conference on Algebra and Coalgebra in Computer Science (CALCO 2019), ser. Leibniz International Proceedings in Informatics (LIPIcs), M. Roggenbach and A. Sokolova, Eds., vol. 139, 2019, pp. 19:1–19:23.
  67. S. Gogioso and W. Zeng, “Generalised Mermin-type non-locality arguments,” Logical Methods in Computer Science, vol. Volume 15, Issue 2, 2019.
  68. B. Coecke and R. Duncan, “Interacting quantum observables,” in Automata, Languages and Programming: 35th International Colloquium, ICALP 2008, Reykjavik, Iceland, July 7-11, 2008, Proceedings, Part II 35.   Springer, 2008, pp. 298–310.
  69. R. Duncan and S. Perdrix, “Graph states and the necessity of Euler decomposition,” in Conference on Computability in Europe.   Springer, 2009, pp. 167–177.
  70. A. Kissinger and J. van de Wetering, “Universal MBQC with generalised parity-phase interactions and pauli measurements,” Quantum, vol. 3, p. 134, 2019.
  71. K. Meichanetzidis, S. Gogioso, G. de Felice, N. Chiappori, A. Toumi, and B. Coecke, “Quantum natural language processing on near-term quantum computers,” Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 340, pp. 213–229, sep 2021.
  72. R. Lorenz, A. Pearson, K. Meichanetzidis, D. Kartsaklis, and B. Coecke, “QNLP in practice: Running compositional models of meaning on a quantum computer, doi: 10.48550,” arXiv preprint arXiv.2102.12846, 2021.
  73. B. Coecke, G. de Felice, K. Meichanetzidis, and A. Toumi, “Foundations for near-term quantum natural language processing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.03755, 2020.
  74. F. Bonchi, P. Sobociński, and F. Zanasi, “A categorical semantics of signal flow graphs,” in CONCUR 2014–Concurrency Theory: 25th International Conference, CONCUR 2014, Rome, Italy, September 2-5, 2014. Proceedings 25.   Springer, 2014, pp. 435–450.
  75. M. Sadrzadeh, S. Clark, and B. Coecke, “The Frobenius anatomy of word meanings I: subject and object relative pronouns,” Journal of Logic and Computation, vol. 23, no. 6, pp. 1293–1317, 2013.
  76. V. Wang-Mascianica, J. Liu, and B. Coecke, “Distilling text into circuits,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.10595, 2023.
  77. R. Lorenz and S. Tull, “Causal models in string diagrams,” 2023.
  78. M. Backens and A. Kissinger, “ZH: A complete graphical calculus for quantum computations involving classical non-linearity,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1805.02175, 2018.
  79. B. Poór, Q. Wang, R. A. Shaikh, L. Yeh, R. Yeung, and B. Coecke, “Completeness for arbitrary finite dimensions of zxw-calculus, a unifying calculus,” in 2023 38th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS), 2023, pp. 1–14.
  80. G. de Felice, R. A. Shaikh, B. Poór, L. Yeh, Q. Wang, and B. Coecke, “Light-matter interaction in the ZXW calculus,” in Quantum Physics and Logic, in press 2023.
  81. R. A. Shaikh, Q. Wang, and R. Yeung, “How to sum and exponentiate Hamiltonians in ZXW calculus,” in Quantum Physics and Logic, in press 2022.
  82. A. Hadzihasanovic, K. F. Ng, and Q. Wang, “Two complete axiomatisations of pure-state qubit quantum computing,” in Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science.   ACM, 2018, pp. 502–511.
  83. J. P. Dowling and G. J. Milburn, “Quantum technology: the second quantum revolution,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 361, no. 1809, pp. 1655–1674, 2003.
  84. B. Coecke, “Basic ZX-calculus for students and professionals,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.03163, 2023.
  85. J. van de Wetering, “ZX-calculus for the working quantum computer scientist,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.13966, 2020.
Citations (9)
View on Semantic Scholar
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

User Circle Single Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Sign Up

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now
Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Generate Now
Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

YouTube