Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 87 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 471 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 193 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Equivariant plug-and-play image reconstruction (2312.01831v2)

Published 4 Dec 2023 in eess.IV and cs.CV

Abstract: Plug-and-play algorithms constitute a popular framework for solving inverse imaging problems that rely on the implicit definition of an image prior via a denoiser. These algorithms can leverage powerful pre-trained denoisers to solve a wide range of imaging tasks, circumventing the necessity to train models on a per-task basis. Unfortunately, plug-and-play methods often show unstable behaviors, hampering their promise of versatility and leading to suboptimal quality of reconstructed images. In this work, we show that enforcing equivariance to certain groups of transformations (rotations, reflections, and/or translations) on the denoiser strongly improves the stability of the algorithm as well as its reconstruction quality. We provide a theoretical analysis that illustrates the role of equivariance on better performance and stability. We present a simple algorithm that enforces equivariance on any existing denoiser by simply applying a random transformation to the input of the denoiser and the inverse transformation to the output at each iteration of the algorithm. Experiments on multiple imaging modalities and denoising networks show that the equivariant plug-and-play algorithm improves both the reconstruction performance and the stability compared to their non-equivariant counterparts.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (52)
  1. Plug-and-play methods for magnetic resonance imaging: Using denoisers for image recovery. IEEE signal processing magazine, 37(1):105–116, 2020.
  2. Correction to: Convex Analysis and Monotone Operator Theory in Hilbert Spaces. Springer, 2017.
  3. Total generalized variation. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 3(3):492–526, 2010.
  4. Geometric deep learning: Grids, groups, graphs, geodesics, and gauges. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.13478, 2021.
  5. Equivariant neural networks for inverse problems. Inverse Problems, 37(8):085006, 2021.
  6. An introduction to continuous optimization for imaging. Acta Numerica, 25:161–319, 2016.
  7. Equivariant imaging: Learning beyond the range space. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 4379–4388, 2021.
  8. Imaging with equivariant deep learning: From unrolled network design to fully unsupervised learning. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 40(1):134–147, 2023.
  9. Diffusion posterior sampling for general noisy inverse problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.14687, 2022.
  10. Regularization by denoising via fixed-point projection (red-pro). SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 14(3):1374–1406, 2021.
  11. Group equivariant convolutional networks. In International conference on machine learning, pages 2990–2999. PMLR, 2016.
  12. A forward-backward view of some primal-dual optimization methods in image recovery. In 2014 IEEE International Conference on Image Processing (ICIP), pages 4141–4145. IEEE, 2014.
  13. Laurent Condat. Discrete total variation: New definition and minimization. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 10(3):1258–1290, 2017.
  14. Diffusion schrödinger bridge with applications to score-based generative modeling. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 34:17695–17709, 2021.
  15. Se (3)-transformers: 3d roto-translation equivariant attention networks. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:1970–1981, 2020.
  16. Denoising diffusion probabilistic models. Advances in neural information processing systems, 33:6840–6851, 2020.
  17. Gradient step denoiser for convergent plug-and-play. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.03220, 2021.
  18. Convergent plug-and-play with proximal denoiser and unconstrained regularization parameter. arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.01216, 2023.
  19. Deep convolutional neural network for inverse problems in imaging. IEEE transactions on image processing, 26(9):4509–4522, 2017.
  20. Plug-and-play methods for integrating physical and learned models in computational imaging: Theory, algorithms, and applications. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 40(1):85–97, 2023.
  21. Denoising diffusion restoration models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:23593–23606, 2022.
  22. fastmri: A publicly available raw k-space and dicom dataset of knee images for accelerated mr image reconstruction using machine learning. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence, 2(1):e190007, 2020.
  23. Bayesian imaging using plug & play priors: when langevin meets tweedie. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 15(2):701–737, 2022.
  24. Understanding and evaluating blind deconvolution algorithms. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1964–1971. IEEE, 2009.
  25. Swinir: Image restoration using swin transformer. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF international conference on computer vision, pages 1833–1844, 2021.
  26. Recovery of continuous 3d refractive index maps from discrete intensity-only measurements using neural fields. Nature Machine Intelligence, 4(9):781–791, 2022.
  27. Learning proximal operators: Using denoising networks for regularizing inverse imaging problems. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1781–1790, 2017.
  28. Rotation-equivariant deep learning for diffusion mri. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.06942, 2021.
  29. Learning maximally monotone operators for image recovery. SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 14(3):1206–1237, 2021.
  30. Regularization by denoising: Clarifications and new interpretations. IEEE transactions on computational imaging, 5(1):52–67, 2018.
  31. One network to solve them all–solving linear inverse problems using deep projection models. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 5888–5897, 2017.
  32. The little engine that could: Regularization by denoising (red). SIAM Journal on Imaging Sciences, 10(4):1804–1844, 2017.
  33. Deep invariant networks with differentiable augmentation layers. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:35672–35683, 2022.
  34. Plug-and-play methods provably converge with properly trained denoisers. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 5546–5557. PMLR, 2019.
  35. Equivariant wavelets: Fast rotation and translation invariant wavelet scattering transforms. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 45(2):1716–1731, 2022.
  36. The dual-tree complex wavelet transform. IEEE signal processing magazine, 22(6):123–151, 2005.
  37. Jean-Pierre Serre et al. Linear representations of finite groups. Springer, 1977.
  38. Fluctuation-based deconvolution in fluorescence microscopy using plug-and-play denoisers. In International Conference on Scale Space and Variational Methods in Computer Vision, pages 498–510. Springer, 2023.
  39. Sensing theorems for unsupervised learning in linear inverse problems. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 24(39):1–45, 2023.
  40. Building firmly nonexpansive convolutional neural networks. In ICASSP 2020-2020 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 8658–8662. IEEE, 2020.
  41. Image reconstruction algorithms in radio interferometry: From handcrafted to learned regularization denoisers. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 518(1):604–622, 2023.
  42. Seven ways to improve example-based single image super resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pages 1865–1873, 2016.
  43. Plug-and-play priors for model based reconstruction. In 2013 IEEE global conference on signal and information processing, pages 945–948. IEEE, 2013.
  44. Equivariant q𝑞qitalic_q learning in spatial action spaces. In Conference on Robot Learning, pages 1713–1723. PMLR, 2022.
  45. General e (2)-equivariant steerable cnns. Advances in neural information processing systems, 32, 2019.
  46. fastmri: An open dataset and benchmarks for accelerated mri. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.08839, 2018.
  47. Beyond a gaussian denoiser: Residual learning of deep cnn for image denoising. IEEE transactions on image processing, 26(7):3142–3155, 2017.
  48. Plug-and-play image restoration with deep denoiser prior. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 44(10):6360–6376, 2021.
  49. Practical blind denoising via swin-conv-unet and data synthesis. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.13278, 2022.
  50. Ntire 2023 challenge on image super-resolution (x4): Methods and results. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1864–1883, 2023.
  51. 4d panoptic segmentation as invariant and equivariant field prediction. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 22488–22498, 2023a.
  52. Denoising diffusion models for plug-and-play image restoration. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 1219–1229, 2023b.
Citations (9)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

  • The paper introduces an equivariant framework that improves the stability and convergence of plug-and-play algorithms using invariant denoisers.
  • It presents theoretical insights on symmetrizing the Jacobian matrix and reducing the Lipschitz constant to bolster reconstruction robustness.
  • Experimental results across tasks like deblurring, super-resolution, and MRI demonstrate superior performance over non-equivariant methods.

Equivariant Plug-and-Play Image Reconstruction: An Analytical Perspective

The paper "Equivariant Plug-and-Play Image Reconstruction" presents an insightful exploration into the stability and performance enhancements achievable through the integration of equivariance in plug-and-play (PnP) algorithms for image reconstruction. This work provides a detailed theoretical and experimental analysis, focusing on how enforcing equivariance to group transformations enhances both algorithmic stability and image quality.

The crux of PnP algorithms lies in their ability to leverage powerful pre-trained denoisers to solve inverse imaging problems, bypassing the need to design dedicated models for each task. Nevertheless, these denoising-based approaches have historically suffered from issues of instability, often resulting in suboptimal reconstructions. This research posits that integrating equivariance—that is, ensuring the denoiser is invariant to certain transformations like rotations and translations—can significantly mitigate these issues.

Theoretical Insights

The paper builds upon the premise that many imaging tasks contain inherent equivariances which can be capitalized upon. By employing operations invariant to these transformations, the authors propose that the stability and convergence of PnP algorthims can be enhanced. A key contribution of the work is the illustration of how this equivariant approach can symmetrize the Jacobian matrix of a denoiser, which is crucial for the existence of a well-behaved implicit regularizer or prior.

Furthermore, the authors demonstrate that the Lipschitz constant of the denoiser—a significant factor in ensuring algorithm convergence—can be made smaller or equal when averaged over the set of transformation, which is a pivotal property for enhancing the stability of the algorithms.

Experimental Validation

The empirical evaluation covers multiple inverse imaging tasks such as deblurring and super-resolution, alongside magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Across these tasks, the equivariant versions of the PnP and RED algorithms consistently outperform their non-equivariant counterparts in terms of stability and reconstruction quality. For instance, the reduction in the required tuning and mitigation of unwanted artifacts in the reconstructions underscores the practical utility of the approach.

The experiments also offer insight into how the proposed method helps in sampling problems addressed through Langevin dynamics. The equivariant plug-and-play framework demonstrated superior performance in producing high-quality samples compared to non-equivariant baselines, attesting to the robustness introduced by the equivariant framework.

Broader Implications and Future Directions

The implications of this work are twofold. Practically, this method provides a way to meaningfully incorporate denoisers that were traditionally hampered by stability issues into a consistent framework amenable to a wide array of imaging modalities. Theoretically, it opens avenues for further exploration into other forms of transformation-invariance that might be integrated with denoising processes. Future work may likely explore adaptive ways to tune the level of equivariance dynamically, tailoring the approach to the specific topology of the problem space.

In summary, the integration of equivariance into PnP reconstruction frameworks emerges as a compelling direction for research that harmonizes the power of state-of-the-art denoisers with the organizational principles of imaging tasks. This paper elucidates a pathway toward more stable and robust plug-and-play methods in image reconstruction, promising practical advances in diverse applications spanning medical imaging to astrophysical image processing.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com