Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
184 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

$\varepsilon$-fractional Core Stability in Hedonic Games (2311.11101v2)

Published 18 Nov 2023 in cs.GT and cs.AI

Abstract: Hedonic Games (HGs) are a classical framework modeling coalition formation of strategic agents guided by their individual preferences. According to these preferences, it is desirable that a coalition structure (i.e. a partition of agents into coalitions) satisfies some form of stability. The most well-known and natural of such notions is arguably core-stability. Informally, a partition is core-stable if no subset of agents would like to deviate by regrouping in a so-called core-blocking coalition. Unfortunately, core-stable partitions seldom exist and even when they do, it is often computationally intractable to find one. To circumvent these problems, we propose the notion of $\varepsilon$-fractional core-stability, where at most an $\varepsilon$-fraction of all possible coalitions is allowed to core-block. It turns out that such a relaxation may guarantee both existence and polynomial-time computation. Specifically, we design efficient algorithms returning an $\varepsilon$-fractional core-stable partition, with $\varepsilon$ exponentially decreasing in the number of agents, for two fundamental classes of HGs: Simple Fractional and Anonymous. From a probabilistic point of view, being the definition of $\varepsilon$-fractional core equivalent to requiring that uniformly sampled coalitions core-block with probability lower than $\varepsilon$, we further extend the definition to handle more complex sampling distributions. Along this line, when valuations have to be learned from samples in a PAC-learning fashion, we give positive and negative results on which distributions allow the efficient computation of outcomes that are $\varepsilon$-fractional core-stable with arbitrarily high confidence.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (31)
  1. H. Aziz and F. Brandl. Existence of stability in hedonic coalition formation games. In Proc. 11th Conf. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), pages 763–770, 2012.
  2. H. Aziz and R. Savani. Hedonic games. In Handbook of Computational Social Choice, pages 356–376. Cambridge University Press, 2016.
  3. Fractional hedonic games. In Proc. 13th Conf. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems (AAMAS), pages 5–12, 2014.
  4. Statistical cost sharing. In Proc. 30th Conf. Adv. Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pages 6221–6230, 2017.
  5. C. Ballester. Np-completeness in hedonic games. Games Econ. Behav., 49(1):1–30, 2004.
  6. Core in a simple coalition formation game. Social Choice and Welfare, 18(1):135–153, 2001.
  7. Investigating the distribution assumptions in the PAC learning model. In Proc. 4th Conf. Learning Theory (COLT), 1991.
  8. Core-stability in assignment markets with financially constrained buyers. In Proc. 23rd Conf. Econom. Comput. (EC), pages 473–474, 2022.
  9. M. Bichler and S. Waldherr. Core pricing in combinatorial exchanges with financially constrained buyers: Computational hardness and algorithmic solutions. Oper. Res., 70(1):241–264, 2022.
  10. A. Bogomolnaia and M. O. Jackson. The stability of hedonic coalition structures. Games Econom. Behav., 38(2):201–230, 2002.
  11. Generating empirical core size distributions of hedonic games using a monte carlo method. IGTR, 24(3):2250001:1–2250001:28, 2022.
  12. Neural payoff machines: Predicting fair and stable payoff allocations among team members. In Proc. 36th Conf. Adv. Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), 2022.
  13. X. Deng and C. H. Papadimitriou. On the complexity of cooperative solution concepts. Math. Oper. Res., 19(2):257–266, 1994.
  14. K. Donahue and J. M. Kleinberg. Model-sharing games: Analyzing federated learning under voluntary participation. In Proc. 35th Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 5303–5311, 2021a.
  15. K. Donahue and J. M. Kleinberg. Optimality and stability in federated learning: A game-theoretic approach. In Proc. 34th Conf. Adv. Neural Information Processing Systems (NIPS), pages 1287–1298, 2021b.
  16. J. Dreze and J. Greenberg. Hedonic coalitions: Optimality and stability. Econometrica, 48(4):987–1003, 1980.
  17. Relaxed core stability in fractional hedonic games. In Proc. 30th Intl. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. (IJCAI), pages 182–188, 2021.
  18. PAC learning and stabilizing hedonic games: Towards a unifying approach. In Proc. 37th Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 5641–5648, 2023.
  19. D. B. Gillies. Solutions to general zero-sum games. Contributions to the Theory of Games IV (Annals of Mathematics Studies, 40), pages 47–85, 1959.
  20. Forming probably stable communities with limited interactions. In Proc. 33rd Conf. Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pages 2053–2060, 2019.
  21. T. Jha and Y. Zick. A learning framework for distribution-based game-theoretic solution concepts. In Proc. 21st Conf. Econom. Comput. (EC), pages 355–377, 2020.
  22. Geometric properties of the kernel, nucleolus, and related solution concepts. Math. Oper. Res., 4(4):303–338, 1979.
  23. M. Mitzenmacher and E. Upfal. Probability and Computing, 2nd edition. Cambridge University Press, 2017. ISBN 9781107154889.
  24. E. Miyagawa. Strategy-proofness and the core in house allocation problems. Games Econ. Behav., 38(2):347–361, 2002.
  25. D. Peters and E. Elkind. Simple causes of complexity in hedonic games. In Proc. 24th Intl. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. (IJCAI), pages 617–623, 2015.
  26. L. S. Shapley and M. Shubik. Quasi-cores in a monetary economy with nonconvex preferences. Econometrica, 4(34):805––827, 1966.
  27. J. Sliwinski and Y. Zick. Learning hedonic games. In Proc. 26th Intl. Joint Conf. Artif. Intell. (IJCAI), pages 2730–2736, 2017.
  28. S. C. Sung and D. Dimitrov. On core membership testing for hedonic coalition formation games. Oper. Res. Lett., 35(2):155–158, 2007.
  29. P. Trivedi and N. Hemachandra. Noise robust core-stable coalitions of hedonic games. In Proc. 14th Asian Conf. Machine Learning, (ACML), volume 189, pages 1038–1053, 2022.
  30. L. G. Valiant. A theory of the learnable. Commun. ACM, 27(11):1134–1142, 1984.
  31. G. J. Woeginger. Core stability in hedonic coalition formation. In Proc. 39th Intl. Conf. Current Trends in Theory & Practice of Comput. Sci. (SOFSEM), pages 33–50, 2013.
Citations (1)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.