Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
AI Research Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 77 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 31 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 91 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 178 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 385 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 38 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Interpretable Diffusion via Information Decomposition (2310.07972v3)

Published 12 Oct 2023 in cs.LG, cs.AI, cs.IT, and math.IT

Abstract: Denoising diffusion models enable conditional generation and density modeling of complex relationships like images and text. However, the nature of the learned relationships is opaque making it difficult to understand precisely what relationships between words and parts of an image are captured, or to predict the effect of an intervention. We illuminate the fine-grained relationships learned by diffusion models by noticing a precise relationship between diffusion and information decomposition. Exact expressions for mutual information and conditional mutual information can be written in terms of the denoising model. Furthermore, pointwise estimates can be easily estimated as well, allowing us to ask questions about the relationships between specific images and captions. Decomposing information even further to understand which variables in a high-dimensional space carry information is a long-standing problem. For diffusion models, we show that a natural non-negative decomposition of mutual information emerges, allowing us to quantify informative relationships between words and pixels in an image. We exploit these new relations to measure the compositional understanding of diffusion models, to do unsupervised localization of objects in images, and to measure effects when selectively editing images through prompt interventions.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (71)
  1. ediffi: Text-to-image diffusion models with an ensemble of expert denoisers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.01324, 2022.
  2. Clustering with bregman divergences. Journal of machine learning research, 6(10), 2005.
  3. Identifying and mitigating the security risks of generative ai. arXiv preprint arXiv:2308.14840, 2023.
  4. Mutual information neural estimation. In Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.  531–540, 2018.
  5. Easily accessible text-to-image generation amplifies demographic stereotypes at large scale. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, pp.  1493–1504, 2023.
  6. Multimodal datasets: misogyny, pornography, and malignant stereotypes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.01963, 2021.
  7. Improving mutual information estimation with annealed and energy-based bounds. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.06992, 2023.
  8. Diffusion policy: Visuomotor policy learning via action diffusion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.04137, 2023.
  9. Testing relational understanding in text-guided image generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2208.00005, 2022.
  10. Elements of information theory. Wiley-Interscience, 2006.
  11. Robert M Fano. Transmission of Information: A Statistical Theory of Communications. MIT Press, 1961.
  12. Pointwise partial information decompositionusing the specificity and ambiguity lattices. Entropy, 20(4):297, 2018.
  13. Mutual information and minimum mean-square error in gaussian channels. IEEE transactions on information theory, 51(4):1261–1282, 2005.
  14. How does gpt-2 compute greater-than?: Interpreting mathematical abilities in a pre-trained language model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.00586, 2023.
  15. Discriminative diffusion models as few-shot vision and language learners, 2023.
  16. An overview of catastrophic ai risks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.12001, 2023.
  17. Equivariant 3d-conditional diffusion models for molecular linker design. arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.05274, 2022.
  18. Openclip, July 2021. URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5143773.
  19. Ddp: Diffusion model for dense visual prediction, 2023.
  20. Diffusion models for zero-shot open-vocabulary segmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.09316, 2023.
  21. Elucidating the design space of diffusion-based generative models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 35:26565–26577, 2022.
  22. Imagic: Text-based real image editing with diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  6007–6017, 2023.
  23. Steven M Kay. Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory. Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1993.
  24. Variational diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.00630, 2021.
  25. Redundant information neural estimation. Entropy, 23(7):922, 2021.
  26. Artemy Kolchinsky. A novel approach to the partial information decomposition. Entropy, 24(3):403, 2022.
  27. Information-theoretic diffusion. In The Eleventh International Conference on Learning Representations (ICLR), 2022.
  28. Are diffusion models vision-and-language reasoners? In Thirty-seventh Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems, 2023.
  29. Maskdiff: Modeling mask distribution with diffusion probabilistic model for few-shot instance segmentation, 2023.
  30. Neural word embedding as implicit matrix factorization. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp.  2177–2185, 2014.
  31. Factorized contrastive learning: Going beyond multi-view redundancy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05268, 2023.
  32. Microsoft coco: Common objects in context, 2015.
  33. Feature pyramid networks for object detection, 2017.
  34. Zachary C Lipton. The mythos of model interpretability: In machine learning, the concept of interpretability is both important and slippery. Queue, 16(3):31–57, 2018.
  35. Compositional visual generation with composable diffusion models. In European Conference on Computer Vision, pp.  423–439. Springer, 2022.
  36. Unsupervised compositional concepts discovery with text-to-image generative models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.05357, 2023.
  37. A unified approach to interpreting model predictions, 2017.
  38. Diffusionseg: Adapting diffusion towards unsupervised object discovery, 2023.
  39. Guided image synthesis via initial image editing in diffusion model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.03382, 2023.
  40. David McAllester. On the mathematics of diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.11108, 2023.
  41. Null-text inversion for editing real images using guided diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  6038–6047, 2023.
  42. Glide: Towards photorealistic image generation and editing with text-guided diffusion models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2112.10741, 2021.
  43. Mitigating dataset harms requires stewardship: Lessons from 1000 papers. arXiv preprint arXiv:2108.02922, 2021.
  44. Comprehensive discovery of subsample gene expression components by information explanation: therapeutic implications in cancer. BMC medical genomics, 10(1):12, 2017. URL https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-017-0245-6.
  45. Billy Perrigo. Openai used kenyan workers on less than $2 per hour: Exclusive, Jan 2023.
  46. On variational bounds of mutual information. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Machine Learning, 2019.
  47. Learning transferable visual models from natural language supervision, 2021.
  48. Hierarchical text-conditional image generation with clip latents. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.06125, 2022.
  49. Linguistic binding in diffusion models: Enhancing attribute correspondence through attention map alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.08877, 2023.
  50. Influence decompositions for neural network attribution. In The 24th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics (AISTATS), 2021.
  51. High-resolution image synthesis with latent diffusion models. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pp.  10684–10695, 2022.
  52. Photorealistic text-to-image diffusion models with deep language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11487, 2022.
  53. Laion-400m: Open dataset of clip-filtered 400 million image-text pairs. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.02114, 2021.
  54. C.E. Shannon. A mathematical theory of communication. The Bell System Technical Journal, 27:379–423, 1948.
  55. Deep unsupervised learning using nonequilibrium thermodynamics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1503.03585, 2015.
  56. Denoising diffusion implicit models, 2022.
  57. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456, 2020.
  58. Dual diffusion implicit bridges for image-to-image translation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.08382, 2022.
  59. Axiomatic attribution for deep networks, 2017.
  60. Intriguing properties of neural networks. In ICLR, 2014.
  61. Diffss: Diffusion model for few-shot semantic segmentation, 2023.
  62. What the daam: Interpreting stable diffusion using cross attention, 2022.
  63. Diffuse, attend, and segment: Unsupervised zero-shot segmentation using stable diffusion, 2023.
  64. Diffusion model is secretly a training-free open vocabulary semantic segmenter, 2023.
  65. Interpretability in the wild: a circuit for indirect object identification in gpt-2 small. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.00593, 2022.
  66. De novo design of protein structure and function with rfdiffusion. Nature, pp.  1–3, 2023.
  67. Nonnegative decomposition of multivariate information. arXiv:1004.2515, 2010.
  68. Open-vocabulary panoptic segmentation with text-to-image diffusion models, 2023.
  69. When and why vision-language models behave like bag-of-words models, and what to do about it? arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.01936, 2022.
  70. Diffusionengine: Diffusion model is scalable data engine for object detection, 2023.
  71. Unleashing text-to-image diffusion models for visual perception, 2023.
Citations (13)

Summary

  • The paper presents a novel framework for information decomposition that quantifies contributions at both pixel and word levels.
  • It demonstrates robust compositional understanding by localizing textual cues within generated images, outperforming traditional contrastive models.
  • The paper evaluates prompt interventions using Conditional Mutual Information, providing actionable insights for enhancing model interpretability.

Interpretable Diffusion via Information Decomposition

The paper "Interpretable Diffusion via Information Decomposition" introduces a novel approach to understanding the inner workings of denoising diffusion models, widely recognized for their prowess in image and text generation. The central contribution lies in elucidating the relationships that diffusion models learn between images and descriptions, achieved through an information-theoretic perspective. The authors demonstrate an efficient methodology to decompose information, attributing it to individual text and image components, offering insights into the model's understanding and potential interventions.

Key Contributions

  1. Information Decomposition: The authors establish a framework where denoising diffusion models are leveraged for fine-grained information decomposition. This decomposition allows precise quantification at the per-sample and per-variable level, offering detailed insights into the informational contributions of pixels and words.
  2. Compositional Understanding: In examining diffusion models’ understanding of compositional relationships between images and captions, the paper utilizes the ARO benchmark. The results exhibit that diffusion models, often underestimated, reveal enhanced compositional abilities compared to the commonly used contrastive models like OpenCLIP.
  3. Localization of Textual Information: A further analysis addresses how specific words within a text prompt are localized within the resulting image. This exploration underscores the capabilities of diffusion models to recognize and align abstract concepts such as adjectives and verbs more effectively than traditional attention maps.
  4. Evaluating Interventions: The paper undertakes a novel examination of how prompt interventions—specifically, word omissions or swaps—affect image generation. The Conditional Mutual Information (CMI) estimates outperform attention-based methodologies in predicting the impact of such interventions, thus providing a quantitative measure of word importance in a given context.

Methodology

The paper builds its methodology on diffusion models as noisy channels, drawing on information theory principles to analyze how information is encoded and processed. By defining optimal denoisers through the lens of Minimum Mean Square Error (MMSE), it interprets these models as approximations of ideal information decomposers. The application of this theoretical framework extends to both Mutual Information (MI) and Conditional Mutual Information (CMI) estimations, setting the foundations for robust analytical computations.

Results and Implications

The experimental outcomes assert that the information decomposition approach clarifies and enhances the interpretability of generative models, moving beyond the constraints of architecture-specific attention mechanisms. The numerical findings on the ARO benchmark, for instance, challenge existing underestimations of diffusion models, advocating for their integration into discriminative tasks traditionally dominated by attention-based frameworks.

The implications of these findings extend beyond conventional generative applications. The ability to pinpoint informative relationships holds potential in diverse sectors such as biotechnology, where identifying gene expression patterns is critical. Additionally, the insights into compositional understanding offer valuable guidance for enhancing other AI models in handling complex relational data.

Future Directions

This paper opens avenues for further exploration of diffusion models' capabilities. Future research could explore mechanistic interpretability to identify neural circuits responsible for specific tasks within diffusion models. Evaluating these models across different domains, particularly those requiring sensitive and accurate data interpretation, could expand the utility of information-theoretic diffusion approaches. Furthermore, incorporating these insights into improving ethical and transparent AI systems remains a pertinent and promising field of inquiry.

In summary, the paper provides a comprehensive framework for understanding and utilizing the intricate relationships modeled by denoising diffusion models, emphasizing the significance of information-theoretic methods in advancing the interpretability and application of complex AI systems.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Tweets

This paper has been mentioned in 3 posts and received 0 likes.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube