Multiview Transformer: Rethinking Spatial Information in Hyperspectral Image Classification (2310.07186v1)
Abstract: Identifying the land cover category for each pixel in a hyperspectral image (HSI) relies on spectral and spatial information. An HSI cuboid with a specific patch size is utilized to extract spatial-spectral feature representation for the central pixel. In this article, we investigate that scene-specific but not essential correlations may be recorded in an HSI cuboid. This additional information improves the model performance on existing HSI datasets and makes it hard to properly evaluate the ability of a model. We refer to this problem as the spatial overfitting issue and utilize strict experimental settings to avoid it. We further propose a multiview transformer for HSI classification, which consists of multiview principal component analysis (MPCA), spectral encoder-decoder (SED), and spatial-pooling tokenization transformer (SPTT). MPCA performs dimension reduction on an HSI via constructing spectral multiview observations and applying PCA on each view data to extract low-dimensional view representation. The combination of view representations, named multiview representation, is the dimension reduction output of the MPCA. To aggregate the multiview information, a fully-convolutional SED with a U-shape in spectral dimension is introduced to extract a multiview feature map. SPTT transforms the multiview features into tokens using the spatial-pooling tokenization strategy and learns robust and discriminative spatial-spectral features for land cover identification. Classification is conducted with a linear classifier. Experiments on three HSI datasets with rigid settings demonstrate the superiority of the proposed multiview transformer over the state-of-the-art methods.
- Tensorflow: a system for large-scale machine learning.. In Osdi, Vol. 16. Savannah, GA, USA, 265–283.
- Hyperspectral image classification—Traditional to deep models: A survey for future prospects. IEEE journal of selected topics in applied earth observations and remote sensing 15 (2021), 968–999.
- Classification of hyperspectral data from urban areas based on extended morphological profiles. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 43, 3 (2005), 480–491.
- Claude Cariou and Kacem Chehdi. 2016. A new k-nearest neighbor density-based clustering method and its application to hyperspectral images. In 2016 IEEE International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS). IEEE, 6161–6164.
- Dimensionality reduction for hyperspectral image classification based on multiview graphs ensemble. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 10, 3 (2016), 030501–030501.
- Wei Di and Melba M Crawford. 2011. View generation for multiview maximum disagreement based active learning for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 50, 5 (2011), 1942–1954.
- Spectral and spatial classification of hyperspectral data using SVMs and morphological profiles. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 46, 11 (2008), 3804–3814.
- Hyperspectral image classification using convolutional neural networks and multiple feature learning. Remote Sensing 10, 2 (2018), 299.
- Generation of spectral–temporal response surfaces by combining multispectral satellite and hyperspectral UAV imagery for precision agriculture applications. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing 8, 6 (2015), 3140–3146.
- Advances in hyperspectral image and signal processing: A comprehensive overview of the state of the art. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine 5, 4 (2017), 37–78.
- Recent advances in convolutional neural networks. Pattern recognition 77 (2018), 354–377.
- Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 770–778.
- Graph convolutional networks for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 59, 7 (2020), 5966–5978.
- SpectralFormer: Rethinking hyperspectral image classification with transformers. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 60 (2021), 1–15.
- Deep convolutional neural networks for hyperspectral image classification. Journal of Sensors 2015 (2015), 1–12.
- Gordon Hughes. 1968. On the mean accuracy of statistical pattern recognizers. IEEE transactions on information theory 14, 1 (1968), 55–63.
- Diederik P Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2014. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.6980 (2014).
- Data augmentation for hyperspectral image classification with deep CNN. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters 16, 4 (2018), 593–597.
- Multi-view learning for hyperspectral image classification: An overview. Neurocomputing (2022).
- End-to-End Blind Quality Assessment of Compressed Videos Using Deep Neural Networks.. In ACM Multimedia. 546–554.
- Farid Melgani and Lorenzo Bruzzone. 2004. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 42, 8 (2004), 1778–1790.
- Towards better exploiting convolutional neural networks for remote sensing scene classification. Pattern Recognition 61 (2017), 539–556.
- Deep learning classifiers for hyperspectral imaging: A review. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 158 (2019), 279–317.
- Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library. Advances in neural information processing systems 32 (2019).
- You only look once: Unified, real-time object detection. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition. 779–788.
- U-net: Convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention–MICCAI 2015: 18th International Conference, Munich, Germany, October 5-9, 2015, Proceedings, Part III 18. Springer, 234–241.
- Hyperspectral image classification with convolutional neural networks. In Proceedings of the 23rd ACM international conference on Multimedia. 1159–1162.
- Spectral–spatial feature tokenization transformer for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 60 (2022), 1–14.
- Weiwei Sun and Qian Du. 2019. Hyperspectral band selection: A review. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine 7, 2 (2019), 118–139.
- Attention is all you need. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
- Semi-supervised multiview embedding for hyperspectral data classification. Neurocomputing 145 (2014), 427–437.
- The Spectral Crust project—Research on new mineral exploration technology. In 2012 4th Workshop on Hyperspectral Image and Signal Processing: Evolution in Remote Sensing (WHISPERS). IEEE, 1–4.
- A survey on multi-view learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1304.5634 (2013).
- Shuo Yang and Zhenwei Shi. 2016. Hyperspectral image target detection improvement based on total variation. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 25, 5 (2016), 2249–2258.
- Hyperspectral image transformer classification networks. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 60 (2022), 1–15.
- A super-resolution reconstruction algorithm for hyperspectral images. Signal Processing 92, 9 (2012), 2082–2096.
- Robust Dual Graph Self-Representation for Unsupervised Hyperspectral Band Selection. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 60 (2022), 1–13.
- Spectral–Spatial Feature Extraction With Dual Graph Autoencoder for Hyperspectral Image Clustering. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology 32, 12 (2022), 8500–8511.
- Rotation-invariant attention network for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 31 (2022), 4251–4265.
- Spectral–spatial residual network for hyperspectral image classification: A 3-D deep learning framework. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 56, 2 (2017), 847–858.
- Residual spectral–spatial attention network for hyperspectral image classification. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing 59, 1 (2020), 449–462.
- Deep learning in remote sensing: A comprehensive review and list of resources. IEEE geoscience and remote sensing magazine 5, 4 (2017), 8–36.