Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
156 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Data Anomaly Detection, Classification, Localization, and Mitigation: A Review, Challenges, and Path Forward (2309.10788v1)

Published 19 Sep 2023 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: Advancements in digital automation for smart grids have led to the installation of measurement devices like phasor measurement units (PMUs), micro-PMUs ($\mu$-PMUs), and smart meters. However, a large amount of data collected by these devices brings several challenges as control room operators need to use this data with models to make confident decisions for reliable and resilient operation of the cyber-power systems. Machine-learning (ML) based tools can provide a reliable interpretation of the deluge of data obtained from the field. For the decision-makers to ensure reliable network operation under all operating conditions, these tools need to identify solutions that are feasible and satisfy the system constraints, while being efficient, trustworthy, and interpretable. This resulted in the increasing popularity of physics-informed machine learning (PIML) approaches, as these methods overcome challenges that model-based or data-driven ML methods face in silos. This work aims at the following: a) review existing strategies and techniques for incorporating underlying physical principles of the power grid into different types of ML approaches (supervised/semi-supervised learning, unsupervised learning, and reinforcement learning (RL)); b) explore the existing works on PIML methods for anomaly detection, classification, localization, and mitigation in power transmission and distribution systems, c) discuss improvements in existing methods through consideration of potential challenges while also addressing the limitations to make them suitable for real-world applications.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (112)
  1. Lawrence, KS: CMP Books, 2001.
  2. S. Thudumu, P. Branch, J. Jin, and J. Singh, “comprehensive survey of anomaly detection techniques for high dimensional big data,” J. Big Data, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 1–30, Dec. 2020.
  3. R. Borges, J. M. Beaver, M. A. Buckner, T. Morris, U. Adhikari, and S. Pan, “Machine learning for power system disturbance and cyber-attack discrimination,” in Proc. 7th Int. Symp. Resilient Control Syst. (ISRCS), pp. 1–8, Aug. 2014.
  4. Y. Himeur, K. Ghanem, A. Alsalemi, F. Bensaali, and A. Amira, “Artificial intelligence based anomaly detection of energy consumption in buildings: A review, current trends and new perspectives,” Appl. Energy, vol. 287, no. 116601, 2021.
  5. S. Liu, Y. Zhao, Z. Lin, Y. Liu, Y. Ding, L. Yang, and S. Yi, “Data-driven event detection of power systems based on unequal-interval reduction of pmu data and local outlier factor,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 2, p. 1630–1643, 2020.
  6. M. Ozay, I. Esnaola, F. T. Y. Vural, S. R. Kulkarni, and H. V. Poor, “Machine learning methods for attack detection in the smart grid,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., vol. 27, no. 8, p. 1773–1786, Aug. 2016.
  7. A. Aligholian, M. Farajollahi, and H. Mohsenian-Rad, “Unsupervised learning for online abnormality detection in smart meter data,” in Proc. IEEE PES Gen. Meeting, pp. 1–8, Aug. 2019.
  8. J. Willard, X. Jia, S. Xu, M. Steinbach, and V. Kumar, “Integrating scientific knowledge with machine learning for engineering and envi- ronmental systems,” arXiv:2003.04919, 2020.
  9. P. Linardatos, V. Papastefanopoulo, and S. Kotsianti, “Explainable ai: A review of machine learning interpretability methods,” Entropy, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 18, 2021.
  10. R. Rai and C. K. Sahu, “Driven by data or derived through physics? a review of hybrid physics guided machine learning techniques with cyber physical system (cps) focus,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, p. 71050–71073, 2020.
  11. B. Huang and J. Wang, “Applications of physics-informed neural networks in power systems-a review,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, Mar. 2022.
  12. S. Cuomo, V. S. Di Cola, F. Giampaolo, G. Rozza, and M. Raissi, “Scientific machine learning through physics-informed neural networks: Where we are and what’s next,” arXiv Prepr. arXiv2201.05624, 2022.
  13. S. Li, A. Pandey, and L. Pileggi, “Gridwarm: Towards practical physics-informed ml design and evaluation for power grid,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.03673, 2022.
  14. J. S. Read, X. Jia, A. P. Appling, J. A. Zwart, S. K. Oliver, A. Karpatne, G. J. Hansen, P. C. Hanson, and W. Watkins, “Process-guided deep learning predictions of lake water temperature,” Water Resources Research, vol. 55, no. 11, p. 9173–9190, 2019.
  15. M. W. M. G. D. Dissanayake and N. Phan-Thien, “Neural-network-based approximations for solving partial differential equations,” Commun. Numer. Methods. Eng, vol. 10, no. 3, p. 195–201, Mar. 1994.
  16. H. Owhadi, “Bayesian numerical homogenization,” Multiscale Model. Simul., vol. 13, no. 3, p. 812–828, Jan. 2015.
  17. M. Raissi, P. Perdikaris, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks: A deep learning framework for solving forward and inverse problems involving nonlinear partial differential equations,” J. Comput. Phys., vol. 378, p. 686–707, Feb. 2019.
  18. G. Karniadakis, I. Kevrekidis, L. Lu, P. Perdikaris, S. Wang, and L. Yang, “Physics-informed machine learning,” Nature Rev. Phys., vol. 3, p. 422–440, May 2021.
  19. A. Karpatne, G. Atluri, J. H. Faghmous, M. Steinbach, A. Banerjee, A. Ganguly, S. Shekhar, N. Samatova, and V. Kumar, “Theory-guided data science: A new paradigm for scientific discovery from data,” IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng., vol. 29, no. 10, p. 2318–2331, Oct. 2017.
  20. A. Dey, “Machine learning algorithms: A review,” nt. J. Comput. Sci. Inf. Technol., vol. 7, no. 3, p. 1174–1179, 2016.
  21. J. E. van Engelen and H. H. Hoos, “A survey on semi-supervised learning,” Mach. Learn., vol. 109, no. 2, p. 373–440, Feb. 2020.
  22. K. Yao, J. E. Herr, D. W. Toth, R. Mckintyre, and J. Parkhill, “The tensormol-0.1 model chemistry: a neural network augmented with longrange physics,” Chemical science, vol. 9, no. 8, p. 2261–2269, 2018.
  23. X. Zheng, B. Wang, D. Kalathil, and L. Xie, “Generative adversarial networks-based synthetic pmu data creation for improved event classification,” IEEE Open Access J. Power Energy, vol. 8, p. 68–76, 2021.
  24. F. Djeumou, C. Neary, E. Goubault, S. Putot, and U. Topcu, “Neural networks with physics-informed architectures and constraints for dynamical systems modeling,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.06407, 2021.
  25. A. Daw, R. Q. Thomas, C. C. Carey, J. S. Read, A. P. Appling, and A. Karpatne, “Physics-guided architecture (pga) of neural networks for quantifying uncertainty in lake temperature modeling.,” in Proc. SIAM Int. Conf. Data Mining, p. 532–540, 2020.
  26. Y. Wang, X. Han, C. Chang, D. Zha, U. BragaNeto, and X. Hu, “Understanding and optimizing physics informed neural architecture,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.13748, 2022.
  27. A. Karpatne, W. Watkins, J. Read, and V. Kumar, “Physics-guided neural networks (pgnn): An application in lake temperature modeling,” arXiv:1710.11431, 2017.
  28. X. Liu, X. Zhang, W. Peng, W. Zhou, and W. Yao, “A novel meta-learning initialization method for physics-informed neural networks,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.10991, 2021.
  29. X. Jia, J. Willard, A. Karpatne, J. S. Read, J. A. Zwart, M. Steinbach, and V. Kumar, “Physics-guided machine learning for scientific discovery: An application in simulating lake temperature profiles,” ACM/IMS Trans. Data Sci., vol. 2, no. 3, p. 1629–1640, May 2021.
  30. H. Sun, L. Peng, S. Huang, S. Li, Y. Long, S. Wang, and W. Zhao, “Development of a physics-informed doubly fed cross-residual deep neural network for high-precision magnetic flux leakage defect size estimation,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 18, no. 3, p. 1629–1640, Mar. 2022.
  31. H. Sun, L. Peng, J. Lin, S. Wang, W. Zhao, and S. Huang, “Microcrack defect quantification using a focusing high-order sh guided wave emat: The physics-informed deep neural network guwnet,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform., vol. 18, no. 5, p. 3235–3247, May 2022.
  32. in The Elements of Statistical Learning. New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2009, pp. 2672–2680.
  33. Y. Lei, F. Jia, J. Lin, S. Xing, and S. X. Ding, “An intelligent fault diagnosis method using unsupervised feature learning towards mechanical big data,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 63, no. 5, p. 3137–3147, May 2016.
  34. I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, “An intelligent fault diagnosis method using unsupervised feature learning towards mechanical big data,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 63, no. 11, pp. 139–144, Oct. 2020.
  35. B. C. Kwon, B. Eysenbach, J. Verma, K. Ng, C. De Filippi, W. F. Stewart, and A. Perer, “Clustervision: Visual supervision of unsupervised clustering,” IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graphics, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 142–151, Jan. 2018.
  36. P. J. Rousseeuw, “Silhouettes: A graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis,” J. Comput. Appl. Math., vol. 20, no. 1, p. 53–65, 1987.
  37. A. Chakravarty, S. Misra, and C. S. Rai, “Visualization of hydraulic fracture using physics-informed clustering to process ultrasonic shear waves,” Int. J. Rock Mec. Min. Sci., vol. 137, p. 104568, Jan. 2021.
  38. R. Sutton and A. Barto, Reinforcement Learning: An Introduction. Cambridge MA: The MIT Press, 2018.
  39. Y. Li, “Deep reinforcement learning: An overview,” CoRR, vol. abs/1701.07274, 2017.
  40. V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. Graves, I. Antonoglou, D. Wierstra, and M. A. Riedmiller, “Playing atari with deep reinforcement learning,” CoRR, 2013.
  41. V. Mnih, K. Kavukcuoglu, D. Silver, A. A. Rusu, J. Veness, M. G. Bellemare, A. Graves, M. Riedmiller, A. K. Fidjeland, G. Ostrovski, and S. Petersen, “Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning,” Nature, vol. 518, p. 529–533, 2015.
  42. J. Watts, F. van Wyk, S. Rezaei, Y. Wang, N. Masoud, and A. Khojandi, “A dynamic deep reinforcement learning-bayesian framework for anomaly detection,” IEEE Trans. Intel. Trans. Sys., Aug. 2022.
  43. T. T. Nguyen and V. J. Reddi, “Deep reinforcement learning for cyber security,” IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. Learn. Syst., early access, Nov. 13, 2021.
  44. Y. Dai, K. Zhang, S. Maharjan, and Y. Zhang, “Deep reinforcement learning for stochastic computation offloading in digital twin networks,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 17, no. 7, p. 4968–4977, Jul. 2021.
  45. Y. Wang, H. Tan, Y. Wu, and J. Peng, “Hybrid electric vehicle energy management with computer vision and deep reinforcement learning,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 17, no. 6, p. 3857–3868, Jun. 2021.
  46. J. Tang, H. Tang, X. Zhang, K. Cumanan, G. Chen, K. K. Wong, and J. A. Chambers, “Energy minimization in d2d-assisted cache-enabled internet of things: A deep reinforcement learning approach,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 16, no. 8, p. 5412–5423, Aug. 2020.
  47. Z. Dang and M. Ishii, “Towards stochastic modeling for two-phase flow interfacial area predictions: A physics-informed reinforcement learning approach,” Int. J. Heat Mass Tran., vol. 192, p. 122919, Aug. 2022.
  48. Y. Li, S. He, Y. Li, Y. Shi, and Z. Zeng, “Federated multiagent deep reinforcement learning approach via physics-informed reward for multimicrogrid energy management,” IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, pp. 1–13, 2023.
  49. T. Wu, I. L. Carreño, A. Scaglione, and D. Arnold, “Spatio-temporal graph convolutional neural networks for physics-aware grid learning algorithms,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, pp. 1–1, 2023.
  50. T. Wang, Y. Tang, Y. Huang, X. Chen, S. Zhang, and H. Huang, “Automatic adjustment method of power flow calculation convergence for large-scale power grid based on knowledge experience and deep reinforcement learning,” in 2020 IEEE 4th Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2), pp. 694–699, 2020.
  51. S. Alladin, S. El-Tantaway, M. Fouad, and A. Tag Eldien, “Marla-sg: Milti-agent reinforcement learning algorithm for efficient demand response in smart grid,” IEEE Access, 2022.
  52. H. Li and H. He, “Learning to operate distribution networks with safe deep reinforcement,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 13, no. 3, 2022.
  53. R. Bellman, “On the theory of dynamic programming,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, vol. 38, pp. 716–719, 1952.
  54. K. Mahapatra, X. Fan, X. Li, Y. Huang, and Q. Huang, “Physics informed reinforcement learning for power grid control using augmented random search,” in 2022 Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences., Jan. 2022, doi : 10.24251/HICSS.2022.427.
  55. Q. Yang, G. Wang, A. Sadeghi, G. B. Giannakis, and J. Sun, “Two-timescale voltage control in distribution grids using deep reinforcement learning,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 11, no. 3, pp. 2313–2323, 2020.
  56. W. Cai, H. N. Esfahani, A. B. Kordabad, and S. Gros, “Optimal management of the peak power penalty for smart grids using mpc-based reinforcement learning,” in 2021 60th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), pp. 6365–6370, 2021.
  57. X. Wang, H. Liu, X. Cao, W. Wu, S. Li, and X. Jia, “Active and reactive power coordinated control of active distribution networks based on prioritized reinforcement learning,” in 2021 Power System and Green Energy Conference (PSGEC), pp. 91–96, 2021.
  58. P. Chen, S. Liu, X. Wang, and I. Kamwa, “Physics-shielded multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for safe active voltage control with photovoltaic/battery energy storage systems,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, pp. 1–1, 2022.
  59. A. R. R. Matavalam, K. P. Guddanti, Y. Weng, and V. Ajjarapu, “Curriculum based reinforcement learning of grid topology controllers to prevent thermal cascading,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, pp. 1–15, 2022.
  60. Z. Lawal, H. Yassin, D. Lai, and A. Che Idris, “Physics-informed neural network (pinn) evolution and beyond: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis,” Big Data Cognitive Computing, vol. 6, no. 4, p. 140, Dec. 2022.
  61. Z. Hao, S. Liu, Y. Zhang, C. Ying, Y. Feng, H. Su, and J. Zhu, “Physics-informed machine learning: A survey on problems, methods and applications,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.08064, 2022.
  62. C. Meng, S. Seo, D. Cao, S. Griesemer, and Y. Liu, “When physics meets machine learning: A survey of physics-informed machine learning,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.16797, 2022.
  63. S. Huang, W. Feng, C. Tang, and J. Lv, “Partial differential equations meet deep neural networks: A survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.05567, Oct. 2022.
  64. S. R. Vadyala, S. N. Betgeri, J. C. Matthews, and E. Matthews, “A review of physics-based machine learning in civil engineering,” Results in Engineering, vol. 13, p. 100316, 2022.
  65. S. A. Faroughi, P. Nikhil, F. Celio, D. Subasish, N. K. Kalantari, and S. K. Mahjour, “Physics-guided, physics-informed, and physics-encoded neural networks in scientific computing,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.07377, 2022.
  66. P. Sharma, T. C. Wai, A. Bassem, and I. Matthias, “A review of physics-informed machine learning in fluid mechanics,” Energies, vol. 16, no. 5, p. 2343, Feb 2023.
  67. S. Cai, Z. Mao, Z. Wang, M. Yin, and G. E. Karniadakis, “Physics-informed neural networks (pinns) for fluid mechanics: A review,” Acta Mechanica Sinica, vol. 37, no. 12, pp. 1727–1738, 2021.
  68. A. Y. Sun, Y. Hongkyu, S. Chung-Yan, and Z. Zhi, “Applications of physics-informed scientific machine learning in subsurface science: A survey,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.04764, Apr. 2021.
  69. K. Kashinath, M. Mustafa, A. Albert, J. Wu, C. Jiang, S. Esmaeilzadeh, K. Azizzadenesheli, R. Wang, A. Chattopadhyay, A. Singh, and A. Manepalli, “Physics-informed machine learning: case studies for weather and climate modelling,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. 379, no. 2194, p. 20200093, Apr. 2021.
  70. H.-H. Liu, Z. Jilin, L. Feng, T. Cenk, A. B. Mustafa, and M. Rabah, “Incorporation of physics into machine learning for production prediction from unconventional reservoirs: A brief review of the gray-box approach,” SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, vol. 24, no. 4, pp. 847–858, Nov. 2021.
  71. Y. Xu, S. Kohtz, J. Boakye, P. Gardoni, and P. Wang, “Physics-informed machine learning for reliability and systems safety applications: State of the art and challenges,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, p. 108900, Nov. 2022.
  72. L. Hu, J. Zhang, Y. Xiang, and W. Wang, “Neural networks-based aerodynamic data modeling: A comprehensive review,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 90805–90823, 2020.
  73. Z. Lawal, H. Yassin, D. T. C. Lai, and A. Idris, “Physics-informed neural network (pinn) evolution and beyond: A systematic literature review and bibliometric analysis,” Big Data and Cognitive Computing, 11 2022.
  74. R. D. Trevizan, C. Ruben, K. Nagaraj, L. L. Ibukun, A. C. Starke, A. S. Bretas, J. McNair, and A. Zare, “Data-driven physics-based solution for false data injection diagnosis in smart grids,” in 2019 IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), pp. 1–5, IEEE, 2019.
  75. C. I. Chang and S. S. Chiang, “Anomaly detection and classification for hyperspectral imagery,” IEEE Trans. Geosci. and Remote Sens., vol. 40, no. 6, p. 1314–1325, Jun. 2002.
  76. C. Ruben, S. Dhulipala, K. Nagaraj, S. Zou, A. Starke, A. Bretas, A. Zare, and J. McNair, “Hybrid data-driven physics model-based framework for enhanced cyber-physical smart grid security,” IET Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 4, p. 445–453, 2020.
  77. K. C. Ho and P. D. Gader, “Correlation-based land mine detection using gpr,” in Proc. SPIE Symp. Detection and Remediation Technology Mines and Minelike Targets IV, p. 1088–1096, Orlando, FL, Apr. 2000.
  78. K. Nagaraj, S. Zou, C. Ruben, S. Dhulipala, A. Starke, A. Bretas, A. Zare, and J. McNair, “Ensemble corrdet with adaptive statistics for bad data detection,” IET Smart Grid, vol. 3, no. 5, p. 572–580, Oct. 2020.
  79. O. Boyaci, A. Umunnakwe, A. Sahu, M. R. Narimani, M. Ismail, K. R. Davis, and E. Serpedin, “Graph neural networks based detection of stealth false data injection attacks in smart grids,” IEEE Systems Journal, pp. 1–12, 2021.
  80. K. Nagaraj, N. Aljohani, S. Zou, C. Ruben, A. Bretas, A. Zare, and J. McNair, “State estimator and machine learning analysis of residual differences to detect and identify fdi and parameter errors in smart grids,” in 2020 52nd North American Power Symposium (NAPS), pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2021.
  81. M. El Chamie, K. G. Lore, D. M. Shila, and A. Surana, “Physics-based features for anomaly detection in power grids with micro-pmus,” in 2018 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp. 1–7, IEEE, 2018.
  82. M. Jamei, A. Scaglione, C. Roberts, E. Stewart, S. Peisert, C. McParland, and A. McEachern, “Automated anomaly detection in distribution grids using μ𝜇\muitalic_μpmu measurements,” in Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), Jan. 2017.
  83. M. Jamei, A. Scaglione, C. Roberts, E. Stewart, S. Peisert, C. McParland, and A. McEachern, “Anomaly detection using optimally-placed μ𝜇\muitalic_μmu sensors in distribution grids,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 3611–3623, Oct. 2017.
  84. W. Li and D. Deka, “Physics based gnns for locating faults in power grids,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.02275, Jul. 2021.
  85. K. Chen, J. Hu, Y. Zhang, Z. Yu, and J. He, “Fault location in power distribution systems via deep graph convolutional networks,” IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 119–131, Jan. 2020.
  86. S. Lakshminarayana, S. Sthapit, H. Jahangir, C. Maple, and H. Poor, “Data‐driven detection and identification of iot‐enabled load‐altering attacks in power grids,” IET Smart Grid, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 203–218, Jun. 2022.
  87. Z. Chen, J. Xu, T. Peng, and C. Yang, “Graph convolutional network-based method for fault diagnosis using a hybrid of measurement and prior knowledge,” IEEE trans. cyber., vol. 52, no. 9, pp. 9157–9169, Mar. 2021.
  88. M. MansourLakouraj, M. Gautam, R. Hossain, H. Livani, M. Benidris, and S. Commuri, “Event classification in active distribution grids using physics-informed graph neural network and pmu measurements,” in 2022 IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting (IAS), pp. 1–6, Oct. 2022.
  89. M. MansourLakouraj, M. Gautam, H. Livani, and M. Benidris, “A multi-rate sampling pmu-based event classification in active distribution grids with spectral graph neural network,” Elec. Power Sys. Resea., vol. 211, p. 108145, Oct. 2022.
  90. V. Vega-Martinez, A. Cooper, B. Vera, N. Aljohani, and A. Bretas, “Hybrid data-driven physics-based model framework implementation: Towards a secure cyber-physical operation of the smart grid,” in 2022 IEEE International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering and 2022 IEEE Industrial and Commercial Power Systems Europe (EEEIC/I&CPS Europe), pp. 1–5, Jun. 2022.
  91. W. Xu, M. Higgins, J. Wang, I. Jaimoukha, and F. Teng, “Blending data and physics against false data injection attack: An event-triggered moving target defence approach,” IEEE Trans. Smart Grid, Dec. 2022.
  92. E. Vincent, M. Korki, M. Seyedmahmoudian, A. Stojcevski, and S. Mekhilef, “Detection of false data injection attacks in cyber–physical systems using graph convolutional network,” Electric Power Systems Research, vol. 217, p. 109118, Apr 2023.
  93. W. Li, D. Deka, R. Wang, and M. Paternina, “Physics-constrained adversarial training for neural networks in stochastic power grids,” IEEE Transactions on Artificial Intelligence, Jan. 2023.
  94. K. Pan, P. Palensky, and P. M. Esfahani, “Dynamic anomaly detection with high-fidelity simulators: A convex optimization approach,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 1500–1515, Nov. 2021.
  95. L. Wang and Q. Zhou, “Physics-guided deep learning for time-series state estimation against false data injection attacks,” in Proc. North Amer. Power Symp. (NAPS), pp. 1–6, Oct. 2019.
  96. W. Li and D. Deka, “Physics-informed learning for high impedance faults detection,” in 2021 IEEE Madrid PowerTech, pp. 1–6, IEEE, 2021.
  97. O. Anderson and N. Yu, “Distribution system bad data detection using graph signal processing,” in 2021 IEEE Power Energy Society General Meeting (PESGM), pp. 1–5, IEEE, 2021.
  98. W. Li and D. Deka, “Physics-informed graph learning for robust fault location in distribution systems,” arXiv e-prints, pp.arXiv-2107, 2021.
  99. F. Alotibi and T. David, “Physics-informed cyber-attack detection in wind farms,” in GLOBECOM 2022-2022 IEEE Global Communications Conference, pp. 1–6, Dec. 2022.
  100. C. Feng, C. Liu, and D. Jiang, “Unsupervised anomaly detection using graph neural networks integrated with physical-statistical feature fusion and local-global learning,” Renewable Energy, vol. 206, pp. 309–323, Apr. 2023.
  101. L. Zeng, M. Sun, X. Wan, Z. Zhang, R. Deng, and Y. Xu, “Physics-constrained vulnerability assessment of deep reinforcement learning-based scopf,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 2022.
  102. J. Wu, D. Ota, K., J. M., Li, and H. Wang, “Big data analysis-based security situational awareness for smart grid,” IEEE Transactions on Big Data, vol. 4, no. 8, p. 408, 2018.
  103. P. Chen, S. Liu, B. Chen, and L. Yu, “Multi-agent reinforcement learning for decentralized resilient secondary control of energy storage systems against dos attacks,” IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, vol. 13, no. 3, pp. 1739–1750, 2022.
  104. V. P. Singh, N. Kishor, and P. Samuel, “Distributed multi-agent system-based load frequency control for multi-area power system in smart grid,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, vol. 64, no. 6, pp. 5151–5160, 2017.
  105. V. Thanh and W. Su, “Data-driven model predictive control-based proactive scheduling for commercial microgrid considering anomaly detection,” IEEE Systems Journal, accepted for publication in 2022.
  106. Y. Du, Q. Huang, R. Huang, T. Yin, J. Tan, W. Yu, and X. Li, “Physics informed evolutionary strategy based control for mitigation delayed voltage recovery,” IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, vol. 37, no. 5, 2022.
  107. Y. Tao, J. Qiu, S. Lai, X. Zhang, Y. Wang, and G. Wang, “A human-machine reinforcement learning method for cooperative energy management,” IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, vol. 18, no. 5, pp. 2974–2985, 2022.
  108. L. Ma and S. Tian, “A hybrid cnn-lstm model for aircraft 4d trajectory prediction,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, p. 134668–134680, 2020.
  109. X. Yuan, L. Li, Y. A. Shardt, Y. Wang, and C. Yang, “Deep learning with spatiotemporal attention-based lstm for industrial soft sensor model development,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 68, no. 5, pp. 4404–4414, Apr. 2020.
  110. R. R. Bhat, R. D. Trevizan, R. Sengupta, X. Li, and A. Bretas, “Identifying nontechnical power loss via spatial and temporal deep learning,” in Proc. 15th IEEE Int. Conf. Mach. Learn. Appl. (ICMLA), p. 272–279, Dec. 2016.
  111. L. Akoglu, H. Tong, and D. Koutra, “Graph based anomaly detection and description: A survey,” Data Mining Knowl. Discovery, vol. 29, no. 3, p. 626–688, May 2015.
  112. W. Liao, B. Bak-Jensen, J. R. Pillai, Y. Wang, and Y. Wang, “A review of graph neural networks and their applications in power systems,” J. Mod. Power Sys. Clean Ener., Aug. 2021.
Citations (19)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now