Harnessing Collective Intelligence Under a Lack of Cultural Consensus (2309.09787v2)
Abstract: Harnessing collective intelligence to drive effective decision-making and collaboration benefits from the ability to detect and characterize heterogeneity in consensus beliefs. This is particularly true in domains such as technology acceptance or leadership perception, where a consensus defines an intersubjective truth, leading to the possibility of multiple "ground truths" when subsets of respondents sustain mutually incompatible consensuses. Cultural Consensus Theory (CCT) provides a statistical framework for detecting and characterizing these divergent consensus beliefs. However, it is unworkable in modern applications because it lacks the ability to generalize across even highly similar beliefs, is ineffective with sparse data, and can leverage neither external knowledge bases nor learned machine representations. Here, we overcome these limitations through Infinite Deep Latent Construct Cultural Consensus Theory (iDLC-CCT), a nonparametric Bayesian model that extends CCT with a latent construct that maps between pretrained deep neural network embeddings of entities and the consensus beliefs regarding those entities among one or more subsets of respondents. We validate the method across domains including perceptions of risk sources, food healthiness, leadership, first impressions, and humor. We find that iDLC-CCT better predicts the degree of consensus, generalizes well to out-of-sample entities, and is effective even with sparse data. To improve scalability, we introduce an efficient hard-clustering variant of the iDLC-CCT using an algorithm derived from a small-variance asymptotic analysis of the model. The iDLC-CCT, therefore, provides a workable computational foundation for harnessing collective intelligence under a lack of cultural consensus and may potentially form the basis of consensus-aware information technologies.
- State of the art—encoding subjective probabilities: A psychological and psychometric review. Management Science, 29(2):151–173, 1983.
- James Surowiecki. The wisdom of crowds. Anchor, 2005.
- Jeff Howe et al. The rise of crowdsourcing. Wired magazine, 14(6):1–4, 2006.
- The collective intelligence genome. MIT Sloan Management Review, 2010.
- Eric Bonabeau. Decisions 2.0: The power of collective intelligence. MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(2):45, 2009.
- Barry L Bayus. Crowdsourcing new product ideas over time: An analysis of the dell ideastorm community. Management Science, 59(1):226–244, 2013.
- Harnessing the wisdom of crowds. Management Science, 66(5):1847–1867, 2020.
- Francis Galton. Vox populi. Nature, 75(1949):450–451, 1907.
- Maximum likelihood estimation of observer error-rates using the em algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series C (Applied Statistics), 28(1):20–28, 1979.
- Boosting the wisdom of crowds within a single judgment problem: Weighted averaging based on peer predictions. Management Science, 2023.
- Identifying expertise to extract the wisdom of crowds. Management Science, 61(2):267–280, 2015.
- Steffen R Giessner and Daan van Knippenberg. “license to fail”: Goal definition, leader group prototypicality, and perceptions of leadership effectiveness after leader failure. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 105(1):14–35, 2008.
- Tattoo or taboo? tattoo stigma and negative attitudes toward tattooed individuals. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158(5):521–540, 2018.
- Has facial recognition technology been misused? a public perception model of facial recognition scenarios. Computers in Human Behavior, 124:106894, 2021.
- The social construction of reality. In Wired Magazine. Routledge, 1966.
- Culture as consensus: A theory of culture and informant accuracy. American Anthropologist, 88(2):313–338, 1986.
- What does it mean to feel loved: Cultural consensus and individual differences in felt love. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(1):214–243, 2019.
- A mixed methods approach: Using cultural modeling and consensus analysis to better understand new zealand’s international innovation performance. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(3):166–183, 2012.
- Learning and enforcing a cultural consensus in online communities. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, volume 44, 2022.
- Getting personal: A deep learning artifact for text-based measurement of personality. Information Systems Research, 2022.
- Predicting shareholder litigation on insider trading from financial text: An interpretable deep learning approach. Information & Management, 57(8):103387, 2020.
- Deep learning in asset pricing. Management Science, 2023.
- Deep learning. Nature, 521(7553):436–444, 2015.
- Sudeep Bhatia. Predicting risk perception: New insights from data science. Management Science, 65(8):3800–3823, 2019.
- Deep models of superficial face judgments. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(17):e2115228119, 2022.
- Cultural alignment of machine-vision representations. In SVRHM 2022 Workshop@ NeurIPS, 2022.
- Predicting leadership perception with large-scale natural language data. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(5):101535, 2022.
- Divergent semantic integration (dsi): Extracting creativity from narratives with distributional semantic modeling. Behavior Research Methods, pages 1–34, 2022.
- Product choice with large assortments: A scalable deep-learning model. Management Science, 68(3):1808–1827, 2022.
- Measuring founding strategy. Management Science, 69(1):101–118, 2023.
- Aligning differences: Discursive diversity and team performance. Management Science, 68(11):8430–8448, 2022.
- Ensemble deep learning: A review. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 115:105151, 2022.
- Gemma Boleda. Distributional semantics and linguistic theory. Annual Review of Linguistics, 6:213–234, 2020.
- Distributed semantic representations for modeling human judgment. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 29:31–36, 2019.
- Topics in semantic representation. Psychological Review, 114(2):211, 2007.
- Representing word meaning and order information in a composite holographic lexicon. Psychological Review, 114(1):1, 2007.
- Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 26, 2013.
- Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pages 1532–1543, 2014.
- Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases. Science, 356(6334):183–186, 2017.
- Bert: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.04805, 2018.
- Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30, 2017.
- Roberta: A robustly optimized bert pretraining approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.11692, 2019.
- Transformers: State-of-the-art natural language processing. In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing: System Demonstrations, pages 38–45, 2020.
- Comet: Commonsense transformers for automatic knowledge graph construction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.05317, 2019.
- Inducing relational knowledge from bert. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 34, pages 7456–7463, 2020.
- Predicting human similarity judgments using large language models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.04728, 2022.
- Representing and predicting everyday behavior. Computational Brain & Behavior, 5(1):1–21, 2022.
- Delving deep into rectifiers: Surpassing human-level performance on imagenet classification. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision, pages 1026–1034, 2015.
- Detecting and classifying lesions in mammograms with deep learning. Scientific reports, 8(1):4165, 2018.
- Surpassing human-level face verification performance on lfw with gaussianface. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, volume 29, 2015.
- Understanding and predicting image memorability at a large scale. In Proceedings of the IEEE international Conference on Computer Vision, pages 2390–2398, 2015.
- Deep neural networks predict category typicality ratings for images. Cognitive Science, 2015.
- Unsupervised neural network models of the ventral visual stream. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(3):e2014196118, 2021.
- Adapting deep network features to capture psychological representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1608.02164, 2016.
- Capturing human categorization of natural images by combining deep networks and cognitive models. Nature Communications, 11(1):5418, 2020.
- Test theory without an answer key. Psychometrika, 53(1):71–92, 1988.
- Hierarchical bayesian modeling for test theory without an answer key. Psychometrika, 80:341–364, 2015.
- Item response theory. Psychology Press, 2013.
- Ambiguity aversion and comparative ignorance. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110(3):585–603, 1995.
- Susan C Weller. Cultural consensus theory: Applications and frequently asked questions. Field Methods, 19(4):339–368, 2007.
- Cultural consensus theory: Comparing different concepts of cultural truth. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 56(5):316–332, 2012.
- Cultural consensus theory for the ordinal data case. Psychometrika, 80(1):151–181, 2015.
- Cultural consensus theory for continuous responses: A latent appraisal model for information pooling. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 61:1–13, 2014.
- Cultural consensus theory for the evaluation of patients’ mental health scores in forensic psychiatric hospitals. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 98:102383, 2020.
- Gibbs sampling methods for stick-breaking priors. Journal of the American statistical Association, 96(453):161–173, 2001.
- Hierarchical topic models and the nested chinese restaurant process. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 16, 2003.
- Radford M Neal. Markov chain sampling methods for dirichlet process mixture models. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 9(2):249–265, 2000.
- Nonparametric bayesian modelling for item response. Statistical Modelling, 8(1):41–66, 2008.
- A bayesian semiparametric item response model with dirichlet process priors. Psychometrika, 74(3):375–393, 2009.
- Michael D Lee. How cognitive modeling can benefit from hierarchical bayesian models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 55(1):1–7, 2011.
- Composable effects for flexible and accelerated probabilistic programming in NumPyro. arXiv preprint arXiv:1912.11554, 2019.
- JAX: composable transformations of Python+ NumPy programs, 2018. URL http://github. com/google/jax, 4:16, 2020.
- Jun S Liu. Peskun’s theorem and a modified discrete-state gibbs sampler. Biometrika, 83(3), 1996.
- The no-u-turn sampler: adaptively setting path lengths in hamiltonian monte carlo. J. Mach. Learn. Res., 15(1):1593–1623, 2014.
- Janet Holmes. Making humour work: Creativity on the job. Applied linguistics, 28(4):518–537, 2007.
- Workplace fun and its correlates: A conceptual inquiry. International Journal of Management, 27(2):294, 2010.
- Relationships among gender, type of humor, and perceived leader effectiveness. Journal of Managerial Issues, pages 450–465, 2001.
- Humor and work: Applications of joking behavior to management. Journal of Management, 16(2):255–278, 1990.
- Jim Lyttle. The judicious use and management of humor in the workplace. Business Horizons, 50(3):239–245, 2007.
- When does humor enhance or inhibit ad responses?-the moderating role of the need for humor. Journal of Advertising, 32(3):31–45, 2003.
- Attitude toward the ad: An assessment of diverse measurement indices under different processing “sets”. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(3):242–252, 1988.
- The effects of incongruity, surprise and positive moderators on perceived humor in television advertising. Journal of Advertising, 29(2):1–15, 2000.
- Martin Eisend. How humor in advertising works: A meta-analytic test of alternative models. Marketing Letters, 22:115–132, 2011.
- Yong Zhang. Responses to humorous advertising: The moderating effect of need for cognition. Journal of Advertising, 25(1):15–32, 1996.
- A priest, a rabbi, and a minister walk into a bar: A meta-analysis of humor effects on persuasion. Human Communication Research, 44(4):343–373, 2018.
- Influencer marketing on tiktok: The effectiveness of humor and followers’ hedonic experience. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 70:103149, 2023.
- Yong Zhang. The effect of humor in advertising: An individual-difference perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 13(6):531–545, 1996.
- Fred K Beard. Advertising and audience offense: The role of intentional humor. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(1):1–17, 2008.
- Eigentaste: A constant time collaborative filtering algorithm. Information Retrieval, 4:133–151, 2001.
- What’s in a face? an experiment on facial information and loan-approval decision. Management Science, 2022.
- Elected in 100 milliseconds: Appearance-based trait inferences and voting. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 34:83–110, 2010.
- An examination of criminal face bias in a random sample of police lineups. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25(2):265–273, 2011.
- The many (distinctive) faces of leadership: Inferring leadership domain from facial appearance. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(5):817–834, 2014.
- Facial dominance of west point cadets as a predictor of later military rank. Social Forces, 74(3):823–850, 1996.
- Facial first impressions across culture: Data-driven modeling of chinese and british perceivers’ unconstrained facial impressions. Personality and Social Psychology bulletin, 44(4):521–537, 2018.
- Cross-cultural agreement in perceptions of babyfaced adults. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 18(2):165–192, 1987.
- The facial width-to-height ratio shares stronger links with judgments of aggression than with judgments of trustworthiness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40(4):1526, 2014.
- Trait knowledge forms a common structure across social cognition. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(4):361–371, 2020.
- Analyzing and improving the image quality of stylegan. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, pages 8110–8119, 2020.
- Paul Slovic. Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799):280–285, 1987.
- Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2):363–391, 1979.
- Perception of risk posed by extreme events. Regulation of Toxic Substances and Hazardous Waste (2nd edition)(Applegate, Gabba, Laitos, and Sachs, Editors), Foundation Press, Forthcoming, 2013.
- How safe is safe enough? a psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sciences, 9:127–152, 1978.
- The ecological risks and benefits of genetically engineered plants. Science, 290(5499):2088–2093, 2000.
- The relationship between knowledge and attitudes in the public understanding of science in britain. Public Understanding of Science, 4(1):57, 1995.
- Morality and nuclear energy: Perceptions of risks and benefits, personal norms, and willingness to take action related to nuclear energy. Risk Analysis: An International Journal, 30(9):1363–1373, 2010.
- The affect heuristic in judgments of risks and benefits. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 13(1):1–17, 2000.
- Arthur G Jago. Leadership: Perspectives in theory and research. Management science, 28(3):315–336, 1982.
- Perceived leader integrity scale: An instrument for assessing employee perceptions of leader integrity. The Leadership Quarterly, 9(2):127–145, 1998.
- Causal attributions and perceptions of leadership. Organizational Behavior and Human performance, 28(2):143–163, 1981.
- A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 34(3):343–378, 1984.
- What matters most in leader selection? the role of personality and implicit leadership theories. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 36(4):360–379, 2015.
- Rapid mortality falls after risk-factor changes in populations. The Lancet, 378(9793):752–753, 2011.
- Predicting judgments of food healthiness with deep latent-construct cultural consensus theory. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, volume 45, 2023.
- Ellen Messer. Anthropological perspectives on diet. Annual Review of Anthropology, 13(1):205–249, 1984.
- Defining and labelling ‘healthy’and ‘unhealthy’food. Public Health Nutrition, 12(3):331–340, 2009.
- Is sushi ‘healthy’? what about granola? where americans and nutritionists disagree. The New York Times, 5, 2016.
- Cultural adaptations of behavioral health interventions: a progress report. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 81(2):196, 2013.
- A comparative study of american and chinese college students’ motives for food choice. Appetite, 123:325–333, 2018.
- Cross-cultural comparison of perspectives on healthy eating among chinese and american undergraduate students. BMC Public Health, 16(1):1–12, 2016.
- Interpretations and attitudes toward healthy eating among japanese workers. Appetite, 44(1):123–129, 2005.
- Socio-economic pathways to diet: modelling the association between socio-economic position and food purchasing behaviour. Public Health Nutrition, 9(3):375–383, 2006.
- Jacob L Orquin. A brunswik lens model of consumer health judgments of packaged foods. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 13(4):270–281, 2014.
- Jonathon P Schuldt. Does green mean healthy? nutrition label color affects perceptions of healthfulness. Health Communication, 28(8):814–821, 2013.
- Computational methods for predicting and understanding food judgment. Psychological Science, 33(4):579–594, 2022.
- Optimal brain damage. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 2, 1989.
- Risk preferences around the world. Management Science, 61(3):637–648, 2015.
- Individual differences in trust evaluations are shaped mostly by environments, not genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(19):10218–10224, 2020.
- Beyond simple demographic effects: The importance of relational demography in superior-subordinate dyads. Academy of management journal, 32(2):402–423, 1989.
- The echo chamber is overstated: the moderating effect of political interest and diverse media. Information, communication & society, 21(5):729–745, 2018.
- The echo chamber effect on social media. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(9):e2023301118, 2021.
- Yee Whye Teh et al. Dirichlet process. Encyclopedia of machine learning, 1063:280–287, 2010.
- Probabilistic principal component analysis. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), 61(3):611–622, 1999.
- Sam Roweis. Em algorithms for pca and spca. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 10, 1997.
- Revisiting k-means: New algorithms via bayesian nonparametrics. arXiv preprint arXiv:1111.0352, 2011.
- Small-variance asymptotics for exponential family dirichlet process mixture models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 25, 2012.
- Klaus Fiedler. Explaining and simulating judgment biases as an aggregation phenomenon in probabilistic, multiple-cue environments. Psychological Review, 103(1):193, 1996.
- The development of embodied cognition: Six lessons from babies. Artificial Life, 11(1-2):13–29, 2005.
- Deep multimodal learning: A survey on recent advances and trends. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 34(6):96–108, 2017.
Paper Prompts
Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.
Collections
Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.