Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
AI Research Assistant
AI Research Assistant
Well-researched responses based on relevant abstracts and paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses.
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 78 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 12 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 14 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 89 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 212 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 472 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Developmental Scaffolding with Large Language Models (2309.00904v2)

Published 2 Sep 2023 in cs.RO

Abstract: Exploratoration and self-observation are key mechanisms of infant sensorimotor development. These processes are further guided by parental scaffolding accelerating skill and knowledge acquisition. In developmental robotics, this approach has been adopted often by having a human acting as the source of scaffolding. In this study, we investigate whether LLMs can act as a scaffolding agent for a robotic system that aims to learn to predict the effects of its actions. To this end, an object manipulation setup is considered where one object can be picked and placed on top of or in the vicinity of another object. The adopted LLM is asked to guide the action selection process through algorithmically generated state descriptions and action selection alternatives in natural language. The simulation experiments that include cubes in this setup show that LLM-guided (GPT3.5-guided) learning yields significantly faster discovery of novel structures compared to random exploration. However, we observed that GPT3.5 fails to effectively guide the robot in generating structures with different affordances such as cubes and spheres. Overall, we conclude that even without fine-tuning, LLMs may serve as a moderate scaffolding agent for improving robot learning, however, they still lack affordance understanding which limits the applicability of the current LLMs in robotic scaffolding tasks.

Citations (2)

Summary

  • The paper explores using Large Language Models (LLMs) as scaffolding agents in robotic exploration and learning, adapting techniques from human developmental scaffolding.
  • The study's simulation experiments show LLM-guided exploration significantly outperforms random exploration in discovering complex object configurations but struggles with tasks requiring affordance reasoning.
  • These findings imply LLMs can be cost-effective robotic scaffolding, though improving affordance reasoning through grounded, multimodal learning is crucial for wider real-world application.

Developmental Scaffolding with LLMs

In the paper "Developmental Scaffolding with LLMs," the authors investigate the potential of utilizing LLMs, specifically GPT3.5, as scaffolding agents in robotic exploration and learning tasks. The paper is set within the context of developmental robotics, where the capability of infants to explore and learn from their environment is partly guided by parental scaffolding, which accelerates their skill acquisition. This research seeks to adapt similar scaffolding techniques using LLMs in lieu of human trainers, with the aim of improving the efficiency of robotic learning systems.

Methodological Approach

The research design employs a simulation environment with a robotic agent tasked with the sequential manipulation of objects, including cubes and spheres, on a table. The robot's goal is to learn by exploring the effects of various actions. The LLM, GPT3.5, is harnessed to guide these actions, intending to achieve configurations that are complex or unfamiliar to mere random exploration. The robot and objects' interactions are parsed into natural language prompts which the LLM interprets to suggest subsequent actions. This exploration framework involves several experiments with varying numbers of objects and placement complexities, comparing LLM-guided exploration to a random exploration baseline.

Key Findings

The results indicate that LLM-guided exploration significantly outpaces random exploration in discovering technically complex configurations, such as towering structures of cubes. Notable within these findings is the LLM's ability to quickly identify and pursue actions leading to novel object configurations, which parallels an inherent understanding typically sought through human scaffolding.

However, the research also highlights limitations in the application of LLMs for tasks that require affordance reasoning. GPT3.5 showed notable deficiency in effectively guiding the manipulation involving objects with distinct affordances, such as balancing a cube on a sphere. Despite its vast training data, the LLM defaulted to suggesting actions inconsistent with real-world physics when merely driven by textual descriptions lacking grounding feedback.

Implications and Future Directions

These findings suggest that while current LLMs like GPT3.5 exhibit promising capacities for serving as robotic scaffolding agents, their applications are still hindered by a lack of robust affordance reasoning. This constraint pinpoints critical opportunities for enhancing LLM capabilities with more grounded experiences, potentially through multimodal learning strategies that incorporate real-world sensory inputs.

The implications of this work span both theoretical and practical domains. Theoretically, the research supports the concept of LLMs as heuristic engines that can facilitate efficient exploration in developmental robotics. Practically, it underscores the potential cost-effectiveness of replacing human scaffolding with AI models, given appropriate constraints and tasks.

Looking forward, the field should focus on integrating LLM knowledge with sensorimotor data to improve grounded inference capabilities. Investigations into advanced models like GPT4 and others should examine their efficacy in not only directing actions but also in understanding and appropriately responding to the affordances and complexities innate to physical environments. Additionally, developments in fine-tuning methods could bridge the current gap between simulated AI behavior and model robotics applications in real-world scenarios. With these advancements, the role of LLMs in enabling more adaptive and efficient robotic systems that closely mimic human developmental learning processes could be significantly expanded.

Lightbulb On Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Continue Learning

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Youtube Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube