Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 45 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 52 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 30 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 206 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 457 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Fast and effortless computation of profile likelihoods using CONNECT (2308.06379v2)

Published 11 Aug 2023 in astro-ph.CO, astro-ph.IM, and hep-ph

Abstract: The frequentist method of profile likelihoods has recently received renewed attention in the field of cosmology. This is because the results of inferences based on the latter may differ from those of Bayesian inferences, either because of prior choices or because of non-Gaussianity in the likelihood function. Consequently, both methods are required for a fully nuanced analysis. However, in the last decades, cosmological parameter estimation has largely been dominated by Bayesian statistics due to the numerical complexity of constructing profile likelihoods, arising mainly from the need for a large number of gradient-free optimisations of the likelihood function. In this paper, we show how to accommodate the computational requirements of profile likelihoods using the publicly available neural network framework CONNECT together with a novel modification of the gradient-based $basin$-$hopping$ optimisation algorithm. Apart from the reduced evaluation time of the likelihood due to the neural network, we also achieve an additional speed-up of 1$-$2 orders of magnitude compared to profile likelihoods computed with the gradient-free method of $simulated$ $annealing$, with excellent agreement between the two. This allows for the production of typical triangle plots normally associated with Bayesian marginalisation within cosmology (and previously unachievable using likelihood maximisation because of the prohibitive computational cost). We have tested the setup on three cosmological models: the $\Lambda$CDM model, an extension with varying neutrino mass, and finally a decaying cold dark matter model. Given the default precision settings in CONNECT, we achieve a high precision in $\chi2$ with a difference to the results obtained by CLASS of $\Delta\chi2\approx0.2$ (and, importantly, without any bias in inferred parameter values) $-$ easily good enough for profile likelihood analyses.

Citations (5)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.