Learning Evacuee Models from Robot-Guided Emergency Evacuation Experiments (2306.17824v1)
Abstract: Recent research has examined the possibility of using robots to guide evacuees to safe exits during emergencies. Yet, there are many factors that can impact a person's decision to follow a robot. Being able to model how an evacuee follows an emergency robot guide could be crucial for designing robots that effectively guide evacuees during an emergency. This paper presents a method for developing realistic and predictive human evacuee models from physical human evacuation experiments. The paper analyzes the behavior of 14 human subjects during physical robot-guided evacuation. We then use the video data to create evacuee motion models that predict the person's future positions during the emergency. Finally, we validate the resulting models by running a k-fold cross-validation on the data collected during physical human subject experiments. We also present performance results of the model using data from a similar simulated emergency evacuation experiment demonstrating that these models can serve as a tool to predict evacuee behavior in novel evacuation simulations.
- M. Nayyar and A. R. Wagner, “Effective robot evacuation strategies in emergencies,” in 2019 28th IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN), 2019, pp. 1–6.
- M. Nayyar, Z. Zoloty, C. McFarland, and A. R. Wagner, “Exploring the effect of explanations during robot-guided emergency evacuation,” in Social Robotics. Springer International Publishing, 2020, pp. 13–22.
- P. Robinette, W. Li, R. Allen, A. M. Howard, and A. R. Wagner, “Overtrust of robots in emergency evacuation scenarios,” in Human-Robot Interaction (HRI), 2016 11th ACM/IEEE International Conference on. IEEE, 2016, pp. 101–108.
- D. A. Shell and M. J. Matarić, “Insights toward robot-assisted evacuation,” Advanced Robotics, vol. 19, no. 8, pp. 797–818, 2005.
- Y. Wang, M. Kyriakidis, and V. N. Dang, “Incorporating human factors in emergency evacuation–an overview of behavioral factors and models,” International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, vol. 60, p. 102254, 2021.
- P. Gantt and R. Gantt, “Disaster psychology: Dispelling the myths of panic,” Professional Safety, vol. 57, no. 08, pp. 42–49, 2012.
- H. C. Vorst, “Evacuation models and disaster psychology,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 3, pp. 15–21, 2010.
- N. Verdière, V. Lanza, R. Charrier, D. Provitolo, E. Dubos-Paillard, C. Bertelle, and M. Aziz-Alaoui, “Mathematical modeling of human behaviors during catastrophic events,” in International Conference on Complex Systems and Applications Le Havre, 23 au 26 juin 2014., 2014, pp. 67–74.
- D. Provitolo, E. Dubos-Paillard, and J. P. Müller, “Emergent human behaviour during a disaster: thematic# versus# complex systems approaches,” 2011.
- X. Pan, C. S. Han, K. Dauber, and K. H. Law, “A multi-agent based framework for the simulation of human and social behaviors during emergency evacuations,” Ai & Society, vol. 22, no. 2, pp. 113–132, 2007.
- D. Helbing, I. Farkas, and T. Vicsek, “Simulating dynamical features of escape panic,” Nature, vol. 407, no. 6803, p. 487, 2000.
- P. Goatin, R. M. Colombo, and M. D. Rosini, “A macroscopic model for pedestrian flows in panic situations,” in 4th Polish-Japan Days, vol. 32, 2009, pp. 255–272.
- X. Song, Q. Zhang, Y. Sekimoto, and R. Shibasaki, “Prediction of human emergency behavior and their mobility following large-scale disaster,” in Proceedings of the 20th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. ACM, 2014, pp. 5–14.
- X. Song, R. Shibasaki, N. J. Yuan, X. Xie, T. Li, and R. Adachi, “Deepmob: Learning deep knowledge of human emergency behavior and mobility from big and heterogeneous data,” ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), vol. 35, no. 4, p. 41, 2017.
- N. Golshani, R. Shabanpour, A. Mohammadian, J. Auld, and H. Ley, “Evacuation decision behavior for no-notice emergency events,” Transportation research part D: transport and environment, vol. 77, pp. 364–377, 2019.
- R. Lovreglio, E. Ronchi, and D. Borri, “The validation of evacuation simulation models through the analysis of behavioural uncertainty,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, vol. 131, pp. 166–174, 2014.
- C. Liu, Z.-l. Mao, and Z.-m. Fu, “Emergency evacuation model and algorithm in the building with several exits,” Procedia Engineering, vol. 135, pp. 12–18, 2016.
- S. Wei-Guo, Y. Yan-Fei, W. Bing-Hong, and F. Wei-Cheng, “Evacuation behaviors at exit in ca model with force essentials: A comparison with social force model,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 371, no. 2, pp. 658–666, 2006.
- J. Wan, J. Sui, and H. Yu, “Research on evacuation in the subway station in china based on the combined social force model,” Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, vol. 394, pp. 33–46, 2014.
- D. Helbing and P. Molnar, “Social force model for pedestrian dynamics,” Physical review E, vol. 51, no. 5, p. 4282, 1995.
- H.-S. Fang, S. Xie, Y.-W. Tai, and C. Lu, “RMPE: Regional multi-person pose estimation,” in ICCV, 2017.
- J. Redmon and A. Farhadi, “Yolov3: An incremental improvement,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1804.02767, 2018.
- G. Jocher, A. Chaurasia, A. Stoken, J. Borovec, NanoCode012, Y. Kwon, TaoXie, K. Michael, J. Fang, imyhxy, Lorna, C. Wong, Z. Yifu, A. V, D. Montes, Z. Wang, C. Fati, J. Nadar, Laughing, UnglvKitDe, tkianai, yxNONG, P. Skalski, A. Hogan, M. Strobel, M. Jain, L. Mammana, and xylieong, “ultralytics/yolov5: v6.2 - yolov5 classification models, apple m1, reproducibility, clearml and deci.ai integrations,” Aug. 2022.
- A. Savitzky and M. J. Golay, “Smoothing and differentiation of data by simplified least squares procedures.” Analytical chemistry, vol. 36, no. 8, pp. 1627–1639, 1964.
- T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system,” in Proceedings of the 22nd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, 2016, pp. 785–794.
- C. Bentéjac, A. Csörgő, and G. Martínez-Muñoz, “A comparative analysis of gradient boosting algorithms,” Artificial Intelligence Review, vol. 54, pp. 1937–1967, 2021.