Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

A prior regularized full waveform inversion using generative diffusion models (2306.12776v1)

Published 22 Jun 2023 in physics.geo-ph and cs.LG

Abstract: Full waveform inversion (FWI) has the potential to provide high-resolution subsurface model estimations. However, due to limitations in observation, e.g., regional noise, limited shots or receivers, and band-limited data, it is hard to obtain the desired high-resolution model with FWI. To address this challenge, we propose a new paradigm for FWI regularized by generative diffusion models. Specifically, we pre-train a diffusion model in a fully unsupervised manner on a prior velocity model distribution that represents our expectations of the subsurface and then adapt it to the seismic observations by incorporating the FWI into the sampling process of the generative diffusion models. What makes diffusion models uniquely appropriate for such an implementation is that the generative process retains the form and dimensions of the velocity model. Numerical examples demonstrate that our method can outperform the conventional FWI with only negligible additional computational cost. Even in cases of very sparse observations or observations with strong noise, the proposed method could still reconstruct a high-quality subsurface model. Thus, we can incorporate our prior expectations of the solutions in an efficient manner. We further test this approach on field data, which demonstrates the effectiveness of the proposed method.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (25)
  1. Full model wavenumber inversion: Identifying sources of information for the elusive middle model wavenumbers. Geophysics, 83(6):R597–R610, 2018.
  2. Mlreal: Bridging the gap between training on synthetic data and real data applications in machine learning. Artificial Intelligence in Geosciences, 3:101–114, 2022.
  3. 3-d salt and overthrust seismic models. Studies in Geology, 42:247–256, 1996.
  4. Tikhonov regularization.Parameter estimation and inverse problems. 2nd edn. Elsevier Academic Press, New York, 2011.
  5. Marmousi, model and data. In EAEG workshop-practical aspects of seismic data inversion, pages cp–108. EAGE Publications BV, 1990.
  6. Improving Diffusion Models for Inverse Problems using Manifold Constraints, October 2022. URL http://arxiv.org/abs/2206.00941. arXiv:2206.00941 [cs, stat].
  7. Openfwi: Large-scale multi-structural benchmark datasets for seismic full waveform inversion. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.02926, 2021.
  8. A robust full waveform inversion using dictionary learning. In SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting, page 5407. OnePetro, 2019.
  9. Flux-corrected transport for full-waveform inversion. Geophysical Journal International, 217(3):2147–2164, 2019.
  10. Mapping full seismic waveforms to vertical velocity profiles by deep learning. Geophysics, 86(5):R711–R721, 2021.
  11. Deep learning. nature, 521(7553):436–444, 2015.
  12. Deep-learning inversion of seismic data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 58(3):2135–2149, 2020. doi: 10.1109/TGRS.2019.2953473.
  13. Fast randomized full-waveform inversion with compressive sensing. Geophysics, 77(3), 2012. ISSN 00168033. doi: 10.1190/geo2011-0410.1.
  14. Extended full waveform inversion with matching filter. Geophysical Prospecting, 69(7):1441–1454, 2021.
  15. Target-oriented time-lapse elastic full-waveform inversion constrained by deep learning-based prior model. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60:1–12, 2022.
  16. Deep-learning assisted regularized elastic full waveform inversion using the velocity distribution information from wells. Geophysical Journal International, 226(2):1322–1335, 2021.
  17. A kernelized stein discrepancy for goodness-of-fit tests. In International conference on machine learning, pages 276–284. PMLR, 2016.
  18. Stochastic seismic waveform inversion using generative adversarial networks as a geological prior. Mathematical Geosciences, 52(1):53–79, 2020.
  19. Multi-task learning for low-frequency extrapolation and elastic model building from seismic data. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing, 60:1–17, 2022.
  20. Alan Richardson. Deepwave, November 2022. URL https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7278382.
  21. Score-based generative modeling through stochastic differential equations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.13456, 2020.
  22. Albert Tarantola. Inversion of seismic reflection data in the acoustic approximation. GEOPHYSICS, 49(8):1259–1266, August 1984. ISSN 0016-8033. doi: 10.1190/1.1441754. URL http://library.seg.org/doi/10.1190/1.1441754.
  23. Full-waveform inversion using seislet regularization. Geophysics, 82(5):A43–A49, 2017. ISSN 19422156. doi: 10.1190/GEO2016-0699.1.
  24. Fast online orthonormal dictionary learning for efficient full waveform inversion. In 2016 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP), pages 1427–1431, 2016. doi: 10.1109/ICASSP.2016.7471912.
  25. Sparse-promoting full-waveform inversion based on online orthonormal dictionary learning. Geophysics, 82(2):R87–R107, 3 2017. ISSN 0016-8033. doi: 10.1190/geo2015-0632.1. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1190/geo2015-0632.1http://library.seg.org/doi/10.1190/geo2015-0632.1.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (3)
  1. Fu Wang (15 papers)
  2. Xinquan Huang (12 papers)
  3. Tariq Alkhalifah (66 papers)
Citations (15)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.