Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 52 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 55 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 25 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 107 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 216 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 468 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 39 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Misinformation as Information Pollution (2306.12466v1)

Published 21 Jun 2023 in cs.SI and cs.CL

Abstract: Social media feed algorithms are designed to optimize online social engagements for the purpose of maximizing advertising profits, and therefore have an incentive to promote controversial posts including misinformation. By thinking about misinformation as information pollution, we can draw parallels with environmental policy for countering pollution such as carbon taxes. Similar to pollution, a Pigouvian tax on misinformation provides economic incentives for social media companies to control the spread of misinformation more effectively to avoid or reduce their misinformation tax, while preserving some degree of freedom in platforms' response. In this paper, we highlight a bird's eye view of a Pigouvian misinformation tax and discuss the key questions and next steps for implementing such a taxing scheme.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (47)
  1. How effectively can we form opinions?. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on World Wide Web. 213–214.
  2. Marshall Van Alstyne. 2019. Could Taxes Deter the Spread of Harmful Fake News? The Brink (Boston University Blog) (2019). https://www.bu.edu/articles/2019/deter-the-spread-of-harmful-fake-news/
  3. Stewardship of global collective behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 27 (2021), e2025764118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2025764118 arXiv:https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.2025764118
  4. Economic costs of excessive alcohol consumption in the US, 2006. American journal of preventive medicine 41, 5 (2011), 516–524.
  5. The impact of misinformation on the COVID-19 pandemic. AIMS public health 9, 2 (2022), 262.
  6. Ron Carson. 2018. Retirement Savers Are Losing $17 Billion A Year From Fake News And Conflicts of Interest. Forbes (2018). https://www.forbes.com/sites/rcarson/2018/10/14/retirement-savers-are-losing-17-billion-a-year-from-fake-news-bad-advice-conflicts-of-interest/?sh=4c6e6e6abec7
  7. R Cavazos. 2019. The Economic cost of bad actors on the Internet: Fake News.
  8. Tobacco taxes as a tobacco control strategy. Tobacco control 21, 2 (2012), 172–180.
  9. Sijbren Cnossen. 2006. Tobacco taxation in the European Union. FinanzArchiv/Public Finance Analysis (2006), 305–322.
  10. Sijbren Cnossen. 2007. Alcohol taxation and regulation in the European Union. International Tax and Public Finance 14, 6 (2007), 699–732.
  11. Federal Communications Commission et al. 2017. Obscene, indecent and profane broadcasts. Federal Communications Commission Consumer Guides 13 (2017).
  12. Renee Garett and Sean D Young. 2021. Online misinformation and vaccine hesitancy. Translational behavioral medicine 11, 12 (2021), 2194–2199.
  13. Science communication in the age of misinformation. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 54, 12 (2020), 985–990.
  14. Amnesty International. 2022. MYANMAR: FACEBOOK’S SYSTEMS PROMOTED VIOLENCE AGAINST ROHINGYA; META OWES REPARATIONS. Amnesty International (2022). https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2022/09/myanmar-facebooks-systems-promoted-violence-against-rohingya-meta-owes-reparations-new-report/
  15. Sharon Kann and Angelo Carusone. 2022. In less than a month, Elon Musk has driven away half of Twitter’s top 100 advertisers. Media Matters for America (2022). https://www.mediamatters.org/elon-musk/less-month-elon-musk-has-driven-away-half-twitters-top-100-advertisers
  16. Research note: Tiplines to uncover misinformation on encrypted platforms: A case study of the 2019 Indian general election on WhatsApp. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review (2022).
  17. Dara Kerr. 2017. Tech companies’ newest cause celebre? Boycott Breitbart. CNET (2017). https://www.cnet.com/tech/tech-industry/boycott-breitbart-lyft-hewlett-packard-t-mobile-autodesk-uber-amazon/
  18. From Exxon to BP: Has some number become better than no number? Journal of Economic Perspectives 26, 4 (2012), 3–26.
  19. Misinformation of COVID-19 vaccines and vaccine hesitancy. Scientific Reports 12, 1 (2022), 13681.
  20. Robin Lindsney* and Erik Verhoef*. 2001. Traffic congestion and congestion pricing. (2001).
  21. Representation in online prostate cancer content lacks racial and ethnic diversity: implications for Black and Latinx men. The Journal of Urology 207, 3 (2022), 559–564.
  22. Fake news: spread of misinformation about urological conditions on social media. European urology focus 6, 3 (2020), 437–439.
  23. Measuring the impact of COVID-19 vaccine misinformation on vaccination intent in the UK and USA. Nature human behaviour 5, 3 (2021), 337–348.
  24. Gilbert E Metcalf. 2009. Designing a carbon tax to reduce US greenhouse gas emissions. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy (2009).
  25. Gillbert E Metcalf and David Weisbach. 2009. The design of a carbon tax. Harv. Envtl. L. Rev. 33 (2009), 499.
  26. Vivek H. Murthy. 2022. Confronting Health Worker Burnout and Well-Being. New England Journal of Medicine 387, 7 (2022), 577–579. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2207252 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp2207252
  27. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy in Africa: a call to action. The Lancet Global Health 10, 3 (2022), e320–e321.
  28. Office of the Surgeon General et al. 2021. Confronting health misinformation: The US surgeon general’s advisory on building a healthy information environment [internet]. (2021).
  29. Ian William Holmes Parry. 2002. Comparing the efficiency of alternative policies for reducing traffic congestion. Journal of public economics 85, 3 (2002), 333–362.
  30. Kari Paul. 2019. Zuckerberg defends Facebook as bastion of ’free expression’ in speech. The Guardian (2019). https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2019/oct/17/mark-zuckerberg-facebook-free-expression-speech
  31. Keith Payne. 2018. The broken ladder: How inequality affects the way we think, live, and die. Penguin.
  32. Whitney Phillips. 2018. The oxygen of amplification. (2018).
  33. Arthur Pigou. 2002. The economics of welfare. Routledge.
  34. Jack Queen. 2022. Alex Jones ordered to pay $473 million in punitive damages in Sandy Hook defamation case. Reuters (2022). https://www.reuters.com/legal/alex-jones-must-pay-473-million-punitive-damages-sandy-hook-defamation-case-2022-11-10/
  35. Accuracy and social motivations shape judgements of (mis) information. Nature Human Behaviour (2023), 1–12.
  36. Paul Romer. 2019. A Tax That Could Fix Big Tech. New York Times (2019). https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/06/opinion/tax-facebook-google.html
  37. Dietram A. Scheufele and Nicole M. Krause. 2019. Science audiences, misinformation, and fake news. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 116, 16 (2019), 7662–7669. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1805871115 arXiv:https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1805871115
  38. Heidi Shierholz and Ben Zipperer. 2017. Here is what’s at stake with the conflict of interest (‘fiduciary’) rule. (2017).
  39. Timothy Taylor. 2020. Value of a Statistical Life: Where Does It Come From? Conversable Economist (2020). https://conversableeconomist.com/2020/03/27/value-of-a-statistical-life-where-does-it-come-from/
  40. The spread of true and false news online. science 359, 6380 (2018), 1146–1151.
  41. Effects of alcohol tax and price policies on morbidity and mortality: a systematic review. American journal of public health 100, 11 (2010), 2270–2278.
  42. Comprova: an evaluation of the impact of a collaborative journalism project on brazilian journalists and audiences. First Draft (2019).
  43. Jevin D. West and Carl T. Bergstrom. 2021. Misinformation in and about science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, 15 (2021), e1912444117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912444117 arXiv:https://www.pnas.org/doi/pdf/10.1073/pnas.1912444117
  44. Jennifer A. Whitson and Adam D. Galinsky. 2008. Lacking Control Increases Illusory Pattern Perception. Science 322, 5898 (2008), 115–117. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1159845 arXiv:https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1159845
  45. Richard Wilson. 2019. Cambridge analytica, Facebook, and Influence Operations: A case study and anticipatory ethical analysis. In European conference on cyber warfare and security. Academic Conferences International Limited, 587–XX.
  46. TikTok and prostate cancer: misinformation and quality of information using validated questionnaires. (2021).
  47. Defending Against Neural Fake News. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, H. Wallach, H. Larochelle, A. Beygelzimer, F. d'Alché-Buc, E. Fox, and R. Garnett (Eds.), Vol. 32. Curran Associates, Inc. https://proceedings.neurips.cc/paper/2019/file/3e9f0fc9b2f89e043bc6233994dfcf76-Paper.pdf
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube