- The paper presents a novel three-hop reasoning framework that leverages chain-of-thought prompting to address implicit sentiment analysis.
- It demonstrates significant improvements by boosting F1 scores by over 6% in supervised setups and achieving a 50% increase with GPT-3.
- The study highlights the crucial role of model scale and self-consistency mechanisms in enhancing reasoning accuracy and sentiment prediction.
Introduction
Sentiment analysis has traditionally relied on deciphering explicit emotional expressions within texts. However, implicit sentiment analysis (ISA) presents a greater challenge due to its reliance on subtle cues and the necessity for multi-hop reasoning to uncover the underlying sentiment. Recent advancements in chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting with LLMs have opened new avenues for addressing ISA. This paper introduces a novel Three-hop Reasoning (THO R) framework built upon this CoT concept to better tackle the intricacies involved in ISA.
Three-hop Reasoning Framework
The THO R framework operates through a three-step prompting process, using LLMs to infer the implicit aspect, opinion, and ultimately the sentiment polarity. This progression mirrors a human-like approach to sentiment grasp, starting from the initial aspect and moving towards a sentiment conclusion. The paper describes a self-consistency mechanism, inspired by Wang et al. (2022b), which selects consistent candidate answers to improve reasoning accuracy. Furthermore, for supervised setups, the authors introduce a reasoning revision method where intermediate reasoning steps are utilized as model inputs, guided by gold labels to rectify the reasoning pathway.
Experimental Results
The THO R framework's effectiveness is evident, showcasing a significant improvement over existing methods. In supervised setups, Flan-T5 (11B), a THO R-enhanced LLM, surpassed the best-performing baseline by over 6% F1 score. When applied to GPT-3 (175B) without fine-tuning, THO R achieved an impressive 50% increase in the state-of-the-art F1 score. These results underline the importance of model size in achieving substantial gains with CoT-based methods, with larger LLMs benefiting more from THO R's reasoning capabilities.
Conclusion and Limitations
This paper contributes a pioneering approach to ISA by leveraging a CoT framework that mimics human thought processes. It establishes that reasoning through CoT not only improves attribute and sentiment prediction but also reveals the potential of LLM-based CoT frameworks in other NLP tasks. The primary limitation acknowledged is the diminished impact of THO R on smaller LLMs. This phenomenon stresses the significance of model scale in harnessing the full power of LLMs within the THO R framework. Future research could explore enhancing the efficacy of THO R on LLMs of various scales or applying the model to different NLP challenges. The supplementary material provided, including GitHub repository and real-case testing examples, indicates the thoroughness of the research and the practical application of the proposed framework.