Bilingual analogical proportions via hedges (2305.05614v2)
Abstract: Analogical proportions are expressions of the form ``$a$ is to $b$ what $c$ is to $d$'' at the core of analogical reasoning which itself is at the core of human and artificial intelligence. The author has recently introduced {\em from first principles} an abstract algebro-logical framework of analogical proportions within the general setting of universal algebra and first-order logic. In that framework, the source and target algebras have the {\em same} underlying language. The purpose of this paper is to generalize his unilingual framework to a bilingual one where the underlying languages may differ. This is achieved by using hedges in justifications of proportions. The outcome is a major generalization vastly extending the applicability of the underlying framework. In a broader sense, this paper is a further step towards a mathematical theory of analogical reasoning.
- Antić, C. (2022). Analogical proportions. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence, 90(6), 595–644. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10472-022-09798-y.
- Antić, C. (2023a). Analogical proportions via abstract justifications. https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-03879901/document.
- Antić, C. (2023b). Boolean proportions. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2109.00388.pdf.
- Antić, C. (2023c). Logic-based analogical proportions. https://hal.science/hal-04005139.
- Antić, C. (2023d). Proportional algebras. https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.01751.pdf.
- Analogy between concepts. Artificial Intelligence, 275, 487–539.
- Boden, M. A. (1998). Creativity and artificial intelligence. Artificial Intelligence, 103(1-2), 347–356.
- A Course in Universal Algebra. http://www.math.hawaii.edu/~ralph/Classes/619/univ-algebra.pdf.
- Anti-unification and generalization: a survey. In IJCAI 2023, pp. 6563–6573.
- Analogical reasoning: a core of cognition. Künstliche Intelligenz, 22(1), 8–12.
- Hofstadter, D. (2001). Analogy as the core of cognition. In Gentner, D., Holyoak, K. J., and Kokinov, B. K. (Eds.), The Analogical Mind: Perspectives from Cognitive Science, pp. 499–538. MIT Press/Bradford Book, Cambridge MA.
- Surfaces and Essences. Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking. Basic Books, New York.
- Krieger, M. H. (2003). Doing Mathematics: Convention, Subject, Calculation, Analogy. World Scientific, New Jersey.
- Anti-unification for unranked terms and hedges. Journal of Automated Reasoning, 52, 155–190.
- Handling analogical proportions in classical logic and fuzzy logics settings. In Sossai, C., and Chemello, G. (Eds.), ECSQARU 2009, LNAI 5590, pp. 638–650. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg.
- Pólya, G. (1954). Induction and Analogy in Mathematics, Vol. 1 of Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey.
- Homogenous and heterogenous logical proportions: an introduction. In Gabbay, D. M., and Guenthner, F. (Eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Springer Nature Switzerland AG.
- Analogical proportions: why they are useful in AI. In Zhou, Z.-H. (Ed.), IJCAI 2021, pp. 4568–4576.
- Heuristic-driven theory projection: an overview. In Prade, H., and Richard, G. (Eds.), Computational Approaches to Analogical Reasoning: Current Trends, Vol. 548 of Studies in Computational Intelligence, pp. 163–194. Springer-Verlag, Berlin/Heidelberg.
- Formal models of analogical proportions. Technical Report D008, Telecom ParisTech - École Nationale Supérieure de Télécommunications, Télécom Paris.
- Winston, P. H. (1980). Learning and reasoning by analogy. Communications of the ACM, 23(12), 689–703.
- Modelling semi-structured documents with hedges for deduction and induction. In Rouveirol, C., and Sebag, M. (Eds.), ILP 2001, LNAI 2157, pp. 240–247. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
- Christian Antić (20 papers)