Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
133 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Causal Discovery from Subsampled Time Series with Proxy Variables (2305.05276v5)

Published 9 May 2023 in cs.LG and stat.ME

Abstract: Inferring causal structures from time series data is the central interest of many scientific inquiries. A major barrier to such inference is the problem of subsampling, i.e., the frequency of measurement is much lower than that of causal influence. To overcome this problem, numerous methods have been proposed, yet either was limited to the linear case or failed to achieve identifiability. In this paper, we propose a constraint-based algorithm that can identify the entire causal structure from subsampled time series, without any parametric constraint. Our observation is that the challenge of subsampling arises mainly from hidden variables at the unobserved time steps. Meanwhile, every hidden variable has an observed proxy, which is essentially itself at some observable time in the future, benefiting from the temporal structure. Based on these, we can leverage the proxies to remove the bias induced by the hidden variables and hence achieve identifiability. Following this intuition, we propose a proxy-based causal discovery algorithm. Our algorithm is nonparametric and can achieve full causal identification. Theoretical advantages are reflected in synthetic and real-world experiments.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (36)
  1. Judea Pearl. Causality. Cambridge University Press, 2009.
  2. Patrick Suppes. Causal analysis of hidden variables. In PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association, volume 1980, pages 563–571. Cambridge University Press, 1980.
  3. Differences in the pattern of hippocampal neuronal loss in normal ageing and alzheimer’s disease. The Lancet, 344(8925):769–772, 1994.
  4. Alzheimer’s disease neuroimaging initiative (adni): clinical characterization. Neurology, 74(3):201–209, 2010.
  5. A method for estimating progression rates in alzheimer disease. Archives of neurology, 58(3):449–454, 2001.
  6. Alzheimer’s disease: rapid and slow progression. Journal of the Royal Society Interface, 9(66):119–126, 2012.
  7. Dynotears: Structure learning from time-series data. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics, pages 1595–1605. PMLR, 2020.
  8. Uncovering the heterogeneity and temporal complexity of neurodegenerative diseases with subtype and stage inference. Nature communications, 9(1):4273, 2018.
  9. Four distinct trajectories of tau deposition identified in alzheimer’s disease. Nature medicine, 27(5):871–881, 2021.
  10. Discovering temporal causal relations from subsampled data. In International Conference on Machine Learning, pages 1898–1906. PMLR, 2015.
  11. Causal discovery from temporally aggregated time series. In Uncertainty in artificial intelligence: proceedings of the… conference. Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, volume 2017. NIH Public Access, 2017.
  12. Identifiability and estimation of structural vector autoregressive models for subsampled and mixed-frequency time series. Biometrika, 106(2):433–452, 2019.
  13. Learning causal structure from undersampled time series. 2013.
  14. Rate-agnostic (causal) structure learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 28, 2015.
  15. Causal discovery from subsampled time series data by constraint optimization. In Conference on Probabilistic Graphical Models, pages 216–227. PMLR, 2016.
  16. Causal structure learning from multivariate time series in settings with unmeasured confounding. In Proceedings of 2018 ACM SIGKDD workshop on causal discovery, pages 23–47. PMLR, 2018.
  17. Measurement bias and effect restoration in causal inference. Biometrika, 101(2):423–437, 2014.
  18. Computation, causation and discovery, 1999.
  19. Causal discovery with unobserved variables: a proxy variable approach. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.05281, 2023.
  20. Causal discovery from temporal data: An overview and new perspectives. arXiv preprint arXiv:2303.10112, 2023.
  21. Discovery of extended summary graphs in time series. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, pages 96–106. PMLR, 2022.
  22. Jiji Zhang. On the completeness of orientation rules for causal discovery in the presence of latent confounders and selection bias. Artificial Intelligence, 172(16-17):1873–1896, 2008.
  23. Identifying causal effects with proxy variables of an unmeasured confounder. Biometrika, 105(4):987–993, 2018.
  24. Maurice S Bartlett. On the theoretical specification and sampling properties of autocorrelated time-series. Supplement to the Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 8(1):27–41, 1946.
  25. ZA Lomnicki and SK Zaremba. On the estimation of autocorrelation in time series. The Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 28(1):140–158, 1957.
  26. Causation, prediction, and search. MIT press, 2000.
  27. Dags with no tears: Continuous optimization for structure learning. Advances in neural information processing systems, 31, 2018.
  28. On the evolution of random graphs. Publ. Math. Inst. Hung. Acad. Sci, 5(1):17–60, 1960.
  29. Rate of medial temporal lobe atrophy in typical aging and alzheimer’s disease. Neurology, 51(4):993–999, 1998.
  30. Intracellular amyloid-β𝛽\betaitalic_β in alzheimer’s disease. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 8(7):499–509, 2007.
  31. Structure and pathology of tau protein in alzheimer disease. International journal of Alzheimer’s disease, 2012, 2012.
  32. George S Bloom. Amyloid-β𝛽\betaitalic_β and tau: the trigger and bullet in alzheimer disease pathogenesis. JAMA neurology, 71(4):505–508, 2014.
  33. John Ashburner. Vbm tutorial. Wellcome Trust Centre for Neuroimaging, London, UK, 2010.
  34. Karl J Friston. Statistical parametric mapping. Neuroscience databases: a practical guide, pages 237–250, 2003.
  35. Automated anatomical labeling of activations in spm using a macroscopic anatomical parcellation of the mni mri single-subject brain. Neuroimage, 15(1):273–289, 2002.
  36. Which invariance should we transfer? A causal minimax learning approach. In Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Machine Learning, volume 202, pages 22488–22527. PMLR, 23–29 Jul 2023.
Citations (4)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.