Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
119 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
56 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
43 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
6 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
47 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Can LMs Learn New Entities from Descriptions? Challenges in Propagating Injected Knowledge (2305.01651v1)

Published 2 May 2023 in cs.CL

Abstract: Pre-trained LLMs (LMs) are used for knowledge intensive tasks like question answering, but their knowledge gets continuously outdated as the world changes. Prior work has studied targeted updates to LMs, injecting individual facts and evaluating whether the model learns these facts while not changing predictions on other contexts. We take a step forward and study LMs' abilities to make inferences based on injected facts (or propagate those facts): for example, after learning that something is a TV show, does an LM predict that you can watch it? We study this with two cloze-style tasks: an existing dataset of real-world sentences about novel entities (ECBD) as well as a new controlled benchmark with manually designed templates requiring varying levels of inference about injected knowledge. Surprisingly, we find that existing methods for updating knowledge (gradient-based fine-tuning and modifications of this approach) show little propagation of injected knowledge. These methods improve performance on cloze instances only when there is lexical overlap between injected facts and target inferences. Yet, prepending entity definitions in an LM's context improves performance across all settings, suggesting that there is substantial headroom for parameter-updating approaches for knowledge injection.

User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Yasumasa Onoe (20 papers)
  2. Michael J. Q. Zhang (12 papers)
  3. Shankar Padmanabhan (4 papers)
  4. Greg Durrett (117 papers)
  5. Eunsol Choi (76 papers)
Citations (66)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.