Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 87 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 53 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 16 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 18 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 105 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 471 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 193 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Exploring the possible evolution of the mass density power-law index of strong gravitational lenses with a model-independent method (2303.17407v1)

Published 30 Mar 2023 in astro-ph.CO

Abstract: In this work, we adopt a cosmological model-independent approach for the first time to test the question of whether the mass density power-law index($\gamma$) of the strong gravitational lensing system(SGLS) evolves with redshift, and the JLA SNe Ia sample and the quasar sample from Risaliti & Lusso (2019) are used to provide the luminosity distances to be calibrated. Our work is based on the flat universe assumption and the cosmic distance duality relation. A reliable data-matching method is used to pair SGLS-SNe and SGLS-quasar. By using the maximum likelihood method to constrain the luminosity distance and $\gamma$ index, we obtain the likelihood function values for the evolved and non-evolved cases, and then use the Akaike weights and the BIC selection weights to compare the advantages and disadvantages of these two cases. We find that the $\gamma$ index is slightly more likely to be a non-evolutionary model for $\gamma=2$ in the case of the currently used samples with low redshift ($z_l<\sim$0.66). With Akaike weights, the relative probability is 66.3\% versus 33.7\% and 69.9\% versus 30.1\% for the SGLS+SNe Ia sample and SGLS+quasar sample, respectively, and with BIC selection weights, the relative probability is 87.4\% versus 12.6\% and 52.0\% versus 48.0\% for the two samples. In the evolving case for the relatively low redshift lens (SGLS+SNe Ia), with redshift 0.0625 to 0.659, $\gamma= 2.058{+0.041}{-0.040}-0.136{+0.163}{-0.165}z$. At high redshift (SGLS+quasar ), with redshift 0.0625 to 1.004, $\gamma= 2.051{+0.076}{-0.077}-0.171{+0.214}{-0.196}z$. Although not the more likely model, this evolved $\gamma$ case also fits the data well, with a negative and mild evolution for both low and high redshift samples.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.

Authors (1)

Don't miss out on important new AI/ML research

See which papers are being discussed right now on X, Reddit, and more:

“Emergent Mind helps me see which AI papers have caught fire online.”

Philip

Philip

Creator, AI Explained on YouTube