Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
194 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
45 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

$t$-sails and sparse hereditary classes of unbounded tree-width (2302.04783v5)

Published 9 Feb 2023 in math.CO and cs.DS

Abstract: It has long been known that the following basic objects are obstructions to bounded tree-width: for arbitrarily large $t$, $(1)$ the complete graph $K_t$, $(2)$ the complete bipartite graph $K_{t,t}$, $(3)$ a subdivision of the $(t \times t)$-wall and $(4)$ the line graph of a subdivision of the $(t \times t)$-wall. We now add a further \emph{boundary object} to this list, a \emph{$t$-sail}. These results have been obtained by studying sparse hereditary \emph{path-star} graph classes, each of which consists of the finite induced subgraphs of a single infinite graph whose edges can be partitioned into a path (or forest of paths) with a forest of stars, characterised by an infinite word over a possibly infinite alphabet. We show that a path-star class whose infinite graph has an unbounded number of stars, each of which connects an unbounded number of times to the path, has unbounded tree-width. In addition, we show that such a class is not a subclass of the hereditary class of circle graphs. We identify a collection of \emph{nested} words with a recursive structure that exhibit interesting characteristics when used to define a path-star graph class. These graph classes do not contain any of the four basic obstructions but instead contain graphs that have large tree-width if and only if they contain arbitrarily large $t$-sails. We show that these classes are infinitely defined and, like classes of bounded degree or classes excluding a fixed minor, do not contain a minimal class of unbounded tree-width.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (28)
  1. On the tree-width of even-hole-free graphs. European J. Combin., 98:Paper No. 103394, 21, 2021.
  2. Induced subgraphs and tree decompositions viii. excluding a forest in (theta, prism)-free graphs, 2023. arXiv:2301.02138.
  3. Induced subgraphs and tree decompositions VII. Basic obstructions in Hđ»Hitalic_H-free graphs. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 164:443–472, 2024.
  4. Minimal classes of graphs of unbounded clique-width defined by finitely many forbidden induced subgraphs. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 295:57–69, 2021.
  5. Sparse graphs with bounded induced cycle packing number have logarithmic treewidth. In Proceedings of the 2023 Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms (SODA), pages 3006–3028. SIAM, Philadelphia, PA, 2023.
  6. R. Brignall and D. Cocks. Uncountably many minimal hereditary classes of graphs of unbounded clique-width. Electron. J. Combin., 29(1):Paper No. 1.63, 27, 2022.
  7. R. Brignall and D. Cocks. A framework for minimal hereditary classes of graphs of unbounded clique-width. SIAM J. Discrete Math., 37(4):2558–2584, 2023.
  8. Infinitely many minimal classes of graphs of unbounded clique-width. Discrete Appl. Math., 248:145–152, 2018.
  9. Handle-rewriting hypergraph grammars. J. Comput. System Sci., 46(2):218–270, 1993.
  10. B. Courcelle and S. Olariu. Upper bounds to the clique width of graphs. Discrete Appl. Math., 101(1-3):77–114, 2000.
  11. T. Davies. Problem session 4, Treewidth of hereditary classes, p66, Oberwolfach technical report DOI:10.4171/OWR/2022/1.
  12. A. Dawar and A. Sankaran. MSO undecidability for hereditary classes of unbounded clique width. In 30th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic, volume 216 of LIPIcs. Leibniz Int. Proc. Inform., pages Art. No. 17, 17. Schloss Dagstuhl. Leibniz-Zent. Inform., Wadern, 2022.
  13. R. Diestel. Graph theory, volume 173 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer, Berlin, fifth edition, 2017.
  14. The grid theorem for vertex-minors. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B, 2020.
  15. F. Gurski and E. Wanke. The tree-width of clique-width bounded graphs without Kn,nsubscriptđŸđ‘›đ‘›K_{n,n}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT italic_n , italic_n end_POSTSUBSCRIPT. In Graph-theoretic concepts in computer science (Konstanz, 2000), volume 1928 of Lecture Notes in Comput. Sci., pages 196–205. Springer, Berlin, 2000.
  16. Treewidth, circle graphs and circular drawings, 2022. arXiv:2212.11436.
  17. T. Korhonen. Grid induced minor theorem for graphs of small degree. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 160:206–214, 2023.
  18. V. Lozin and I. Razgon. Tree-width dichotomy. European J. Combin., 103:Paper No. 103517, 8, 2022.
  19. V. V. Lozin. Minimal classes of graphs of unbounded clique-width. Ann. Comb., 15(4):707–722, 2011.
  20. Well-quasi-ordering Does Not Imply Bounded Clique-width, pages 351–359. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2016.
  21. C. St. J. A. Nash-Williams. Decomposition of finite graphs into forests. J. London Math. Soc., 39:12, 1964.
  22. C. Pohoata. ”Unavoidable induced subgraphs of large graphs” Senior thesis, Princeton University (2014).
  23. N. Robertson and P. D. Seymour. Graph minors. II. Algorithmic aspects of tree-width. J. Algorithms, 7(3):309–322, 1986.
  24. N. Robertson and P. D. Seymour. Graph minors. V. Excluding a planar graph. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 41(1):92–114, 1986.
  25. Graph minors. XX. Wagner’s conjecture. J. Combin. Theory Ser. B, 92(2):325–357, 2004.
  26. N. L. D. Sintiari and N. Trotignon. (Theta, triangle)-free and (even hole, K4subscriptđŸ4K_{4}italic_K start_POSTSUBSCRIPT 4 end_POSTSUBSCRIPT)-free graphs—part 1: Layered wheels. J. Graph Theory, 97(4):475–509, 2021.
  27. D. Weißauer. On the block number of graphs. SIAM J. Discrete Math., 33(1):346–357, 2019.
  28. E. Zeckendorf. ReprĂ©sentation des nombres naturels par une somme de nombres de Fibonacci ou de nombres de Lucas. Bull. Soc. Roy. Sci. LiĂšge, 41:179–182, 1972.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

X Twitter Logo Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com