Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 91 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 26 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 24 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 95 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 209 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 458 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 37 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Symmetry Resolved Entanglement of Excited States in Quantum Field Theory III: Bosonic and Fermionic Negativity (2302.02666v2)

Published 6 Feb 2023 in hep-th, cond-mat.stat-mech, and quant-ph

Abstract: In two recent works, we studied the symmetry resolved R\'enyi entropies of quasi-particle excited states in quantum field theory. We found that the entropies display many model-independent features which we discussed and analytically characterised. In this paper we extend this line of investigation by providing analytical and numerical evidence that a similar universal behavior arises for the symmetry resolved negativity. In particular, we compute the ratio of charged moments of the partially transposed reduced density matrix as an expectation value of twist operators. These are ``fused" versions of the more traditionally used branch point twist fields and were introduced in a previous work. The use of twist operators allows us to perform the computation in an arbitrary number of spacial dimensions. We show that, in the large-volume limit, only the commutation relations between the twist operators and local fields matter, and computations reduce to a purely combinatorial problem. We address some specific issues regarding fermionic excitations, whose treatment requires the notion of partial time-reversal transformation, and we discuss the differences and analogies with their bosonic counterpart. We find that although the operation of partial transposition requires a redefinition for fermionic theories, the ratio of the negativity moments between an excited state and the ground state is universal and identical for fermions and bosons as well as for a large variety of very different states, ranging from simple qubit states to the excited states of free quantum field theories. Our predictions are tested numerically on a 1D Fermi chain.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (61)
  1. C. Holzhey, F. Larsen and F. Wilczek “Geometric and renormalized entropy in conformal field theory” In Nucl. Phys. B424, 1994, pp. 443–467
  2. “Entanglement entropy and quantum field theory” In J. Stat. Mech. 0406, 2004, pp. P002 eprint: hep-th/0405152
  3. “Quantum spin chain, Toeplitz determinants and Fisher-Hartwig conjecture” In J. Stat. Phys. 116, 2004, pp. 79–95
  4. “Evolution of entanglement entropy in one-dimensional Systems” In J. Stat. Mech. 0504, 2005, pp. P010 eprint: cond-mat/0503393
  5. “Entanglement in quantum critical phenomena” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 2003, pp. 227902
  6. J.I. Latorre, E. Rico and G. Vidal “Ground state entanglement in quantum spin chains” In Quant. Inf. Comput. 4, 2004, pp. 48–92
  7. “Fine-grained entanglement loss along renormalization group flows” In Phys. Rev. A71, 2005, pp. 034301
  8. “Concentrating partial entanglement by local operations” In Phys. Rev. A53, 1996, pp. 2046–2052
  9. J.L. Cardy, O.A. Castro-Alvaredo and B. Doyon “Form factors of branch-point twist fields in quantum integrable models and entanglement entropy” In J. Stat. Phys. 130, 2008, pp. 129–168
  10. “Entanglement properties of the harmonic chain” In Phys. Rev. A66 American Physical Society, 2002, pp. 042327 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.66.042327
  11. “Volume of the set of separable states” In Phys. Rev. A58 American Physical Society, 1998, pp. 883–892 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.58.883
  12. Jens Eisert and Martin B Plenio “A comparison of entanglement measures” In Journal of Modern Optics 46.1 Taylor & Francis, 1999, pp. 145–154
  13. Guifré Vidal and Reinhard F Werner “Computable measure of entanglement” In Phys. Rev. A65.3 APS, 2002, pp. 032314
  14. Martin B Plenio “Logarithmic negativity: a full entanglement monotone that is not convex” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 95.9 APS, 2005, pp. 090503
  15. Martin B Plenio “Erratum: Logarithmic Negativity: A Full Entanglement Monotone That Is not Convex” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 95.9 APS, 2005, pp. 119902
  16. Jens Eisert “Entanglement in quantum information theory” In PhD Thesis quant-ph/0610253, 2006
  17. Pasquale Calabrese, John Cardy and Erik Tonni “Entanglement negativity in quantum field theory” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 109.13 APS, 2012, pp. 130502
  18. Pasquale Calabrese, John Cardy and Erik Tonni “Entanglement negativity in extended systems: a field theoretical approach” In J. Stat. Mech. 2013.02 IOP Publishing, 2013, pp. P02008
  19. “Entanglement negativity in two-dimensional free lattice models” In Phys. Rev. B93.11 APS, 2016, pp. 115148
  20. Hassan Shapourian, Ken Shiozaki and Shinsei Ryu “Partial time-reversal transformation and entanglement negativity in fermionic systems” In Phys. Rev. B95.16 APS, 2017, pp. 165101
  21. “Entanglement negativity of fermions: Monotonicity, separability criterion, and classification of few-mode states” In Phys. Rev. A99.2 APS, 2019, pp. 022310
  22. “Symmetry-Resolved Entanglement in Many-Body Systems” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 120.20 American Physical Society (APS), 2018 DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.120.200602
  23. J.C. Xavier, F.C. Alcaraz and G. Sierra “Equipartition of the entanglement entropy” In Phys. Rev. B 98 American Physical Society, 2018, pp. 041106 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.98.041106
  24. Eyal Cornfeld, Moshe Goldstein and Eran Sela “Imbalance entanglement: Symmetry decomposition of negativity” In Phys. Rev. A98.3 APS, 2018, pp. 032302
  25. Sara Murciano, Riccarda Bonsignori and Pasquale Calabrese “Symmetry decomposition of negativity of massless free fermions” In SciPost Physics 10.5, 2021, pp. 111
  26. Hui-Huang Chen “Charged Rényi negativity of massless free bosons” In Journal of High Energy Physics 2022.2 Springer, 2022, pp. 1–27
  27. Himanshu Gaur and Urjit A Yajnik “Charge imbalance resolved R\\\backslash\’enyi negativity for free compact boson: Two disjoint interval case” In arXiv preprint arXiv:2210.06743, 2022
  28. “Symmetry-resolved entanglement detection using partial transpose moments” In npj Quantum Information 7.1 Nature Publishing Group UK London, 2021, pp. 152
  29. “Entanglement Content of Quasiparticle Excitations” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 121.17, 2018, pp. 170602 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.121.170602
  30. “Entanglement content of quantum particle excitations. Part I. Free field theory” In JHEP 2018.10 Springer, 2018, pp. 1–55
  31. “Entanglement content of quantum particle excitations. Part II. Disconnected regions and logarithmic negativity” In JHEP 2019.11 Springer, 2019, pp. 1–47
  32. “Entanglement Content of Quantum Particle Excitations III. Graph Partition Functions” In J. Math. Phys. 60.8, 2019, pp. 082301 DOI: 10.1063/1.5098892
  33. “Symmetry resolved entanglement of excited states in quantum field theory. Part I. Free theories, twist fields and qubits” In JHEP 12, 2022, pp. 127 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2022)127
  34. “Symmetry resolved entanglement of excited states in quantum field theory. Part II. Numerics, interacting theories and higher dimensions” In JHEP 12, 2022, pp. 128 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2022)128
  35. Dávid X. Horváth and Pasquale Calabrese “Symmetry resolved entanglement in integrable field theories via form factor bootstrap” In JHEP 11, 2020, pp. 131 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP11(2020)131
  36. V.G Knizhnik “Analytic fields on Riemann surfaces. II” In Comm. Math. Phys. 112.4, 1987, pp. 567–590
  37. “The conformal field theory of orbifolds” In Nuclear Physics B 282, 1987, pp. 13–73 URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0550321387906766
  38. P. Bouwknegt “Coset construction for winding subalgebras and applications” In q-alg/9610013
  39. L. Borisov, M.B. Halpern and C. Schweigert “Systematic approach to cyclic orbifolds” In Int. J. Mod. Phys. A13, 1998, pp. 125–168
  40. O.A. Castro-Alvaredo, B. Doyon and E. Levi “Arguments towards a c-theorem from branch-point twist fields” In J.Phys. A44, 2011, pp. 492003 DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/44/49/492003
  41. Emanuele Levi “Composite branch-point twist fields in the Ising model and their expectation values” In J.Phys. A45, 2012, pp. 275401 DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/45/27/275401
  42. “Entanglement entropy of non-unitary conformal field theory” In J.Phys. A48, 2015, pp. 04FT01 arXiv:1405.2804 [hep-th]
  43. “Branch Point Twist Field Correlators in the Massive Free Boson Theory” In Nucl. Phys. B913, 2016, pp. 879–911 DOI: 10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2016.10.016
  44. H. Casini, C.D. Fosco and M. Huerta “Entanglement and alpha entropies for a massive Dirac field in two dimensions” In J. Stat. Mech. 0507, 2005, pp. P07007 DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/2005/07/P07007
  45. “On the partial transpose of fermionic Gaussian states” In New Journal of Physics 17.5 IOP Publishing, 2015, pp. 053048
  46. Luca Capizzi, Paola Ruggiero and Pasquale Calabrese “Symmetry resolved entanglement entropy of excited states in a CFT” In J. Stat. Mech. 2020.7 IOP Publishing, 2020, pp. 073101
  47. “Excited state Rényi entropy and subsystem distance in two-dimensional non-compact bosonic theory. Part I. Single-particle states” In JHEP 12, 2020, pp. 160 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP12(2020)160
  48. “Universal Rényi entanglement entropy of quasiparticle excitations” In EPL 135.6, 2021, pp. 60001 DOI: 10.1209/0295-5075/ac130e
  49. “Corrections to universal Rényi entropy in quasiparticle excited states of quantum chains” In J. Stat. Mech. 2109, 2021, pp. 093101 DOI: 10.1088/1742-5468/ac1f28
  50. “Excited state Rényi entropy and subsystem distance in two-dimensional non-compact bosonic theory. Part II. Multi-particle states” In JHEP 08, 2021, pp. 106 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2021)106
  51. “Entanglement of magnon excitations in spin chains” In JHEP 02, 2022, pp. 072 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP02(2022)072
  52. “Subsystem distances between quasiparticle excited states” In JHEP 07, 2022, pp. 119 DOI: 10.1007/JHEP07(2022)119
  53. “ℏPlanck-constant-over-2-pi\hbarroman_ℏ→0 limit of the entanglement entropy” In Phys. Rev. A 105.3, 2022, pp. 032404 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.032404
  54. Hassan Shapourian, Roger S.K. Mong and Shinsei Ryu “Anyonic Partial Transpose I: Quantum Information Aspects”, 2020 arXiv:2012.02222 [quant-ph]
  55. “Asymptotic density of states in 2d CFTs with non-invertible symmetries”, 2022 arXiv:2208.05495 [hep-th]
  56. Francisco Castilho Alcaraz, Miguel Ibanez Berganza and German Sierra “Entanglement of low-energy excitations in Conformal Field Theory” In Phys. Rev. Lett. 106, 2011, pp. 201601 DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.106.201601
  57. Gilles Parez, Riccarda Bonsignori and Pasquale Calabrese “Dynamics of charge-imbalance-resolved entanglement negativity after a quench in a free-fermion model” In Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment 2022.5 IOP Publishing, 2022, pp. 053103
  58. Hui-Huang Chen “Dynamics of charge imbalance resolved negativity after a global quench in free scalar field theory” In Journal of High Energy Physics 2022.8 Springer, 2022, pp. 1–26
  59. J.J. Tattersall “Elementary Number Theory in Nine Chapters” In Cambridge University Press (2nd Ed.), 2005
  60. Gerald E Bergum and Verner E Hoggatt Jr “Irreducibility of Lucas and generalized Lucas polynomials” In The Fibonacci Quarterly 12 Citeseer, 1974, pp. 95–100
  61. Paolo Emilio Ricci “Generalized Lucas polynomials and Fibonacci polynomials” In Riv. Mat. Univ. Parma 4, 1995, pp. 137–146
Citations (16)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.