Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
139 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
46 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Serious Games and AI: Challenges and Opportunities for Computational Social Science (2302.00500v1)

Published 1 Feb 2023 in cs.HC

Abstract: The video game industry plays an essential role in the entertainment sphere of our society. However, from Monopoly to Flight Simulators, serious games have also been appealing tools for learning a new language, conveying values, or training skills. Furthermore, the resurgence of AI and data science in the last decade has created a unique opportunity since the amount of data collected through a game is immense, as is the amount of data needed to feed such AI algorithms. This paper aims to identify relevant research lines using Serious Games as a novel research tool, especially in Computational Social Sciences. To contextualize, we also conduct a (non-systematic) literature review of this field. We conclude that the synergy between games and data can foster the use of AI for good and open up new strategies to empower humanity and support social research with novel computational tools. We also discuss the challenges and new opportunities that arise from aspiring to such lofty goals.

Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (124)
  1. T. Wijman, “Global games market report,” tech. rep., NewZoo.com, 2020.
  2. R. Rogers, How video games impact players: The pitfalls and benefits of a gaming society. Lexington Books, 2016.
  3. J. Koivisto and J. Hamari, “The rise of motivational information systems: A review of gamification research,” International Journal of Information Management, vol. 45, pp. 191–210, 2019.
  4. Arizton, “Board Games Market - Global Outlook and Forecast 2021-2026,” tech. rep., Arizton, 2020.
  5. C. C. Abt, Serious games. University press of America, 1987.
  6. D. Lazer, A. Pentland, L. Adamic, S. Aral, A.-L. Barabási, D. Brewer, N. Christakis, N. Contractor, J. Fowler, M. Gutmann, T. Jebara, G. King, M. Macy, D. Roy, and M. V. Alstyne, “Computational social science,” Science, vol. 323, no. 5915, pp. 721–723, 2009.
  7. I. Bogost, Persuasive games: The expressive power of videogames. MIT Press, 2010.
  8. Y. Zhonggen, “A Meta-Analysis of Use of Serious Games in Education over a Decade,” International Journal of Computer Games Technology, vol. 2019, p. e4797032, Feb. 2019. Publisher: Hindawi.
  9. W. S. Ravyse, A. Seugnet Blignaut, V. Leendertz, and A. Woolner, “Success factors for serious games to enhance learning: a systematic review,” Virtual Reality, vol. 21, pp. 31–58, Mar. 2017.
  10. G. Games, “Garfield’s count me in,” 2021. Android and iOS game.
  11. M. A. T. M. Corporation., “Minecraft: Education edition,” 2018. PC Game.
  12. K. D. AS, “Dragonbox & kahoot! products,” 2019. Android and iOS Games.
  13. L. Inc., “Coding apps,” 2017. Android and iOS Games.
  14. N. Sharifzadeh, H. Kharrazi, E. Nazari, H. Tabesh, M. E. Khodabandeh, S. Heidari, and M. Tara, “Health education serious games targeting health care providers, patients, and public health users: scoping review,” JMIR serious games, vol. 8, no. 1, p. e13459, 2020.
  15. I. Gorbanev, S. Agudelo-Londoño, R. A. González, A. Cortes, A. Pomares, V. Delgadillo, F. J. Yepes, and Ó. Muñoz, “A systematic review of serious games in medical education: quality of evidence and pedagogical strategy,” Medical education online, vol. 23, no. 1, p. 1438718, 2018.
  16. G. Haoran, E. Bazakidi, and N. Zary, “Serious games in health professions education: review of trends and learning efficacy,” Yearbook of medical informatics, vol. 28, no. 1, p. 240, 2019.
  17. A. Studio, “Microsoft Flight Simulator for Windows 10 | Xbox,” 2020.
  18. R. Wang, S. J. DeMaria, A. Goldberg, and D. Katz, “A Systematic Review of Serious Games in Training Health Care Professionals,” Simulation in Healthcare, vol. 11, no. 1, 2016.
  19. M. Hendrix, A. Al-Sherbaz, and B. Victoria, “Game based cyber security training: are serious games suitable for cyber security training?,” International Journal of Serious Games, vol. 3, no. 1, 2016.
  20. J.-N. Tioh, M. Mina, and D. W. Jacobson, “Cyber security training a survey of serious games in cyber security,” in 2017 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE), pp. 1–5, 2017.
  21. B. Akhgar, Serious Games for Enhancing Law Enforcement Agencies. Springer, 2019.
  22. A. B. Samčović, “Serious games in military applications,” Vojnotehnički glasnik, vol. 66, no. 3, pp. 597–613, 2018.
  23. Gamelearn, “Gamelearn launches Pacific, the first leadership course online,” 2015. Blog.
  24. K. Larson, “Serious Games and Gamification in the Corporate Training Environment: a Literature Review,” TechTrends, vol. 64, no. 2, pp. 319–328, 2020.
  25. U. Harvard, “6 Favorite Business Simulations to Teach and Why,” 2021. Harvard Business Publishing - Education.
  26. Zoomsim, “Zoom Business Simulation,” 2022.
  27. S. Ruíz, “Darfur is dying,” 2006. Take Action Games.
  28. L. A. Stapinski, B. Reda, N. C. Newton, S. Lawler, D. Rodriguez, C. Chapman, and M. Teesson, “Development and evaluation of ‘pure rush’: An online serious game for drug education,” Drug and Alcohol Review, vol. 37, no. S1, pp. S420–S428, 2018.
  29. C. T. Inspire, “Fight against opium,” 2018. Windows, Android, and Web game.
  30. A. Calvo-Morata, C. Alonso-Fernández, M. Freire, I. Martínez-Ortiz, and B. Fernández-Manjón, “Serious games to prevent and detect bullying and cyberbullying: A systematic serious games and literature review,” Computers & Education, vol. 157, p. 103958, 2020.
  31. A. G. Barrera Yañez, C. Alonso-Fernandez, and B. Fernandez Manjon, “Review of serious games to educate on gender equality,” in Eighth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality, pp. 662–668, 2020.
  32. A. Katsaounidou, L. Vrysis, R. Kotsakis, C. Dimoulas, and A. Veglis, “Mathe the game: A serious game for education and training in news verification,” Education Sciences, vol. 9, no. 2, 2019.
  33. U. o. Cambridge, “Political misinformation game: Harmony square,” 2021. Web game.
  34. S. Flood, N. A. Cradock-Henry, P. Blackett, and P. Edwards, “Adaptive and interactive climate futures: systematic review of ‘serious games’ for engagement and decision-making,” Environmental Research Letters, vol. 13, no. 6, p. 063005, 2018.
  35. R.-J. Den Haan and M. C. Van der Voort, “On evaluating social learning outcomes of serious games to collaboratively address sustainability problems: A literature review,” Sustainability, vol. 10, no. 12, p. 4529, 2018.
  36. A. H. Aubert, R. Bauer, and J. Lienert, “A review of water-related serious games to specify use in environmental multi-criteria decision analysis,” Environmental modelling & software, vol. 105, pp. 64–78, 2018.
  37. M. Stanitsas, K. Kirytopoulos, and E. Vareilles, “Facilitating sustainability transition through serious games: A systematic literature review,” Journal of cleaner production, vol. 208, pp. 924–936, 2019.
  38. D. Johnson, E. Horton, R. Mulcahy, and M. Foth, “Gamification and serious games within the domain of domestic energy consumption: A systematic review,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 73, pp. 249–264, 2017.
  39. C. Ferguson, R. Lewis, C. Wilks, and R. Picard, “The guardians: Designing a game for long-term engagement with mental health therapy,” in 2021 IEEE Conference on Games (CoG), pp. 1–8, 2021.
  40. T. M. Fleming, L. Bavin, K. Stasiak, E. Hermansson-Webb, S. N. Merry, C. Cheek, M. Lucassen, H. M. Lau, B. Pollmuller, and S. Hetrick, “Serious games and gamification for mental health: current status and promising directions,” Frontiers in psychiatry, vol. 7, p. 215, 2017.
  41. H. Farley, “Promoting self-efficacy in patients with chronic disease beyond traditional education: A literature review,” Nursing Open, vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 30–41, 2020.
  42. D. Bossen, A. Broekema, B. Visser, A. Brons, A. Timmerman, F. van Etten-Jamaludin, K. Braam, R. Engelbert, et al., “Effectiveness of serious games to increase physical activity in children with a chronic disease: systematic review with meta-analysis,” Journal of medical Internet research, vol. 22, no. 4, p. e14549, 2020.
  43. S. Fridenson-Hayo, S. Berggren, A. Lassalle, S. Tal, D. Pigat, N. Meir-Goren, H. O’Reilly, S. Ben-Zur, S. Bölte, S. Baron-Cohen, et al., “‘emotiplay’: a serious game for learning about emotions in children with autism: results of a cross-cultural evaluation,” European child & adolescent psychiatry, vol. 26, no. 8, pp. 979–992, 2017.
  44. K. Khowaja and S. S. Salim, “Serious game for children with autism to learn vocabulary: an experimental evaluation,” International journal of human–computer interaction, vol. 35, no. 1, pp. 1–26, 2019.
  45. H. Ning, R. Li, X. Ye, Y. Zhang, and L. Liu, “A review on serious games for dementia care in ageing societies,” IEEE Journal of Translational Engineering in Health and Medicine, vol. 8, pp. 1–11, 2020.
  46. T. T. H. Nguyen, D. Ishmatova, T. Tapanainen, T. N. Liukkonen, N. Katajapuu, T. Makila, and M. Luimula, “Impact of serious games on health and well-being of elderly: a systematic review,” in Proceedings of the 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2017.
  47. S. Lopes, P. Magalhães, A. Pereira, J. Martins, C. Magalhães, E. Chaleta, and P. Rosário, “Games used with serious purposes: a systematic review of interventions in patients with cerebral palsy,” Frontiers in psychology, vol. 9, p. 1712, 2018.
  48. R. Karamians, R. Proffitt, D. Kline, and L. V. Gauthier, “Effectiveness of virtual reality- and gaming-based interventions for upper extremity rehabilitation poststroke: A meta-analysis,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 101, no. 5, pp. 885–896, 2020.
  49. I. Ayed, A. Ghazel, A. J. i Capó, G. Moyà-Alcover, J. Varona, and P. Martínez-Bueso, “Vision-based serious games and virtual reality systems for motor rehabilitation: A review geared toward a research methodology,” International Journal of Medical Informatics, vol. 131, p. 103909, 2019.
  50. H. A. Meijer, M. Graafland, J. C. Goslings, and M. P. Schijven, “Systematic review on the effects of serious games and wearable technology used in rehabilitation of patients with traumatic bone and soft tissue injuries,” Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, vol. 99, no. 9, pp. 1890–1899, 2018.
  51. N. Thomas and A. Woodyatt, “Children with ADHD can now be prescribed a video game, FDA says,” 2020. CNN Health News.
  52. Z. Buzady and F. Almeida, “Fligby — a serious game tool to enhance motivation and competencies in entrepreneurship,” in Informatics, vol. 6, p. 27, Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute, 2019.
  53. I. Kuo, “L’Oreal uses Serious Games for Employee Recruitment,” 2014. Blog.
  54. U. Army, “America’s army,” 2002. PC game.
  55. D. Liberties, “Corbyn Run,” 2019. Android game.
  56. A. de Madrid, “Haz Madrid - Presupuestos participativos,” 2017. https://decide.madrid.es/haz-madrid.
  57. B. Schouten, “Playful empowerment, the role of game design innovation in participatory citizenship.,” in Joint Conference of Serious Games, pp. 1–3, Springer, 2016.
  58. L. Von Ahn and L. Dabbish, “Labeling images with a computer game,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems, pp. 319–326, 2004.
  59. Carnegie Mellon University and Stanford University, “Eterna,” 2010. Browser, Android, and iOS game.
  60. University of Washington, “Foldit: Solve Puzzles for Science,” 2008. Windows, Mac, and Linux game.
  61. Sebastian Seung’s Lab at Princeton University, “EyeWire,” 2012. Browser game.
  62. UPM and Campus of International Excellence, “Malariaspot bubbles,” 2016. Android and iOS game.
  63. A. Kawrykow, G. Roumanis, A. Kam, D. Kwak, C. Leung, C. Wu, E. Zarour, L. Sarmenta, M. Blanchette, and J. Waldispühl, “Phylo: A Citizen Science Approach for Improving Multiple Sequence Alignment,” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 3, 2012.
  64. G. ScienceAtHome, “Quantum Moves 2,” 2012. Windows and Mac game.
  65. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019.
  66. National Academies Press, 2001.
  67. Springer Nature Switzerland AG, 2016.
  68. M. Liu, J. Kang, S. Liu, W. Zou, and J. Hodson, “Learning Analytics as an Assessment Tool in Serious Games: A Review of Literature,” in Serious Games and Edutainment Applications : Volume II (M. Ma and A. Oikonomou, eds.), pp. 537–563, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017.
  69. K. Kiili, K. Moeller, and M. Ninaus, “Evaluating the effectiveness of a game-based rational number training - In-game metrics as learning indicators,” Computers & Education, vol. 120, pp. 13–28, 2018.
  70. C. Alonso-Fernández, A. R. Cano, A. Calvo-Morata, M. Freire, I. Martínez-Ortiz, and B. Fernández-Manjón, “Lessons learned applying learning analytics to assess serious games,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 99, pp. 301–309, 2019.
  71. C. Alonso-Fernández, I. Martínez-Ortiz, R. Caballero, M. Freire, and B. Fernández-Manjón, “Predicting students’ knowledge after playing a serious game based on learning analytics data: A case study,” Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 350–358, 2020.
  72. A. B. Hernández-Lara, A. Perera-Lluna, and E. Serradell-López, “Applying learning analytics to students’ interaction in business simulation games. The usefulness of learning analytics to know what students really learn,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 92, pp. 600–612, 2019.
  73. R. N. Landers and D. R. Sanchez, “Game-based, gamified, and gamefully designed assessments for employee selection: Definitions, distinctions, design, and validation,” International Journal of Selection and Assessment, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 1–13, 2022.
  74. C. Alonso-Fernández, A. Calvo-Morata, M. Freire, I. Martínez-Ortiz, and B. Fernández-Manjón, “Applications of data science to game learning analytics data: A systematic literature review,” Computers & Education, vol. 141, p. 103612, 2019.
  75. M. J. Gomez, J. A. Ruipérez-Valiente, and F. J. G. Clemente, “A systematic literature review of digital game-based assessment empirical studies: Current trends and open challenges,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.07369, 2022.
  76. R. Levy, “Dynamic bayesian network modeling of game-based diagnostic assessments,” Multivariate Behavioral Research, vol. 54, no. 6, pp. 771–794, 2019. PMID: 30942094.
  77. V. Shute and L. Wang, “Assessing and supporting hard-to-measure constructs in video games,” The handbook of cognition and assessment, pp. 535–562, 2016.
  78. P. M. Kato and S. de Klerk, “Serious games for assessment: Welcome to the jungle,” Journal of Applied Testing Technology, vol. 18, no. S1, 2017.
  79. D. Hicks, M. Eagle, E. Rowe, J. Asbell-Clarke, T. Edwards, and T. Barnes, “Using game analytics to evaluate puzzle design and level progression in a serious game,” in Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge, LAK ’16, (New York, NY, USA), p. 440–448, Association for Computing Machinery, 2016.
  80. A. Calvo-Morata, D. C. Rotaru, C. Alonso-Fernandez, M. Freire-Moran, I. Martinez-Ortiz, and B. Fernandez-Manjon, “Validation of a Cyberbullying Serious Game Using Game Analytics,” IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, vol. 13, pp. 186–197, Jan. 2020.
  81. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2016.
  82. Z. Peddycord-Liu, C. Cody, S. Kessler, T. Barnes, C. F. Lynch, and T. Rutherford, “Using serious game analytics to inform digital curricular sequencing: What math objective should students play next?,” in Proceedings of the Annual Symposium on Computer-Human Interaction in Play, CHI PLAY ’17, (New York, NY, USA), p. 195–204, Association for Computing Machinery, 2017.
  83. T. Tong, M. Chignell, M. C. Tierney, J. Lee, et al., “A serious game for clinical assessment of cognitive status: validation study,” JMIR serious games, vol. 4, no. 1, p. e5006, 2016.
  84. K.-F. Kowalewski, J. D. Hendrie, M. W. Schmidt, T. Proctor, S. Paul, C. R. Garrow, H. G. Kenngott, B. P. Müller-Stich, and F. Nickel, “Validation of the mobile serious game application Touch Surgery™ for cognitive training and assessment of laparoscopic cholecystectomy,” Surgical Endoscopy, vol. 31, pp. 4058–4066, Oct. 2017.
  85. M. Hendrix, T. Bellamy-Wood, S. McKay, V. Bloom, and I. Dunwell, “Implementing adaptive game difficulty balancing in serious games,” IEEE Transactions on Games, vol. 11, no. 4, pp. 320–327, 2018.
  86. N. Hocine, A. Gouaïch, S. A. Cerri, D. Mottet, J. Froger, and I. Laffont, “Adaptation in serious games for upper-limb rehabilitation: an approach to improve training outcomes,” User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 65–98, 2015.
  87. J. A. DeFalco, J. P. Rowe, L. Paquette, V. Georgoulas-Sherry, K. Brawner, B. W. Mott, R. S. Baker, and J. C. Lester, “Detecting and addressing frustration in a serious game for military training,” International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 152–193, 2018.
  88. J. Kang, M. Liu, and W. Qu, “Using gameplay data to examine learning behavior patterns in a serious game,” Computers in Human Behavior, vol. 72, pp. 757–770, 2017.
  89. Y. J. Kim and J. A. Ruipérez-Valiente, “Data-Driven Game Design: The Case of Difficulty in Educational Games,” in Addressing Global Challenges and Quality Education (C. Alario-Hoyos, M. J. Rodríguez-Triana, M. Scheffel, I. Arnedillo-Sánchez, and S. M. Dennerlein, eds.), vol. 12315, pp. 449–454, Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
  90. A. R. Cano, B. Fernández-Manjón, and Á. J. García-Tejedor, “Using game learning analytics for validating the design of a learning game for adults with intellectual disabilities,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 49, no. 4, pp. 659–672, 2018.
  91. A. Calvo-Morata, C. Alonso-Fernández, M. Freire, I. Martínez-Ortiz, and B. Fernández-Manjón, “Creating awareness on bullying and cyberbullying among young people: Validating the effectiveness and design of the serious game Conectado,” Telematics and Informatics, vol. 60, p. 101568, July 2021.
  92. Springer, 2018.
  93. D. Hooshyar, M. Yousefi, and H. Lim, “Data-driven approaches to game player modeling: A systematic literature review,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 50, jan 2018.
  94. A. Streicher and M. Aydinbas, “Bayesian cognitive state modeling for adaptive serious games,” in Adaptive Instructional Systems (R. A. Sottilare and J. Schwarz, eds.), (Cham), pp. 14–25, Springer International Publishing, 2022.
  95. R. Kim, M. Kleiman-Weiner, A. Abeliuk, E. Awad, S. Dsouza, J. B. Tenenbaum, and I. Rahwan, “A computational model of commonsense moral decision making,” in Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, AIES ’18, (New York, NY, USA), p. 197–203, Association for Computing Machinery, 2018.
  96. E. S. de Lima, B. Feijó, and A. L. Furtado, “Player behavior and personality modeling for interactive storytelling in games,” Entertainment Computing, vol. 28, pp. 32–48, 2018.
  97. V. Corporation, “Left 4 dead,” 2008. PC Game.
  98. C. G. . KONAMI, “Silent hill shattered memories,” 2009. Wii and PlayStation Game.
  99. J. M. Digman, “Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model,” Annual review of psychology, vol. 41, no. 1, pp. 417–440, 1990.
  100. M. Dreier, K. Wölfling, E. Duven, S. Giralt, M. Beutel, and K. Müller, “Free-to-play: About addicted whales, at risk dolphins and healthy minnows. monetarization design and internet gaming disorder,” Addictive Behaviors, vol. 64, pp. 328–333, 2017.
  101. M. Willson and T. Leaver, “Zynga’s farmville, social games, and the ethics of big data mining,” Communication Research and Practice, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 147–158, 2015.
  102. G. van Lankveld, P. Spronck, J. van den Herik, and A. Arntz, “Games as personality profiling tools,” in 2011 IEEE Conference on Computational Intelligence and Games (CIG’11), pp. 197–202, 2011.
  103. N. Yee, N. Ducheneaut, L. Nelson, and P. Likarish, “Introverted elves & conscientious gnomes: The expression of personality in world of warcraft,” in Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI ’11, (New York, NY, USA), p. 753–762, Association for Computing Machinery, 2011.
  104. Z. Halim, M. Atif, A. Rashid, and C. A. Edwin, “Profiling players using real-world datasets: Clustering the data and correlating the results with the big-five personality traits,” IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing, vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 568–584, 2019.
  105. M. Denden, A. Tlili, F. Essalmi, and M. Jemni, “Implicit modeling of learners’ personalities in a game-based learning environment using their gaming behaviors,” Smart Learning Environments, vol. 5, p. 29, Nov. 2018.
  106. J.-L. McCord, J. L. Harman, and J. Purl, “Game-like personality testing: An emerging mode of personality assessment,” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 143, pp. 95–102, 2019.
  107. E. Awad, S. Dsouza, R. Kim, J. Schulz, J. Henrich, A. Shariff, J.-F. Bonnefon, and I. Rahwan, “The Moral Machine experiment,” Nature, vol. 563, pp. 59–64, Nov. 2018.
  108. E. Awad, S. Dsouza, A. Shariff, I. Rahwan, and J.-F. Bonnefon, “Universals and variations in moral decisions made in 42 countries by 70,000 participants,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 117, no. 5, pp. 2332–2337, 2020.
  109. M. Pereda, V. Capraro, and A. Sánchez, “Group size effects and critical mass in public goods games,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, p. 5503, Apr. 2019.
  110. J. Poncela-Casasnovas, M. Gutiérrez-Roig, C. Gracia-Lázaro, J. Vicens, J. Gómez-Gardeñes, J. Perelló, Y. Moreno, J. Duch, and A. Sánchez, “Humans display a reduced set of consistent behavioral phenotypes in dyadic games,” Science Advances, vol. 2, no. 8, p. e1600451, 2016.
  111. G. López, N. Bueno, M. Castro, M. Reneses, J. Pérez, M. Riberas, M. Álvarez-Campana, M. Vega-Barbas, S. Solera-Cotanilla, L. Bastida, et al., “The H2020 project RAYUELA: A fun way to fight cybercrime,” Jornadas Nacionales de Investigación en Ciberseguridad - JNIC, 2021.
  112. L. Ma and B. Sun, “Machine learning and ai in marketing – connecting computing power to human insights,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, vol. 37, no. 3, pp. 481–504, 2020.
  113. B. Keles, N. McCrae, and A. Grealish, “A systematic review: the influence of social media on depression, anxiety and psychological distress in adolescents,” International Journal of Adolescence and Youth, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 79–93, 2020.
  114. E. Abi-Jaoude, K. T. Naylor, and A. Pignatiello, “Smartphones, social media use and youth mental health,” Canadian Medical Association Journal (CMAJ), vol. 192, no. 6, pp. E136–E141, 2020.
  115. A. J. Weaver and N. Lewis, “Mirrored morality: An exploration of moral choice in video games,” Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, vol. 15, no. 11, pp. 610–614, 2012. PMID: 23017118.
  116. S. Joeckel, N. D. Bowman, and L. Dogruel, “Gut or game? the influence of moral intuitions on decisions in video games,” Media Psychology, vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 460–485, 2012.
  117. H. d. Bruijn, M. Warnier, and M. Janssen, “The perils and pitfalls of explainable AI: Strategies for explaining algorithmic decision-making,” Government Information Quarterly, vol. 39, no. 2, p. 101666, 2022.
  118. M. J. Salganik, Bit by bit: Social research in the digital age. Princeton University Press, 2019. Ch. 6.
  119. H. van Hasselt, A. Guez, and D. Silver, “Deep reinforcement learning with double q-learning,” Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 30, no. 1, 2016.
  120. A. Hussein, M. M. Gaber, E. Elyan, and C. Jayne, “Imitation learning: A survey of learning methods,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 50, apr 2017.
  121. I. Goodfellow, J. Pouget-Abadie, M. Mirza, B. Xu, D. Warde-Farley, S. Ozair, A. Courville, and Y. Bengio, “Generative adversarial networks,” Commun. ACM, vol. 63, p. 139–144, oct 2020.
  122. D. M. J. Lazer, A. Pentland, D. J. Watts, S. Aral, S. Athey, N. Contractor, D. Freelon, S. Gonzalez-Bailon, G. King, H. Margetts, A. Nelson, M. J. Salganik, M. Strohmaier, A. Vespignani, and C. Wagner, “Computational social science: Obstacles and opportunities,” Science, vol. 369, no. 6507, pp. 1060–1062, 2020.
  123. R. McElreath, Statistical rethinking: A Bayesian course with examples in R and Stan. Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2020.
  124. John Wiley & Sons, 2016.
Citations (9)
View on Semantic Scholar

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Now