Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
166 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
7 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
42 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
4 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
38 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

RMove: Recommending Move Method Refactoring Opportunities using Structural and Semantic Representations of Code (2212.12195v1)

Published 23 Dec 2022 in cs.SE

Abstract: Incorrect placement of methods within classes is a typical code smell called Feature Envy, which causes additional maintenance and cost during evolution. To remove this design flaw, several Move Method refactoring tools have been proposed. To the best of our knowledge, state-of-the-art related techniques can be broadly divided into two categories: the first line is non-machine-learning-based approaches built on software measurement, while the selection and thresholds of software metrics heavily rely on expert knowledge. The second line is machine learning-based approaches, which suggest Move Method refactoring by learning to extract features from code information. However, most approaches in this line treat different forms of code information identically, disregarding their significant variation on data analysis. In this paper, we propose an approach to recommend Move Method refactoring named RMove by automatically learning structural and semantic representation from code fragment respectively. We concatenate these representations together and further train the machine learning classifiers to guide the movement of method to suitable classes. We evaluate our approach on two publicly available datasets. The results show that our approach outperforms three state-of-the-art refactoring tools including PathMove, JDeodorant, and JMove in effectiveness and usefulness. The results also unveil useful findings and provide new insights that benefit other types of feature envy refactoring techniques.

Citations (7)

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.