Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 84 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 45 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 28 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 21 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 92 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 425 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 157 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

The most massive stars in very young star clusters with a limited mass: Evidence favours significant self-regulation in the star formation processes (2211.13244v1)

Published 23 Nov 2022 in astro-ph.GA and astro-ph.SR

Abstract: The stellar initial mass function (IMF) is commonly interpreted to be a scale-invariant probability density distribution function (PDF) such that many small clusters yield the same IMF as one massive cluster of the same combined number of stars. Observations of the galaxy-wide IMF challenge this as dwarf galaxies do not form as many massive stars as expected. This indicates a highly self-regulated star formation process in which stellar masses are not stochastically sampled from the IMF and are instead related to the environment of star formation. Here, the nature of star formation is studied using the relation between the most massive star born in a star cluster and its parental stellar cluster mass (the $m_{\rm max}$--$M_{\rm ecl}$ relation). This relation has been argued to be a statistical effect if stars are sampled randomly from the IMF. By comparing the tightness of the observed $m_{\rm max}$--$M_{\rm ecl}$ distribution with synthetic star clusters with stochastically sampled stellar masses, we find that the expected dispersion of the mock observations is much larger than the observed dispersion. Assuming that $m_{\rm max}$ and $M_{\rm ecl}$ uncertainties from the literature are correct, our test rejects the hypothesis that the IMF is a PDF at a more than $4.5\sigma$ confidence level. Alternatively, we provide a deterministic stellar mass sampling tool which reproduces the observed $m_{\rm max}$--$M_{\rm ecl}$ distribution and compares well with the luminosities of star-forming molecular clumps. In addition, we find that there is a significant flattening of the $m_{\rm max}$--$M_{\rm ecl}$ relation near $m_{\rm max}=13~M_\odot$. This may suggest strong feedback of stars more massive than about $13~M_\odot$ and/or the ejections of the most massive stars from young clusters in the mass range 63 to $400~M_\odot$ to be likely important physical processes in forming clusters.

Citations (10)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.