Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash
41 tokens/sec
GPT-4o
59 tokens/sec
Gemini 2.5 Pro Pro
41 tokens/sec
o3 Pro
7 tokens/sec
GPT-4.1 Pro
50 tokens/sec
DeepSeek R1 via Azure Pro
28 tokens/sec
2000 character limit reached

Bias Mitigation for Machine Learning Classifiers: A Comprehensive Survey (2207.07068v4)

Published 14 Jul 2022 in cs.LG

Abstract: This paper provides a comprehensive survey of bias mitigation methods for achieving fairness in Machine Learning (ML) models. We collect a total of 341 publications concerning bias mitigation for ML classifiers. These methods can be distinguished based on their intervention procedure (i.e., pre-processing, in-processing, post-processing) and the technique they apply. We investigate how existing bias mitigation methods are evaluated in the literature. In particular, we consider datasets, metrics and benchmarking. Based on the gathered insights (e.g., What is the most popular fairness metric? How many datasets are used for evaluating bias mitigation methods?), we hope to support practitioners in making informed choices when developing and evaluating new bias mitigation methods.

PDF HTML Abstract
Ai Sparkles Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Summarize Bookmark Chat Bubble Oval Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com Chat (Pro)
Definition Search Book Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
References (418)
  1. 2001. Dutch Central Bureau for Statistics Volkstelling. http://easy.dans.knaw.nl/dms. Retrieved on June 12, 2022.
  2. 2016. Medical Expenditure Panel Survey dataset. https://meps.ahrq.gov/mepsweb/data_stats/download_data_files_detail.jsp?cboPufNumber=HC-192. Retrieved on June 12, 2022.
  3. 2017. The Heritage Health Prize dataset. https://www.kaggle.com/c/hhp. Retrieved on June 12, 2022.
  4. 2017. Stop, Question and Frisk dataset. http://www1.nyc.gov/site/nypd/stats/reports-analysis/stopfrisk.page. Retrieved on June 12, 2022.
  5. 2018. Home Credit Default Risk. https://www.kaggle.com/c/home-credit-default-risk. Retrieved on June 12, 2022.
  6. 2019. National longitudinal surveys of youth data set. www.bls.gov/nls/. Retrieved on June 12, 2022.
  7. Mitigating bias in federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2012.02447 (2020).
  8. Generative Adversarial Networks for Mitigating Biases in Machine Learning Systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.09972 (2019).
  9. One-network adversarial fairness. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 2412–2420.
  10. Auditing black-box models for indirect influence. Knowledge and Information Systems 54, 1 (2018), 95–122.
  11. A reductions approach to fair classification. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 60–69.
  12. Fair regression: Quantitative definitions and reduction-based algorithms. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 120–129.
  13. Sushant Agarwal and Amit Deshpande. 2022. On the Power of Randomization in Fair Classification and Representation. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (FAccT ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1542–1551. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533209
  14. Learning optimal and fair decision trees for non-discriminative decision-making. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 1418–1426.
  15. Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin. 2020. Fair Classification via Unconstrained Optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14621 (2020).
  16. A Reduction to Binary Approach for Debiasing Multiclass Datasets. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.15860 (2022).
  17. Ibrahim M Alabdulmohsin and Mario Lucic. 2021. A near-optimal algorithm for debiasing trained machine learning models. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021), 8072–8084.
  18. Unleashing linear optimizers for group-fair learning and optimization. In Conference On Learning Theory. PMLR, 2043–2066.
  19. Beyond Adult and COMPAS: Fairness in Multi-Class Prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.07801 (2022).
  20. ABCinML: Anticipatory Bias Correction in Machine Learning Applications. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (FAccT ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1552–1560. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533211
  21. Jack J Amend and Scott Spurlock. 2021. Improving machine learning fairness with sampling and adversarial learning. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 36, 5 (2021), 14–23.
  22. Fair active learning. Expert Systems with Applications 199 (2022), 116981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116981
  23. Fairwashing explanations with off-manifold detergent. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 314–323.
  24. Machine bias. ProPublica. See https://www. propublica. org/article/machine-bias-risk-assessments-in-criminal-sentencing (2016).
  25. Online Appendix. 2022. Online Appendix: Survey Results. https://solar.cs.ucl.ac.uk/os/softwarefairness.html
  26. Finite-time analysis of the multiarmed bandit problem. Machine learning 47, 2 (2002), 235–256.
  27. Equalized odds postprocessing under imperfect group information. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR, 1770–1780.
  28. R\\\backslash\’enyi Fair Inference. In 8th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2020.
  29. What is fair? exploring pareto-efficiency for fairness constrained classifiers. arXiv preprint arXiv:1910.14120 (2019).
  30. Fair Normalizing Flows. In International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=BrFIKuxrZE
  31. Niels Bantilan. 2018. Themis-ml: A fairness-aware machine learning interface for end-to-end discrimination discovery and mitigation. Journal of Technology in Human Services 36, 1 (2018), 15–30.
  32. It’s compaslicated: The messy relationship between rai datasets and algorithmic fairness benchmarks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.05498 (2021).
  33. Understanding Fairness Requirements for ML-based Software. In Procs. of the 31st IEEE RE. IEEE.
  34. Solon Barocas and Andrew D Selbst. 2016. Big data’s disparate impact. Calif. L. Rev. 104 (2016), 671.
  35. Yahav Bechavod and Katrina Ligett. 2017. Penalizing unfairness in binary classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00044 (2017).
  36. AI Fairness 360: An extensible toolkit for detecting, understanding, and mitigating unwanted algorithmic bias. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.01943 (2018).
  37. A convex framework for fair regression. arXiv preprint arXiv:1706.02409 (2017).
  38. Fairness in criminal justice risk assessments: The state of the art. Sociological Methods & Research (2018), 0049124118782533.
  39. Putting fairness principles into practice: Challenges, metrics, and improvements. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 453–459.
  40. Data decisions and theoretical implications when adversarially learning fair representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1707.00075 (2017).
  41. Sex bias in graduate admissions: Data from Berkeley. Science 187, 4175 (1975), 398–404.
  42. Fairlearn: A toolkit for assessing and improving fairness in AI. Microsoft, Tech. Rep. MSR-TR-2020-32 (2020).
  43. William Blanzeisky and Pádraig Cunningham. 2022. Using Pareto simulated annealing to address algorithmic bias in machine learning. The Knowledge Engineering Review 37 (2022), e5. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269888922000029
  44. Language (technology) is power: A critical survey of” bias” in nlp. arXiv preprint arXiv:2005.14050 (2020).
  45. Ruth G Blumrosen. 1978. Wage discrimination, job segregation, and the title vii of the civil rights act of 1964. U. Mich. JL Reform 12 (1978), 397.
  46. Stelios Boulitsakis-Logothetis. 2022. Fairness-Aware Naive Bayes Classifier for Data with Multiple Sensitive Features. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.11499 (2022).
  47. Building classifiers with independency constraints. In 2009 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining Workshops. IEEE, 13–18.
  48. Controlling attribute effect in linear regression. In 2013 IEEE 13th international conference on data mining. IEEE, 71–80.
  49. Toon Calders and Sicco Verwer. 2010. Three naive Bayes approaches for discrimination-free classification. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 21, 2 (2010), 277–292.
  50. Optimized pre-processing for discrimination prevention. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 3992–4001.
  51. Fair and Green Hyperparameter Optimization via Multi-objective and Multiple Information Source Bayesian Optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.08835 (2022).
  52. Simon Caton and Christian Haas. 2020. Fairness in machine learning: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.04053 (2020).
  53. Classification with fairness constraints: A meta-algorithm with provable guarantees. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 319–328.
  54. Fair classification with noisy protected attributes: A framework with provable guarantees. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 1349–1361.
  55. L Elisa Celis and Vijay Keswani. 2019. Improved adversarial learning for fair classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:1901.10443 (2019).
  56. Data preprocessing to mitigate bias: A maximum entropy based approach. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 1349–1359.
  57. Fair classification with adversarial perturbations. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021), 8158–8171.
  58. Fair Interpretable Representation Learning with Correction Vectors. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.03078 (2022).
  59. Junyi Chai and Xiaoqian Wang. 2022. Fairness with Adaptive Weights. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2853–2866.
  60. Bias in Machine Learning Software: Why? How? What to Do?. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (Athens, Greece) (ESEC/FSE 2021). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 429–440. https://doi.org/10.1145/3468264.3468537
  61. Fair-SSL: Building fair ML Software with less data. In International Workshop on Equitable Data and Technology (FairWare ’22 ).
  62. Fairway: A Way to Build Fair ML Software. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 654–665. https://doi.org/10.1145/3368089.3409697
  63. Software engineering for fairness: A case study with hyperparameter optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.05786 (2019).
  64. SMOTE: synthetic minority over-sampling technique. Journal of artificial intelligence research 16 (2002), 321–357.
  65. On Fair Classification with Mostly Private Sensitive Attributes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.08336 (2022).
  66. Why is my classifier discriminatory? Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (2018).
  67. Fairness under unawareness: Assessing disparity when protected class is unobserved. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. 339–348.
  68. Fairness Testing: A Comprehensive Survey and Analysis of Trends. arXiv e-prints (2022), arXiv–2207.
  69. MAAT: A Novel Ensemble Approach to Addressing Fairness and Performance Bugs for Machine Learning Software. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC/FSE’22.
  70. A Comprehensive Empirical Study of Bias Mitigation Methods for Machine Learning Classifiers. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 32, 4 (2023), 106:1–106:30.
  71. Fairness Improvement with Multiple Protected Attributes: How Far Are We?. In Proceedings of the 46th ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering, ICSE 2024.
  72. Silvia Chiappa. 2019. Path-specific counterfactual fairness. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 7801–7808.
  73. Silvia Chiappa and William S Isaac. 2018. A causal bayesian networks viewpoint on fairness. In IFIP International Summer School on Privacy and Identity Management. Springer, 3–20.
  74. A fair classifier using kernel density estimation. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020), 15088–15099.
  75. Group Fairness by Probabilistic Modeling with Latent Fair Decisions. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35. 12051–12059.
  76. Alexandra Chouldechova and Aaron Roth. 2018. The frontiers of fairness in machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.08810 (2018).
  77. Ching-Yao Chuang and Youssef Mroueh. 2021. Fair Mixup: Fairness via Interpolation. In International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=DNl5s5BXeBn
  78. Leveraging labeled and unlabeled data for consistent fair binary classification. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (2019).
  79. Fair regression via plug-in estimator and recalibration with statistical guarantees. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020), 19137–19148.
  80. Fair regression with wasserstein barycenters. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020), 7321–7331.
  81. Evgenii Chzhen and Nicolas Schreuder. 2020. A minimax framework for quantifying risk-fairness trade-off in regression. arXiv preprint arXiv:2007.14265 (2020).
  82. Algorithmic decision making and the cost of fairness. In Proceedings of the 23rd acm sigkdd international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 797–806.
  83. Modeling wine preferences by data mining from physicochemical properties. Decision support systems 47, 4 (2009), 547–553.
  84. Paulo Cortez and Alice Maria Gonçalves Silva. 2008. Using data mining to predict secondary school student performance. (2008).
  85. Training well-generalizing classifiers for fairness metrics and other data-dependent constraints. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 1397–1405.
  86. Optimization with Non-Differentiable Constraints with Applications to Fairness, Recall, Churn, and Other Goals. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 20, 172 (2019), 1–59.
  87. Two-player games for efficient non-convex constrained optimization. In Algorithmic Learning Theory. PMLR, 300–332.
  88. Flexibly fair representation learning by disentanglement. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 1436–1445.
  89. Promoting Fairness through Hyperparameter Optimization. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). 1036–1041. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDM51629.2021.00119
  90. André Miguel Ferreira da Cruz. 2020. Fairness-Aware Hyperparameter Optimization: An Application to Fraud Detection. (2020).
  91. Towards A Holistic View of Bias in Machine Learning: Bridging Algorithmic Fairness and Imbalanced Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.06084 (2022).
  92. Adversarial classification. In Proceedings of the tenth ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 99–108.
  93. Jeffrey Dastin. 2018. Amazon scraps secret AI recruiting tool that showed bias against women. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-amazon-com-jobs-automation-insight-idUSKCN1MK08G
  94. Ethical Adversaries: Towards Mitigating Unfairness with Adversarial Machine Learning. In Bias and Fairness in AI (BIAS 2020).
  95. FIFA: Making Fairness More Generalizable in Classifiers Trained on Imbalanced Data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.02792 (2022).
  96. Counterfactual fairness: removing direct effects through regularization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.10774 (2020).
  97. Multiaccurate Proxies for Downstream Fairness. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (FAccT ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1207–1239. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533180
  98. Bayesian fairness. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 33. 509–516.
  99. Retiring adult: New datasets for fair machine learning. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021), 6478–6490.
  100. Differentially private and fair classification via calibrated functional mechanism. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 622–629.
  101. Yasmine Djebrouni. 2022. Towards Bias Mitigation in Federated Learning. In 16th EuroSys Doctoral Workshop.
  102. Fair Generalized Linear Models with a Convex Penalty. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 5286–5308.
  103. Empirical risk minimization under fairness constraints. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2796–2806.
  104. Fairness via representation neutralization. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021), 12091–12103.
  105. Wei Du and Xintao Wu. 2021. Fair and Robust Classification Under Sample Selection Bias. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management (Virtual Event, Queensland, Australia) (CIKM ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2999–3003. https://doi.org/10.1145/3459637.3482104
  106. Data pre-processing for discrimination prevention: Information-theoretic optimization and analysis. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 12, 5 (2018), 1106–1119.
  107. Dheeru Dua and Casey Graff. 2017. UCI Machine Learning Repository. http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml
  108. Jannik Dunkelau and Michael Leuschel. 2019. Fairness-Aware Machine Learning. (2019).
  109. Fairness through awareness. In Proceedings of the 3rd innovations in theoretical computer science conference. 214–226.
  110. Decoupled classifiers for group-fair and efficient machine learning. In Conference on fairness, accountability and transparency. PMLR, 119–133.
  111. Harrison Edwards and Amos Storkey. 2015. Censoring representations with an adversary. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.05897 (2015).
  112. Michael Emmerich and André H Deutz. 2018. A tutorial on multiobjective optimization: fundamentals and evolutionary methods. Natural computing 17, 3 (2018), 585–609.
  113. Simon Aagaard Enni and Ira Assent. 2018. Using Balancing Terms to Avoid Discrimination in Classification. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). IEEE, 947–952.
  114. Fairfed: Enabling group fairness in federated learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.00857 (2021).
  115. Algorithmic fairness datasets: the story so far. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 36, 6 (2022), 2074–2152.
  116. Fairness in relational domains. In Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 108–114.
  117. The five factor model of personality and evaluation of drug consumption risk. In Data science. Springer, 231–242.
  118. Certifying and removing disparate impact. In proceedings of the 21th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining. 259–268.
  119. Learning fair representations via an adversarial framework. arXiv preprint arXiv:1904.13341 (2019).
  120. Fair boosting: a case study. In Workshop on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency in Machine Learning. Citeseer.
  121. A confidence-based approach for balancing fairness and accuracy. In Proceedings of the 2016 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining. SIAM, 144–152.
  122. Fairness for AUC via Feature Augmentation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.12823 (2021).
  123. A comparative study of fairness-enhancing interventions in machine learning. In Proceedings of the Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. ACM, 329–338.
  124. Prediction with model-based neutrality. IEICE TRANSACTIONS on Information and Systems 98, 8 (2015), 1503–1516.
  125. Kazuto Fukuchi and Jun Sakuma. 2015. Fairness-Aware Learning with Restriction of Universal Dependency using f-Divergences. arXiv preprint arXiv:1506.07721 (2015).
  126. Causal Feature Selection for Algorithmic Fairness. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Management of Data (Philadelphia, PA, USA) (SIGMOD ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 276–285. https://doi.org/10.1145/3514221.3517909
  127. FairNeuron: Improving Deep Neural Network Fairness with Adversary Games on Selective Neurons. In Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) (ICSE ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 921–933. https://doi.org/10.1145/3510003.3510087
  128. Reducing Age Bias in Machine Learning: An Algorithmic Approach. SMU Data Science Review 3, 2 (2020), 11.
  129. Cascaded Debiasing: Studying the Cumulative Effect of Multiple Fairness-Enhancing Interventions. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.03734 (2022).
  130. Online learning with an unknown fairness metric. Advances in neural information processing systems 31 (2018).
  131. Non-discriminatory machine learning through convex fairness criteria. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  132. Satisfying real-world goals with dataset constraints. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2415–2423.
  133. Obtaining fairness using optimal transport theory. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2357–2365.
  134. Marrying fairness and explainability in supervised learning. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 1905–1916.
  135. Learning Unbiased Representations via Rényi Minimization. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 749–764.
  136. Fairness-aware neural Rényi minimization for continuous features. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Conference on International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence. 2262–2268.
  137. Fairness without the sensitive attribute via Causal Variational Autoencoder. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.04999 (2021).
  138. Fair adversarial gradient tree boosting. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). IEEE, 1060–1065.
  139. Beyond distributive fairness in algorithmic decision making: Feature selection for procedurally fair learning. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 32.
  140. Proxy fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1806.11212 (2018).
  141. Controllable Guarantees for Fair Outcomes via Contrastive Information Estimation. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35. 7610–7619.
  142. Philipp Hacker and Emil Wiedemann. 2017. A continuous framework for fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1712.07924 (2017).
  143. Sara Hajian and Josep Domingo-Ferrer. 2012. A methodology for direct and indirect discrimination prevention in data mining. IEEE transactions on knowledge and data engineering 25, 7 (2012), 1445–1459.
  144. Equality of opportunity in supervised learning. In Advances in neural information processing systems. 3315–3323.
  145. Fairness without demographics in repeated loss minimization. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 1929–1938.
  146. Multicalibration: Calibration for the (computationally-identifiable) masses. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 1939–1948.
  147. Fairness behind a veil of ignorance: A welfare analysis for automated decision making. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (2018).
  148. Fairness by Explicability and Adversarial SHAP Learning. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 174–190.
  149. Improving fairness in machine learning systems: What do industry practitioners need?. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–16.
  150. Max Hort and Federica Sarro. 2021. Did You Do Your Homework? Raising Awareness on Software Fairness and Discrimination. ASE.
  151. Fairea: A Model Behaviour Mutation Approach to Benchmarking Bias Mitigation Methods. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering.
  152. Provably Fair Federated Learning via Bounded Group Loss. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.10190 (2022).
  153. Fairnn-conjoint learning of fair representations for fair decisions. In International Conference on Discovery Science. Springer, 581–595.
  154. Lingxiao Huang and Nisheeth Vishnoi. 2019. Stable and fair classification. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2879–2890.
  155. Fair-AdaBoost: Extending AdaBoost method to achieve fair classification. Expert Systems with Applications 202 (2022), 117240.
  156. Ben Hutchinson and Margaret Mitchell. 2019. 50 years of test (un) fairness: Lessons for machine learning. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. 49–58.
  157. Towards formal fairness in machine learning. In International Conference on Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming. Springer, 846–867.
  158. Flea: Provably fair multisource learning from unreliable training data. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.11732 (2021).
  159. Fae: A fairness-aware ensemble framework. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE, 1375–1380.
  160. Vasileios Iosifidis and Eirini Ntoutsi. 2018. Dealing with bias via data augmentation in supervised learning scenarios. Jo Bates Paul D. Clough Robert Jäschke 24 (2018).
  161. Vasileios Iosifidis and Eirini Ntoutsi. 2019. Adafair: Cumulative fairness adaptive boosting. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management. 781–790.
  162. Vasileios Iosifidis and Eirini Ntoutsi. 2020. FABBOO-Online Fairness-Aware Learning Under Class Imbalance. In International Conference on Discovery Science. Springer, 159–174.
  163. Parity-based cumulative fairness-aware boosting. Knowledge and Information Systems (27 Jul 2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-022-01723-3
  164. Fairness-enhancing interventions in stream classification. In International Conference on Database and Expert Systems Applications. Springer, 261–276.
  165. Can We Obtain Fairness For Free?. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 586–596.
  166. Invariant representations through adversarial forgetting. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 4272–4279.
  167. Group-aware threshold adaptation for fair classification. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 36. 6988–6995.
  168. Constructing a fair classifier with generated fair data. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35. 7908–7916.
  169. Heinrich Jiang and Ofir Nachum. 2020. Identifying and correcting label bias in machine learning. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR, 702–712.
  170. Wasserstein fair classification. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. PMLR, 862–872.
  171. Generalized Demographic Parity for Group Fairness. In International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=YigKlMJwjye
  172. Input-agnostic Certified Group Fairness via Gaussian Parameter Smoothing. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 10340–10361.
  173. James E Johndrow and Kristian Lum. 2019. An algorithm for removing sensitive information: application to race-independent recidivism prediction. The Annals of Applied Statistics 13, 1 (2019), 189–220.
  174. MIMIC-III, a freely accessible critical care database. Scientific data 3, 1 (2016), 1–9.
  175. Impartial predictive modeling: Ensuring fairness in arbitrary models. Statist. Sci. (2016), 1.
  176. Meritocratic fairness for infinite and contextual bandits. In Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 158–163.
  177. Fairness in learning: Classic and contextual bandits. Advances in neural information processing systems 29 (2016).
  178. An algorithmic framework for fairness elicitation. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.10660 (2019).
  179. Learning Fair Classifiers with Partially Annotated Group Labels. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 10348–10357.
  180. Generating Fair Universal Representations Using Adversarial Models. IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security 17 (2022), 1970–1985. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2022.3170265
  181. Mohammad Mahdi Kamani. 2020. Multiobjective Optimization Approaches for Bias Mitigation in Machine Learning. (2020).
  182. Efficient fair principal component analysis. Machine Learning (2022), 1–32.
  183. Faisal Kamiran and Toon Calders. 2009. Classifying without discriminating. In 2009 2nd international conference on computer, control and communication. IEEE, 1–6.
  184. Faisal Kamiran and Toon Calders. 2010. Classification with no discrimination by preferential sampling. In Proc. 19th Machine Learning Conf. Belgium and The Netherlands. Citeseer, 1–6.
  185. Faisal Kamiran and Toon Calders. 2012. Data preprocessing techniques for classification without discrimination. Knowledge and Information Systems 33, 1 (2012), 1–33.
  186. Discrimination aware decision tree learning. In 2010 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 869–874.
  187. Decision theory for discrimination-aware classification. In 2012 IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 924–929.
  188. Exploiting reject option in classification for social discrimination control. Information Sciences 425 (2018), 18–33.
  189. Fairness-aware classifier with prejudice remover regularizer. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 35–50.
  190. The independence of fairness-aware classifiers. In 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops. IEEE, 849–858.
  191. Model-based and actual independence for fairness-aware classification. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 32, 1 (2018), 258–286.
  192. Fairness-aware learning through regularization approach. In 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops. IEEE, 643–650.
  193. Kentaro Kanamori and Hiroki Arimura. 2019. Fairness-aware Edit of Thresholds in a Learned Decision Tree Using a Mixed Integer Programming Formulation. In The 33rd Annual Conference of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence (2019). The Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 3Rin211–3Rin211.
  194. Kentaro Kanamori and Hiroki Arimura. 2021. Fairness-Aware Decision Tree Editing Based on Mixed-Integer Linear Optimization. Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence 36, 4 (2021), B–L13_1.
  195. MultiFair: Multi-Group Fairness in Machine Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.11069 (2021).
  196. Preventing Fairness Gerrymandering: Auditing and Learning for Subgroup Fairness (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 80), Jennifer Dy and Andreas Krause (Eds.). PMLR, Stockholmsmässan, Stockholm Sweden, 2564–2572. http://proceedings.mlr.press/v80/kearns18a.html
  197. Tuning Fairness by Marginalizing Latent Target Labels. stat 1050 (2019), 10.
  198. Tuning fairness by balancing target labels. Frontiers in artificial intelligence 3 (2020), 33.
  199. Equitable allocation of healthcare resources with fair cox models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2010.06820 (2020).
  200. Blind justice: Fairness with encrypted sensitive attributes. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 2630–2639.
  201. Fair decisions despite imperfect predictions. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR, 277–287.
  202. Avoiding Discrimination through Causal Reasoning. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Long Beach, California, USA) (NIPS’17). Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 656–666.
  203. Fact: A diagnostic for group fairness trade-offs. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 5264–5274.
  204. Jin-Young Kim and Sung-Bae Cho. 2020. Fair Representation for Safe Artificial Intelligence via Adversarial Learning of Unbiased Information Bottleneck.. In SafeAI@ AAAI. 105–112.
  205. Jin-Young Kim and Sung-Bae Cho. 2022. An information theoretic approach to reducing algorithmic bias for machine learning. Neurocomputing 500 (2022), 26–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2021.09.081
  206. Fairness through computationally-bounded awareness. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (2018).
  207. Multiaccuracy: Black-box post-processing for fairness in classification. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 247–254.
  208. Kenji Kobayashi and Yuri Nakao. 2021. One-vs.-One Mitigation of Intersectional Bias: A General Method for Extending Fairness-Aware Binary Classification. In International Conference on Disruptive Technologies, Tech Ethics and Artificial Intelligence. Springer, 43–54.
  209. Junpei Komiyama and Hajime Shimao. 2017. Two-stage algorithm for fairness-aware machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.04924 (2017).
  210. Nonconvex optimization for regression with fairness constraints. In International conference on machine learning. PMLR, 2737–2746.
  211. Adaptive sensitive reweighting to mitigate bias in fairness-aware classification. In Proceedings of the 2018 World Wide Web Conference. 853–862.
  212. No computation without representation: Avoiding data and algorithm biases through diversity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.11836 (2020).
  213. Counterfactual fairness. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 4066–4076.
  214. Fairness without demographics through adversarially reweighted learning. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 728–740.
  215. ifair: Learning individually fair data representations for algorithmic decision making. In 2019 ieee 35th international conference on data engineering (icde). IEEE, 1334–1345.
  216. Operationalizing Individual Fairness with Pairwise Fair Representations. Proc. VLDB Endow. 13, 4 (dec 2019), 506–518. https://doi.org/10.14778/3372716.3372723
  217. Noise-tolerant fair classification. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (2019).
  218. Interpretable and Fair Boolean Rule Sets via Column Generation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2111.08466 (2021).
  219. A survey on datasets for fairness-aware machine learning. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery (2022), e1452.
  220. A maximal correlation approach to imposing fairness in machine learning. In ICASSP 2022-2022 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 3523–3527.
  221. A Maximal Correlation Framework for Fair Machine Learning. Entropy 24, 4 (2022), 461.
  222. Fair Selective Classification via Sufficiency. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 6076–6086.
  223. Michelle Seng Ah Lee and Jat Singh. 2021. The landscape and gaps in open source fairness toolkits. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1–13.
  224. Yet Another Predictive Model? Fair Predictions of Students’ Learning Outcomes in an Online Math Learning Platform. In LAK21: 11th International Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference. 572–578.
  225. Peizhao Li and Hongfu Liu. 2022. Achieving Fairness at No Utility Cost via Data Reweighing with Influence. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 12917–12930.
  226. ’Propose and Review’: Interactive Bias Mitigation for Machine Classifiers. Available at SSRN 4139244 (2022).
  227. Dark-Skin Individuals Are at More Risk on the Street: Unmasking Fairness Issues of Autonomous Driving Systems. CoRR abs/2308.02935 (2023).
  228. Accurate Fairness: Improving Individual Fairness without Trading Accuracy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.08704 (2022).
  229. Training Data Debugging for the Fairness of Machine Learning Software. In 2022 IEEE/ACM 44th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE). 2215–2227. https://doi.org/10.1145/3510003.3510091
  230. Joint Adversarial Learning for Cross-domain Fair Classification. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.03656 (2022).
  231. FairMod-Making Predictive Models Discrimination Aware. arXiv preprint arXiv:1811.01480 (2018).
  232. Fair Transfer Learning with Factor Variational Auto-Encoder. Neural Processing Letters (2022), 1–13.
  233. Suyun Liu and Luis Nunes Vicente. 2022. Accuracy and fairness trade-offs in machine learning: A stochastic multi-objective approach. Computational Management Science (2022), 1–25.
  234. Fair Differential Privacy Can Mitigate the Disparate Impact on Model Accuracy. https://openreview.net/forum?id=IqVB8e0DlUd
  235. Too relaxed to be fair. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 6360–6369.
  236. Pranay Lohia. 2021. Priority-based Post-Processing Bias Mitigation for Individual and Group Fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.00417 (2021).
  237. Bias Mitigation Post-processing for Individual and Group Fairness. In ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). 2847–2851. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8682620
  238. The Variational Fair Autoencoder. In 4th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2016, San Juan, Puerto Rico, May 2-4, 2016, Conference Track Proceedings, Yoshua Bengio and Yann LeCun (Eds.). http://arxiv.org/abs/1511.00830
  239. FERMI: Fair Empirical Risk Minimization via Exponential R\\\backslash\’enyi Mutual Information. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.12586 (2021).
  240. Kristian Lum and James Johndrow. 2016. A statistical framework for fair predictive algorithms. arXiv preprint arXiv:1610.08077 (2016).
  241. Discrimination-aware association rule mining for unbiased data analytics. In International Conference on Big Data Analytics and Knowledge Discovery. Springer, 108–120.
  242. k-NN as an implementation of situation testing for discrimination discovery and prevention. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 502–510.
  243. Ramanujam Madhavan and Mohit Wadhwa. 2020. Fairness-Aware Learning with Prejudice Free Representations. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 2137–2140.
  244. Learning adversarially fair and transferable representations. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 3384–3393.
  245. Fairness through causal awareness: Learning causal latent-variable models for biased data. In Proceedings of the conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. 349–358.
  246. Predict responsibly: improving fairness and accuracy by learning to defer. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 31 (2018).
  247. Gaurav Maheshwari and Michaël Perrot. 2022. FairGrad: Fairness Aware Gradient Descent. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.10923 (2022).
  248. There is no trade-off: enforcing fairness can improve accuracy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2011.03173 (2020).
  249. Ensuring fairness beyond the training data. Advances in neural information processing systems 33 (2020), 18445–18456.
  250. Debiasing Deep Chest X-Ray Classifiers using Intra- and Post-processing Methods. In Machine Learning for Healthcare Conference. PMLR.
  251. A survey of app store analysis for software engineering. IEEE transactions on software engineering 43, 9 (2016), 817–847.
  252. Minimax pareto fairness: A multi objective perspective. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 6755–6764.
  253. Fairness-aware learning for continuous attributes and treatments. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 4382–4391.
  254. Provably fair representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1710.04394 (2017).
  255. Attributing Fair Decisions with Attention Interventions. In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Trustworthy Natural Language Processing (TrustNLP 2022). Association for Computational Linguistics, Seattle, U.S.A., 12–25. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2022.trustnlp-1.2
  256. A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 54, 6 (2021), 1–35.
  257. Aditya Krishna Menon and Robert C Williamson. 2018. The cost of fairness in binary classification. In Conference on Fairness, Accountability and Transparency. PMLR, 107–118.
  258. Alan Mishler and Edward Kennedy. 2021. FADE: FAir Double Ensemble Learning for Observable and Counterfactual Outcomes. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.00173 (2021).
  259. Fairness in Risk Assessment Instruments: Post-Processing to Achieve Counterfactual Equalized Odds. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Virtual Event, Canada) (FAccT ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 386–400. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445902
  260. FETA: Fairness Enforced Verifying, Training, and Predicting Algorithms for Neural Networks. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.00553 (2022).
  261. Wellington Rodrigo Monteiro and Gilberto Reynoso-Meza. [n. d.]. Proposal of a Fair Voting Classifier Using Multi-Objective Optimization. ([n. d.]).
  262. Wellington Rodrigo Monteiro and Gilberto Reynoso-Meza. 2021. Proposal of a Fair Voting Classifier Using Multi-Objective Optimization.
  263. Alice Morano. 2020. Bias mitigation for automated decision making systems. Ph. D. Dissertation. Politecnico di Torino.
  264. Auditing and achieving intersectional fairness in classification problems. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.01468 (2019).
  265. A data-driven approach to predict the success of bank telemarketing. Decision Support Systems 62 (2014), 22–31.
  266. Invariant representations without adversarial training. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 9102–9111.
  267. Learning optimal fair policies. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 4674–4682.
  268. Razieh Nabi and Ilya Shpitser. 2018. Fair inference on outcomes. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 32.
  269. Harikrishna Narasimhan. 2018. Learning with complex loss functions and constraints. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR, 1646–1654.
  270. Fairness improvement for black-box classifiers with Gaussian process. Information Sciences 576 (2021), 542–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ins.2021.06.095
  271. Active fairness in algorithmic decision making. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 77–83.
  272. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science 366, 6464 (2019), 447–453.
  273. Learning Fair Representation via Distributional Contrastive Disentanglement. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.08743 (2022).
  274. Mahbod Olfat and Anil Aswani. 2018. Spectral algorithms for computing fair support vector machines. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR, 1933–1942.
  275. General fair empirical risk minimization. In 2020 International Joint Conference on Neural Networks (IJCNN). IEEE, 1–8.
  276. Taking advantage of multitask learning for fair classification. In Proceedings of the 2019 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 227–237.
  277. Bifair: Training fair models with bilevel optimization. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.04757 (2021).
  278. Manisha Padala and Sujit Gujar. 2020. Fnnc: Achieving fairness through neural networks. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence,{normal-{\{{IJCAI-20}normal-}\}}, International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence Organization.
  279. Addressing fairness in classification with a model-agnostic multi-objective algorithm. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. PMLR, 600–609.
  280. Privacy-Preserving Fair Learning of Support Vector Machine with Homomorphic Encryption. In Proceedings of the ACM Web Conference 2022 (Virtual Event, Lyon, France) (WWW ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3572–3583. https://doi.org/10.1145/3485447.3512252
  281. Pranita Patil and Kevin Purcell. 2022. Decorrelation-Based Deep Learning for Bias Mitigation. Future Internet 14, 4 (2022), 110.
  282. Measuring discrimination in socially-sensitive decision records. In Proceedings of the 2009 SIAM international conference on data mining. SIAM, 581–592.
  283. Discrimination-aware data mining. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining. 560–568.
  284. PrivFairFL: Privacy-Preserving Group Fairness in Federated Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11584 (2022).
  285. Fair kernel learning. In Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases. Springer, 339–355.
  286. Fair bayesian optimization. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 854–863.
  287. Dana Pessach and Erez Shmueli. 2020. Algorithmic fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2001.09784 (2020).
  288. Dana Pessach and Erez Shmueli. 2022. A Review on Fairness in Machine Learning. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR) 55, 3 (2022), 1–44.
  289. FAIR: Fair adversarial instance re-weighting. Neurocomputing 476 (2022), 14–37.
  290. Fair classification via Monte Carlo policy gradient method. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence 104 (2021), 104398. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2021.104398
  291. On fairness and calibration. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 5680–5689.
  292. FairVFL: A Fair Vertical Federated Learning Framework with Contrastive Adversarial Learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.03200 (2022).
  293. Are my deep learning systems fair? An empirical study of fixed-seed training. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 34 (2021), 30211–30227.
  294. Novi Quadrianto and Viktoriia Sharmanska. 2017. Recycling privileged learning and distribution matching for fairness. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 30 (2017), 677–688.
  295. Neural styling for interpretable fair representations. arXiv preprint arXiv:1810.06755 (2018).
  296. Discovering fair representations in the data domain. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 8227–8236.
  297. Edward Raff and Jared Sylvester. 2018. Gradient reversal against discrimination: A fair neural network learning approach. In 2018 IEEE 5th International Conference on Data Science and Advanced Analytics (DSAA). IEEE, 189–198.
  298. Fair forests: Regularized tree induction to minimize model bias. In Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 243–250.
  299. Amirarsalan Rajabi and Ozlem Ozmen Garibay. 2022. Tabfairgan: Fair tabular data generation with generative adversarial networks. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction 4, 2 (2022), 488–501.
  300. Fairness-Aware Training of Decision Trees by Abstract Interpretation. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 1508–1517.
  301. Don’t Throw it Away! The Utility of Unlabeled Data in Fair Decision Making. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 1421–1433.
  302. FairXGBoost: Fairness-aware Classification in XGBoost. arXiv preprint arXiv:2009.01442 (2020).
  303. Michael Redmond and Alok Baveja. 2002. A data-driven software tool for enabling cooperative information sharing among police departments. European Journal of Operational Research 141, 3 (2002), 660–678.
  304. Fairness for robust log loss classification. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 34. 5511–5518.
  305. Robust fairness under covariate shift. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 35. 9419–9427.
  306. Discrimination aware classification for imbalanced datasets. In Proceedings of the 22nd ACM international conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 1529–1532.
  307. Fr-train: A mutual information-based approach to fair and robust training. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 8147–8157.
  308. Fairbatch: Batch selection for model fairness. In 9th International Conference on Learning Representations, ICLR 2021.
  309. Sample Selection for Fair and Robust Training. In Thirty-Fifth Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems.
  310. Achieving equalized odds by resampling sensitive attributes. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020), 361–371.
  311. Andrea Romei and Salvatore Ruggieri. 2011. A multidisciplinary survey on discrimination analysis.
  312. Multi-Fair Pareto Boosting. In International Conference on Discovery Science. Springer.
  313. Arjun Roy and Eirini Ntoutsi. 2022. Learning to Teach Fairness-aware Deep Multi-task Learning. In European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in Databases.
  314. Learning certified individually fair representations. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020), 7584–7596.
  315. When worlds collide: integrating different counterfactual assumptions in fairness. In Advances in neural information processing systems, Vol. 30. NIPS Proceedings.
  316. On the global optima of kernelized adversarial representation learning. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 7971–7979.
  317. Automated feature engineering for algorithmic fairness. Proceedings of the VLDB Endowment 14, 9 (2021), 1694–1702.
  318. FAWOS: Fairness-Aware Oversampling Algorithm Based on Distributions of Sensitive Attributes. IEEE Access (2021).
  319. Interventional fairness: Causal database repair for algorithmic fairness. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Conference on Management of Data. 793–810.
  320. The price of fair pca: One extra dimension. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 10976–10987.
  321. Fairness by learning orthogonal disentangled representations. In European Conference on Computer Vision. Springer, 746–761.
  322. Federica Sarro. 2023. Search-based software engineering in the era of modern software systems. In Procs. of the 31st IEEE International Requirements Engineering Conferece.
  323. Intra-processing methods for debiasing neural networks. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020), 2798–2810.
  324. Nicolas Schreuder and Evgenii Chzhen. 2021. Classification with abstention but without disparities. In Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence. PMLR, 1227–1236.
  325. Achieving Fairness with a Simple Ridge Penalty. arXiv preprint arXiv:2105.13817 (2021).
  326. Preprocessing to Address Bias in Healthcare Data. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics 294 (2022), 327–331.
  327. FaiR-N: Fair and Robust Neural Networks for Structured Data. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society (Virtual Event, USA) (AIES ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 946–955. https://doi.org/10.1145/3461702.3462559
  328. Data augmentation for discrimination prevention and bias disambiguation. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 358–364.
  329. Martin B. Short and George O. Mohler. 2022. A fully Bayesian tracking algorithm for mitigating disparate prediction misclassification. International Journal of Forecasting (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2022.05.008
  330. Fair Representation Learning through Implicit Path Alignment. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.13316 (2022).
  331. GetFair: Generalized Fairness Tuning of Classification Models. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency. 289–299.
  332. Developing a Novel Fair-Loan Classifier through a Multi-Sensitive Debiasing Pipeline: DualFair. Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction 4, 1 (2022), 240–253.
  333. Agnieszka Słowik and Léon Bottou. 2021. Algorithmic Bias and Data Bias: Understanding the Relation between Distributionally Robust Optimization and Data Curation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.09467 (2021).
  334. P. Snel and S. van Otterloo. 2022. Practical bias correction in neural networks: a credit default prediction case study. Computers and Society Research Journal 3 (2022).
  335. Learning controllable fair representations. In The 22nd International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR, 2164–2173.
  336. Software Fairness: An Analysis and Survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.08809 (2022).
  337. Towards Fair and Robust Classification. In 2022 IEEE 7th European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P). IEEE, 356–376.
  338. Mitigating gender bias in natural language processing: Literature review. arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.08976 (2019).
  339. Supreme Court of the United States. 2009. Ricci v. DeStefanoo. Vol. 557.
  340. When Personalization Harms: Reconsidering the Use of Group Attributes in Prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.02058 (2022).
  341. Jared Sylvester and Edward Raff. 2020. Trimming the Thorns of AI Fairness Research. IEEE Data Eng. Bull. 43, 4 (2020), 74–84.
  342. Learning fair representations for kernel models. In International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. PMLR, 155–166.
  343. RULER: Discriminative and Iterative Adversarial Training for Deep Neural Network Fairness. In Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering, ESEC/FSE 2022.
  344. Maryam Tavakol. 2020. Fair Classification with Counterfactual Learning. In Proceedings of the 43rd International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval. 2073–2076.
  345. Fairness-Aware Configuration of Machine Learning Libraries. In Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Software Engineering (Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania) (ICSE ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, 909–920. https://doi.org/10.1145/3510003.3510202
  346. Fairness without harm: Decoupled classifiers with preference guarantees. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 6373–6382.
  347. How fair can we go in machine learning? Assessing the boundaries of accuracy and fairness. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 36, 4 (2021), 1619–1643.
  348. Overcoming the pitfalls and perils of algorithms: A classification of machine learning biases and mitigation methods. Journal of Business Research 144 (2022), 93–106.
  349. Removing biased data to improve fairness and accuracy. arXiv preprint arXiv:2102.03054 (2021).
  350. Sahil Verma and Julia Rubin. 2018. Fairness definitions explained. In 2018 IEEE/ACM International Workshop on Software Fairness (FairWare). IEEE, 1–7.
  351. Achieving fairness through adversarial learning: an application to recidivism prediction. arXiv preprint arXiv:1807.00199 (2018).
  352. In-Processing Modeling Techniques for Machine Learning Fairness: A Survey. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data (jul 2022). https://doi.org/10.1145/3551390 Just Accepted.
  353. Mitigating Algorithmic Bias with Limited Annotations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2207.10018 (2022).
  354. Repairing without retraining: Avoiding disparate impact with counterfactual distributions. In International Conference on Machine Learning. PMLR, 6618–6627.
  355. Avoiding disparate impact with counterfactual distributions. In NeurIPS Workshop on Ethical, Social and Governance Issues in AI.
  356. Synthesizing Fair Decision Trees via Iterative Constraint Solving. In International Conference on Computer Aided Verification. Springer, 364–385.
  357. Fair classification with group-dependent label noise. In Proceedings of the 2021 ACM conference on fairness, accountability, and transparency. 526–536.
  358. Understanding Instance-Level Impact of Fairness Constraints. In Proceedings of the 39th International Conference on Machine Learning (Proceedings of Machine Learning Research, Vol. 162), Kamalika Chaudhuri, Stefanie Jegelka, Le Song, Csaba Szepesvari, Gang Niu, and Sivan Sabato (Eds.). PMLR, 23114–23130. https://proceedings.mlr.press/v162/wang22ac.html
  359. Robust optimization for fairness with noisy protected groups. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020), 5190–5203.
  360. Xiaoqian Wang and Heng Huang. 2019. Approaching machine learning fairness through adversarial network. arXiv preprint arXiv:1909.03013 (2019).
  361. Understanding and improving fairness-accuracy trade-offs in multi-task learning. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 1748–1757.
  362. Optimized score transformation for fair classification. Proceedings of Machine Learning Research 108 (2020).
  363. Unlocking fairness: a trade-off revisited. In NeurIPS.
  364. Linda F Wightman. 1998. LSAC National Longitudinal Bar Passage Study. LSAC Research Report Series. (1998).
  365. Claes Wohlin. 2014. Guidelines for snowballing in systematic literature studies and a replication in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 18th international conference on evaluation and assessment in software engineering. 1–10.
  366. Learning non-discriminatory predictors. In Conference on Learning Theory. PMLR, 1920–1953.
  367. Semi-FairVAE: Semi-supervised Fair Representation Learning with Adversarial Variational Autoencoder. arXiv preprint arXiv:2204.00536 (2022).
  368. Fair classification with instance-dependent label noise. In Conference on Causal Learning and Reasoning. PMLR, 927–943.
  369. Fairness-aware classification: Criterion, convexity, and bounds. arXiv preprint arXiv:1809.04737 (2018).
  370. Ziwei Wu and Jingrui He. 2022. Fairness-Aware Model-Agnostic Positive and Unlabeled Learning. In 2022 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (FAccT ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1698–1708. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531146.3533225
  371. Controllable invariance through adversarial feature learning. Advances in neural information processing systems 30 (2017).
  372. Achieving causal fairness through generative adversarial networks. In Proceedings of the Twenty-Eighth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  373. Achieving differential privacy and fairness in logistic regression. In Companion Proceedings of The 2019 World Wide Web Conference. 594–599.
  374. Fairgan: Fairness-aware generative adversarial networks. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE, 570–575.
  375. Fairgan+: Achieving fair data generation and classification through generative adversarial nets. In 2019 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data). IEEE, 1401–1406.
  376. Fair class balancing: enhancing model fairness without observing sensitive attributes. In Proceedings of the 29th ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management. 1715–1724.
  377. Algorithmic Fairness and Bias Mitigation for Clinical Machine Learning: Insights from Rapid COVID-19 Diagnosis by Adversarial Learning. medRxiv (2022).
  378. Distraction is All You Need for Fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.07593 (2022).
  379. I-Cheng Yeh and Che-hui Lien. 2009. The comparisons of data mining techniques for the predictive accuracy of probability of default of credit card clients. Expert systems with applications 36, 2 (2009), 2473–2480.
  380. Xiaoxin Yin and Jiawei Han. 2003. CPAR: Classification based on predictive association rules. In Proceedings of the 2003 SIAM international conference on data mining. SIAM, 331–335.
  381. Zhe Yu. 2021. Fair Balance: Mitigating Machine Learning Bias Against Multiple Protected Attributes With Data Balancing. CoRR abs/2107.08310 (2021). arXiv:2107.08310 https://arxiv.org/abs/2107.08310
  382. Training individually fair ML models with sensitive subspace robustness. In International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=B1gdkxHFDH
  383. Mikhail Yurochkin and Yuekai Sun. 2021. SenSeI: Sensitive Set Invariance for Enforcing Individual Fairness. In International Conference on Learning Representations.
  384. Fairness beyond disparate treatment & disparate impact: Learning classification without disparate mistreatment. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web. 1171–1180.
  385. Fairness constraints: A flexible approach for fair classification. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 20, 1 (2019), 2737–2778.
  386. From Parity to Preference-Based Notions of Fairness in Classification. In Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems (Long Beach, California, USA) (NIPS’17). Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, USA, 228–238.
  387. Fairness constraints: Mechanisms for fair classification. In Artificial Intelligence and Statistics. 962–970.
  388. Matching code and law: achieving algorithmic fairness with optimal transport. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 34, 1 (2020), 163–200.
  389. Parametrised data sampling for fairness optimisation. KDD XAI (2019).
  390. Learning fair representations. In International Conference on Machine Learning. 325–333.
  391. Bayes-Optimal Classifiers under Group Fairness. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.09724 (2022).
  392. Fair Bayes-Optimal Classifiers Under Predictive Parity. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.07182 (2022).
  393. Mitigating unwanted biases with adversarial learning. In Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. ACM, 335–340.
  394. OmniFair: A Declarative System for Model-Agnostic Group Fairness in Machine Learning. In Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Management of Data. 2076–2088.
  395. Junzhe Zhang and Elias Bareinboim. 2018a. Equality of opportunity in classification: A causal approach. In Proceedings of the 32nd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 3675–3685.
  396. Junzhe Zhang and Elias Bareinboim. 2018b. Fairness in decision-making—the causal explanation formula. In Thirty-Second AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence.
  397. Fair Decision Making via Automated Repair of Decision Trees. In International Workshop on Equitable Data and Technology (FairWare ’22 ).
  398. Machine learning testing: Survey, landscapes and horizons. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (2020).
  399. A causal framework for discovering and removing direct and indirect discrimination. In Proceedings of the 26th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 3929–3935.
  400. Achieving Non-Discrimination in Prediction. In Proceedings of the 27th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Stockholm, Sweden) (IJCAI’18). AAAI Press, 3097–3103.
  401. FARF: A Fair and Adaptive Random Forests Classifier. In Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining: 25th Pacific-Asia Conference, PAKDD 2021, Virtual Event, May 11–14, 2021, Proceedings, Part II. 245–256.
  402. Wenbin Zhang and Eirini Ntoutsi. 2019. FAHT: an adaptive fairness-aware decision tree classifier. In Proceedings of the 28th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence. 1480–1486.
  403. On fairness-aware learning for non-discriminative decision-making. In 2019 International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW). IEEE, 1072–1079.
  404. Wenbin Zhang and Jeremy C Weiss. 2021. Fair decision-making under uncertainty. In 2021 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM). IEEE, 886–895.
  405. Wenbin Zhang and Jeremy C Weiss. 2022. Longitudinal fairness with censorship. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 36. 12235–12243.
  406. Fairness amidst non-iid graph data: A literature review. arXiv preprint arXiv:2202.07170 (2022).
  407. Xueru Zhang and Mingyan Liu. 2021. Fairness in learning-based sequential decision algorithms: A survey. In Handbook of Reinforcement Learning and Control. Springer, 525–555.
  408. Yue Zhang and Arti Ramesh. 2020. Learning Fairness-aware Relational Structures. arXiv preprint arXiv:2002.09471 (2020).
  409. Fairness-Aware Online Meta-learning. In Proceedings of the 27th ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery & Data Mining. 2294–2304.
  410. Adaptive Fairness-Aware Online Meta-Learning for Changing Environments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2205.11264 (2022).
  411. Conditional Learning of Fair Representations. In International Conference on Learning Representations. https://openreview.net/forum?id=Hkekl0NFPr
  412. Han Zhao and Geoff Gordon. 2019. Inherent tradeoffs in learning fair representations. Advances in neural information processing systems 32 (2019).
  413. Learning Gender-Neutral Word Embeddings. EMNLP (2018), 4847–4853.
  414. You Can Still Achieve Fairness Without Sensitive Attributes: Exploring Biases in Non-Sensitive Features. arXiv preprint arXiv:2104.14537 (2021).
  415. Towards Fair Classifiers Without Sensitive Attributes: Exploring Biases in Related Features. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining. 1433–1442.
  416. Learning Bias-Invariant Representation by Cross-Sample Mutual Information Minimization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF International Conference on Computer Vision. 15002–15012.
  417. Indre Žliobaite. 2015. A survey on measuring indirect discrimination in machine learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:1511.00148 (2015).
  418. Handling conditional discrimination. In 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Data Mining. IEEE, 992–1001.
User Edit Pencil Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com
Authors (5)
  1. Max Hort (10 papers)
  2. Zhenpeng Chen (39 papers)
  3. Jie M. Zhang (39 papers)
  4. Mark Harman (31 papers)
  5. Federica Sarro (40 papers)
Citations (114)
View on Semantic Scholar