High Dimensional Quantum Machine Learning With Small Quantum Computers (2203.13739v4)
Abstract: Quantum computers hold great promise to enhance machine learning, but their current qubit counts restrict the realisation of this promise. In an attempt to placate this limitation techniques can be applied for evaluating a quantum circuit using a machine with fewer qubits than the circuit naively requires. These techniques work by evaluating many smaller circuits on the smaller machine, that are then combined in a polynomial to replicate the output of the larger machine. This scheme requires more circuit evaluations than are practical for general circuits. However, we investigate the possibility that for certain applications many of these subcircuits are superfluous, and that a much smaller sum is sufficient to estimate the full circuit. We construct a machine learning model that may be capable of approximating the outputs of the larger circuit with much fewer circuit evaluations. We successfully apply our model to the task of digit recognition, using simulated quantum computers much smaller than the data dimension. The model is also applied to the task of approximating a random 10 qubit PQC with simulated access to a 5 qubit computer, even with only relatively modest number of circuits our model provides an accurate approximation of the 10 qubit PQCs output, superior to a neural network attempt. The developed method might be useful for implementing quantum models on larger data throughout the NISQ era.
- Quantum advantage and noise reduction in distributed quantum computing. Physical Review A, 104(5):052404, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.104.052404.
- S Balakrishnan and R Sankaranarayanan. Operator-schmidt decomposition and the geometrical edges of two-qubit gates. Quantum Information Processing, 10(4):449–461, 2011. doi: 10.1007/s11128-010-0207-9.
- Rademacher and gaussian complexities: Risk bounds and structural results. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Nov):463–482, 2002. doi: 10.1007/3-540-44581-1˙15.
- i𝑖iitalic_i-qer: An intelligent approach towards quantum error reduction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.06347, 2021. doi: 10.1145/3539613.
- Marvin Bechtold. Bringing the concepts of virtualization to gate-based quantum computing. Master’s thesis, University of Stuttgart, 2021.
- Trading classical and quantum computational resources. Physical Review X, 6(2):021043, 2016. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevX.6.021043.
- Encoding-dependent generalization bounds for parametrized quantum circuits. arXiv preprint arXiv:2106.03880, 2021. doi: 10.22331/q-2021-11-17-582.
- Gavin E Crooks. Gradients of parameterized quantum gates using the parameter-shift rule and gate decomposition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1905.13311, 2019. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1905.13311.
- Li Deng. The mnist database of handwritten digit images for machine learning research. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 29(6):141–142, 2012. doi: 10.1109/MSP.2012.2211477.
- Classification with quantum neural networks on near term processors. arXiv preprint arXiv:1802.06002, 2018. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1802.06002.
- Deep variational quantum eigensolver: a divide-and-conquer method for solving a larger problem with smaller size quantum computers. PRX Quantum, 3(1):010346, 2022. doi: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.010346.
- Input redundancy for parameterized quantum circuits. Frontiers in Physics, 8:297, 2020. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1901.11434.
- Quantum machine learning of large datasets using randomized measurements. Machine Learning: Science and Technology, 4(1):015005, jan 2023. doi: 10.1088/2632-2153/acb0b4.
- Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces. Nature, 567(7747):209–212, 2019. doi: 10.1038/s41586-019-0980-2.
- Power of data in quantum machine learning. Nature Communications, 12(1), May 2021. ISSN 2041-1723. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-22539-9. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22539-9.
- Variational quantum policies for reinforcement learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.05577, 2021. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2103.05577.
- js21 (https://mathoverflow.net/users/21724/js21). Product of estimates of mean values - concentration of measure inequality. MathOverflow. URL https://mathoverflow.net/q/286787. URL:https://mathoverflow.net/q/286787 (version: 2017-11-23).
- Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets. Nature, 549(7671):242–246, 2017. doi: 10.1038/nature23879.
- Quantum federated learning through blind quantum computing. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy, 64(10):1–8, 2021. doi: 10.1007/s11433-021-1753-3.
- Differentiable learning of quantum circuit born machines. Physical Review A, 98(6):062324, 2018. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.062324.
- Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes. Nature communications, 9(1):1–6, 2018. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4.
- Constructing a virtual two-qubit gate by sampling single-qubit operations. New Journal of Physics, 23(2):023021, 2021a. doi: 10.1088/1367-2630/abd7bc.
- Overhead for simulating a non-local channel with local channels by quasiprobability sampling. Quantum, 5:388, 2021b. doi: 10.22331/q-2021-01-28-388.
- Foundations of machine learning. MIT press, 2018. doi: 10.1007/s00362-019-01124-9.
- Simulating large quantum circuits on a small quantum computer. Physical Review Letters, 125(15):150504, 2020. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.150504.
- Quantum circuit cutting with maximum-likelihood tomography. npj Quantum Information, 7(1):1–8, 2021. doi: 10.1038/s41534-021-00390-6.
- Machine learning of high dimensional data on a noisy quantum processor. npj Quantum Information, 7(1):1–5, 2021. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2101.09581.
- John Preskill. Quantum computing in the nisq era and beyond. Quantum, 2:79, 2018. doi: 10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79.
- Avoiding barren plateaus using classical shadows. arXiv preprint arXiv:2201.08194, 2022. doi: 10.1103/PRXQuantum.3.020365.
- Quantum divide and conquer for combinatorial optimization and distributed computing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2107.07532, 2021. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2107.07532.
- Quantum machine learning in feature hilbert spaces. Physical review letters, 122(4):040504, 2019. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.122.040504.
- Effect of data encoding on the expressive power of variational quantum-machine-learning models. Physical Review A, 103(3):032430, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.103.032430.
- Cutqc: using small quantum computers for large quantum circuit evaluations. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems, pages 473–486, 2021. doi: 10.1145/3445814.3446758.
- Stephen J Wright. Coordinate descent algorithms. Mathematical Programming, 151(1):3–34, 2015. doi: 10.48550/arXiv.1502.04759.
- LeCun Yann. If you listen carefully, you can hear the goat screaming “MNIST results!” But the dude isn’t listening carefully. Twitter, 2022.
- Quantum simulation with hybrid tensor networks. Physical Review Letters, 127(4):040501, 2021. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.127.040501.