Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 43 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 49 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 17 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 96 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 197 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 455 tok/s Pro
Claude Sonnet 4 36 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Generalized Bell-like inequality and maximum violation for multiparticle entangled Schrödinger-cat-states of spin-s (2112.15477v1)

Published 31 Dec 2021 in quant-ph

Abstract: This paper proposes a generalized Bell-like inequality (GBI) for multiparticle entangled Schr\"{o}dinger-cat--states of arbitrary spin-$s$. Based on quantum probability statistics the GBI and violation are formulated in an unified manner with the help of state density operator, which can be separated to local and non-local parts. The local part gives rise to the inequality, while the non-local part is responsible for the violation. The GBI is not violated at all by quantum average except the spin-$1/2$ entangled states. If the measuring outcomes are restricted in the subspace of spin coherent state (SCS), namely, only the maximum spin values $\pm s$, the GBI is still meaningful for the incomplete measurement. With the help of SCS quantum probability statistics, it is proved that the violation of GBI can occur only for half-integer spins but not integer spins. Moreover, the maximum violation bound depends on the number parity of entangled particles, that it is $1/2$ for the odd particle-numbers while $1$ for even numbers.

List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-Up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.