Papers
Topics
Authors
Recent
Detailed Answer
Quick Answer
Concise responses based on abstracts only
Detailed Answer
Well-researched responses based on abstracts and relevant paper content.
Custom Instructions Pro
Preferences or requirements that you'd like Emergent Mind to consider when generating responses
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Flash 95 tok/s
Gemini 2.5 Pro 46 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 Medium 15 tok/s Pro
GPT-5 High 19 tok/s Pro
GPT-4o 90 tok/s Pro
GPT OSS 120B 449 tok/s Pro
Kimi K2 192 tok/s Pro
2000 character limit reached

Theoretical Development and Numerical Validation of an Asymmetric Linear Bilateral Control Model- Case Study for an Automated Truck Platoon (2112.14528v2)

Published 29 Dec 2021 in eess.SY and cs.SY

Abstract: In this paper, we theoretically develop and numerically validate an asymmetric linear bilateral control model (LBCM). The novelty of the asymmetric LBCM is that using this model all the follower vehicles in a platoon can adjust their acceleration and deceleration to closely follow a constant desired time gap to improve platoon operational efficiency while maintaining local and string stability. We theoretically analyze the local stability of the asymmetric LBCM using the condition for asymptotic stability of a linear time-invariant system and prove the string stability of the asymmetric LBCM using a space gap error attenuation approach. Then, we evaluate the efficacy of the asymmetric LBCM by simulating a closely coupled cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC) platoon of fully automated trucks in various non-linear acceleration and deceleration states. We choose automated truck platooning as a case study since heavy-duty trucks experience higher delays and lags in the powertrain system, and limited acceleration and deceleration capabilities than passenger cars. To evaluate the platoon operational efficiency of the asymmetric LBCM, we compare the performance of the asymmetric LBCM to a baseline model, i.e., the symmetric LBCM, for different powertrain delays and lags. Our analyses found that the asymmetric LBCM can handle any combined powertrain delays and lags up to 0.6 sec while maintaining a constant desired time gap during a stable platoon operation, whereas the symmetric LBCM fails to ensure stable platoon operation as well as maintain a constant desired time gap for any combined powertrain delays and lags over 0.2 sec. These findings demonstrate the potential of the asymmetric LBCM in improving platoon operational efficiency and stability of an automated truck platoon.

Citations (1)
List To Do Tasks Checklist Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Collections

Sign up for free to add this paper to one or more collections.

Summary

We haven't generated a summary for this paper yet.

Ai Generate Text Spark Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Paper Prompts

Sign up for free to create and run prompts on this paper using GPT-5.

Dice Question Streamline Icon: https://streamlinehq.com

Follow-up Questions

We haven't generated follow-up questions for this paper yet.